This article is part of a series on the |
Supreme Court of the United States |
---|
The Court |
Current membership |
|
Lists of justices |
|
Court functionaries |
Since the creation of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary (Judiciary Committee) in 1816, many, but not all, nominations for the Supreme Court of the United States have been first referred to a committee for review prior to facing a confirmation vote before the full United States Senate. [1] Some nominations have been withdrawn, lapsed, or been postponed without being referred to the Judiciary Committee, while some others up until 1941 had proceeded to full Senate confirmation votes without first being reviewed by the Judiciary Committee. However, ever since 1941, all nominations have been referred to the Judiciary Committee. [1]
In the 19th century and portions of the early 20th century, Judiciary Committee reviews were brief and entailed rather cursory looks at the nominee. However, increasingly since the 1910s, the process became more rigorous. The 1916 nomination of Louis Brandeis was the first to feature public hearings on the nomination and only the second recorded instance of any form of hearings being a part of a Judiciary Committee review of a Supreme Court nomination. From after Brandeis’ 1916 hearings until the mid-1930s, it was regarded as a courtesy to spare nominees from hearings. However, after controversy arose when it was reported shortly after Hugo Black was confirmed in 1937 without much deliberation and without any hearings that he had had association with the Ku Klux Klan, this was changed and it became more common for hearings to be held and for confirmations. The first nominee to testify at hearings on their own nomination was Harlan F. Stone in 1925, but he was the only one to do so until after the controversy surrounding Hugo Black. Since Harold Hitz Burton in 1946, no nominee has proceeded to a confirmation vote without hearings, and only four nominations that have been put forth have since failed to have hearings (all four of which lapsed or were withdrawn without confirmation votes). In more recent confirmations, hearings have often lasted around four or five days.
In more recent practice, between the announcement of the nomination and the start of hearings, the Judiciary Committee undertakes an investigative stage in which committee members and their staffs prepare for the hearings by looking over the background of the nominees and relevant issues. During this stage, nominees are typically prepped by the presidential administration for the hearings, including holding grueling mock-hearings often-dubbed “murder boards”. The nominee also often pays “courtesy call” visits to the offices of individual United States Senators. The American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary also usually provides their evaluation of the nominee's qualifications in this period before hearings are held.
Typically, at the end of its reviews of nominations, the Judiciary Committee has reported to the full Senate on the nomination. Often these reports have included either a positive or negative assessment of a nomination. The decision of how the Judiciary Committee reports has been conducted by a vote of its members. Historically, the Judiciary Committee had often published printed volumes outlining its members’ views. However, this has not occurred with any nominations in the 21st century.
Since 1829, many Supreme Court nominations had been referred to the Senate's Judiciary Committee. In 1868, the Senate adopted a rule that nominations needed to be referred to appropriate standing committees, which has resulted in nearly all subsequent Supreme Court nominations being referred to the Judiciary Committee. [1]
In modern practice, the Judiciary Committee assumes the main responsibility of investigating the qualifications and background of each nominee. Judiciary Committee reviews are not mentioned in the United States Constitution, but have become an important intermediary process between the nomination of a nominee by a president and a vote on the confirmation. [2] The most recent nomination to face a confirmation vote without first being referred to the Judiciary Committee was the 1941 nomination of James F. Byrnes. [1]
From the late-1960s onwards, the Judiciary Committee's review process has nearly always consisted first of the pre-hearing investigative stage, followed by public hearings, and ending with a committee decision on what recommendation the committee should make to the full Senate. [2]
The period of time between nominations and confirmation are longer in recent decades than they once were. Before the early 1950s, the average period of time between nominations being made and votes on confirmation was 13.2 days. In contrast, for nominations spanning between the 1954 nomination of Earl Warren to the 2020 nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, the average time was 54.4 days. [3]
In modern practice, the period between the nomination being made and the beginning of hearings is utilized by the committee as an investigative stage. [2] This period of time is, in modern practice, intended to be utilized by the committee members and their staffs to prepare for the hearings by looking over the background of the nominees and issues that are relevant to their nominations. [1] [2]
For confirmations with hearings, the amount of time that has passed between the receipt of a nomination by the Senate and the start of the first hearing has differed by nomination. The shortest time interval between these was the four days between the receipt of both the 1932 nomination of Benjamin N. Cardozo and the 1939 nomination of William O. Douglas and the beginning of hearings on those nominations. The second-shortest time interval between these occurrences was the five days between the receipt of both the 1938 nomination of Stanley F. Reed and the 1939 nomination of Felix Frankfurter and the beginning of hearings on the nominations. The longest time interval between these occurrences was the 82 days between the receipt of the 1959 nomination of Potter Stewart and the beginning of hearings on that nomination. The second-longest time interval between those occurrences was the 70 days between the receipt of the 1987 nomination of Robert Bork and the beginning of hearings on that nomination. From the 1960s onwards, the amount of time taken between the receipt of nominations and start of hearings increased over what it had tended to be prior. Prior to 1967 there was a median of only ten days between the receipt of nominations and the beginning of hearings on them. For all nominations between Thurgood Marshall's 1967 nomination and Amy Coney Barrett's 2020 nomination, the median was 27 days between the Senate's receipt of nomination and the beginning of confirmation hearings. Since the 1990s, the Judiciary Committee has typically allowed at least four weeks to elapse between the Senate's receipt of a nomination and the beginning of confirmation hearings. [1] Of the twelve confirmations held since the 1990s, the shortest period between the receipt of the nomination and the start of hearings is the 21 days between the receipt of the 2022 nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson and the beginning of hearings on her nomination. The second-shortest period between nomination and the start of hearings of the twelve nominations since the start of the 1990s is the 28 that elapsed between the receipt of the 1990 nomination of David Souter and the start of hearings on his nomination. [1] [4] [5]
It has become a long-standing tradition for nominees to, during this stage, pay "courtesy call" visits to individual senators at their offices, including those senators not on the Judiciary Committee. Also, in typical modern practice, during this pre-hearing stage, the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary provides their evaluation of the nominee's qualifications. [2] The American Bar Association has provided its analysis and a recommendation on the professional qualifications to sit on the Supreme Court of every nominee since 1952. [6]
In modern practice, during this period, the presidential administration usually helps to prepare their nominee for hearings by providing them with legal background materials and by holding mock-hearings with the nominee for practice. These mock-hearings are often called "murder boards" in reference to the grueling demand they place on the nominees. [2]
The first recorded instance in which formal hearings are known to have been held by the Judiciary Committee (or any other committee) in regards to a Supreme Court nomination was on December 16, 1873, when the first of two closed-door hearings was held by the committee to review documents and hear relevant testimony from witnesses about a controversy that had arisen about the nomination of George Henry Williams. This controversy, pertaining to a probe into his use of Department of Justice funds for personal household expenses, had arisen after the committee had issued its initial favorable report on his nomination (approved by the committee on December 11, 1873), but the Senate voted on December 15, 1873, to recommit the nomination (sending it back to committee). There were no more recorded instances of formal committee hearings for a Supreme Court nomination until the 1916 nomination of Louis D. Brandeis, when open door hearings were held. [1] [7]
While there was only one recorded instance of a Supreme Court nomination having Judiciary Committee hearings prior to 1916, Judiciary Committee hearings have since become a regular practice for Supreme Court nominations. [7] They became increasingly prevalent between 1925 and 1946. The 1946 nomination of Harold Hitz Burton is the most recent nomination to proceed to a confirmation vote without having had formal hearings while before the Senate Judiciary Committee. [1] Since then only four nominations put forth by presidents have gone without hearings. Two of these instances (the 2005 nominations of John Roberts and Harriet Miers to the associate judgeship being vacated by the retiring Sandra Day O'Connor) saw the nominations be withdrawn before hearings could be held. Another instance was when the 1954 nomination of John Marshall Harlan II was referred to committee only to lapse without hearings. The most recent instance was when the 2016 nomination of Merrick Garland lapsed without any Senate action. [1]
The first nominee to appear before the committee themselves and testify at their own confirmation hearings was Harlan F. Stone in 1925. [1] From after Brandeis' 1916 hearings until the mid-1930s, it had been seen as a courtesy to spare nominees from hearings, particularly as nominees were often already well-regarded individuals, and because hearings were seen as being tied to the appearance of scandal. Additionally, nominees did not appear to testify in-person when hearings did occur (with the exception of Harlan F. Stone). [7] However, this began to change after the confirmation of Hugo Black in 1937. [1] [7] Black had been quickly confirmed after only five days of deliberation, and without any public hearings on the nomination. A month after his confirmation, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette first reported that Black had been a member of the Ku Klux Klan. [7] President Franklin Roosevelt, who had nominated Black, denied having known this about him. The fact that such an individual had been speedily confirmed without the diligence of having hearings brought concern that the confirmation process was flawed. [7] Time magazine referred to this as, "the prize political scandal of the year." [8] Not too long after, in 1939, Felix Frankfurter became the second Supreme Court nominee to testify at his own confirmation hearings, and was the first to do so at the request of the Judiciary Committee and the first to do so in open session. [7] [9] [10] Frankfurter's testimony only addressed what he regarded to have been slanderous allegations raised against him. [9]
The modern questioning of nominees on their judicial views arose with the nomination hearings for John Marshall Harlan II in 1955. His nomination followed shortly after the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision by the Supreme Court. Several senators from the Southern United States threatened to obstruct Harlan's confirmation, which persuaded Harlan to provide his testimony at hearings. [11] [12] Most nominees since Harlan have appeared before the Judiciary Committee. In the 1950s, 1960s, and part of the 1970, many hearings were perfunctorily. Few hearings saw extended questioning or comments from members of the Judiciary Committee. [10] In these decades, hearings were not lengthy either, with nominees typically only spending a few hours before the committee. [13]
During the late civil rights and post-Watergate eras, hearings began to see more substantive issues be discussed. [10] This, according to Robert Katzmann, "reflects in part the increasing importance of the Supreme Court to interest groups in the making of public policy." With this transformation have come longer confirmation hearings. In 1967, for example, Thurgood Marshall spent about seven hours in front of the committee. In 1987, Robert Bork was questioned for 30 hours over five days, with the hearings as a whole lasting for 12 days. [14] An estimated 150–300 interest groups were involved in the Bork confirmation process. [15]
Hearing for recent nominations have typically lasted four or five days. The Senate may decide to hold additional hearings if a nomination becomes controversial, an example of this being the eleven days of hearings given to the 1983 nomination of Robert Bork. [2] The first hearings to receive gavel-to-gavel television coverage was those for the 1981 nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor. [2]
Hearings tend to examine the background of the nominee, and directly question the nominee about their own work experiences, views on a variety of constitutional issues, and their general judicial philosophy. [16] [11] The hearings also tend to include testimony from various outside witnesses both in support and opposition to a nomination. [17] Among them is the American Bar Association. [6]
The table below notes the approximate number of hours that media sources estimate Supreme Court nominees since 2005 (excluding those whose nomination was withdrawn) have spent before the Senate Judiciary Committee for public testimony:
Approximate number of hours of public testimony from Supreme Court nominees since 2005 | ||
---|---|---|
Year | Nominee | # Hours |
2005 | John Roberts (CJ) | 17 [18] |
2006 | Samuel Alito | 18 [19] |
2009 | Sonia Sotomayor | 12+ [20] |
2010 | Elena Kagan | 17 [21] |
2016 | Merrick Garland (NC) | 0 [22] |
2017 | Neil Gorsuch | 20 [23] |
2018 | Brett Kavanaugh | 32+ [upper-alpha 1] [24] |
2020 | Amy Coney Barrett | 20 [25] |
2022 | Ketanji Brown Jackson | 24 [26] |
The Judiciary Committee generally gives a report to the Senate in modern practice. [1] Typically, the committee meets in open session within a week of the end of hearings in order to determine what their report will be. Typical practice is to report even on nominations the majority of the committee opposes, in order to allow for the full Senate to make a final decision on whether to confirm or not. [2] Without an affirmative vote, a nomination cannot proceed to the floor of the Senate unless the Senate votes to discharge it from the committee. The rarely needed parliamentary procedure of discharging a nomination from committee was used to move the 2022 nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson forward after the Judiciary Committee deadlocked along party lines in a vote on whether to give it a favorable recommendation. [27] [28]
While early reports typically did not include an assessment or recommendation, it had since become common practice for reports to. [1] The 1991 nomination of Clarence Thomas was the most recent instance in which the Judiciary Committee voted to report without a recommendation (which it did only after an earlier committee vote on whether to report positively on his nomination had failed to pass). [1] The most recent instance where no recommendation was given, however, was the 2022 confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson, with the aforementioned move by the Senate to vote without a Judiciary Committee recommendation after the committee deadlocked. However, unlike with Thomas' nomination, the move to advance from committee review to full-Senate consideration of the confirmation without a recommendation was not made by a vote of the Judiciary Committee, but rather by a vote of the full Senate. [28]
Seven nominations have received negative committee report (either an “unfavorable” recommendation, an “adverse” report, or a report featuring a “recommendation not to act”). The only two instances in which the Senate has confirmed a nominee that had received a negative committee report were the nominations of Stanley Matthews in 1881 and Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar in 1888. The most recent instance in which the committee gave a nomination a negative report was the 1987 nomination of Robert Bork, whose nomination was rejected by the Senate. [1]
Only six nominations that have received favorable committee reports have failed to result in a confirmation. [1]
While, previously, the Senate Judiciary Committee regularly provided printed committee reports, from the 2005 nomination of John Roberts onwards, nominations have gone without one. Printed reports were prepared behind closed doors after the committee had held their vote and provided a single volume outlining the views of committee members on the nomination as well as supplemental minority or additional views. [2]
The Judiciary Committee is led by a chair.
Two Judiciary Committee chairs (Martin Van Buren and Joe Biden) would subsequently serve as president of the United States. Both put forward nominations to the Supreme Court during their presidencies. However, of the two, only Biden had any nominations referred to the Judiciary Committee during his tenure as its chair. [1] [29]
One Judiciary Committee chair, John J. Crittenden, was subsequently nominated to the Supreme Court. Crittenden was not confirmed, however, as his nomination lapsed after a recommendation from the Judiciary Committee that the Senate not act on the nomination. During Crittenden's tenure as Judiciary Committee chair, no nominations were recorded as having been formally reviewed by the committee. In fact, his own subsequent nomination is the first recorded instance of the committee receiving a nomination for review. [1] [29]
Below is a table listing chairs of the Senate Judiciary Committee, with the number of nominations that were referred to the committee during their tenure(s) as chair:
Nominee | Nominated by | Senate majority party | Committee action | Subsequent action/ outcome | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
President | Party | Committee | Committee chair | Public hearing date(s) | Final vote date | Final vote | ||||
Alexander Wolcott | Madison | Dem-Rep | Dem-Rep | Select committee | No record of hearing | February 13, 1811 | Reported | Rejected by Senate (9–24) on February 13, 1811 | ||
General source: [1] [30] |
The following is a list of Senate Judiciary Committee actions on nominations for the Supreme Court of the United States. Excluded from this list are nominations for which there either was no committee referral or for which no record exists of any committee referral.
Nominee | Nominated by | Senate majority party | Committee action | Subsequent action/ outcome | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
President | Party | Committee chair | Public hearing date(s) | Final vote date | Final vote | |||
John J. Crittenden | J. Q. Adams | Rep (A-C) | Rep (J-C) | John Rowan | No record of hearing | January 26, 1829 | Reported with recommendation not to act | Postponed by Senate (23–17) [upper-alpha 2] on February 12, 1829 |
James Moore Wayne | Jackson | Democratic | Natl Rep | John M. Clayton | No record of hearing | January 9, 1835 | Reported | Confirmed by voice vote on January 9, 1835 |
Roger B. Taney (second nomination) | Democratic | Felix Grundy | No record of hearing | January 5, 1836 | Reported | Confirmed (29–15) on March 15, 1836 | ||
Philip P. Barbour | No record of hearing | January 5, 1836 | Reported | Confirmed (30–11) on March 15, 1836 | ||||
John Catron | No record of hearing | March 8, 1937 | Reported | Confirmed (23–18) on March 8, 1937 | ||||
William Smith | No record of hearing | March 8, 1937 | Reported | Confirmed (28–15) on March 8, 1937 | ||||
John McKinley [upper-alpha 3] | Van Buren | No record of hearing | September 25, 1937 | Reported | Confirmed by voice vote on September 25, 1837 | |||
John C. Spencer | Tyler | None | Whig | John Macpherson Berrien | No record of hearing | January 30, 1844 | Reported | Rejected by Senate (21–26) on January 31, 1844 |
Reuben Walworth | No record of hearing | June 14, 1844 | Reported | Tabled (postponed) by Senate on June 15, 1844 (27–20); nomination withdrawn on June 17, 1844 | ||||
Edward King | No record of hearing | June 14, 1844 | Reported | Tabled (postponed) by Senate on June 15, 1844 (29–18) | ||||
Reuben Walworth | No record of hearing | January 21, 1845 | Reported | Tabled (postponed) by Senate on January 21, 1845; nomination withdrawn on February 6, 1845 | ||||
Edward King | No record of hearing | January 21, 1845 | Reported | Tabled (postponed) by Senate on January 21, 1845; nomination withdrawn on February 8, 1845 | ||||
Samuel Nelson | No record of hearing | February 8, 1845 | Reported | Confirmed by voice vote on February 14, 1845 | ||||
John M. Read | No record of hearing | February 14, 1845 | Reported | Lapsed | ||||
Levi Woodbury [upper-alpha 3] | Polk | Democratic | Democratic | Chester Ashley | No record of hearing | January 3, 1846 | Reported | Confirmed by voice vote on January 3, 1846 |
George Woodward | No record of hearing | January 20, 1846 | Reported | Rejected by Senate (20–29) on January 22, 1846 | ||||
Robert Cooper Grier | No record of hearing | August 4, 1846 | Reported | Confirmed by voice vote on August 4, 1846 | ||||
Benjamin R. Curtis [upper-alpha 3] | Fillmore | Whig | Andrew Butler | No record of hearing | December 23, 1851 | Reported | Confirmed by voice vote on December 23, 1851 | |
Edward A. Bradford | No record of hearing | August 30, 1852 | Reported | Tabled by Senate; lapsed | ||||
William C. Micou | No record of hearing | N/A | On February 24, 1853 (the same day the Senate referred the nomination to committee), the Senate ordered the committee to discharge the nomination | Lapsed | ||||
John A. Campbell | Pierce | Democratic | No record of hearing | March 22, 1853 | Reported | Confirmed by voice vote on March 22, 1853 | ||
Nathan Clifford | Buchanan | James A. Bayard Jr. | No record of hearing | December 9, 1857 | Reported | Confirmed (26–23) on January 12, 1858 | ||
Noah Haynes Swayne | Lincoln | Republican | Republican | Lyman Trumbull | No record of hearing | February 6, 1861 | Reported | Confirmed (38–1) on January 24, 1862 |
David Davis [upper-alpha 3] | No record of hearing | December 5, 1862 | Reported | Confirmed by voice vote on December 8, 1862 | ||||
Stephen Johnson Field | No record of hearing | March 9, 1863 | Reported | Confirmed by voice vote on March 10, 1863 | ||||
Henry Stanbery | A. Johnson | Natl Union | No record of hearing | N/A | Referred to Judiciary Committee on April 16, 1866, but no record exists of any committee vote | Lapsed [upper-alpha 4] | ||
Ebenezer R. Hoar | Grant | Republican | No record of hearing | December 22, 1869 | Reported adversely | Rejected by Senate (24–33) on February 3, 1870 | ||
William Strong | No record of hearing | February 14, 1870 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on February 18, 1870 | ||||
Joseph P. Bradley | No record of hearing | February 14, 1870 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (46–9) on March 21, 1870 | ||||
Ward Hunt | No record of hearing | December 11, 1872 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on December 11, 1872 | ||||
George Henry Williams | George F. Edmunds | No record of hearing | December 11, 1873 | Reported favorably | Recommitted (returned to the committee) on December 15, 1873; nomination withdrawn on January 8, 1874 | |||
Closed hearings on Dec 16 and 17, 1873 | N/A | |||||||
Caleb Cushing | No record of hearing | January 9, 1874 | Reported favorably | Nomination withdrawn on January 13, 1874 | ||||
Morrison Waite | No record of hearing | January 20, 1874 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (63–0) on January 21, 1874 | ||||
John Marshall Harlan | Hayes | No record of hearing | November 26, 1877 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on November 29, 1877 | |||
William Burnham Woods | Democratic | Allen G. Thurman | No record of hearing | December 20, 1880 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (39–8) on December 21, 1880 | ||
Stanley Matthews | No record of hearing | February 7, 1881 | Considered | Lapsed | ||||
No record of hearing | February 14, 1881 | Postponed | ||||||
Stanley Matthews | Garfield | Republican | George F. Edmunds | No record of hearing | May 9, 1881 | Reported adversely (6–1) | Confirmed (24–23) on May 12, 1881 | |
Horace Gray | Arthur | Split | No record of hearing | December 20, 1881 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (51–5) on December 20, 1881 | ||
Roscoe Conkling | No record of hearing | March 2, 1882 | Reported favorably | Confirmed [upper-alpha 5] (39–12) on March 2, 1882 | ||||
Samuel Blatchford | No record of hearing | March 22, 1882 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on March 22, 1882 | ||||
Lucius Q. C. Lamar II | Cleveland | Democratic | Republican | No record of hearing | January 10, 1888 | Reported adversely (5–4) | Confirmed (32–28) on January 16, 1888 | |
Melville Fuller | No record of hearing | July 2, 1888 | Reported without recommendation | Confirmed (41–20) on July 20, 1888 | ||||
David Josiah Brewer | B. Harrison | Republican | No record of hearing | December 16, 1889 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (53–11) on December 18, 1889 | ||
Henry Billings Brown | No record of hearing | December 29, 1890 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on December 29, 1890 | ||||
George Shiras Jr. | George Frisbie Hoar | No record of hearing | July 25, 1892 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on July 26, 1892 | |||
Howell E. Jackson | No record of hearing | February 13, 1893 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on February 18, 1893 | ||||
William B. Hornblower | Cleveland | Democratic | Democratic | James L. Pugh | No record of hearing | September 25, 1893; October 25, 1893; October 30, 1893 | Considered | Lapsed |
William B. Hornblower | No record of hearing | December 11, 1893; December 14, 1893; December 18, 1893 | Considered | Rejected (24–30) on January 15, 1894 | ||||
No record of hearing | January 8, 1894 | Reported adversely | ||||||
Wheeler H. Peckham | No record of hearing | February 12, 1894 | Committee divided (5–5) in vote on question of reporting favorability; ultimately reported without recommendation | Rejected (32–41) on February 16, 1894 | ||||
Rufus W. Peckham | Republican | George Frisbie Hoar | No record of hearing | December 9, 1895 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on December 9, 1895 | ||
Joseph McKenna | McKinley | Republican | No record of hearing | January 13, 1898 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on January 21, 1898 | ||
Oliver W. Holmes Jr. | T. Roosevelt | No record of hearing | December 4, 1902 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on December 4, 1902 | |||
William R. Day | No record of hearing | February 19, 1903 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on February 23, 1903 | ||||
William Henry Moody | Clarence D. Clark | No record of hearing | December 10, 1906 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on December 12, 1906 | |||
Horace Harmon Lurton | Taft | No record of hearing | December 16, 1909 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on December 20, 1909 | |||
Charles Evans Hughes | No record of hearing | February 5, 1910 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on May 2, 1910 | ||||
Willis Van Devanter | No record of hearing | December 15, 1910 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on December 15, 1910 | ||||
Joseph Rucker Lamar | No record of hearing | December 15, 1910 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on December 15, 1910 | ||||
Mahlon Pitney | No record of hearing | March 4, 1912 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (50–26) on March 13, 1912 | ||||
James C. McReynolds | Wilson | Democratic | Democratic | Charles Allen Culberson | No record of hearing | August 19, 1914 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (44–6) on August 29, 1914 |
Louis Brandeis | Feb. 9–10, 1916; Feb. 15–18, 1916; Feb. 24–26, 1916; Feb. 29 – March 4, 1916; March 6–8, 1916; March 14–15, 1916 | May 24, 1916 | Reported favorably (10–8) | Confirmed (47–22) on June 1, 1916 | ||||
John Hessin Clarke | No record of hearing | July 24, 1916 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on July 24, 1916 | ||||
Pierce Butler | Harding | Republican | Republican | Knute Nelson | No record of hearing | November 28, 1922 | Reported favorably | Lapsed |
Pierce Butler | Closed hearings held on Dec 12 and 13, 1922 | December 18, 1922 | Reported favorably | Motion to recommit defeated (7–63) on December 21, 1922; confirmed (61–8) on December 21, 1922 | ||||
Edward Terry Sanford | No record of hearing | January 28, 1923 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on January 29, 1923 | ||||
Harlan F. Stone | Coolidge | Albert B. Cummins | Closed hearing held on January 12, 1925 | January 21, 1925 | Reported favorably | Recommitted (returned to committee) on January 26, 1925; confirmed (71–6) on February 5, 1925 | ||
Closed hearing [7] held on January 28, 1925 | February 2, 1925 | Reported favorably | ||||||
Charles Evans Hughes | Hoover | George W. Norris | No record of hearing | February 10, 1930 | Reported favorably (10–2) | Motion to recommit defeated (3–49) on February 13, 1930; confirmed (52–26) on February 13, 1930 | ||
John J. Parker | April 5, 1930 | April 21, 1930 | Reported adversely | Rejected (39–41) on May 7, 1930 | ||||
Owen Roberts | No record of hearing | May 19, 1930 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on May 20, 1930 | ||||
Benjamin N. Cardozo | February 19, 1932 | February 23, 1932 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on February 24, 1932 | ||||
Hugo Black | F. D. Roosevelt | Democratic | Democratic | Henry F. Ashurst | No record of hearing | August 16, 1937 | Reported favorably (13–4) | Confirmed (63–16) on August 17, 1937 |
Stanley Forman Reed | January 20, 1938 | January 24, 1938 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on January 25, 1938 | ||||
Felix Frankfurter | Jan. 10–12, 1939 | January 16, 1939 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on January 17, 1939 | ||||
William O. Douglas | March 24, 1939 | March 27, 1939 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (62–4) on April 4, 1939 | ||||
Frank Murphy | January 11, 1940 | January 15, 1940 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on January 16, 1940 | ||||
Harlan F. Stone [upper-alpha 6] | Frederick Van Nuys | June 21, 1941 | June 23, 1941 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on June 27, 1941 | |||
Robert H. Jackson | June 21, 1941; June 23, 1941; June 27, 1941; June 30, 1941 | June 23, 1941 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on July 7, 1941 | ||||
Wiley Rutledge | January 22, 1943 | February 1, 1943 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on February 8, 1943 | ||||
Harold Hitz Burton | Truman | Pat McCarran | No record of hearing | September 19, 1945 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on September 19, 1945 | ||
Fred M. Vinson | June 14, 1946 | June 19, 1946 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on June 20, 1946 | ||||
Tom C. Clark | Aug. 9–11, 1949 | August 12, 1949 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (73–8) on August 18, 1949 | ||||
Sherman Minton | September 27, 1949 | October 3, 1943 | Reported favorably (9–2) | Motion to recommit defeated on October 4, 1949; confirmed (48–16) on October 4, 1949 | ||||
Earl Warren [upper-alpha 3] | Eisenhower | Republican | Republican | William Langer | February 2, 1954; February 19, 1954 | February 24, 1954 | Reported favorably (12–3) | Confirmed by voice vote on March 1, 1954 |
John Marshall Harlan II | No hearing held | N/A | Referred to Judiciary Committee on September 9, 1945, but no record exists of any committee vote | Lapsed | ||||
John Marshall Harlan II | Democratic | Harley M. Kilgore | February 25, 1955 | March 10, 1955 | Reported favorably (10–4) | Confirmed (71–11) on March 16, 1955 | ||
William J. Brennan Jr. [upper-alpha 3] | James O. Eastland | Feb 26 and 27, 1957 | March 4, 1957 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on March 19, 1957 | |||
Charles Evans Whittaker | March 18, 1957 | March 19, 1957 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by voice vote on March 19, 1957 | ||||
Potter Stewart [upper-alpha 3] | Apr 9 and 14, 1959 | May 5, 1959 | Reported favorably (12–3) | Confirmed (70–17) on May 5, 1959 | ||||
Byron White | Kennedy | Democratic | April 11, 1962 | April 11, 1962 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by unanimous consent on April 11, 1962 | ||
Arthur Goldberg | Sep 11 and 13, 1962 | September 25, 1962 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by unanimous consent on September 25, 1962 | ||||
Abe Fortas | L. Johnson | August 5, 1965 | August 10, 1965 | Reported favorably | Confirmed by unanimous consent on August 11, 1965 | |||
Thurgood Marshall | July 13, 14, 18, 19 and 24, 1967 | August 3, 1967 | Reported favorably (11–5) | Confirmed (69–11) on August 30, 1967 | ||||
Abe Fortas [upper-alpha 6] | Jul 11 and 12, 1968; Jul. 16–20, 1968; Jul 22 and 23, 1968; September 13, 1968 September 16, 1968 | September 17, 1968 | Reported favorably (11–6) | Cloture motion rejected (45–43) on October 1, 1968; nomination withdrawn [upper-alpha 7] on October 2, 1968 | ||||
Homer Thornberry | Jul 11 and 12, 1968; Jul. 16–20, 1968; Jul 22 and 23, 1968; September 13, 1968 September 16, 1968 | N/A | No committee vote taken | Nomination withdrawn on October 2, 1968 | ||||
Warren E. Burger | Nixon | Republican | June 3, 1969 | June 3, 1969 | Reported favorably | Confirmed (74–3) on June 9, 1969 | ||
Clement Haynsworth | Sep. 16–19, 1969; Sep. 23–26, 1969 | October 9, 1969 | Reported favorably (10–7) | Rejected (45–55) on November 21, 1969 | ||||
G. Harrold Carswell | Jan. 7–9, 1970; Feb 2 and 3, 1970 | February 16, 1970 | Reported favorably (13–4) | Rejected (45–51) on April 8, 1970 | ||||
Harry Blackmun | April 29, 1970 | May 6, 1970 | Reported favorably (17–0) | Confirmed (94–0) on May 12, 1970 | ||||
Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Nov 3 and 4, 1971; Nov. 8–10, 1971 | November 23, 1971 | Reported favorably (17–0) | Confirmed (89–1) on December 6, 1971 | ||||
William Rehnquist | Nov 3 and 4, 1971; Nov. 8–10, 1971 | November 23, 1971 | Reported favorably (12–4) | Confirmed (68–26) on December 10, 1971 | ||||
John Paul Stevens | Ford | Dec. 8–10, 1975 | December 11, 1975 | Reported favorably (13–0) | Confirmed (98–0) on December 17, 1975 | |||
Sandra Day O'Connor | Reagan | Republican | Strom Thurmond | Sep. 9–11, 1981 | September 15, 1981 | Reported favorably (17–1) | Confirmed (99–0) on September 21, 1981 | |
William Rehnquist [upper-alpha 6] | Jul. 29 – August 1, 1986 | August 14, 1986 | Reported favorably (13–5) | Confirmed (65–33) on September 17, 1986 | ||||
Antonin Scalia | Aug 5 and 6, 1986 | August 14, 1986 | Reported favorably (18–0) | Confirmed (98–0) on September 17, 1986 | ||||
Robert Bork | Democratic | Joe Biden | Sep. 15–19, 1987; Sep. 21–23, 1987; September 25, 1987; Sep. 29–30, 1987 | October 6, 1987 | Motion to report favorably rejected (5–9); reported unfavorably (9–5) | Rejected (42–58) on October 23, 1987 | ||
Anthony Kennedy | Dec. 14–16, 1987 | January 27, 1988 | Reported favorably (14–0) | Confirmed (97–0) on February 3, 1988 | ||||
David Souter | G. H. W. Bush | Sep 13 and 14, 1990; Sep. 17–19, 1990 | September 27, 1990 | Reported favorably (13–1) | Confirmed (90–9) on October 2, 1990 | |||
Clarence Thomas | Sep. 10–13, 1991; Sep. 16–17, 1991; Sep 19 and 20, 1991; Oct. 11–13, 1991 | September 27, 1991 | Motion to report favorably failed (7–7); reported without recommendation (13–1) | Confirmed (52–48) on October 15, 1991 | ||||
Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Clinton | Democratic | Jul, 20–23, 1993 | July 29, 1993 | Reported favorably (18–0) | Confirmed (96–3) on August 3, 1993 | ||
Stephen Breyer | Jul. 12–15, 1994 | July 19, 1994 | Reported favorably (18–0) | Confirmed (87–9) on July 29, 1994 | ||||
John Roberts | G. W. Bush | Republican | Republican | Arlen Specter | No hearing held | N/A | Nomination referred to Judiciary Committee on July 29, 2005. No committee vote taken. | Nomination withdrawn on September 6, 2005 |
John Roberts | Sep. 12–15, 2005 | September 22, 2005 | Reported favorably (13–5) | Confirmed (78–22) on September 29, 2005 | ||||
Harriet Miers | No hearing held | N/A | Nomination referred to Judiciary Committee on October 7, 2005. No committee vote taken. | Nomination withdrawn on October 28, 2005 | ||||
Samuel Alito | Jan. 9–13, 2006 | January 24, 2006 | Reported favorably (10–8) | Confirmed (58–42) on January 31, 2006 | ||||
Sonia Sotomayor | Obama | Democratic | Democratic | Patrick Leahy | Jul. 13–16, 2009 | July 28, 2009 | Reported favorably (13–6) | Confirmed (68–31) on August 6, 2009 |
Elena Kagan | Jun. 28 – Jul 1, 2010 | July 20, 2010 | Reported favorably (13–6) | Confirmed (63–37) on August 5, 2010 | ||||
Merrick Garland | Republican | Chuck Grassley | No hearing held | N/A | Nomination referred to Judiciary Committee on March 16, 2016. No committee vote taken. | Lapsed | ||
Neil Gorsuch | Trump | Republican | Mar. 20–23, 2017 | April 3, 2017 | Reported favorably (11–9) | Confirmed (54–45) on April 7, 2017 | ||
Brett Kavanaugh | Sep. 4–7, 2018; September 27, 2018 | September 28, 2018 | Reported favorably (11–9) | Confirmed (50–48) on October 6, 2018 | ||||
Amy Coney Barrett | Lindsey Graham | Oct. 12–15, 2020 | October 22, 2020 | Reported favorably (12–0) [upper-alpha 8] | Confirmed (52–48) on October 26, 2020 | |||
Ketanji Brown Jackson | Biden | Democratic | Democratic | Dick Durbin | March 21–24, 2022 [5] [31] | April 3, 2022 [32] | Motion to report favorably deadlocked (11–11), thus failing. [32] Senate subsequently voted 53–47 on April 4, 2022, to discharge the nomination from committee [33] | Confirmed 53–47 on April 7, 2022 |
General sources: [1] [2] [29] [30] [34] |
Several times the Senate has held votes on whether to have the Judiciary Committee review a nomination.
Several votes have been held on whether to return a nomination to committee for further review.
Nominee | Nominated by | Recommitting vote | Cite | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
President | Party of President | Date of vote | Outcome | "Yea" votes | "Nay" votes | Majority party | Vote by party | ||||||||||||
Total | % | Total | % | Democratic | Republican | Other Parties | |||||||||||||
Total "yaes" | Total "nays" | Total "yaes" | Total "nays" | Party name | Total "yaes" | Total "nays" | |||||||||||||
George Henry Williams | Grant | Republican | December 15, 1873 | Recommitted | Voice vote | Republican | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||
Pierce Butler | Harding | December 21, 1922 | Motion defeated | 7 | 10.00% | 63 | 90.00% | — | — | — | |||||||||
Harlan F. Stone | Coolidge | January 26, 1925 | Recommitted | Voice vote | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | [35] | |||||||
Charles Evans Hughes | Hoover | February 13, 1930 | Motion defeated | 31 | 38.75% | 49 | 61.25% | 19 | 11 | 12 | 38 | Farmer-Labor | 0 | 0 | [36] | ||||
Hugo Black | F. D. Roosevelt | Democratic | August 17, 1937 | Motion defeated | 15 | 18.52% | 66 | 81.48% | Democratic | 6 | 59 | 9 | 5 | Farmer-Labor | 0 | 1 | [37] | ||
Wisconsin Progressive | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
Independents | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
Sherman Minton | Truman | October 4, 1949 | Motion defeated | 21 | 27.63% | 45 | 59.21% | 2 | 36 | 19 | 9 | — | — | — | [38] | ||||
General source: [1] |
The 1826 nomination of Robert Trimble by John Quincy Adams saw a successful effort to first refer the nomination to the Judiciary Committee, with the Senate voting to reject the motion to do so. The Senate defeated a motion to refer this nomination to the Judiciary Committee by a 7–25 vote on May 9, 1826. The Senate confirmed the nomination later that day. [1]
The following outlines United States Supreme Court nominations that were not referred to the Judiciary Committee
List of nominations predating the creation of the Judiciary Committee | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nominee | Nominated by | Senate majority party | Outcome | ||||||||||||||||
President | Party | ||||||||||||||||||
John Jay | Washington | None | Pro Admin | Confirmed by voice vote on September 26, 1789 | |||||||||||||||
John Rutledge | Confirmed by voice vote September 26, 1789 | ||||||||||||||||||
William Cushing | Confirmed by voice vote on September 26, 1789 | ||||||||||||||||||
James Wilson | Confirmed by voice vote on September 26, 1789 | ||||||||||||||||||
John Blair Jr. | Confirmed by voice vote on September 26, 1789 | ||||||||||||||||||
Robert H. Harrison | Confirmed [upper-alpha 5] by voice vote on September 26, 1789 | ||||||||||||||||||
James Iredell | Confirmed by voice vote on February 10, 1790 | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas Johnson [upper-alpha 3] | Confirmed by voice vote on November 7, 1791 | ||||||||||||||||||
William Paterson | Nomination withdrawn on February 28, 1793 | ||||||||||||||||||
William Paterson | Confirmed by voice vote on March 4, 1793 | ||||||||||||||||||
John Rutledge [upper-alpha 3] | Federalist | Rejected (10–14) on December 15, 1795 [39] | |||||||||||||||||
William Cushing [upper-alpha 6] | Confirmed [upper-alpha 9] by voice vote on January 27, 1796 | ||||||||||||||||||
Samuel Chase | Confirmed by voice vote on January 27, 1796 | ||||||||||||||||||
Oliver Ellsworth | Confirmed (21–1) on March 4, 1796 [40] | ||||||||||||||||||
Bushrod Washington [upper-alpha 3] | J. Adams | Federalist | Confirmed by voice vote on December 20, 1798 | ||||||||||||||||
Alfred Moore | Confirmed by voice vote on December 10, 1799 | ||||||||||||||||||
John Jay | Confirmed [upper-alpha 5] by voice vote on December 19, 1800 | ||||||||||||||||||
John Marshall | Confirmed by voice vote on January 27, 1801 | ||||||||||||||||||
William Johnson | Jefferson | Dem-Rep | Dem-Rep | Confirmed by voice vote on March 24, 1804 | |||||||||||||||
Henry B. Livingston [upper-alpha 3] | Confirmed by voice vote on December 17, 1806 | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas Todd | Confirmed by voice vote on March 2, 1807 | ||||||||||||||||||
Levi Lincoln Sr. | Madison | Confirmed [upper-alpha 5] by voice vote on January 3, 1811 | |||||||||||||||||
Alexander Wolcott | Rejected (9–24) on February 13, 1811 [41] | ||||||||||||||||||
John Quincy Adams | Confirmed [upper-alpha 5] by voice vote on February 22, 1811 | ||||||||||||||||||
Joseph Story | Confirmed by voice vote on November 18, 1811 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gabriel Duvall | Confirmed by voice vote on November 18, 1811 | ||||||||||||||||||
General sources: [1] |
List of nominations that were not referred to the Judiciary Committee | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nominee | Nominated by | Senate majority party | Outcome | ||||||||||||||||
President | Party | ||||||||||||||||||
Smith Thompson [upper-alpha 3] | Monroe | Dem-Rep | Dem-Rep | Confirmed by voice vote on December 9, 1823 | |||||||||||||||
Robert Trimble | J. Q. Adams | Adams Rep | Jacksonian | Confirmed (27–5) on May 9, 1826 | |||||||||||||||
John McLean | Jackson | Jacksonian | Confirmed by voice vote on March 7, 1829 | ||||||||||||||||
Henry Baldwin | Confirmed (41–2) on January 6, 1830 [42] | ||||||||||||||||||
Roger B. Taney (first nomination) | Democratic | Natl Rep | Postponed (23–22) on March 3, 1835 [43] | ||||||||||||||||
Peter Vivian Daniel | Van Buren | Democratic | Confirmed (25–5) on March 2, 1841 [44] | ||||||||||||||||
George E. Badger | Fillmore | Whig | Postponed (26–15) on February 11, 1853 [45] | ||||||||||||||||
Jeremiah S. Black | Buchanan | Democratic | Lapsed [upper-alpha 10] | ||||||||||||||||
Samuel Freeman Miller | Lincoln | Republican | Republican | Confirmed by voice vote on July 16, 1862 | |||||||||||||||
Salmon P. Chase | Confirmed by voice vote on December 6, 1864 | ||||||||||||||||||
Edwin Stanton | Grant | Confirmed [upper-alpha 11] (46–11) by voice vote on December 20, 1869 [47] | |||||||||||||||||
Edward D. White | Cleveland | Democratic | Democratic | Confirmed by voice vote on February 19, 1894 | |||||||||||||||
Edward D. White [upper-alpha 6] | Taft | Republican | Republican | Confirmed by voice vote on December 12, 1910 | |||||||||||||||
William Howard Taft | Harding | Confirmed by voice vote on June 30, 1921 | |||||||||||||||||
George Sutherland | Confirmed by voice vote on September 5, 1922 | ||||||||||||||||||
James F. Byrnes | F. D. Roosevelt | Democratic | Democratic | Confirmed by voice vote on June 12, 1941 | |||||||||||||||
General sources: [1] |
The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest-ranking judicial body in the United States. Established by Article III of the Constitution, the detailed structure of the court was laid down by the 1st United States Congress in 1789. Congress specified the Court's original and appellate jurisdiction, created 13 judicial districts, and fixed the initial size of the Supreme Court. The number of justices on the Supreme Court changed six times before settling at the present total of nine in 1869. As of June 2022, a total of 116 justices have served on the Supreme Court since 1789. Justices have life tenure, and so they serve until they die in office, resign or retire, or are impeached and removed from office.
On July 1, 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court of the United States to replace Thurgood Marshall, who had announced his retirement. At the time of his nomination, Thomas was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; President Bush had appointed him to that position in March 1990.
On July 1, 1987, President Ronald Reagan nominated Judge Robert Bork for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, to succeed Lewis F. Powell Jr., who had earlier announced his retirement. At the time of his nomination, Bork was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, a position to which he had been appointed by President Reagan in 1982.
Speculation abounded over potential nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States by Ronald Reagan even before his presidency officially began, due to the advanced ages of several justices, and Reagan's own highlighting of Supreme Court nominations as a campaign issue. Reagan had promised "to appoint only those opposed to abortion and the 'judicial activism' of the Warren and Burger Courts". Conversely, some opposed to Reagan argued that he could "appoint as many as five Justices" and would "use the opportunity to stack the Court against women, minorities and social justice".
Ketanji Onyika Brown Jackson is an American lawyer and jurist who is an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Jackson was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Joe Biden on February 25, 2022, and confirmed by the U.S. Senate and sworn into office that same year. She is the first black woman and the first former federal public defender to serve on the Supreme Court. From 2021 to 2022, Jackson was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
The nomination and confirmation of justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps, the framework for which is set forth in the United States Constitution. Specifically, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, provides that the president of the United States nominates a justice and that the United States Senate provides advice and consent before the person is formally appointed to the Court. It also empowers a president to temporarily, under certain circumstances, fill a Supreme Court vacancy by means of a recess appointment. The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a justice, thus the president may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.
U.S. President Barack Obama nominated over 400 individuals for federal judgeships during his presidency. Of these nominations, Congress confirmed 329 judgeships, 173 during the 111th & 112th Congresses and 156 during the 113th and 114th Congresses.
Salvador Mendoza Jr. is an American lawyer serving as United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He previously served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington from 2014 to 2022 and as a Washington state court judge from 2002 to 2014.
On March 16, 2016, President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to succeed Antonin Scalia, who had died one month earlier. At the time of his nomination, Garland was the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Florence Yu Pan is an American lawyer who serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia from 2021 to 2022 and a judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia from 2009 to 2021.
Tamika Renee Montgomery-Reeves is an American lawyer who serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. She previously served as an Associate Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court.
On September 26, 2020, President Donald Trump announced the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the position of Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to fill in the vacancy left by the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. At the time of her nomination, Barrett was a Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Chicago, Illinois. The Senate received word from the president on September 29.
Eunice Cheryl Lee is an American lawyer who serves as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Born in West Germany, she attended Ohio State University and Yale Law School. In 2021, she was confirmed by the U.S. Senate to serve on the Second Circuit after being nominated by President Joe Biden.
President Joe Biden began his presidency with fewer vacancies to fill than his predecessor. He pledged to nominate people with diverse backgrounds and professional experience; further he pledged to nominate the first black woman to the Supreme Court of the United States.
On February 25, 2022, President Joe Biden announced that he would nominate Ketanji Brown Jackson to the position of associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to fill the vacancy by Stephen Breyer, who announced his retirement on January 27, 2022, at the age of 83. Jackson, a former law clerk of Breyer, was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, having been appointed by Biden in 2021. Jackson is the first Black woman in U.S. history to be nominated to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Harlan F. Stone was nominated and confirmed twice to the Supreme Court of the United States. First in 1925, when President Calvin Coolidge nominated him to serve as an associate justice and again in 1941, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt nominated Justice Stone to be elevated to Chief Justice. Both times, the United States Senate confirmed the nominations.
Louis Brandeis was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson on January 28, 1916, after the death in office of Joseph Rucker Lamar created a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Per the Constitution of the United States, Brandeis' nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Thurgood Marshall was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson on June 13, 1967 to fill the seat being vacated by Tom C. Clark. Per the Constitution of the United States, the nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court. Marshall was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in a 69–11 vote on August 30, 1967, becoming the first African American member of the Court, and the court's first non-white justice.