Agricultural Adjustment Act

Last updated
Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA)
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Other short titles
  • Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933
  • The Farm Relief Bill
Long titleAn Act to relieve the existing national economic emergency by increasing agricultural purchasing power, to raise revenue for extraordinary expenses incurred by reason of such emergency, to provide emergency relief with respect to agricultural indebtedness, to provide for the orderly liquidation of joint-stock land banks, and for other purposes.
Enacted bythe 73rd United States Congress
EffectiveMay 12, 1933
Citations
Public law Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  73–10
Statutes at Large 48  Stat.   31
Codification
Titles amended 7 U.S.C.: Agriculture
U.S.C. sections created 7 U.S.C. ch. 26 § 601 et seq.
Legislative history
  • Introduced in the House as H.R. 3835
  • Passed the House on March 22, 1933 (315-98)
  • Passed the Senate on April 28, 1933 (64-20)
  • Reported by the joint conference committee on May 10, 1933; agreed to by the House on May 10, 1933 (passed) and by the Senate on May 10, 1933 (53-28)
  • Signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on May 12, 1933 [1]
United States Supreme Court cases
United States v. Butler

The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) was a United States federal law of the New Deal era designed to boost agricultural prices by reducing surpluses. The government bought livestock for slaughter and paid farmers subsidies not to plant on part of their land. The money for these subsidies was generated through an exclusive tax on companies which processed farm products. The Act created a new agency, the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, also called "AAA" (1933-1942), an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, to oversee the distribution of the subsidies. [2] [3] [4] The Agriculture Marketing Act, which established the Federal Farm Board in 1929, was seen as an important precursor to this act. [5] [6] The AAA, along with other New Deal programs, represented the federal government's first substantial effort to address economic welfare in the United States. [7]

Contents

Background

When President Franklin D. Roosevelt took office in March 1933, the United States was in the midst of the Great Depression. [8] "Farmers faced the most severe economic situation and lowest agricultural prices since the 1890s." [8] "Overproduction and a shrinking international market had driven down agricultural prices." [9] Soon after his inauguration, Roosevelt called the Hundred Days Congress into session to address the crumbling economy. [9] From this Congress came the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, to replace the Federal Farm Board. The Roosevelt Administration was tasked with decreasing agricultural surpluses. [9] Wheat, cotton, field corn, hogs, rice, tobacco, and milk and its products were designated as basic commodities in the original legislation. Subsequent amendments in 1934 and 1935 expanded the list of basic commodities to include rye, flax, barley, grain sorghum, cattle, peanuts, sugar beets, sugar cane, and potatoes. [1] The administration targeted these commodities for the following reasons:

  1. Changes in the prices of these commodities had a strong effect on the prices of other important commodities.
  2. These commodities were already running a surplus at the time.
  3. These items each required some amount of processing before they could be consumed by humans. [4]

Goals and implementations

Taos County, New Mexico. Mr. Tenoriom, AAA representative in office. - NARA - 521975.jpg
Agricultural Adjustment Administration representative in his New Mexico office (1941)
Uncle Sam spending $3,000,000 to make one map. Washington D.C. July 28. A huge photographic map which when completed will have cost $3,000,000, is being put together by the Agriculture LCCN2016872077.jpg
The AAA photographed one-third of the land surface of the U.S. and created a huge map to determine compliance in the agricultural conservation program, plan soil conservation and Public Works projects, lay out roads, forests and public parks, and improve national defense (1937).
A Roosevelt County, New Mexico, farmer and a County Agricultural Conservation Committee representative review the provisions of the AAA farm program to determine how it can best be applied on that particular acreage in 1934. 20111110-OC-AMW-0033 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg
A Roosevelt County, New Mexico, farmer and a County Agricultural Conservation Committee representative review the provisions of the AAA farm program to determine how it can best be applied on that particular acreage in 1934.

"The goal of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, restoring farm purchasing power of agricultural commodities or the fair exchange value of a commodity based upon price relative to the prewar 1909–14 level, was to be accomplished through a number of methods. These included the authorization by the Secretary of Agriculture (1) to secure voluntary reduction of the acreage in basic crops through agreements with producers and use of direct payments for participation in acreage control programs; (2) to regulate marketing through voluntary agreements with processors, associations or producers, and other handlers of agricultural commodities or products; (3) to license processors, association, and others handling agricultural commodities to eliminate unfair practices or charges; (4) to determine the necessity for and the rate or processing taxes; and (5) to use the proceeds of taxes and appropriate funds for the cost of adjustment operations, for the expansion of markets, and for the removal or agricultural surpluses." [1]

"Congress declared its intent, at the same time, to protect the consumers interest. This was to be done by readjusting farm production at a level that would not increase the percentage of consumers' retail expenditures above the percentage returned to the farmer in the prewar base period." [1]

The juxtaposition of huge agricultural surpluses and the many deaths due to insufficient food shocked many, as well as some of the administrative decisions that happened under the Agricultural Adjustment Act. [10] For example, in an effort to reduce agricultural surpluses, the government paid farmers to reduce crop production [11] and to sell pregnant sows as well as young pigs. [12] Oranges were being soaked with kerosene to prevent their consumption and corn was being burned as fuel because it was so cheap. [10] There were many people, however, as well as livestock in different places starving to death. [10] Farmers slaughtered livestock because feed prices were rising, and they could not afford to feed their own animals. [10] Under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, "plowing under" of pigs was also common to prevent them reaching a reproductive age, as well as donating pigs to the Red Cross. [10]

In 1935, the income generated by farms was 50 percent higher than it was in 1932, which was partly due to farm programs such as the AAA. [13]

The Agricultural Adjustment Act affected around 99% of farmers in this time period.[ citation needed ]

Tenant farming

Barn on tenant's farm in Walker County, Alabama, 1937 Walker County Alabama Barn.jpg
Barn on tenant's farm in Walker County, Alabama, 1937

Tenant farming characterized the cotton and tobacco production in the post-Civil War South. As the agricultural economy plummeted in the early 1930s, all farmers were badly hurt but the tenant farmers and sharecroppers experienced the worst of it. [14]

To accomplish its goal of parity (raising crop prices to where they were in the golden years of 1909–1914), the Act reduced crop production. [15] The Act accomplished this by offering landowners acreage reduction contracts, by which they agreed not to grow cotton on a portion of their land. By law, they were required to pay the tenant farmers and sharecroppers on their land a portion of the money; but after Southern Democrats in Congress complained, the Secretary of Agriculture surrendered and reinterpreted section 7 to no longer send checks to sharecroppers directly, hurting the tenants. The farm wage workers who worked directly for the landowner suffered the greatest unemployment as a result of the Act. There are few people gullible enough to believe that the acreage devoted to cotton can be reduced one-third without an accompanying decrease in the laborers engaged in its production. [16] Researchers concluded that the statistics after the Act took effect "indicate a consistent and widespread tendency for cotton croppers and, to a considerable extent, tenants to decrease in numbers between 1930 and 1935. The decreases among Negroes were consistently greater than those among whites." Another consequence was that the historic high levels of mobility from year to year declined sharply, as tenants and croppers tended to stay longer with the same landowner. [17]

According to researchers Frey and Smith, "To the extent that the AAA control-program has been responsible for the increased price [of cotton], we conclude that it has increased the amount of goods and services consumed by the cotton tenants and croppers area." Furthermore, the landowners typically let the tenants and croppers use the land taken out of cotton production for their own personal use in growing food and feed crops, which further increased their standard of living. Another consequence was that the historic high levels of turnover from year to year declined sharply, as tenants and croppers tend to stay with the same landowner. These researchers concluded, "As a rule, planters seem to prefer Negroes to whites as tenants and croppers." [17]

However, according to researcher Harold C. Hoffsommer, many landlords were concerned that aid given directly to tenant farmers would have a "demoralizing effect." An article appearing in the St. Louis Dispatch in 1935, quoted Hoffsommer's survey conducted for the Federal Emergency Relief Administration.

Tenant demoralization from relief had either one or both of two meanings to the landlord. In the first place, it might have been a fear that the tenant would escape from under his influence. It is probably not too much to say that the cropper system can only be maintained by the subordination of the tenant group. If the cropper were to become self-directing and take over his own affairs, the system would necessarily crumble. Hence anything that disrupts dependence is demoralizing. In the second place, the landlords were influenced by the belief that when members of any group are given privileges to which they are unaccustomed, they are likely in their inexperience to abuse them for a time. There can be no question that a considerable number of the sharecroppers reacted in this fashion, when under the Civil Works Administration, for example, they received more cash in a single week than they had been accustomed to receiving in an entire year. In their inexperience the money was spent foolishly and from this standpoint the outcome was demoralizing. [18] [ failed verification ]

Delta and Providence Cooperative Farms in Mississippi and the Southern Tenant Farmers Union were organized in the 1930s principally as a response to the hardships imposed on sharecroppers and tenant farmers. [19]

Although the Act stimulated American agriculture, it was not without its faults. For example, it disproportionately benefited large farmers and food processors, with lesser benefits to small farmers and sharecroppers. [20] With the spread of cotton-picking machinery after 1945, there was an exodus of small farmers and croppers to the city.

Thomas Amendment

Senator Elmer Thomas (left) with Claude M. Hurst and John Collier, members of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, and unassociated (directly) with the Thomas Amendment. Elmer Thomas, Claude M. Hirst, and John Collier.jpg
Senator Elmer Thomas (left) with Claude M. Hurst and John Collier, members of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, and unassociated (directly) with the Thomas Amendment.

Attached as Title III to the Act, the Thomas Amendment became the 'third horse' in the New Deal's farm relief bill. Drafted by Senator Elmer Thomas of Oklahoma, the amendment blended populist easy-money views with the theories of the New Economics. Thomas wanted a stabilized "honest dollar," one that would be fair to debtor and creditor alike. [21]

The Amendment said that whenever the President desired currency expansion, he must first authorize the Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve to purchase up to $3 billion of federal obligations. Should open market operations prove insufficient, the President had several options. He could have the U.S. Treasury issue up to $3 billion in greenbacks, reduce the gold content of the dollar by as much as 50 percent, or accept 100 million dollars in silver at a price not to exceed fifty cents per ounce in payment of World War I debts owed by European nations. [21]

The Thomas Amendment was used sparingly. The treasury received limited amounts of silver in payment for war debts from World War I. [21] On 21 December 1933, Roosevelt ratified the London Agreement on Silver (adopted at the World Economic and Monetary Conference in London on 20 July 1933). [22] At the same time, Roosevelt issued Proclamation 2067, ordering the United States mints to buy the entire domestic production of newly mined silver at 64.5¢ per ounce. [23] "Roosevelt's most dramatic use of the Thomas amendment" [21] came on 31 January 1934, when he decreased the gold content of the dollar to 15 5/21 grains (0.98741 grams) .900 fine gold, or 59.06 per cent of the previous fixed content (25 8/10 grains, or 1.6718 grams). [24] [25] "However, wholesale prices still continued to climb. Possibly the most significant expansion brought on by the Thomas Amendment may have been the growth of governmental power over monetary policy. [21]

The impact of this amendment was to reduce the amount of silver that was being held by private citizens (presumably as a hedge against inflation or collapse of the financial system) and increase the amount of circulating currency.

Ruled unconstitutional

On January 6, 1936, the Supreme Court decided in United States v. Butler that the act was unconstitutional for levying this tax on the processors only to have it paid back to the farmers. [13] Regulation of agriculture was deemed a state power. As such, the federal government could not force states to adopt the Agricultural Adjustment Act due to lack of jurisdiction. However, the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 remedied these technical issues and the farm program continued.

Ware Group

The following employees of the AAA were also alleged members of the Ware Group, named by Whittaker Chambers during subpoenaed testimony to HUAC on August 3, 1948: Harold Ware, John Abt, Lee Pressman, Alger Hiss, Donald Hiss, Nathan Witt, Henry Collins, Marion Bachrach (husband Howard Bachrach was also an AAA employee), John Herrmann, and Nathaniel Weyl.

See also

Footnotes

  1. 1 2 3 4 Rasmussen, Wayne D.; Baker, Gladys L.; Ward, James S. (March 1976). "A Short History of Agricultural Adjustment, 1933-75". Agriculture Information Bulletin, No. 391. Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture: 2. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  2. Agricultural Adjustment Act, Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  73–10, 48  Stat.   31, enacted May 12, 1933.
  3. Peters, Gerhard; Woolley, John T. "Franklin D. Roosevelt: "Statement on Signing the Farm Relief Bill" May 12, 1933". The American Presidency Project. University of California – Santa Barbara. Retrieved July 4, 2013.
  4. 1 2 Hurt, R. Douglas, Problems of Plenty: The American Farmer in the Twentieth Century, (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2002), 69.
  5. Harris Gaylord Warren, Herbert Hoover and the Great Depression (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 175.
  6. "The New Deal Farm Program". The Depression Begins: President Hoover Takes Command. Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  7. Gates, Staci L. 2006. "Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933." Federalism in American: An Encyclopedia.
  8. 1 2 Hurt, R. Douglas, Problems of Plenty: The American Farmer in the Twentieth Century, (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2002), 67.
  9. 1 2 3 Hurt, R. Douglas, Problems of Plenty: The American Farmer in the Twentieth Century, (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2002), 68.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Poppendieck, Janet (1986). Breadlines Knee Deep in Wheat: Food Assistance in the Great Depression. Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. pp. 1–306. ISBN   978-0813511214. OCLC   12132710.
  11. Powell, Jim (2003). FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression . New York: Crown Forum. pp.  134. ISBN   978-0761501657.
  12. Fleetwood, Jonathan (May 1993). "The Hog Reduction Program of the AAA". Illinois History. Archived from the original on 2015-01-03. Retrieved 5 December 2014.
  13. 1 2 Rasmussen, Wayne D., Gladys L. Baker, and James S. Ward, "A Short History of Agricultural Adjustment, 1933-75." Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 391 (March 1976), pg. 4.
  14. Badger, Anthony J (January 1, 1989). The New Deal. The Depression Years, 1933–1940. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee. pp. 147–89. ASIN   B00B8TO1SY.
  15. Folsom Jr., Burton (2008). New Deal or Raw Deal?. Simon and Schuster. p. 62.
  16. Fred C. Frey and T. Lynn Smith, "The Influence of the AAA Cotton Program Upon the Tenant, Cropper, and Laborer," Rural Sociology (1936) 1#4 pp. 483–505 at p 489 online
  17. 1 2 Fred C. Frey and T. Lynn Smith, "The Influence of the AAA Cotton Program Upon the Tenant, Cropper, and Laborer," Rural Sociology (1936) 1#4 pp. 483–505 at pp. 501–3 online
  18. Childs, Marquis W. (22 Nov 1935). "The St. Louis Dispatch". The St. Louis Dispatch. p. 16. Retrieved 6 Jan 2022.
  19. Smith, Fred C. (2004). "Cooperative Farming in Mississippi." Archived 2012-02-15 at the Wayback Machine Mississippi Historical Society.
  20. Hamilton, David. Agricultural Adjustment Act: An entry from Macmillan Reference USA's Encyclopedia of the Great Depression. s.v. "Sharecroppers". Vol. 1. Macmillan Reference USA.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 David Webb, "The Thomas Amendment: A Rural Oklahoma Response to the Great Depression," in Rural Oklahoma, ed. Donald E. Green (Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Historical Society Archived November 19, 2012, at the Wayback Machine , 1977).
  22. Roosevelt, Franklin D. (December 21, 1933). "Statement and Proclamation Ratifying the London Agreement on Silver - December 21, 1933". Internet Archive. National Archives and Records Administration. pp. 534–535.
  23. Roosevelt, Franklin D. (December 21, 1933). "Proclamation No. 2067: Accompanying the Preceding Statement - December 21, 1933". Internet Archive. National Archives and Records Administration. pp. 535–539.
  24. Roosevelt, Franklin D. (January 31, 1934). "White House Statement on Presidential Proclamation No. 2072: Fixing the Weight of the Gold Dollar - January 31, 1934". Internet Archive. National Archives and Records Administration. pp. 64–66.
  25. Roosevelt, Franklin D. (January 31, 1934). "Presidential Proclamation No. 2072: Fixing the Weight of the Gold Dollar - January 31, 1934". Internet Archive. National Archives and Records Administration. pp. 67–76.

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sharecropping</span> Use of land by a tenant in return for a share of the crops produced

Sharecropping is a legal arrangement with regard to agricultural land in which a landowner allows a tenant to use the land in return for a share of the crops produced on that land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Emergency Relief Administration</span> Program that was established by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933

The Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA) was a program established by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933, building on the Herbert Hoover administration's Emergency Relief and Construction Act. It was replaced in 1935 by the Works Progress Administration (WPA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of agriculture in the United States</span> Aspect of history in the United States

The history of agriculture in the United States covers the period from the first English settlers to the present day. In Colonial America, agriculture was the primary livelihood for 90% of the population, and most towns were shipping points for the export of agricultural products. Most farms were geared toward subsistence production for family use. The rapid growth of population and the expansion of the frontier opened up large numbers of new farms, and clearing the land was a major preoccupation of farmers. After 1800, cotton became the chief crop in southern plantations, and the chief American export. After 1840, industrialization and urbanization opened up lucrative domestic markets. The number of farms grew from 1.4 million in 1850, to 4.0 million in 1880, and 6.4 million in 1910; then started to fall, dropping to 5.6 million in 1950 and 2.2 million in 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act of 1936</span> United States federal law

The Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment ActPub. L.Tooltip Public Law  74–461, enacted February 29, 1936) is a United States federal law that allowed the government to pay farmers to reduce production so as to conserve soil and prevent erosion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rexford Tugwell</span> American economist, academic, and former governor of Puerto Rico

Rexford Guy Tugwell was an American economist who became part of Franklin D. Roosevelt's first "Brain Trust", a group of Columbia University academics who helped develop policy recommendations leading up to Roosevelt's New Deal. Tugwell served in FDR's administration until he was forced out in 1936. He was a specialist on planning and believed the government should have large-scale plans to move the economy out of the Great Depression because private businesses were too frozen in place to do the job. He helped design the New Deal farm program and the Resettlement Administration that moved subsistence farmers into small rented farms under close supervision. His ideas on suburban planning resulted in the construction of Greenbelt, Maryland, with low-cost rents for relief families. He was denounced by conservatives for advocating state-directed economic planning to overcome the Great Depression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McNary–Haugen Farm Relief Bill</span> Unsuccessful American bill

The McNary–Haugen Farm Relief Act, which never became law, was a controversial plan in the 1920s to subsidize American agriculture by raising the domestic prices of five crops. The plan was for the government to buy each crop and then store it or export it at a loss. It was co-authored by Charles L. McNary (R-Oregon) and Gilbert N. Haugen (R-Iowa). Despite attempts in 1924, 1926, 1927, and 1931 to pass the bill, it was vetoed by President Calvin Coolidge, and not approved. It was supported by Secretary of Agriculture Henry Cantwell Wallace and Vice President Charles Dawes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southern Tenant Farmers Union</span> Labor union organization

The Southern Tenant Farmers Union (STFU) (1934–1970) was founded as a civil farmer's union to organize tenant farmers in the Southern United States. Many such tenant farmer sharecroppers were Black descendants of former slaves.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Surplus Commodities Corporation</span>

The Federal Surplus Commodities Corporation was one of the so-called alphabet agencies set up in the United States during the 1930s as part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal. Created in 1933 as the Federal Surplus Relief Corporation, its name was changed by charter amendment on November 18, 1935. In 1937 its administration was placed within the United States Department of Agriculture. In 1940 it was combined with other USDA initiatives to form the Surplus Marketing Administration. It was abolished February 23, 1942, with the creation of the Agricultural Marketing Administration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States farm bill</span> Primary agricultural and food policy instrument of the federal government

In the United States, the farm bill is comprehensive omnibus bill that is the primary agricultural and food policy instrument of the federal government. Congress typically passes a new farm bill every five to six years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Peek</span>

George Nelson Peek was an American agricultural economist, business executive, and civil servant. He was the first administrator of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) and the first president of the two banks that would become the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Potato Control Law</span> Act of the US Congress

The Potato Control Law (1929) was based upon an economic policy enacted by U.S. President Herbert Hoover's Federal Emergency Relief Administration at the beginning of the Great Depression. The policy became a formal act in 1935, and its legislative sponsors were from the state of North Carolina. Hoover's presidential successor, Franklin D. Roosevelt, signed the Act into law on August 24, 1935.

The agricultural policy of the United States is composed primarily of the periodically renewed federal U.S. farm bills. The Farm Bills have a rich history which initially sought to provide income and price support to US farmers and prevent them from adverse global as well as local supply and demand shocks. This implied an elaborate subsidy program which supports domestic production by either direct payments or through price support measures. The former incentivizes farmers to grow certain crops which are eligible for such payments through environmentally conscientious practices of farming. The latter protects farmers from vagaries of price fluctuations by ensuring a minimum price and fulfilling their shortfalls in revenue upon a fall in price. Lately, there are other measures through which the government encourages crop insurance and pays part of the premium for such insurance against various unanticipated outcomes in agriculture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Deal</span> Economic programs of United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt

The New Deal was a series of programs, public work projects, financial reforms, and regulations enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States between 1933 and 1938. Major federal programs and agencies, including the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), the Works Progress Administration (WPA), the Civil Works Administration (CWA), the Farm Security Administration (FSA), the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 (NIRA) and the Social Security Administration (SSA), provided support for farmers, the unemployed, youth, and the elderly. The New Deal included new constraints and safeguards on the banking industry and efforts to re-inflate the economy after prices had fallen sharply. New Deal programs included both laws passed by Congress as well as presidential executive orders during the first term of the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frazier–Lemke Farm Bankruptcy Act</span> United States federal law

The Frazier–Lemke Farm Bankruptcy Act was an Act of Congress passed in the United States in 1934 that restricted the ability of banks to repossess farms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agricultural Adjustment Act Amendment of 1935</span> United States federal law

In United States federal agriculture legislation, the Agricultural Adjustment Act Amendment of 1935 made several important and lasting changes to the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933. Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Act into law on August 24, 1935.

A farm crisis describes times of agricultural recession, low crop prices and low farm incomes. The most recent US farm crisis occurred during the 1980s.

The doctrine of parity was used to justify agricultural price controls in the United States beginning in the 1920s. It was the belief that farming should be as profitable as it was between 1909 and 1914, an era of high food prices and farm prosperity. The doctrine sought to restore the "terms of trade" enjoyed by farmers in those years. It was highly controversial, since critics argued it ignored changes in agricultural productivity and set an artificial standard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First 100 days of Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency</span>

The first 100 days of Franklin D. Roosevelt's presidency began on March 4, 1933, the day Franklin D. Roosevelt was inaugurated as the 32nd president of the United States. He had signaled his intention to move with unprecedented speed to address the problems facing the nation in his inaugural address, declaring: "I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require." Roosevelt's specific priorities at the outset of his presidency were getting Americans back to work, protecting their savings and creating prosperity, providing relief for the sick and elderly, and getting industry and agriculture back on their feet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jennie B. Moton</span> American educator and clubwoman

Jennie B. Moton (1879-1942) was an American educator and clubwoman. As a special field agent for the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) in the 1930s and 40s, she worked to improve the lives of rural African Americans in the South. She directed the department of Women's Industries at the Tuskegee Institute, presided over the Tuskegee Woman's Club, and was a two-term president of the National Association of Colored Women (NACW).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, first and second terms</span> U.S. presidential administration from 1933 to 1941

The first term of the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt began on March 4, 1933, when he was inaugurated as the 32nd president of the United States, and the second term of his presidency ended on January 20, 1941, with his inauguration to a third term. Roosevelt, the Democratic governor of the largest state, New York, took office after defeating incumbent President Herbert Hoover, his Republican opponent in the 1932 presidential election. Roosevelt led the implementation of the New Deal, a series of programs designed to provide relief, recovery, and reform to Americans and the American economy during the Great Depression. He also presided over a realignment that made his New Deal Coalition of labor unions, big city machines, white ethnics, African Americans, and rural white Southerners dominant in national politics until the 1960s and defined modern American liberalism.