List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 226

Last updated

Supreme Court of the United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 226
38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789;235 years ago (1789-03-04)
Location Washington, D.C.
Coordinates 38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized by Constitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Website supremecourt.gov

This is a list of cases reported in volume 226 of United States Reports , decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1912 and 1913.

Contents

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 226 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices). [1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 226 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Edward White, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing slightly left, 1905.jpg Edward Douglass White Chief Justice Louisiana Melville Fuller December 12, 1910
(Acclamation)
December 19, 1910

May 19, 1921
(Died)
Justice McKenna.jpg Joseph McKenna Associate Justice California Stephen Johnson Field January 21, 1898
(Acclamation)
January 26, 1898

January 5, 1925
(Retired)
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr circa 1930-edit.jpg Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Associate Justice Massachusetts Horace Gray December 4, 1902
(Acclamation)
December 8, 1902

January 12, 1932
(Retired)
Justice William R. Day.jpg William R. Day Associate Justice Ohio George Shiras Jr. February 23, 1903
(Acclamation)
March 2, 1903

November 13, 1922
(Retired)
HoraceHarmonLurton.jpg Horace Harmon Lurton Associate Justice Tennessee Rufus W. Peckham December 20, 1909
(Acclamation)
January 3, 1910

July 12, 1914
(Died)
Charles Evans Hughes cph.3b15401.jpg Charles Evans Hughes Associate Justice New York David Josiah Brewer May 2, 1910
(Acclamation)
October 10, 1910

June 10, 1916
(Resigned)
Willis Van Devanter.jpg Willis Van Devanter Associate Justice Wyoming Edward Douglass White (as Associate Justice)December 15, 1910
(Acclamation)
January 3, 1911

June 2, 1937
(Retired)
Joseph Lamar.jpg Joseph Rucker Lamar Associate Justice Georgia William Henry Moody December 15, 1910
(Acclamation)
January 3, 1911

January 2, 1916
(Died)
Mahlon Pitney cph.3b30300.jpg Mahlon Pitney Associate Justice New Jersey John Marshall Harlan March 13, 1912
(50–26)
March 18, 1912

December 31, 1922
(Resigned)

Notable Case in 226 U.S.

Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. United States

In Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. United States , 226 U.S. 20 (1912), also known as the Bathtub Trust case, the Supreme Court held unanimously that ownership of patent rights does not immunize the owner from the antitrust laws prohibiting combinations in unreasonable restraint of trade. The Court famously said that the Sherman Act "is its own measure of right and wrong, of what it permits or forbids, and the judgment of the courts cannot be set up against it in a supposed accommodation of its policy with the good intention of parties, and, it may be, of some good results." A commentary stated, "This decision has become the leading case on the subject of the relation of the patent law and Sherman law to each other." [2]

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.

On January 1, 1912, the effective date of the Judicial Code of 1911, the old Circuit Courts were abolished, with their remaining trial court jurisdiction transferred to the U.S. District Courts.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 226 U.S.

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition
Breese v. United States 1 (1912) Holmesnonenone 4th Cir. certification
Harty v. Victoria 12 (1912) Holmesnonenone Phil. dismissed
United States v. Baltimore et al. Railway Company 14 (1912) Holmesnonenone Comm. Ct. affirmed
Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Company v. United States 20 (1912) McKennanonenone D. Md. affirmed
Smith v. Hitchcock 53 (1912) Holmesnonenone D.C. Cir. affirmed
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company 61 (1912) Daynonenone C.C.D. Utah reversed
Louisiana Navigation Company, Ltd. v. Oyster Commission 99 (1912) Whitenonenone La. dismissed
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Company 102 (1912) Whitenonenone Wash. dismissed
First National Bank v. Littlefield 110 (1912) Whitenonenone 2d Cir. affirmed
Selover Bates and Company v. Walsh 112 (1912) McKennanonenone Minn. affirmed
Taylor v. Columbian University 126 (1912) McKennanonenone D.C. Cir. affirmed
Eubank v. City of Richmond 137 (1912) McKennanonenone Va. reversed
Burnet v. Desmornes y Alvarez 145 (1912) Holmesnonenone P.R. affirmed
Jones v. Springer 148 (1912) Holmesnonenone N.M. affirmed
Central Lumber Company v. South Dakota 157 (1912) Holmesnonenone S.D. affirmed
Southwestern Brewery and Ice Company v. Schmidt 162 (1912) Holmesnonenone N.M. affirmed
Miller v. Guasti 170 (1912) Daynonenone N.Y. Sup. Ct. affirmed
443 Cans Egg Product v. United States 172 (1912) Daynonenone 3d Cir. reversed
Toyota v. Hawaii 184 (1912) Hughesnonenone Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. affirmed
Purity Extract and Tonic Company v. Lynch 192 (1912) Hughesnonenone Miss. affirmed
Buck Stove and Range Company v. Vickers 205 (1912) VanDevanternonenone Kan. reversed
Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad Company v. Jackson Vinegar Company 217 (1912) VanDevanternonenoneMiss. Cir. Ct.affirmed
German Alliance Insurance Company v. Home Water Supply Company 220 (1912) Lamarnonenone 4th Cir. affirmed
Veve v. Sanchez 234 (1912) Lamarnonenone D.P.R. reversed
Beach v. United States 243 (1912) Pitneynonenone Ct. Cl. affirmed
Rosenthal v. New York 260 (1912) Pitneynonenone N.Y. Cnty. Ct. affirmed
Zakonaite v. Wolf 272 (1912) Pitneynonenone E.D. Mo. affirmed
National Surety Company v. Architectural Decorating Company 276 (1912) Pitneynonenone Minn. affirmed
United States v. Union Stock Yard Transit Company of Chicago 286 (1912) Daynonenone Comm. Ct. multiple
Florida ex rel. Wailes v. Croom 309 (1912) Whitenonenone Fla. dismissed
Robertson v. Gordon 311 (1912) Holmesnonenone D.C. Cir. reversed
Murray v. City of Pocatello 318 (1912) Holmesnonenone Idaho affirmed
United States v. Reading Company 324 (1912) Lurtonnonenone C.C.E.D. Pa. multiple
McLean v. United States 374 (1912) McKennanonenone Ct. Cl. reversed
Wood, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Wilbert's Sons Shingle and Lumber Company 384 (1912) McKennanonenone E.D. La. affirmed
Darnell v. Indiana 390 (1912) Holmesnonenone Ind. affirmed
Keatley v. Furey 399 (1912) Holmesnonenone C.C.N.D. Ill. dismissed
Williams v. City of Talladega 404 (1912) Daynonenone Ala. reversed
Ex parte United States 420 (1913) Whitenonenone E.D. Mo. prohibition granted
Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. Hardwick Elevator Company 426 (1913) Whitenonenone Minn. reversed
Hannum v. United States 436 (1913) Whitenonenone Ct. Cl. affirmed
Anderson v. Smith 439 (1913) Whitenonenone D.C. Cir. affirmed
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Henderson Elevator Company 441 (1913) Whitenonenone Ky. reversed
Preston v. City of Chicago 447 (1913) Whitenonenone Ill. dismissed
Illinois ex rel. Gersch v. City of Chicago 451 (1913) Whitenonenone Ill. dismissed
Ubeda v. Zialcita 452 (1913) Holmesnonenone Phil. affirmed
Pittsburg Steel Company v. Baltimore Equitable Society 455 (1913) Holmesnonenone Md. affirmed
Marshall Dental Manufacturing Company v. Iowa 460 (1913) Holmesnonenone Iowa affirmed
Kalanianaole v. Smithies 462 (1913) Holmesnonenone Sup. Ct. Terr. Haw. affirmed
Ewing v. City of Leavenworth 464 (1913) Daynonenone Kan. affirmed
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company 470 (1913) Daynonenone D. Utah decree rejected
Wheeler v. United States 478 (1913) Daynonenone D. Mass. affirmed
Adams Express Company v. Croninger 491 (1913) Lurtonnonenone Ky. Cir. Ct. reversed
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Miller 513 (1913) Lurtonnonenone Neb. reversed
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company v. Latta 519 (1913) Lurtonnonenone 8th Cir. reversed
McNamara v. Henkel 520 (1913) Hughesnonenone S.D.N.Y. affirmed
United States v. Patten 525 (1913) VanDevanternoneLurton C.C.S.D.N.Y. reversed
Plumley v. United States 545 (1913) Lamarnonenone Ct. Cl. affirmed
Bunker Hill and Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company v. United States 548 (1913) Lamarnonenone 9th Cir. affirmed
Thompson v. Thompson 551 (1913) Pitneynonenone D.C. Cir. affirmed
Evans v. United States 567 (1913) Pitneynonenone Ct. Cl. affirmed
Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company v. Wulf 570 (1913) Pitneynonenone 5th Cir. affirmed
Schmidinger v. City of Chicago 578 (1913) Daynonenone Ill. affirmed
El Paso and Southwestern Railroad Company v. Eichel 590 (1913) Pitneynonenone Tex. Civ. App. dismissed

Notes and references

    1. "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
    2. Edwin P. Grosvenor, "The Rule of Reason as Applied by the United States Supreme Court of Commerce in Patented Articles", 17 Colum. L. Rev. 208, 213 (1917).