List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 272

Last updated

Supreme Court of the United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789;234 years ago (1789-03-04)
Location Washington, D.C.
Coordinates 38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Coordinates: 38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized by Constitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Website supremecourt.gov

This is a list of cases reported in volume 272 of United States Reports , decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1926 and 1927.

Contents

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 272 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices). [1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 272 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
William Howard Taft 1909b.jpg William Howard Taft Chief Justice Connecticut Edward Douglass White June 30, 1921
(Acclamation)
July 11, 1921

February 3, 1930
(Retired)
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr circa 1930-edit.jpg Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Associate Justice Massachusetts Horace Gray December 4, 1902
(Acclamation)
December 8, 1902

January 12, 1932
(Retired)
Willis Van Devanter.jpg Willis Van Devanter Associate Justice Wyoming Edward Douglass White (as Associate Justice)December 15, 1910
(Acclamation)
January 3, 1911

June 2, 1937
(Retired)
Jamescmcreynolds.jpg James Clark McReynolds Associate Justice Tennessee Horace Harmon Lurton August 29, 1914
(44–6)
October 12, 1914

January 31, 1941
(Retired)
Brandeisl.jpg Louis Brandeis Associate Justice Massachusetts Joseph Rucker Lamar June 1, 1916
(47–22)
June 5, 1916

February 13, 1939
(Retired)
Justice George Sutherland 5.jpg George Sutherland Associate Justice Utah John Hessin Clarke September 5, 1922
(Acclamation)
October 2, 1922

January 17, 1938
(Retired)
Pierce Butler.jpg Pierce Butler Associate Justice Minnesota William R. Day December 21, 1922
(61–8)
January 2, 1923

November 16, 1939
(Died)
Justice Edward Terry Sanford.jpg Edward Terry Sanford Associate Justice Tennessee Mahlon Pitney January 29, 1923
(Acclamation)
February 19, 1923

March 8, 1930
(Died)
Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone photograph circa 1927-1932.jpg Harlan F. Stone Associate Justice New York Joseph McKenna February 5, 1925
(71–6)
March 2, 1925

July 2, 1941
(Continued as chief justice)

Notable Cases in 272 U.S.

Myers v. United States

In Myers v. United States , 272 U.S. 52 (1926), the Supreme Court held that the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body. It was distinguished in 1935 by Humphrey's Executor v. United States . In Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2020), however, the Supreme Court interpreted Myers as establishing that the President generally has unencumbered removal power. Myers was the first Supreme Court case to address the President's removal powers.

Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.

Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. , 272 U.S. 365 (1926), is a landmark Supreme Court decision approving the power of local government to establish rules of zoning. The Court's ruling that local ordinance zoning is a valid exercise of the police power bolstered zoning in the United States and influenced other countries. At the time of Euclid, zoning was a relatively new concept, and there had been complaints that it was an unreasonable intrusion into private property rights for a government to restrict how an owner might use property. The Court, in holding that there was valid government interest in maintaining the character of a neighborhood and in regulating where certain land uses should occur, allowed for the subsequent explosion in zoning ordinances across the country. The Court has never heard a case seeking to overturn Euclid. Today most local governments in the United States have zoning ordinances.

Lambert v. Yellowley

In Lambert v. Yellowley , 272 U.S. 581 (1926), the Supreme Court reaffirmed the National Prohibition Act's limitation on the dispensation of alcoholic medicines. The Court affirmed dismissal of a suit in which New York City physician Samuel Lambert sought to prevent Edward Yellowley, the acting federal prohibition director, from enforcing the Prohibition Act so as to preclude Lambert from prescribing alcoholic medicines. The decision strengthened the police powers of the individual states, and clarified the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution, which was cited in upholding the Prohibition Act's limitations as a necessary and proper implementation of the Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari. On January 1, 1912, the effective date of the Judicial Code of 1911, the old Circuit Courts were abolished, with their remaining trial court jurisdiction transferred to the U.S. District Courts.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 272 U.S.

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition
United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc. 1 (1926) Butlernonenone 3d Cir. affirmed
Oklahoma v. Texas 21 (1926) Sanfordnonenone original boundary set
International Stevedoring Company v. Haverty 50 (1926) Holmesnonenone Wash. affirmed
Myers v. United States 52 (1926) TaftnoneHolmes; McReynolds; Brandeis Ct. Cl. affirmed
Palmetto Fire Insurance Company v. Conn 295 (1926) Holmesnonenone S.D. Ohio affirmed
Dorchy v. Kansas 306 (1926) Brandeisnonenone Kan. affirmed
Hebert v. Louisiana 312 (1926) VanDevanternonenone La. affirmed
Moore v. Fidelity and Deposit Company 317 (1926) Brandeisnonenone D. Or. dismissed
United States v. One Ford Coupe Automobile 321 (1926) BrandeisStoneButler 5th Cir. reversed
Yankton Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United States 351 (1926) Sutherlandnonenone Ct. Cl. reversed
Anderson v. Shipowners Association of the Pacific Coast 359 (1926) Sutherlandnonenone 9th Cir. reversed
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Company 365 (1926) Sutherlandnonenone N.D. Ohio reversed
Michigan v. Wisconsin 398 (1926) Sutherlandnonenone original boundary set
McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Company 400 (1926) ButlernoneBrandeis D. Ind. affirmed
Graves v. Minnesota 425 (1926) Sanfordnonenone Minn. affirmed
I.T.S. Rubber Company v. Essex Rubber Company 429 (1926) Sanfordnonenone 1st Cir. affirmed
Southern Pacific Company v. United States 445 (1926) Stonenonenone Ct. Cl. affirmed
Brasfield v. United States 448 (1926) Stonenonenone 9th Cir. reversed
Hudson v. United States 451 (1926) Stonenonenone 3d Cir. affirmed
United States v. New York Central Railroad Company 457 (1926) Stonenonenone N.D.N.Y. reversed
Van Oster v. Kansas 465 (1926) Stonenonenone Kan. affirmed
Hughes Brothers Timber Company v. Minnesota 469 (1926) Taftnonenone Minn. reversed
United States v. General Electric Company 476 (1926) Taftnonenone N.D. Ohio affirmed
Hanover Fire Insurance Company v. Harding 494 (1926) Taftnonenone Ill. reversed
Deutsche Bank Filiale Nurnberg v. Humphrey 517 (1926) HolmesnoneSutherland 9th Cir. reversed
Massachusetts State Grange v. Benton 525 (1926) HolmesnoneMcReynolds D. Mass. affirmed
Dodge v. United States 530 (1926) Holmesnonenone 1st Cir. affirmed
Luckenbach Steamship Company v. United States 533 (1926) VanDevanternonenone Ct. Cl. affirmed
Salinger v. United States 542 (1926) VanDevanternonenone D.S.D. transfer to 8th Cir.
United States v. Brims 549 (1926) McReynoldsnonenone 7th Cir. reversed
Federal Trade Commission v. Western Meat Company 554 (1926) McReynoldsnoneBrandeis 7th Cir. multiple
Port Gardner Investment Company v. United States 564 (1926) BrandeisButlernone 9th Cir. certification
Wachovia Bank and Trust Company v. Doughton 567 (1926) McReynoldsnoneHolmes N.C. reversed
Ottinger, Attorney General of New York v. Consolidated Gas Company of New York 576 (1926) McReynoldsnonenone S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Ottinger, Attorney General of New York v. Brooklyn Union Gas Company 579 (1926) McReynoldsnonenone E.D.N.Y. affirmed
Lambert v. Yellowley 581 (1926) BrandeisnoneSutherland 2d Cir. affirmed
Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company 605 (1926) Brandeisnonenone N.D. Ga. multiple
Duffy v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company 613 (1926) Sutherlandnonenone 3d Cir. affirmed
Fasulo v. United States 620 (1926) Butlernonenone 9th Cir. reversed
Murphy v. United States 630 (1926) Holmesnonenone 3d Cir. certification
United States v. McElvain 633 (1926) Butlernonenone N.D. Ill. affirmed
Wright v. Ynchausti and Company 640 (1926) Taftnonenone Phil. affirmed
United States v. Storrs 652 (1926) Holmesnonenone D. Utah dismissed
Dysart v. United States 655 (1926) McReynoldsnonenone 5th Cir. reversed
Virginian Railway Company v. United States 658 (1926) Brandeisnonenone S.D.W. Va. multiple
Eastern Transportation Company v. United States 675 (1927) Taftnonenone W.D. Va. reversed
Postum Cereal Company v. California Fig Nut Company 693 (1927) Taftnonenone D.C. Cir. dismissed
Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corporation v. James 701 (1927) Taftnonenone S.D. Cal. mandamus denied
Emmons Coal Mining Company v. Norfolk and Western Railroad Company 709 (1927) Holmesnonenone 3d Cir. affirmed
Miller v. City of Milwaukee 713 (1927) HolmesBrandeisnone E.D. Wis. reversed
Steamship Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Company 718 (1927) McReynoldsnonenone 3d Cir. affirmed
Garland's Heirs v. Choctaw Nation 728 (1927) McReynoldsnonenone Ct. Cl. affirmed
De la Mettrie v. De Gasquet James 731 (1927) McReynoldsnonenone D.C. Cir. affirmed
United States v. Gettinger and Pomerantz 734 (1927) McReynoldsnonenone N.D.N.Y. reversed

Notes and references

    1. "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.