This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 593 of the United States Reports :
| Case name | Docket no. | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. | 18–956 | April 5,2021 |
| Google's copying of the Java SE API, which included only those lines of code that were needed to allow programmers to put their accrued talents to work in a new and transformative program, was a fair use of that material as a matter of law. | ||
| Tandon v. Newsom | 20A151 | April 9,2021 |
| Government regulations are not neutral and generally applicable, and therefore trigger strict scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause, whenever they treat any comparable secular activity more favorably than religious exercise. | ||
| AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC | 19–508 | April 22,2021 |
| Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act does not authorize the Commission to seek or a court to award equitable monetary relief such as restitution or disgorgement. | ||
| Carr v. Saul | 19–1442 | April 22,2021 |
| A petitioner need not challenge the constitutionality of an agency's structure under the Appointments Clause in an internal agency administrative proceeding in order to present that challenge in court on appeal. | ||
| Jones v. Mississippi | 18–1259 | April 22,2021 |
| When a minor commits a homicide, neither Miller v. Alabama nor Montgomery v. Louisiana requires the sentencer to make a separate factual finding of "permanent incorrigibility" before sentencing the defendant to life without parole. In such a case, a discretionary sentencing system is both constitutionally necessary and constitutionally sufficient. | ||
| Alaska v. Wright | 20–940 | April 26,2021 |
| Niz-Chavez v. Garland | 19–863 | April 29,2021 |
| A notice to appear sufficient to trigger the IIRIRA's stop-time rule is a single document containing all the information about an individual's removal hearing specified in §1229(a)(1). | ||
| Caniglia v. Strom | 20–157 | May 17,2021 |
| There is no open-ended "community caretaking" exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. Exigency must be shown. | ||
| CIC Services, LLC v. IRS | 19–930 | May 17,2021 |
| A suit to enjoin IRS Notice 2016–66 did not trigger the Anti-Injunction Act even though a violation of the notice may have resulted in a tax penalty. | ||
| BP p.l.c. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore | 19–1189 | May 17,2021 |
| The Fourth Circuit erred in holding that it lacked jurisdiction to consider all of the defendants’ grounds for removal under §1447(d). | ||
| Edwards v. Vannoy | 19–5807 | May 17,2021 |
| The Ramos v. Louisiana jury-unanimity rule does not apply retroactively on federal collateral review. | ||
| Guam v. United States | 20–382 | May 24,2021 |
| United States v. Palomar-Santiago | 20–437 | May 24,2021 |
| All three requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d) are mandatory. | ||
| San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P. | 20–334 | May 27,2021 |
| Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39 does not permit a district court to alter a court of appeals’ allocation of the costs listed in subdivision (e) of that rule. | ||
| United States v. Cooley | 19–1414 | June 1,2021 |
| A tribal police officer may, with probable cause, detain and search non-Native people traveling on public roads through a reservation. | ||
| Garland v. Ming Dai | 19–1155 | June 1,2021 |
| The Ninth Circuit's rule that a reviewing court "must treat a noncitizen's testimony as credible and true absent an explicit adverse credibility determination" violated the Immigration and Nationality Act. | ||
| Van Buren v. United States | 19–783 | June 3,2021 |
| An individual "exceeds authorized access" when he accesses a computer with authorization but then obtains information located in particular areas of the computer—such as files, folders, or databases—that are off-limits to him. | ||
| Sanchez v. Mayorkas | 20–315 | June 7,2021 |
| A Temporary Protected Status (TPS) recipient who entered the United States unlawfully is not eligible under §1255 for lawful permanent resident status merely by dint of his TPS. | ||
| Borden v. United States | 19–5410 | June 10,2021 |
| A criminal offense with a mens rea of recklessness does not qualify as a "violent felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act's elements clause. | ||
| Terry v. United States | 20–5904 | June 14,2021 |
| A crack offender is eligible for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act only if convicted of a crack offense that triggered a mandatory minimum sentence. | ||
| Greer v. United States | 19–8709 | June 14,2021 |
| An unobjected-to failure to instruct the jury that the defendant must have known they were a felon is not structural error requiring reversal. Moreover, it would be difficult to show plain error because "convicted felons ordinarily know that they are convicted felons." | ||
| Fulton v. City of Philadelphia | 19–123 | June 17,2021 |
| The refusal of Philadelphia to contract with CSS for the provision of foster care services unless CSS agrees to certify same-sex couples as foster parents violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment | ||
| Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe | 19–416 | June 17,2021 |
| California v. Texas | 19–840 | June 17,2021 |
| Plaintiffs do not have standing to challenge §5000A(a)'s minimum essential coverage provision because they have not shown a past or future injury fairly traceable to defendants' conduct enforcing the specific statutory provision they attack as unconstitutional. | ||