John Rutledge Supreme Court nominations

Last updated

Painting of Rutledge, circa 1788 John Rutledge color painting.jpg
Painting of Rutledge, circa 1788

John Rutledge was twice nominated by President George Washington to the Supreme Court of the United States, being nominated and confirmed in 1789 as an associate justice, and being unsuccessfully nominated in 1795 to serve as chief justice.

Contents

1789 nomination for associate justice

John Rutledge 1789 Supreme Court nomination
Nominee John Rutledge
Nominated by George Washington (president of the United States)
SucceedingAssociate judgeship established
Date nominatedSeptember 24, 1789
Date confirmedSeptember 24, 1789
OutcomeConfirmed by the U.S. Senate
Senate confirmation vote
ResultConfirmed by voice vote

On September 24, 1789, George Washington nominated Rutledge for one of the five associate justice positions on the newly established Supreme Court. His appointment (along with those of fellow associate justices John Blair Jr., William Cushing, Robert H. Harrison, and James Wilson; plus that of John Jay for chief justice) was confirmed by the Senate two days later by voice vote. [1] While he had accepted the associate judgeship, Rutledge had been hoping to be named the court's chief justice instead.[ citation needed ] Rutledge's service on the Court officially began February 15, 1790, when he took the judicial oath, and continued until March 5, 1791. [2] However, Rutledge would ultimately resign from this Supreme Court judgeship in 1791 before ever hearing a case in order to become chief justice of the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas and Sessions. [3] [4]

1795 nomination for chief justice

John Rutledge 1795 Supreme Court nomination
Nominee John Rutledge
Nominated by George Washington (president of the United States)
Succeeding John Jay (chief justice)
Date nominatedDecember 10, 1795
Date rejectedDecember 15, 1795
OutcomeRejected by the U.S. Senate
Senate confirmation vote
Votes in favor10
Votes against14
Not voting6
ResultRejected
Note: Rutledge was already serving as chief justice by recess appointment

In 1795, Rutlege was unsuccessfully nominated to the court to serve as chief justice, after having been first given a recess appointment by President Washington to the position in August 1795. On December 10, 1795, Washington nominated Rutlege to serve as chief justice permanently. The nomination ran into opposition due to speculation about his mental health and alcohol use. The nomination was rejected by the Senate in a 14–10 vote, the first instance in which the Senate rejected a Supreme Court nomination, and the only instance in the court's history in which a recess appointee was not permanently confirmed after the recess.

Recess appointment

On June 28, 1795, Chief Justice John Jay resigned after having been elected governor of New York. Rutlege wrote Washington that month offering to replace Jay as chief justice. President Washington selected Rutledge to succeed Jay as chief justice, and, as the Senate would not be meeting again until December, gave Rutledge a recess appointment so that he could serve as chief justice during the upcoming August session. He was commissioned as the second Chief Justice of the Supreme Court on June 30, 1795, [5] and took the judicial oath on August 12. [2] [6]

Nomination

President Washington formally nominated Rutlege on December 10, 1795, to a lifetime appointment as chief justice. However, by this time, Rutledge's reputation was in tatters, and support for his nomination had faded. Rumors of mental illness and alcohol abuse swirled around him, concocted largely by the Federalist press. His words and actions in response to the Jay Treaty (including an immensely controversial speech he delivered against the treaty on July 16, 1795) were used as evidence of his continued mental decline. [3] [7] A lot of the opposition to Rutledge spurred from his opposition to the Jay Treaty, meaning that his political views influenced opposition to his appointment. [8] [9]

The Senate rejected the nomination on December 15, 1795, by a vote of 14–10. This was the first time that the Senate had voted down a Supreme Court nomination. As of 2023; it remains the only U.S. Supreme Court recess appointment to be subsequently rejected by the Senate. [3] [10] All nine Democratic Republican Senators that cast a vote voted to confirm Rutledge, while all but one of the fifteen Federalist Senators that cast a vote voted against his confirmation. [11] This came despite the fact that the Federalist Party was the party more aligned with Washington's administration. [4]

December 15, 1795 Senate confirmation vote tally sheet John Rutledge 1795 Supreme Court nomination vote tally sheet.png
December 15, 1795 Senate confirmation vote tally sheet
Rutledge confirmation vote
December 15, 1795PartyTotal votes
Federalist Democratic-Republican
Yea1910
Nay14014
Result: Rejected
Roll call vote on the nomination
SenatorPartyStateVote
William Bingham F Pennsylvania Nay
Timothy Bloodworth DR North Carolina Yea
John Brown DR Kentucky Yea
Pierce Butler DR South Carolina Yea
William Bradford F Rhode Island Not voting
Aaron Burr DR New York Yea
George Cabot F Massachusetts Nay
Oliver Ellsworth F Connecticut Nay
Theodore Foster F Rhode Island Nay
Frederick Frelinghuysen F New Jersey Nay
James Gunn F Georgia Not voting
John Henry F Maryland Not voting
James Jackson DR Georgia Not voting
Rufus King F New York Nay
John Langdon DR New Hampshire Yea
Henry Latimer F Delaware Nay
Samuel Livermore F New Hampshire Nay
Humphrey Marshall F Kentucky Nay
Alexander Martin DR North Carolina Yea
Stevens Mason DR Virginia Yea
Elijah Paine F Vermont Nay
Richard Potts F Maryland Not voting
Jacob Read F South Carolina Yea
Moses Robinson DR Vermont Yea
James Ross F Pennsylvania Nay
John Rutherfurd F New Jersey Nay
Caleb Strong F Massachusetts Nay
Henry Tazewell DR Virginia Yea
Jonathan Trumbull Jr. F Connecticut Nay
John Vining F Delaware Not voting
Sources: [11] [12]

Aftermath

Soon after the Senate's rejection of his nomination to the Supreme Court, on December 26, 1795, Rutledge attempted suicide by jumping off a wharf into Charleston Harbor. [13] [5] [14] He was rescued by two slaves who saw him drowning. [15] Though the Senate remained in session through June 1, 1796, which would have been the automatic end of Rutledge's commission following the rejection, Rutledge resigned from the Court two days later, on December 28, 1795, having served the briefest tenure of any chief justice of the United States (138 days). [16] Afterward, he largely withdrew from public life and returned to live in Charleston, South Carolina. [17]

Regarding the Senate's rejection of Rutledge's nomination, Vice President John Adams wrote to his wife Abigail that it "gave me pain for an old friend, though I could not but think he deserved it. Chief Justices must not go to illegal Meetings and become popular orators in favor of Sedition, nor inflame the popular discontents which are ill founded, nor propagate Disunion, Division, Contention and delusion among the people." [18]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States</span> United States federal judge position

An associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States is any justice of the Supreme Court of the United States other than the chief justice of the United States. The number of associate justices is eight, as set by the Judiciary Act of 1869.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Justice of the United States</span> Chief judicial officer of the United States

The chief justice of the United States is the chief judge of the Supreme Court of the United States and is the highest-ranking officer of the U.S. federal judiciary. Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution grants plenary power to the president of the United States to nominate, and, with the advice and consent of the United States Senate, appoint "Judges of the Supreme Court", who serve until they die, resign, retire, or are impeached and convicted. The existence of a chief justice is only explicit in Article I, Section 3, Clause 6 which states that the chief justice shall preside on the impeachment trial of the president; this has occurred three times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unsuccessful nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest-ranking judicial body in the United States. Established by Article III of the Constitution, the detailed structure of the court was laid down by the 1st United States Congress in 1789. Congress specified the Court's original and appellate jurisdiction, created 13 judicial districts, and fixed the initial size of the Supreme Court. The number of justices on the Supreme Court changed six times before settling at the present total of nine in 1869. As of June of 2022, a total of 116 justices have served on the Supreme Court since 1789. Justices have life tenure, and so they serve until they die in office, resign or retire, or are impeached and removed from office.

In the United States, a recess appointment is an appointment by the president of a federal official when the U.S. Senate is in recess. Under the U.S. Constitution's Appointments Clause, the President is empowered to nominate, and with the advice and consent (confirmation) of the Senate, make appointments to high-level policy-making positions in federal departments, agencies, boards, and commissions, as well as to the federal judiciary. A recess appointment under Article II, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution is an alternative method of appointing officials that allows the temporary filling of offices during periods when the Senate is not in session. It was anticipated that the Senate would be away for months at a time, so the ability to fill vacancies in important positions when the Senate is in recess and unavailable to provide advice and consent was deemed essential to maintain government function, as described by Alexander Hamilton in No. 67 of The Federalist Papers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Cushing</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1790 to 1810

William Cushing was one of the original five associate justices of the United States Supreme Court; confirmed by the United States Senate on September 26, 1789, he served until his death. His Supreme Court tenure of 20 years and 11 months was the longest among the Court's inaugural members. In January 1796, he was nominated by President George Washington to become the Court's Chief Justice; though confirmed, he declined the appointment. He was the last judge in the United States to wear a full wig.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexander Wolcott</span> American politician (1758–1828)

Alexander Wolcott was a United States politician, customs inspector, and nominee to the Supreme Court of the United States. Nominated by James Madison in 1811, to replace the late William Cushing, he was rejected by the United States Senate by a vote of 9–24. He was later a delegate to the 1818 convention that drafted the Constitution of Connecticut.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jay Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court from 1789 to 1795

The Jay Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1789 to 1795, when John Jay served as the first Chief Justice of the United States. Jay served as Chief Justice until his resignation, at which point John Rutledge took office as a recess appointment. The Supreme Court was established in Article III of the United States Constitution, but the workings of the federal court system were largely laid out by the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established a six-member Supreme Court, composed of one Chief Justice and five Associate Justices. As the first President, George Washington was responsible for appointing the entire Supreme Court. The act also created thirteen judicial districts, along with district courts and circuit courts for each district.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ellsworth Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court from 1796 to 1800

The Ellsworth Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1796 to 1800, when Oliver Ellsworth served as the third Chief Justice of the United States. Ellsworth took office after the Senate refused to confirm the nomination of Chief Justice John Rutledge, who briefly served as a Chief Justice as a recess appointment. Ellsworth served as Chief Justice until his resignation, at which point John Marshall took office. With some exceptions, the Ellsworth Court was the last Supreme Court to use seriatim opinions.

In the history of the United States, there have been approximately 32 unsuccessful recess appointments to United States federal courts. 22 individuals have been appointed to a United States federal court through a recess appointment who were thereafter rejected by the United States Senate when their name was formally submitted in nomination, either by a vote rejecting the nominee, or by the failure of the Senate to act on the nomination. These individuals served as federal judges, having full authority to hold office and issue rulings, until their rejection by the Senate. Five individuals were appointed but resigned either before the Senate voted on their nomination, or before a formal nomination was even submitted. Another five individuals were appointed but never assumed the office.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Rutledge</span> Chief justice of the United States in 1795

John Rutledge was an American Founding Father, politician, and jurist who served as one of the original associate justices of the Supreme Court and the second chief justice of the United States. Additionally, he served as the first president of South Carolina and later as its first governor after the Declaration of Independence was signed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nomination and confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States</span> Political process

The nomination and confirmation of justices to the Supreme Court of the United States involves several steps, the framework for which is set forth in the United States Constitution. Specifically, Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, provides that the president of the United States nominates a justice and that the United States Senate provides advice and consent before the person is formally appointed to the Court. It also empowers a president to temporarily, under certain circumstances, fill a Supreme Court vacancy by means of a recess appointment. The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a justice, thus the president may nominate any individual to serve on the Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oliver Ellsworth</span> Chief justice of the United States from 1796 to 1800

Oliver Ellsworth was a Founding Father of the United States, attorney, jurist, politician, and diplomat. Ellsworth was a framer of the United States Constitution, United States senator from Connecticut, and the third chief justice of the United States. Additionally, he received 11 electoral votes in the 1796 presidential election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rutledge Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court in 1795

The Rutledge Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from June to December 1795, when John Rutledge served as the second Chief Justice of the United States. Rutledge took office as a recess appointment of President George Washington to succeed John Jay. However, Rutledge was denied confirmation by the United States Senate, partly due to his attacks on the Jay Treaty. Rutledge was succeeded in office by Oliver Ellsworth. This was the first time that the Senate rejected a Supreme Court nomination; it remains the only time a "recess appointed" justice was not subsequently confirmed by the Senate. Rutledge's tenure as Chief Justice lasted for only 138 days, and the court only decided two cases under his leadership.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sherman Minton Supreme Court nomination</span>

Sherman Minton was nominated to serve as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by U.S. President Harry S. Truman on September 14, 1949 after the death in office of Wiley Rutledge created a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Per the Constitution of the United States, Minton's nomination was subject to the advice and consent of the United States Senate, which holds the determinant power to confirm or reject nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court. The nomination was met with a mixed reception and faced active opposition stemming both from the belief that Minton would be a liberal justice and from his history as a New Deal-supporting member of the United States Senate. There was an unsuccessful effort to compel Minton to testify before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Nevertheless, the nomination was approved by a 48-16 vote of the United States Senate on October 4, 1949.

References

  1. "Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789". Washington, D.C.: United States Senate. Archived from the original on December 9, 2020. Retrieved August 31, 2018.
  2. 1 2 "Justices 1789 to Present". Washington, D.C.: Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original on April 15, 2010. Retrieved December 7, 2018.
  3. 1 2 3 "Chief Justice Nomination Rejected". Washington, D.C.: United States Senate. Retrieved March 8, 2022.
  4. 1 2 "Supreme Court Nomination Battles". Time. May 4, 2009. Retrieved April 16, 2022.
  5. 1 2 Fisher, Louis (September 5, 2005). "Recess Appointments of Federal Judges" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. pp. 14–15. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 17, 2020. Retrieved October 20, 2012.
  6. "CQ Supreme Court Collection". library.cqpress.com. Congressional Quarterly. Retrieved April 16, 2022.
  7. Independent Chronicle (Boston). August 13, 1795, reprinted in Marcus, Maeva, and Perry, James Russell. The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789–1800 Archived April 28, 2016, at the Wayback Machine p. 780
  8. "Supreme Court Nominations Not Confirmed, 1789 to the Present" (PDF). www.everycrsreport.com. Congressional Research Service. August 20, 2010. Retrieved April 16, 2023.
  9. Koziatek, Mike (March 31, 2022). "How often are U.S. Supreme Court nominees rejected by the Senate? Here's a list". MSN. Belleville News-Democrat. Retrieved April 16, 2022.
  10. Wermiel, Stephen (February 15, 2013). "SCOTUS for law students (sponsored by Bloomberg Law): Recess appointments and the Court". SCOTUSblog, Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original on January 17, 2018. Retrieved January 16, 2018.
  11. 1 2 Lewis, Jeffrey B.; Poole, Keith; Rosenthal, Howard; Boche, Adam; Rudkin, Aaron; Sonnet, Luke (2022). "4th Congress Senate Vote 18 (1795)". Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. Retrieved April 26, 2022.
  12. "Senate tally sheet on nomination of John Rutledge as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, December 15, 1795". Washington, D.C.: Records of the U.S. Senate, National Archives and Records Administration. Archived from the original on February 28, 2022. Retrieved March 5, 2022 via U.S. Capitol Visitor Center.
  13. Paxton, Sarah (October 9, 2018). "Top Ten Origins: Controversial SCOTUS Nominees". Origins.osu.edu. The Ohio State University. Retrieved April 16, 2022.
  14. Haw, James (1997). John & Edward Rutledge of South Carolina. University of Georgia Press. ISBN   978-0-8203-1859-2.
  15. "John Rutledge". Oyez . Archived from the original on October 21, 2017. Retrieved March 21, 2018.
  16. Flanders, Henry (1874). The Lives and Times of the Chief Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: J. B. Lippincott & Co. p. 642.
  17. "Sheriff's spokesman: Supreme Court Historical Society: John Rutledge". December 5, 2009. Archived from the original on December 2, 2009. Retrieved December 5, 2009.
  18. Maltese, John Anthony (April 24, 1998). The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees. JHU Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN   978-0-8018-5883-3.