List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 247

Last updated

Supreme Court of the United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789;234 years ago (1789-03-04)
Location Washington, D.C.
Coordinates 38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 Coordinates: 38°53′26″N77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized by Constitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Website supremecourt.gov

This is a list of cases reported in volume 247 of United States Reports , decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1918.

Contents

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 247 U.S.

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices). [1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 247 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

PortraitJusticeOfficeHome StateSucceededDate confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Edward White, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing slightly left, 1905.jpg Edward Douglass White Chief Justice Louisiana Melville Fuller December 12, 1910
(Acclamation)
December 19, 1910

May 19, 1921
(Died)
Justice McKenna.jpg Joseph McKenna Associate Justice California Stephen Johnson Field January 21, 1898
(Acclamation)
January 26, 1898

January 5, 1925
(Retired)
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr circa 1930-edit.jpg Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Associate Justice Massachusetts Horace Gray December 4, 1902
(Acclamation)
December 8, 1902

January 12, 1932
(Retired)
Justice William R. Day.jpg William R. Day Associate Justice Ohio George Shiras Jr. February 23, 1903
(Acclamation)
March 2, 1903

November 13, 1922
(Retired)
Willis Van Devanter.jpg Willis Van Devanter Associate Justice Wyoming Edward Douglass White (as Associate Justice)December 15, 1910
(Acclamation)
January 3, 1911

June 2, 1937
(Retired)
Mahlon Pitney cph.3b30300.jpg Mahlon Pitney Associate Justice New Jersey John Marshall Harlan March 13, 1912
(50–26)
March 18, 1912

December 31, 1922
(Resigned)
Jamescmcreynolds.jpg James Clark McReynolds Associate Justice Tennessee Horace Harmon Lurton August 29, 1914
(44–6)
October 12, 1914

January 31, 1941
(Retired)
Brandeisl.jpg Louis Brandeis Associate Justice Massachusetts Joseph Rucker Lamar June 1, 1916
(47–22)
June 5, 1916

February 13, 1939
(Retired)
John Hessin Clarke cph.3b09252.jpg John Hessin Clarke Associate Justice Ohio Charles Evans Hughes July 24, 1916
(Acclamation)
October 9, 1916

September 18, 1922
(Retired)

Notable Case in 247 U.S.

Hammer v. Dagenhart

In Hammer v. Dagenhart , 247 U.S. 251 (1918), the Supreme Court struck down a federal law regulating child labor. During the Progressive Era, public sentiment in the United States turned against what was perceived as increasingly intolerable child labor conditions. In response, Congress passed the Keating–Owen Act, prohibiting the sale in interstate commerce of any merchandise that had been made either by children under the age of fourteen, or by children under sixteen who worked more than sixty hours per week. By a 5-4 majority, the Supreme Court struck down the Keating–Owen Act, holding that the Commerce Clause did not give Congress the power to regulate working conditions. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., joined by three other justices, argued that goods manufactured in one state and sold in other states were, by definition, interstate commerce, and so Congress should have power to regulate the manufacturing of those goods. In 1941 Hammer v. Dagenhart was overruled by the Court in United States v. Darby Lumber Co.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari. On January 1, 1912, the effective date of the Judicial Code of 1911, the old Circuit Courts were abolished, with their remaining trial court jurisdiction transferred to the U.S. District Courts.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 247 U.S.

Case NamePage and yearOpinion of the CourtConcurring opinion(s)Dissenting opinion(s)Lower CourtDisposition of case
Shepard v. Barkley 1 (1918) Whitenonenone 8th Cir. affirmed
Cox v. Wood 3 (1918) Whitenonenone D. Kan. affirmed
Perlman v. United States 7 (1918) McKennanonenone S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Gasquet v. Fenner 16 (1918) Holmesnonenone E.D. La. affirmed
Ex parte Southwestern Surety Insurance Company 19 (1918) Whitenonenone W.D.N.C. prohibition denied
York Manufacturing Company v. Colley 21 (1918) Whitenonenone Tex. Civ. App. reversed
Ex parte Abdu 27 (1918) WhitenoneBrandeisnot indicated mandamus denied
United States v. United Shoe Machinery Company of New Jersey 32 (1918) McKennanoneDay; Clarke D. Mass. affirmed
McGinis v. California I 91 (1918) McKennanonenone Cal. Super. Ct. reversed
McGinis v. California II 95 (1918) McKennanonenone Cal. Super. Ct. reversed
Erie Railroad Company v. Hilt 97 (1918) Holmesnonenone 3d Cir. reversed
Carney v. Chapman 102 (1918) Holmesnonenone Okla. affirmed
Western Union Telegraph Company v. Foster 105 (1918) Holmesnonenonemultiplereversed
United States v. Biwabik Mining Company 116 (1918) Daynonenone 6th Cir. reversed
Goldfield Consolidated Mines Company v. Scott 126 (1918) Daynonenone 9th Cir. certification
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Wisconsin 132 (1918) Daynonenone Wis. affirmed
Marin v. Augedahl 142 (1918) VanDevanternoneClarkeN.D. Dist.reversed
Peck and Company v. Lowe 165 (1918) VanDevanternonenone S.D.N.Y. affirmed
United States v. Ferguson 175 (1918) VanDevanternonenone 8th Cir. affirmed
Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Company 179 (1918) Pitneynonenone 6th Cir. affirmed
Hays v. Gauley Mountain Coal Company 189 (1918) Pitneynonenone 4th Cir. reversed
United States v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company 195 (1918) Pitneynonenone 6th Cir. affirmed
Chicago and Alton Railroad Company v. United States 197 (1918) McReynoldsnonenone 7th Cir. affirmed
Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. Rice 201 (1918) McReynoldsnonenone E.D. La. reversed
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Laughlin 204 (1918) Brandeisnonenone Mo. Ct. App. dismissed
Friederichsen v. Renard 207 (1918) Clarkenonenone 8th Cir. reversed
Looney v. Eastern Texas Railroad Company 214 (1918) Clarkenonenone W.D. Tex. dismissed
Lynch v. Turrish 221 (1918) McKennanonenone 8th Cir. affirmed
Ex parte Simons 231 (1918) Holmesnonenone S.D.N.Y. mandamus granted
Alice State Bank v. Houston Pasture Company 240 (1918) Holmesnonenone 5th Cir. reversed
Minnesota v. Lane 243 (1918) Daynonenone original dismissed
Hammer v. Dagenhart 251 (1918) DaynoneHolmes W.D.N.C. affirmed
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Weld County 282 (1918) VanDevanternonenone 8th Cir. dismissed
Jefferson v. Fink 288 (1918) VanDevanternonenone Okla. affirmed
Hartranft v. Mullowny 295 (1918) Pitneynonenone D.C. Cir. dismissed
San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad Company v. United States 307 (1918) Pitneynonenone 9th Cir. dismissed
United States v. St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Railway Company 310 (1918) Pitneynonenone 9th Cir. reversed
United States Glue Company v. Town of Oak Creek 321 (1918) Pitneynonenone Wis. Cir. affirmed
Southern Pacific Company v. Lowe 330 (1918) Pitneynonenone S.D.N.Y. reversed
Lynch v. Hornby 339 (1918) Pitneynonenone 8th Cir. reversed
Peabody v. Eisner 347 (1918) Pitneynonenone S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Sunday Lake Iron Company v. Wakefield Township 350 (1918) McReynoldsnonenone Mich. affirmed
McCoy v. Union Elevated Railroad Company 354 (1918) McReynoldsnonenone Ill. affirmed
New Orleans and Northeastern Railroad Company v. Harris 367 (1918) McReynoldsnonenone Miss. reversed
Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc. 372 (1918) McReynoldsnonenone 2d Cir. affirmed
Philippine Sugar Estates Development Company, Ltd. v. Government of the Philippine Islands 385 (1918) Brandeisnonenone Phil. reversed
Supreme Council of The Royal Arcanum v. Behrend 394 (1918) Brandeisnonenone D.C. Cir. reversed
Toledo Newspaper Company v. United States 402 (1918) WhitenoneHolmes 6th Cir. affirmed
Grinnell Washing Machine Company v. E.E. Johnson Company 426 (1918) Daynonenone 7th Cir. affirmed
Exploration Company, Ltd. v. United States 435 (1918) Daynonenone 8th Cir. affirmed
Jim Butler Tonopah Mining Company v. West End Consolidated Mining Company 450 (1918) VanDevanternonenone Nev. affirmed
Arkansas v. Tennessee 461 (1918) Pitneynonenone original continued
Postal Telegraph Cable Company v. City of Newport 464 (1918) Pitneynonenone Ky. reversed
Northern Pacific Railroad Company v. Solum 477 (1918) Brandeisnonenone Minn. multiple
Aikins v. Kingsbury 484 (1918) Clarkenonenone Cal. affirmed
Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company v. Minneapolis Civic and Commerce Association 490 (1918) Clarkenonenone Minn. affirmed

Notes and references

    1. "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.