This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 574 of the United States Reports :
| Case name | Citation | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| Lopez v. Smith | 574 U.S. 1 | October 6,2014 |
| Johnson v. City of Shelby | 574 U.S. 10 | November 10,2014 |
| Carroll v. Carman | 574 U.S. 13 | November 10,2014 |
| Glebe v. Frost | 574 U.S. 21 | November 17,2014 |
| Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk | 574 U.S. 27 | December 9,2014 |
| Warger v. Shauers | 574 U.S. 40 | December 9,2014 |
| Heien v. North Carolina | 574 U.S. 54 | December 15,2014 |
| Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens | 574 U.S. 81 | December 15,2014 |
| United States v. California | 574 U.S. 105 | December 15,2014 |
| Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. | 574 U.S. 259 | January 13,2015 |
| Whitfield v. United States | 574 U.S. 265 | January 13,2015 |
| Jennings v. Stephens | 574 U.S. 271 | January 14,2015 |
| T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of Roswell | 574 U.S. 293 | January 14,2015 |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. | 574 U.S. 318 | January 20,2015 |
| Holt v. Hobbs | 574 U.S. 352 | January 20,2015 |
| Christeson v. Roper | 574 U.S. 373 | January 20,2015 |
| Dept. of Homeland Security v. MacLean | 574 U.S. 383 | January 21,2015 |
| Gelboim v. Bank of Am. Corp. | 574 U.S. 405 | January 21,2015 |
| Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank | 574 U.S. 418 | January 21,2015 |
| Whether two trademarks may be "tacked" (that is, when a new mark takes on the priority position of an older mark) is a jury question. | ||
| M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett | 574 U.S. 427 | January 26,2015 |
| The interpretation of collective bargaining agreements must follow ordinary contract principles when that interpretation does not conflict with federal labor policy. | ||
| Kansas v. Nebraska | 574 U.S. 445 | February 24,2015 |
| When a state knowingly fails to comply with an interstate compact, the Supreme Court may order that state to disgorge its profits from the violation or pay damages. If there is no danger of the violation happening again, no injunctive relief is necessary. | ||
| N.C. State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC | 574 U.S. 494 | February 25,2015 |
| If a controlling number of an agency's decisionmakers are active market participants in the occupation the agency regulates, the agency can invoke state-action antitrust immunity only if it was subject to active supervision by the State. | ||
| Yates v. United States | 574 U.S. 528 | February 25,2015 |
| For purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1519, a "tangible object" is one used to preserve or record information and does not include, in this case, fish. | ||