This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 558 of the United States Reports :
| Case name | Citation | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| Corcoran v. Levenhagen | 558 U.S. 1 | 2009 |
| A court of appeal cannot reverse the District Court and direct it upon remand to deny a habeas writ without reviewing claims made by the petitioner without explaining why those claims should not be considered. | ||
| Bobby v. Van Hook | 558 U.S. 4 | 2009 |
| Wong v. Belmontes | 558 U.S. 15 | 2009 |
| Porter v. McCollum | 558 U.S. 30 | 2009 |
| Michigan v. Fisher | 558 U.S. 45 | 2009 |
| Beard v. Kindler | 558 U.S. 53 | 2009 |
| A state procedural rule that is enforced by the state courts cannot be reviewed in federal court. | ||
| Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers | 558 U.S. 67 | 2009 |
| Alvarez v. Smith | 558 U.S. 87 | 2009 |
| Case dismissed as moot because the parties agreed that there was no longer contention over the property seized. | ||
| Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter | 558 U.S. 100 | December 8,2009 |
| Disclosure orders adverse to attorney–client privilege do not qualify for immediate appeal. | ||
| McDaniel v. Brown | 558 U.S. 120 | January 11,2010 |
| Smith v. Spisak | 558 U.S. 139 | 2010 |
| Jury's consideration of mitigating circumstances may be limited to circumstances the jury found only unanimously. | ||
| NRG Power Marketing, LLC v. Me. Pub. Util. Comm'n | 558 U.S. 165 | 2010 |
| The Mobile–Sierra presumption does not depend on the identity of the complainant who seeks FERC investigation. | ||
| Hollingsworth v. Perry | 558 U.S. 183 | 2010 |
| Opponents of same-sex marriage do not have standing to intervene in litigation about the constitutionality of same-sex marriage because they cannot demonstrate that they are harmed by a court's decision about it. | ||
| Presley v. Georgia | 558 U.S. 209 | 2010 |
| Wellons v. Hall | 558 U.S. 220 | 2010 |
| Kucana v. Holder | 558 U.S. 233 | 2010 |
| The statute that makes certain discretionary determinations of the Attorney General immune to judicial review does not allow the Attorney General to declare determinations discretionary and immune to review via regulations. | ||
| South Carolina v. North Carolina | 558 U.S. 256 | 2010 |
| Wood v. Allen | 558 U.S. 290 | 2010 |
| The state court's conclusion that the petitioner's counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue or present evidence of his mental deficiencies was not an unreasonable determination of the facts. | ||
| Citizens United v. FEC | 558 U.S. 310 | 2010 |
| The provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 restricting unions, corporations, and profitable organizations from independent political spending and prohibiting the broadcasting of political media funded by them within sixty days of general elections or thirty days of primary elections violate the freedom of speech that is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. | ||