Wiley Rutledge Supreme Court nomination

Last updated
Wiley Rutledge Supreme Court nomination
Wiley Rutledge nomination.jpg
Rutledge's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, signed by Roosevelt
Nominee Wiley Rutledge
Nominated by Franklin D. Roosevelt (president of the United States)
Succeeding James F. Byrnes (associate justice)
Date nominatedJanuary 11, 1943
Date confirmedFebruary 8, 1943
OutcomeConfirmed by the U.S. Senate
Vote of subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee
ResultReported favorably
Vote of the Senate Judiciary Committee
Votes in favor11
Votes against0
Not voting4
ResultReported favorably
Senate confirmation vote
ResultConfirmed by voice vote

Wiley Rutledge was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt on January 11, 1943, after the resignation of James F. Byrnes created a vacancy on the court. Per the Constitution of the United States, Rutledge's nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court. After being favorably reported on by both a subcommittee of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary and the full Judiciary Committee, the nomination was confirmed by the full Senate through a voice vote on February 8, 1943.

Contents

Background

In October 1942, Associate Justice James F. Byrnes resigned from the Supreme Court of the United States, creating the ninth and final vacancy on the Supreme Court of Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency. [1] Per the Constitution of the United States, the president of the United States fills Supreme Court vacancies with the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Rutledge had previously been given some consideration for appointment to the Supreme Court previous to 1942. In 1938, the well-regarded journalist Irving Brant and others encouraged Roosevelt to consider Rutledge as a successor to Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo when Cardozo retired in 1938. Brant appreciated Rutledge's views on legal reform and Rutledge's support for restrictions on child labor. Brant believed that Rutledge was a youthful liberal intellectual. He also believed that Rutledge possessed the strong interpersonal skills, legal talent, and tenacity needed to persuade the Court's more moderate and conservative justices in decisions. Brant worked vigorously to amass endorsements from politicians and lawyers for the appointment of Rutledge. However, Roosevelt instead opted to appoint Felix Frankfurter to fill the vacancy. While Frankfurter had been seen as the front-runner to fill the vacancy, Roosevelt had considered Rutledge and others before settling on him due to pressure to nominate an individual from the "western" United States (west of the Mississippi River). [2]

In 1939, Rutledge was given serious consideration for appointment to the court when Louis Brandeis retired. However, William O. Douglas was instead selected. [2] Rutledge, however, was appointed by Roosevelt that year to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia with the advice and consent of the United States Senate. [3] He would not be given serious consideration as a candidate for the Supreme Court for any of the four vacancies to arise between then and Byrne's 1943 resignation. [2]

Selection of Rutledge

As a result of Roosevelt's many previous appointments to the Court, there was "no obvious successor, no obvious political debt to be paid", according to the scholar Henry J. Abraham. [4] Some, including Justices Felix Frankfurter and Harlan F. Stone, encouraged Roosevelt to appoint the distinguished jurist Learned Hand. [4] Frankfurter, with what Abraham called "not uncharacteristic overkill", lobbied with particular vigor on Hand's behalf: Roosevelt noted that he had received pleas to appoint Hand from "twenty [people], and every one of them a messenger from Felix Frankfurter" in a single day. [4] But the president was uncomfortable appointing the seventy-one-year-old Hand due to his age. Roosevelt had previously cited the advanced age of Supreme Court justices to justify his 1937 proposal to expand the Court and he feared that he would appear hypocritical if he appointed an elderly jurist himself. [5]

Francis Biddle, the attorney general, was unwilling to accept an appointment himself. Roosevelt asked Biddle to search for a suitable nominee. [1] :292 A number of candidates were considered, including federal judge John J. Parker, Solicitor General Charles Fahy, U.S. Senator Alben W. Barkley, and Dean Acheson. [4] But the journalist Drew Pearson soon brought up another possibility, who he identified as "the candidate of Chief Justice Stone" in his columns and radio broadcasts: Wiley Rutledge. [5]

Irving Brant also again promoted Rutledge as a candidate for the court. Brant worked relentlessly to campaign for Roosevelt to appoint Rutledge. Brant solicited endorsements of Rutledge from politicians and lawyers and even paid a visit to Roosevelt to promote Rutledge as a candidate. [2] Brant's avid support for the appointment of Rutledge was fueled by strong impression that Rutledge had given Brant. Brant admired how Rutledge had publicly criticized the president of the American Bar Association after the president had defended decisions by the Supreme Court decision which stuck down limitations on child labor. Brant successfully directed Roosevelt's attention to Rutledge, in part, by touting him as the most likely candidate from a state west of the Mississippi River to support the principles of Roosevelt's New Deal. [6] A strong reason for Brant's avid support for the appointment of Rutledge was the strong impression that Rutledge had given Brant. Brant admired how Rutledge had publicly criticized the president of the American Bar Association after the president had defended decisions by the Supreme Court decision which stuck down limitations on child labor. [6] Additionally, Brant successfully directed Roosevelt's attention to Rutledge, in part, by touting him as the most likely candidate from a state west of the Mississippi River to support the principles of Roosevelt's New Deal. [6]

Rutledge was considered about the workload of the position. [2] , and had no desire to be nominated to the Supreme Court, but his friends nonetheless wrote to Roosevelt and Biddle on his behalf. [5] He wrote to Biddle disclaiming all interest in the position, and he admonished his friends with the words: "For God's sake, don't do anything about stirring up the matter! I am uncomfortable enough as it is." [5] Still, Rutledge's supporters, most notably Irving Brant, continued to lobby the White House to nominate him, and Rutledge stated in private that he would not decline the nomination if Roosevelt offered it to him. [5] [4]

When Attorney General Biddle inquired with Supreme Court Justices Hugo Black, and William O. Douglas, and Harlan Stone about who they advised be appointed, each named Rutledge as the best among the candidates. Black and Douglas were particularly enthusiastic towards Rutledge joining them on the court. [2] Biddle directed his assistant Herbert Wechsler to review the judicial records of Rutledge and several other candidates for the vacancy. Wechsler's report convinced Biddle that Rutledge's judicial opinions were "a bit pedestrian" but nonetheless "sound". [2] [5] Biddle, joined by Roosevelt loyalists such as Douglas, Senator George W. Norris, and Justice Frank Murphy, thus recommended to the president that Rutledge be appointed. [1] :292

After meeting with Rutledge at the White House and being convinced by Biddle that the judge's judicial philosophy was fully aligned with his own, Roosevelt agreed to appoint Rutledge. [4] :186 Despite having appointed him years earlier to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, Roosevelt had never before met Rutledge. [6] According to the scholar Fred L. Israel, Roosevelt found Rutledge to be "a liberal New Dealer who combined the president's respect for the academic community with four years of service on a leading federal appellate court". [7] Additionally, the fact that Rutledge was a Westerner weighed in his favor. [1] :292 The president told his nominee: "Wiley, we had a number of candidates for the Court who were highly qualified, but they didn't re geography—you have that". [7] :1318 Roosevelt also remarked to Wiley, who had lived in Colorado, Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Tennessee at different points in his life, "You have a lot of geography." [2]

Roosevelt formally nominated Rutledge, who was then forty-eight years old, to the Supreme Court on January 11, 1943. [8] Rutledge was the only of Roosevelt's nominees to the Supreme Court that had experience serving as a member of a United States courts of appeals. [9]

Judiciary Committee review

Subcommittee

A subcommittee of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary (Judiciary Committee) which was chaired by Senator Joseph C. O'Mahoney reviewed the nomination. [10] A single hearing was held on January 22, 1943. [11] The hearing was a public hearing. [12] In the hearing, the subcommittee heard from lawyer Edmond C. Fletcher. Along with real estate developer John T. Risher, Fletcher had been urging the committee to examine the disposition of Rutledge as a justice in cases involving them that Rutledge had heard while sitting on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. [13]

The subcommittee gave its approval to the nomination. [10] This vote was announced by O'Mahoney on January 28, 1943. While they had been urged by Fletcher and Risher to hold further hearings, the subcommittee voted against this and instead approved the nomination without conducting further hearings. The subcommittee wrote a favorable report for presentation to the full Judiciary Committee. [14]

Full Judiciary Committee

The Judiciary Committee voted on February 1, 1943 to approve Rutledge's nomination; the vote was 11–0, with four abstentions. [10] Those four senators—North Dakota's William Langer, West Virginia's Chapman Revercomb, Montana's Burton K. Wheeler, and Michigan's Homer S. Ferguson—abstained due to uneasiness about Rutledge's support for Roosevelt's 1937 court-expansion plan. [5] Ferguson later spoke with Rutledge and indicated that his concerns had been resolved, but Wheeler, who had strongly opposed Roosevelt's efforts to enlarge the Court, said that he would vote against the nomination when it came before the full Senate. [5]

Confirmation vote

The only senator to speak on the Senate floor in opposition to Rutledge's nomination was William Langer. [5] Langer cited Ruteledge's lack of experience practicing law as a lawyer. [15] He characterized Rutledge as "a man who, so far as I can ascertain, never practiced law inside a courtroom or, so far as I know, seldom even visited one until he came to take a seat on the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia" and commented that "[t]he Court is not without a professor or two already." [5] The Senate overwhelmingly confirmed Rutledge by a voice vote on February 8, 1943, [16] and he subsequently took the oath of office on February 15. [17]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Felix Frankfurter</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1939 to 1962

Felix Frankfurter was an Austrian-American jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1939 until 1962, during which period he was a noted advocate of judicial restraint in its judgements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wiley Rutledge</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1943 to 1949

Wiley Blount Rutledge Jr. was an American jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1943 to 1949. The ninth and final justice appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, he is known for his impassioned defenses of civil liberties. Rutledge favored broad interpretations of the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause, and the Equal Protection Clause, and he argued that the Bill of Rights applied in its totality to the states. He participated in several noteworthy cases involving the intersection of individual freedoms and the government's wartime powers. Rutledge served on the Court until his death at the age of fifty-five. Legal scholars have generally thought highly of the justice, although the brevity of his tenure has minimized his impact on history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amul Thapar</span> United States federal judge

Amul Roger Thapar is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He is a former United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky and former United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky. He was also President Trump's first Court of Appeals appointment and Trump's second judicial appointment after Justice Neil Gorsuch. Thapar was discussed as a candidate for the Supreme Court of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patricia Millett</span> American judge

Patricia Ann Millett is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. She formerly headed the Supreme Court practice at the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. Millett also was a longtime former assistant to the United States Solicitor General and served as an occasional blogger for SCOTUSblog. At the time of her confirmation to the D.C. Circuit, she had argued 32 cases before the United States Supreme Court. In February 2016 The New York Times identified her as a potential nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry S. Truman Supreme Court candidates</span>

During his two terms in office, President Harry S. Truman appointed four members of the Supreme Court of the United States: Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, Associate Justice Harold Burton, Associate Justice Tom C. Clark, and Associate Justice Sherman Minton.

During his twelve years in office, President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed eight new members of the Supreme Court of the United States: Associate Justices Hugo Black, Stanley F. Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Frank Murphy, James F. Byrnes, Robert H. Jackson, and Wiley Blount Rutledge. Additionally, he elevated sitting Justice Harlan F. Stone to chief justice. Roosevelt's nine nominations filled eight seats on the Supreme Court because Associate Justice Byrnes resigned while Roosevelt was still in office. Roosevelt nominated Rutledge to the seat vacated by Byrnes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nomination and confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States</span> Political process

The nomination and confirmation of justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps, the framework for which is set forth in the United States Constitution. Specifically, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, provides that the President of the United States nominates a justice and that the United States Senate provides Advice and consent before the person is formally appointed to the Court. It also empowers a president to temporarily, under certain circumstances, fill a Supreme Court vacancy by means of a recess appointment. The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a justice, thus the president may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elena Kagan Supreme Court nomination</span> United States Supreme Court nomination

On May 10, 2010, President Barack Obama announced his selection of Elena Kagan for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, to replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens. Kagan's nomination was confirmed by a 63–37 vote of the United States Senate on August 5, 2010. When nominated, Kagan was Solicitor General of the United States, a position to which Obama had appointed her in March 2009. Kagan was the first Supreme Court nominee since Sandra Day O'Connor in 1981 to not be a sitting circuit court judge and the most recent such nominee as of 2020. She was the first Supreme Court nominee since William Rehnquist and Lewis F. Powell Jr. in 1971 to not be a sitting judge on any court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Merrick Garland Supreme Court nomination</span> United States Supreme Court nomination

On March 16, 2016, President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States to succeed Antonin Scalia, who had died one month earlier. At the time of his nomination, Garland was the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Donald Trump Supreme Court candidates</span> Persons nominated or considered for nomination

With the advice and consent of the United States Senate, the president of the United States appoints the members of the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the highest court of the federal judiciary of the United States. Following his victory in the 2016 presidential election, Republican Donald Trump took office as president on January 20, 2017, and faced an immediate vacancy on the Supreme Court due to the February 2016 death of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. During the 2016 campaign, Trump had released two lists of potential nominees to the Supreme Court. After taking office, he nominated Neil Gorsuch to succeed Scalia, and Gorsuch was confirmed in April 2017. In November 2017, five more names were added to the previous lists of potential nominees. In June 2018, Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, creating a second vacancy on the Supreme Court. In early July 2018, Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh as his replacement; Kavanaugh was confirmed on October 6, 2018. Following the death of Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on September 18, 2020, Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett as her replacement on September 26, 2020. Exactly a month later on October 26, 2020, Barrett was confirmed by a vote of 52–48.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patrick Wyrick</span> American judge

Patrick Robert Wyrick is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma and a former Associate Justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court.

Woodrow Wilson appointed three Associate Justices to the Supreme Court of the United States, James Clark McReynolds, Louis Brandeis, and John Hessin Clarke.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Holly A. Thomas</span> American judge

Holly Aiyisha Thomas is an American attorney serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. She previously served as a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court from 2018 to 2022.

Harlan F. Stone was nominated and confirmed twice to the Supreme Court of the United States. First in 1925, when President Calvin Coolidge nominated him to serve as an associate justice and again in 1941, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt nominated Justice Stone to be elevated to Chief Justice. Both times, the United States Senate confirmed the nominations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louis Brandeis Supreme Court nomination</span>

Louis Brandeis was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson on January 28, 1916, after the death in office of Joseph Rucker Lamar created a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Per the Constitution of the United States, Brandeis' nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sherman Minton Supreme Court nomination</span>

Sherman Minton was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Harry S. Truman on September 14, 1949 after the death in office of Wiley Rutledge created a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Per the Constitution of the United States, Minton's nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nomination was met with a mixed reception and faced active opposition stemming both from the belief that Minton would be a liberal justice and from his history as a New Deal-supporting member of the United States Senate. There was an unsuccessful effort to compel Minton to testify before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Nevertheless, the nomination was approved by a 48-16 vote of the United States Senate on October 4, 1949.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thurgood Marshall Supreme Court nomination</span>

Thurgood Marshall was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson on June 13, 1967 to fill the seat being vacated by Tom C. Clark. Per the Constitution of the United States, the nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court. Marshall was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in a 69–11 vote on August 30, 1967, becoming the first African American member of the Court, and the court's first non-white justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Senate Judiciary Committee reviews of nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

Since the creation of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary in 1816, many, but not all, nominations for the Supreme Court of the United States have been first referred to a committee for review prior to facing a confirmation vote before the full United States Senate. Some nominations have been withdrawn, lapsed, or been postponed without being referred to the Judiciary Committee, while some others up until 1941 had proceeded to full Senate confirmation votes without first being reviewed by the Judiciary Committee. However, ever since 1941, all nominations have been referred to the Judiciary Committee.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Abraham, Henry J. (February 1983). "A Bench Happily Filled: Some Historical Reflections on the Supreme Court Appointment Process". Judicature . 66: 292, 294.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Green, Craig (2006). "Wiley Rutledge, Executive Detention, and Judicial Conscience at War". Washington College Law Review. 84 (1). Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  3. "Previous Associate Justices: Wiley B. Rutledge, 1943-1949". Supreme Court Historical Society. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Abraham, Henry J. (2008). Justices, Presidents, and Senators: A History of the U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Bush II. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield. p. 186. ISBN   978-0-7425-5895-3.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ferren, John M. (2004). Salt of the Earth, Conscience of the Court: The Story of Justice Wiley Rutledge. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 208–211, 213, 216–217, 220–221. ISBN   978-0-8078-2866-3.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Ferren, John M. "Justice Wiley Rutledge: Court of Appeals Years – and After" (PDF). dcchs.org. Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  7. 1 2 Israel, Fred L. (1997). "Wiley Rutledge". In Friedman, Leon; Israel, Fred L. (eds.). The Justices of the United States Supreme Court: Their Lives and Major Opinions. Vol. 4. New York: Chelsea House. p. 1318. ISBN   978-0-7910-1377-9.
  8. Cushman, Clare, ed. (2013). Supreme Court Justices: Illustrated Biographies. Thousand Oaks, California: CQ Press. p. 375. ISBN   978-1-60871-832-0.
  9. "Nominations" . Newspapers.com. Lancaster New Era. The Associated Press. January 11, 1943. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  10. 1 2 3 "Senate Committee Favors Rutledge". Fort Worth Star-Telegram . February 1, 1943. p. 2. Retrieved December 18, 2021.
  11. McMillion, Barry J.; Rutkus, Denis Steven (July 6, 2018). "Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2017: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President" (PDF). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
  12. "Rutledge Hearing Called" . Newspapers.com. Evening Star. January 14, 1943. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
  13. "Protesters Delay Rutledge Hearing" . The Idaho Statesman. The Associated Press. January 23, 1943. Retrieved 26 October 2022 via Newspapers.com.
  14. "Subcommittee OK's Rutledge" . The Courier. The Associated Press. January 28, 1943. Retrieved 26 October 2022 via Newspapers.com.
  15. "Nomination of Rutledge is Confirmed" . Newspapers.com. Greeley Daily Tribune. The Associated Press. February 8, 1943. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  16. Hall, Timothy L. (2001). Supreme Court Justices: A Biographical Dictionary. New York: Facts on File. p. 331. ISBN   978-0-8160-4194-7.
  17. Biskupic, Joan; Witt, Elder (1997). Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. Vol. 2 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly. p. 938. ISBN   978-1-56802-130-0.