List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 11

Last updated

Supreme Court of the United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789;234 years ago (1789-03-04)
Location Washington, D.C.
Coordinates 38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized by Constitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Website supremecourt.gov

This is a list of cases reported in volume 11 (7 Cranch) of United States Reports , decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1812 and 1813. [1]

Contents

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called "nominative reports").

William Cranch

Starting with the 5th volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was William Cranch. Cranch was Reporter of Decisions from 1801 to 1815, covering volumes 5 through 13 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 9 of his Cranch's Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, Wells v. United States is 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 22 (1812).

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 11 U.S. (7 Cranch)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices). [2] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) were decided, the Court comprised these seven justices:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
John Marshall by Henry Inman, 1832.jpg John Marshall Chief Justice Virginia Oliver Ellsworth January 27, 1801
(Acclamation)
February 4, 1801

July 6, 1835
(Died)
BushrodWashington.jpg Bushrod Washington
Associate Justice Virginia James Wilson December 20, 1798
(Acclamation)
November 9, 1798
(Recess Appointment)

November 26, 1829
(Died)
WilliamJohnson.jpg William Johnson
Associate Justice South Carolina Alfred Moore March 24, 1804
(Acclamation)
May 7, 1804

August 4, 1834
(Died)
Henry Brockholst Livingston.jpg Henry Brockholst Livingston
Associate Justice New York William Paterson December 17, 1806
(Acclamation)
January 20, 1807

March 18, 1823
(Died)
Thomas Todd SCOTUS.jpg Thomas Todd
Associate Justice Kentucky new seatMarch 2, 1807
(Acclamation)
March 3, 1807

February 7, 1826
(Died)
GabrielDuvall.jpg Gabriel Duvall
Associate Justice Maryland Samuel Chase November 18, 1811
(Acclamation)
November 23, 1811

January 12, 1835
(Resigned)
Daguerreotype of Joseph Story, 1844 (edit).jpg Joseph Story
Associate Justice Massachusetts William Cushing November 18, 1811
(Acclamation)
February 3, 1812

September 10, 1845
(Died)

Notable cases in 11 U.S. (7 Cranch)

United States v. Hudson

In United States v. Hudson , 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 32 (1812), the Court held that Congress must first enact a constitutional law criminalizing an activity, attach a penalty, and give the federal courts jurisdiction over the offense for a federal court to render a conviction.

The Schooner Exchange v. M'Faddon

In The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon , 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116 (1812), the Court considered the jurisdiction of federal courts over a claim against a friendly foreign military vessel visiting an American port. The court interpreted customary international law to determine that there was no federal jurisdiction.

Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee

Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee , 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 603 (1813), was a case arising out of the acquisition of land in Virginia. For the Court, Justice Joseph Story refused to accept as final the Virginia Court of Appeals' interpretation of Virginia law. He found that precedents in Virginia law itself upheld the titles in question. Story's decision to "look into" Virginia law was a vital step in securing federal supremacy. Otherwise, the federal courts could be effectively blocked, by a state court's decision, from addressing a federal question — in this case a British national's rights under treaties with Britain. [3]

Queen v. Hepburn

Queen v. Hepburn , 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 290 (1813), was a case in which a Maryland slave sued for her freedom. In support of her claim, her attorney offered several depositions containing testimony favorable to her. Chief Justice Marshall, who was a slave-owner, affirmed the lower court's judgment against the woman on the basis that the deposition statements were hearsay, and so were properly excluded from evidence. Dissenting, Justice Gabriel Duvall of Maryland, although also a slave-owner, pointed out that under Maryland law certain hearsay can legitimately be admitted to establish land boundaries, and that hearsay in cases involving freedom should be admitted as well.

Duvall wrote:

"It appears to me that the reason for admitting hearsay evidence upon a question of freedom is much stronger than in cases of . . . the boundaries of land. It will be universally admitted that the right to freedom is more important than the right of property. And people of color from their helpless condition under the uncontrolled authority of a master, are entitled to all reasonable protection. A decision that hearsay evidence in such cases shall not be admitted, cuts up by the roots all claims of the kind, and puts a final end to them, unless the claim should arise from a fact of recent date, and such a case will seldom, perhaps never, occur." [4]

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in 11 U.S. (7 Cranch)

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition
Hudson v. Guestier 1 (1812) per curiam nonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Fitzsimmons v. Ogden 2 (1812) Washingtonnonenone C.C.D.N.Y. affirmed
The Brig James Wells 22 (1812) Washingtonnonenone C.C.D. Conn. affirmed
Maryland Insurance Company v. Le Roy 26 (1812) Johnsonnonenone C.C.D. Md. reversed
United States v. Hudson 32 (1812) Johnsonnonenone C.C.D. Conn. certification
Shirras v. Caig 34 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Ga. certification
Schooner Paulina 52 (1812) MarshallJohnsonJohnson C.C.D.R.I. reversed
Russell v. Clark's Executors 69 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.R.I. reversed
Bingham v. Morris 99 (1812) per curiam nonenonenot indicatedoverruled
Catherine v. United States 99 (1812) per curiam nonenonenot indicateddismissed
The Sloop Active 100 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Conn. reversed
Hawthorne v. United States 107 (1812) Marshallnonenone D. Orleans commission granted
United States v. Goodwin 108 (1812) Washingtonnonenone C.C.D. Pa. dismissed
Whelan v. United States 112 (1812) per curiam nonenone D. Pa. dismissed
The Brig Eliza 113 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Del. certification
United States v. Crosby 115 (1812) Storynonenone C.C.D. Mass. affirmed
The Schooner Exchange 116 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Pa. reversed
Freeland v. Heron Lenox and Company 147 (1812) Duvallnonenone C.C.D. Va. reversed
Welch v. Mandeville 152 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Marsteller v. M'Clean 156 (1812) Storynonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Welch v. Lindo 159 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
New Jersey v. Wilson 164 (1812) Marshallnonenone N.J. reversed
King v. Riddle 168 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Davy's Executors v. Faw 171 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. reversed
Hughes v. Moore 176 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. reversed
Barton v. Petit 194 (1812) Washingtonnonenone C.C.D. Va. reversed
Wilson v. Koontz 202 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Riddle v. Moss 206 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. reversed
Sheehy v. Mandeville 208 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Conway's Executors v. Alexander 218 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. reversed
Dunlop v. Munroe 242 (1812) Johnsonnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Wood v. Davis 271 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. reversed
Morgan v. Reintzel 273 (1812) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Caldwell v. Jackson 276 (1812) Marshallnonenonenot indicatedrule absolute
Wise and Lynn v. Columbian Turnpike Company 276 (1812) per curiam nonenonenot indicateddismissed
Blackwell v. Patten 277 (1812) per curiam nonenonenot indicateddismissal denied
Wallen v. Williams 278 (1812) ToddMarshallnone C.C.D. Tenn. overruled
M'Kim v. Voorhies 279 (1812) Toddnonenone C.C.D. Ky. certification
Beatty v. Maryland 281 (1812) DuvallMarshallnone C.C.D.C. affirmed
United States v. Tyler 285 (1812) Livingstonnonenone C.C.D. Vt. certification
United States v. Gordon 287 (1813) per curiam nonenone C.C.D. Va. dismissed
Barton v. Petit 288 (1813) Washingtonnonenone C.C.D. Va. reversed
Queen v. Hepburn 290 (1813) MarshallnoneDuvall C.C.D.C. affirmed
Bank of Columbia v. Patterson's Administrator 299 (1813) Storynonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Clark's Executors v. Carrington 308 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.R.I. affirmed
Dickey v. Baltimore Insurance Company 327 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Md. reversed
Marine Insurance Company v. Hodgson 332 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Locke v. United States 339 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Md. affirmed
The Schooner Good Catharine 349 (1813) per curiam nonenone C.C.D. Md. affirmed
Bond v. Jay 350 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Md. reversed
Preston v. Tremble 354 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.E. Tenn. affirmed
The Brig Penobscot 356 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Ga. affirmed
Caze v. Baltimore Insurance Company 358 (1813) Storynonenone C.C.D. Md. affirmed
The Schooner Jane 363 (1813) Washingtonnonenone C.C.D. Md. affirmed
Lee v. Munroe 366 (1813) Livingstonnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Herbert v. Wren 370 (1813) MarshallnoneJohnson C.C.D.C. reversed
The Brig Aurora 382 (1813) Johnsonnonenone D. Orleans reversed
The Schooner Hoppet 389 (1813) Marshallnonenone D. Orleans multiple
Mutual Assurance Society v. Korn 396 (1813) Johnsonnonenone C.C.D.C. reversed
Webster v. Hoban 399 (1813) Livingstonnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Maryland Insurance Company v. Wood 402 (1813) Livingstonnonenone C.C.D. Md. affirmed
Ferguson v. Harwood 408 (1813) Storynonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Biays v. Chesapeake Insurance Company 415 (1813) Livingstonnonenone C.C.D. Md. affirmed
Stark v. Chesapeake Insurance Company 420 (1813) per curiam nonenone C.C.D. Md. reversed
Williams v. Armroyd 423 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Pa. affirmed
Smith v. Delaware Insurance Company 434 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Md. reversed
Holker v. Parker 436 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D. Mass. reversed
Barnitz's Lessee v. Casey 456 (1813) Storynonenone C.C.D. Md. affirmed
Blackwell v. Patton's Lessee 471 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.W. Tenn. affirmed
Mills v. Duryee 481 (1813) StorynoneJohnson C.C.D.C. affirmed
Oliver v. Maryland Insurance Company 487 (1813) MarshallLivingston, Storynone C.C.D. Md. affirmed
The Brig Caroline 496 (1813) per curiam nonenone C.C.D.S.C. reversed
Riggs v. Lindsay 500 (1813) Livingstonnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
M'Intire v. Wood 504 (1813) Johnsonnonenone C.C.D. Ohio reversed
Livingston v. Maryland Insurance Company 506 (1813) MarshallStorynone C.C.D. Md. reversed
Young v. Grundy 548 (1813) Livingstonnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Palmer v. Allen 550 (1813) Johnsonnonenone Conn. reversed
Young v. Black 565 (1813) StoryLivingston; Johnson; Marshallnone C.C.D.C. reversed
The Schooner Anne 570 (1813) Marshallnonenone C.C.D.S.C. reversed
United States v. January 572 (1813) Duvallnonenone C.C.D. Ky. reversed
United States v. Patterson 575 (1813) Duvallnonenone C.C.D. Ky. reversed
Livingston v. Dorgenois 577 (1813) per curiam nonenone D. Orleans mandamus granted
Otis v. Bacon 589 (1813) Washingtonnonenone Mass. affirmed
Thornton v. Carson 596 (1813) Washingtonnonenone C.C.D.C. affirmed
Wallen v. Williams 602 (1813) per curiam nonenone C.C.D.E. Tenn. reversed
Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee 603 (1813) StorynoneJohnson Va. reversed

Notes and references

    1. Anne Ashmore, DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS, Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.
    2. "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
    3. Haskins and Johnson, Foundations of Power, vol. 2, Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise, 597–599
    4. 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) at 298-299

    See also

    Related Research Articles

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">United States courts of appeals</span> Post-1891 U.S. appellate circuit courts

    The United States courts of appeals are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal judiciary. The courts of appeals are divided into 11 numbered circuits that cover geographic areas of the United States and hear appeals from the U.S. district courts within their borders, the District of Columbia Circuit, which covers only Washington, D.C., and the Federal Circuit, which hears appeals from federal courts across the United States in cases involving certain specialized areas of law. The courts of appeals also hear appeals from some administrative agency decisions and rulemaking, with by far the largest share of these cases heard by the D.C. Circuit. Appeals from decisions of the courts of appeals can be taken to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary Act of 1789</span> 1789 United States law establishing the federal court system

    The Judiciary Act of 1789 was a United States federal statute enacted on September 24, 1789, during the first session of the First United States Congress. It established the federal judiciary of the United States. Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution prescribed that the "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and such inferior Courts" as Congress saw fit to establish. It made no provision for the composition or procedures of any of the courts, leaving this to Congress to decide.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Reports, volume 2</span>

    This is a list of cases reported in volume 2 U.S. of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from 1791 to 1793. Case reports from other federal and state tribunals also appear in 2 U.S..

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Reports, volume 3</span>

    This is a list of cases reported in volume 3 U.S. of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from 1794 to 1799. Case reports from other tribunals also appear in 3 U.S..

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Reports, volume 4</span>

    This is a list of cases reported in volume 4 U.S. of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1799 and 1800. Case reports from other tribunals also appear in 4 U.S..

    United States v. More, 7 U.S. 159 (1805), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it had no jurisdiction to hear appeals from criminal cases in the circuit courts by writs of error. Relying on the Exceptions Clause, More held that Congress's enumerated grants of appellate jurisdiction to the Court operated as an exercise of Congress's power to eliminate all other forms of appellate jurisdiction.