Montevideo Convention

Last updated
Montevideo Convention
Convention on the Rights and Duties of States
Montevideo Convention parties.svg
Ratifications and signatories of the treaty
  Parties
  Signatories
SignedDecember 26, 1933
Location Montevideo, Uruguay
EffectiveDecember 26, 1934
Signatories20 [1]
Parties17 [1] (as of November 2021)
Depositary Pan American Union
Languages English, French, Spanish and Portuguese
Full text
Wikisource-logo.svg Montevideo Convention at Wikisource

The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States is a treaty signed at Montevideo, Uruguay, on December 26, 1933, during the Seventh International Conference of American States. [2] At the conference, United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Secretary of State Cordell Hull declared the Good Neighbor Policy , which opposed U.S. armed intervention in inter-American affairs. The convention was signed by 19 states. The acceptance of three of the signatories was subject to minor reservations. Those states were Brazil, Peru and the United States. [3] [1]

Contents

The convention became operative on December 26, 1934. It was registered in the League of Nations Treaty Series on January 8, 1936. [4]

The conference is notable in U.S. history, since one of the U.S. representatives was Dr. Sophonisba Breckinridge, the first U.S. female representative at an international conference. [5]

Background

In most cases, the only avenue open to self-determination for colonial or national ethnic minority populations was to achieve international legal personality as a nation-state. [6] The majority of delegations at the International Conference of American States represented independent states that had emerged from former colonies. In most cases, their own existence and independence had been disputed or opposed by one or more of the European colonial empires. They agreed among themselves to criteria that made it easier for other dependent states with limited sovereignty to gain international recognition.[ citation needed ]

Contents of the convention

Article 1 sets out the criteria for statehood:

The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.

The first sentence of Article 3 states that "the political existence of the state is independent of recognition by the other states." This is known as the declarative theory of statehood. It stands in contrast with the constitutive theory of statehood, by which a state exists only insofar as it is recognized by other states. It should not be confused with the Estrada doctrine. "Independence" and "sovereignty" are not mentioned in article 1. [7]

An important part of the convention was a prohibition of using military force to gain sovereignty. According to Article 11 of the convention, [3]

The contracting states definitely establish the rule of their conduct the precise obligation not to recognize territorial acquisitions or advantages that have been obtained by force whether this consists in the employment of arms, in threatening diplomatic representations, or in any other effective coercive measure

Parties

Parties to the Montevideo Convention
Parties
Signatories
Other Organization of American States members Montevideo Convention parties.svg
Parties to the Montevideo Convention
  Parties
  Signatories

The 17 states that have ratified this convention are limited to the Americas.

State [1] [8] SignedDepositedMethod
Flag of Brazil (1889-1960).svg  Brazil Dec 26, 1933Feb 23, 1937Ratification
Flag of Chile.svg  Chile Dec 26, 1933Mar 28, 1935Ratification
Flag of Colombia.svg  Colombia Dec 26, 1933Jul 22, 1936Ratification
Flag of Costa Rica.svg  Costa Rica [a] Sep 28, 1937Accession
Flag of Cuba (sky blue).svg  Cuba Dec 26, 1933Apr 28, 1936Ratification
Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg  Dominican Republic Dec 26, 1933Dec 26, 1934Ratification
Flag of Ecuador (1900-2009).svg  Ecuador Dec 26, 1933Oct 3, 1936Ratification
Flag of El Salvador.svg  El Salvador Dec 26, 1933Jan 9, 1937Ratification
Flag of Guatemala (1871-1968).svg  Guatemala Dec 26, 1933Jun 12, 1935Ratification
Flag of Haiti (1820-1849, 1859-1964).svg  Haiti Dec 26, 1933Aug 13, 1941Ratification
Flag of Honduras (1866-1898).svg  Honduras Dec 26, 1933Dec 1, 1937Ratification
Flag of Mexico (1934-1968).svg  Mexico Dec 26, 1933Jan 27, 1936Ratification
Flag of Nicaragua (1908-1971).svg  Nicaragua Dec 26, 1933Jan 8, 1937Ratification
Flag of Panama.svg  Panama Dec 26, 1933Nov 13, 1938Ratification
Flag of Paraguay (1842-1954).svg  Paraguay Dec 26, 1933Sep 7, 2018Ratification
Flag of the United States (1912-1959).svg  United States Dec 26, 1933Jul 13, 1934Ratification
Flag of Venezuela (1930-1954).svg  Venezuela Dec 26, 1933Feb 13, 1940Ratification
Notes
  1. The Organization of American States' database lists Costa Rica as signing the treaty, but the treaty does not include a signature by Costa Rica. [9]

A further three states signed the convention on 26 December 1933, but have not ratified it. [1] [10]

The only state to attend the Seventh International Conference of American States, where the convention was agreed upon, which did not sign it was Bolivia. [10] Costa Rica, which did not attend the conference, later signed the convention. [9]

Analysis

The Montevideo Convention codified several existing legal norms and principles, which apply to all subjects of international law. [11] [12] [ better source needed ]

The Badinter Committee, [13] which consisted of arbitrators from several European countries, considered a state as having a territory, population, and organised political authority and that the existence of states was a question of fact, while the recognition by other states was purely declaratory. [14]

Switzerland adheres to the same principle, stating that "neither a political unit needs to be recognized to become a state, nor does a state have the obligation to recognize another one. At the same time, neither recognition is enough to create a state, nor does its absence abolish it." [15] [ verify ]

Actual state practices do not follow the Montevideo Convention exactly. While they play an important role, fulfilling its criteria do not automatically create a state because additional requirements must be met. The status of countries such as Kosovo and Somaliland largely depends on the recognition or non-recognition by other states. [16]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "A-40: Convention on Rights and Duties of States". Organization of American States . Retrieved 2013-07-23.
  2. Staff writer (2024). "Convention on Rights and Duties of States". UIA Global Civil Society Database. uia.org. Brussels, Belgium: Union of International Associations. Yearbook of International Organizations Online. Retrieved 12 January 2025.
  3. 1 2 Hersch Lauterpacht (2012). Recognition in International Law. Cambridge University Press. p. 419. ISBN   9781107609433.
  4. "United States of America - Convention on Rights and Duties of States adopted by the Seventh International Conference of American States, Signed at Montevideo, December 26th, 1933 [1936] LNTSer 9; 165 LNTS 19". www.worldlii.org. pp. 20–43.
  5. From colony to superpower: U.S. foreign relations since 1776, by George C. Herring, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 499. Online at Google Books. Retrieved 2011-09-20.
  6. The Postcoloniality of International Law, Harvard International Law Journal, Volume 46, Number 2, Summer 2005, Sundhya Pahuja, page 5 Archived 2009-02-05 at the Wayback Machine
  7. see for example State Failure, Sovereignty and Effectiveness, Legal Lessons from the Decolonization of Sub-Saharan Africa, Gerard Kreijen, Published by Martinus Nijhoff, 2004, ISBN   90-04-13965-6, page 110
  8. "Convention on Rights and Duties of States adopted by the Seventh International Conference of American States". United Nations Treaty Series, Registration Number:3802. Retrieved 2015-11-16.
  9. 1 2 Encyclopedia of the Inter-American System. Greenwood Publishing Group. 1997-01-01. p. 287. ISBN   9780313286001 . Retrieved 2013-07-23. Delegations from twenty states participated - from the United States and all those in Latin America except Costa Rica (provision was made for Costa Rica to later sign the conventions and treaties presented in the conference).
  10. 1 2 "Convention on the Rights and Duties of States". Yale . Retrieved 2013-07-23.
  11. Harris, D.J. (ed) 2004 "Cases and Materials on International Law" 6th Ed. at p. 99. Sweet and Maxwell, London
  12. Castellino, Joshua (2000). International Law and Self-Determination: The Interplay of the Politics of Territorial Possession With Formulations of Post-Colonial National Identity. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. p. 77. ISBN   9041114092.
  13. The Badinter Arbitration Committee (full title), named for its chair, ruled on the question of whether the Republics of Croatia, Macedonia, and Slovenia, who had formally requested recognition by the members of the European Union and by the EU itself, had met conditions specified by the Council of Ministers of the European Community on December 16, 1991. "The Opinions of the Badinter Arbitration Committee: A Second Breath for the Self-Determination of Peoples". Archived from the original on 2008-05-17. Retrieved 2012-05-10.
  14. "Opinion No.1" . International Law Reports. 92: 162–166. January 1993. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316152195.002. ISSN   0309-0671.
  15. Switzerland's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, DFA, Directorate of International Law: "Recognition of States and Governments," 2005.
  16. Akande, Dapo (7 August 2013). "The Importance of Legal Criteria for Statehood: A Response to Jure Vidmar". EJIL: Talk!.

Further reading