This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 594 of the United States Reports :
| Case name | Docket no. | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| United States v. Arthrex, Inc. | 19–1434 | June 21,2021 |
| The unreviewable authority of Administrative Patent Judges is incompatible with their status as inferior officers. The Director of the Patent and Trademark Office, as their principal officer, may review such decisions and, upon review, may confirm or revise the decisions. | ||
| National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston | 20–512 | June 21,2021 |
| Upholding as consistent with antitrust principles an injunction that prohibited the enforcement of certain NCAA rules that limited education-related benefits for student-athletes. | ||
| Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System | 20–222 | June 21,2021 |
| Defendants bear the burden of persuasion to prove a lack of price impact by a preponderance of the evidence at class certification. | ||
| Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid | 20–107 | June 23,2021 |
| The California Agricultural Labor Relations Act of 1975, which grants labor organizations an uncompensated "right to take access" to an agricultural employer’s property in order to solicit support for unionization, effects a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment. | ||
| Mahanoy Area School District v. B. L. | 20–255 | June 23,2021 |
| While public schools may have a special interest in regulating some off-campus student speech, the special interests offered by the school are not sufficient to overcome B. L.’s interest in free expression in this case. | ||
| Collins v. Yellen | 19–422 | June 23,2021 |
| 1. The shareholders’ statutory claim must be dismissed. The "anti-injunction clause" of the Recovery Act provides that unless review is specifically authorized by one of its provisions or is requested by the Director, "no court may take any action to restrain or affect the exercise of powers or functions of the Agency as a conservator or a receiver." | ||
| Lange v. California | 20–18 | June 23,2021 |
| Under the Fourth Amendment, pursuit of a fleeing misdemeanor suspect does not always or categorically qualify as an exigent circumstance justifying a warrantless entry into a home. | ||
| Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation | 20–543 | June 25,2021 |
| Alaska Native corporations are "Indian tribe[s]" under ISDA and thus eligible for funding under Title V of the CARES Act. | ||
| HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. Renewable Fuels Assn. | 20–472 | June 25,2021 |
| A small refinery that previously received a hardship exemption may obtain an "extension" under §7545(o)(9)(B)(i) even if it saw a lapse in exemption coverage in a previous year. | ||
| TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez | 20–297 | June 25,2021 |
| Only plaintiffs concretely harmed by a defendant’s statutory violation have Article III standing to seek damages against that private defendant in federal court. | ||
| Lombardo v. St. Louis | 20–391 | June 28,2021 |
| The Supreme Court said it was unclear whether the Eighth Circuit incorrectly thought the use of a prone restraint is per se constitutional so long as an individual appears to resist officers' efforts to subdue him. The case was remanded to give the lower court the opportunity in the first instance to employ the context-specific analysis required by Supreme Court excessive-force precedent. | ||
| Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco | 20–1212 | June 28,2021 |
| Plaintiffs do not need to perform administrative exhaustion of state remedies to file a Section 1983 takings claim when the state has reached a conclusive position. | ||
| PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey | 19–1039 | June 29,2021 |
| Section 717f(h) of the Natural Gas Act of 1938 authorizes FERC certificate holders to condemn all necessary rights-of-way, whether owned by private parties or States. | ||
| Johnson v. Guzman Chavez | 19–897 | June 29,2021 |
| Non-citizens subject to reinstated deportation orders are not entitled to bond hearings while seeking to prevent the deportation; their removal orders are "administratively final." | ||
| Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc. | 20–440 | June 29,2021 |
| Assignor estoppel is a recognized principle, however it only applies when a claim of invalidity is actually inconsistent with representations of the patents validity. | ||
| Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta | 19–251 | July 1,2021 |
| The requirement for non-profit organizations to disclose their donors under California law is facially invalid because it burdens the First Amendment rights of the donors and it is not also narrowly tailored to an important interest of government. | ||
| Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee | 19–1257 | July 1,2021 |
| Neither Arizona's out-of-precinct policy nor HB 2023 violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and HB 2023 was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose in mind. | ||
| Dunn v. Reeves | 20–1084 | July 2,2021 |
| Federal habeas courts must defer to reasonable state-court decisions. Moreover, the Alabama court's treatment of the spotty record in this case was consistent with the Supreme Court's recognition in Burt v. Titlow that "the absence of evidence cannot overcome the strong presumption that counsel's conduct fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance." | ||
| Alabama Assn. of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Servs. | 21A23 | August 26,2021 |
| Denying a request by a group of Alabama real estate agents to block a federal moratorium on evictions that was imposed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. | ||