This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 564 of the United States Reports :
| Case name | Citation | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| Sykes v. United States | 564 U.S. 1 | June 9,2011 |
| Felony vehicle flight, as proscribed by Indiana law, is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act. | ||
| Talk Am., Inc. v. Mich. Bell Tel. Co. | 564 U.S. 50 | June 9,2011 |
| The Federal Communications Commission had advanced a reasonable interpretation of its regulations in a dispute with AT&T. | ||
| DePierre v. United States | 564 U.S. 70 | June 9,2011 |
| The term "cocaine base" in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) refers to cocaine in its chemically basic form. | ||
| Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership | 564 U.S. 91 | June 9,2011 |
| 35 U.S.C. § 282 requires a patent-invalidity defense to be proved by clear and convincing evidence. | ||
| Nev. Comm'n on Ethics v. Carrigan | 564 U.S. 117 | June 13,2011 |
| The Nevada Ethics in Government Law is not unconstitutionally overbroad. | ||
| Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders | 564 U.S. 135 | June 13,2011 |
| A service provider cannot be held liable in a private action under SEC Rule 10b-5. | ||
| United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation | 564 U.S. 162 | June 13,2011 |
| The fiduciary exception to attorney–client privilege does not apply to the general trust relationship between the United States and Indian tribes. | ||
| Flores-Villar v. United States | 564 U.S. 210 | June 13,2011 |
| Lower court upheld by an equally divided court. | ||
| Bond v. United States | 564 U.S. 211 | June 16,2011 |
| People, just like states, may have standing to raise Tenth Amendment challenges to a federal law. | ||
| Davis v. United States | 564 U.S. 229 | June 16,2011 |
| Searches conducted in objectively reasonable reliance on binding appellate precedent are not subject to the exclusionary rule. | ||
| J.D.B. v. North Carolina | 564 U.S. 261 | June 16,2011 |
| A child’s age properly informs the Miranda custody analysis. | ||
| Smith v. Bayer Corp. | 564 U.S. 299 | June 16,2011 |
| Federal courts cannot issue orders to prevent state courts from issuing class certifications. | ||
| Tapia v. United States | 564 U.S. 319 | June 16,2011 |
| The Sentencing Reform Act precludes a federal court from imposing or lengthening a prison sentence for the purposes of rehabilitation. | ||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes | 564 U.S. 338 | June 20,2011 |
| Plaintiffs failed to show that their proposed class shares a common question of law or fact required under Rule 23(a). In addition, claims for monetary relief are not eligible for class certification under Rule 23(b)(2). | ||
| Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri | 564 U.S. 379 | June 20,2011 |
| A petition must address a matter of public concern. Otherwise, a public employer is free to retaliate against the public employee, even if the employee won the grievance he filed and brought suit in federal court. | ||
| Am. Elec. Power Co. v. Connecticut | 564 U.S. 410 | June 20,2011 |
| 1. The Second Circuit’s exercise of jurisdiction is affirmed by an equally divided Court. 2. The Clean Air Act and the EPA action the Act authorizes displace any federal common-law right to seek abatement of carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel fired power plants. | ||
| Turner v. Rogers | 564 U.S. 431 | June 20,2011 |
| The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, while it does not require a state to provide counsel at civil contempt proceedings to indigent individuals, even if incarceration is a possibility, does require some safeguards to prevent the erroneous deprivation of liberty. South Carolina Supreme Court reversed and remanded. | ||
| Stern v. Marshall | 564 U.S. 462 | June 23,2011 |
| The U.S. Bankruptcy Court lacked the constitutional authority to enter a final judgment on a state law counterclaim that is not resolved in the process of ruling on a creditor’s proof of claim, even though they are granted statutory authority under 28 U.S.C. §157 (b)2(C). | ||
| Freeman v. United States | 564 U.S. 522 | June 23,2011 |
| When a criminal defendant pleads guilty under a plea deal and the judge imposes the recommended sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines, the defendant is eligible to have their sentence reduced if the Guidelines later change. | ||
| Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. | 564 U.S. 552 | June 23,2011 |
| A Vermont statute that restricted the sale, disclosure, and use of records that revealed the prescribing practices of individual doctors violated the First Amendment. | ||
| PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing | 564 U.S. 604 | June 23,2011 |
| Federal regulations govern what gets put on drug labels for generic drugs, so generic drug manufacturers cannot be sued for damages under state laws that punish a failure to warn. | ||
| Bullcoming v. New Mexico | 564 U.S. 647 | June 23,2011 |
| A second surrogate analyst's testimony about the statements in the forensic report of a separate certifying analyst violates the Confrontation Clause. | ||
| CSX Transp., Inc. v. McBride | 564 U.S. 685 | June 23,2011 |
| The Federal Employers Liability Act makes a railroad liable if the railroad's negligence plays any part in bringing about the injury; it does not follow proximate-cause standards developed by courts outside of statutory contexts. | ||
| Ariz. Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett | 564 U.S. 721 | June 27,2011 |
| Arizona's matching funds scheme substantially burdens political speech and is not sufficiently justified by a compelling interest to survive First Amendment scrutiny. | ||
| Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n | 564 U.S. 786 | June 27,2011 |
| Bans on the sale of violent video games to children without parental supervision violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. | ||
| J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro | 564 U.S. 873 | June 27,2011 |
| A court may not exercise jurisdiction over a defendant that has not purposefully availed itself of doing business in the jurisdiction or placed goods in the stream of commerce in the expectation they would be purchased in the jurisdiction. | ||
| Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown | 564 U.S. 915 | June 27,2011 |
| The connection between Goodyear and its subsidiaries with the state of North Carolina was not strong enough to establish jurisdiction over the companies. | ||
| United States v. Juvenile Male | 564 U.S. 932 | June 27,2011 |
| Dismissed the case as moot. | ||
| Leal Garcia v. Texas | 564 U.S. 940 | July 7,2011 |
| Courts cannot stay an execution on the basis of the then possibility that Congress will, in the future, enact a statute to enforce an international law. | ||