This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 589 of the United States Reports :
| Case name | Docket no. | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| Thompson v. Hebdon | 19–122 | November 25,2019 |
| Rotkiske v. Klemm | 18–328 | December 10,2019 |
| The statute of limitations for private rights of action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act of 1977 begins to run when the violation occurs, not when the victim discovers it. | ||
| Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. | 18–801 | December 11,2019 |
| USPTO cannot recover the salaries of its legal personnel under section 145 of the Patent Act. | ||
| Retirement Plans Comm. v. Jander | 18–1165 | January 14,2020 |
| Case vacated and remanded for consideration of arguments made for the first time in the Supreme Court briefing. | ||
| Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC | 18–938 | January 14,2020 |
| An unreserved adjudication of a motion of relief from automatic stay by a bankruptcy court yields a final, appealable order. | ||
| Monasky v. Taglieri | 18–935 | February 25,2020 |
| A child's "habitual residence" under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction should be determined based on the totality of the circumstances specific to the case, and should not be based on categorial requirements (e.g. such as an agreement between the parents). | ||
| McKinney v. Arizona | 18–1109 | February 25,2020 |
| Rodriguez v. FDIC | 18–1269 | February 25,2020 |
| Hernández v. Mesa | 17–1678 | February 25,2020 |
| Bivens's holding does not extend to claims based on a cross-border shooting. | ||
| Roman Cath. Archdiocese v. Feliciano | 18–921 | February 25,2020 |
| A Puerto Rico trial court has no jurisdiction to issue payment and seizure orders after a pension benefits proceeding is removed to federal district court and before the proceeding is remanded back to the Puerto Rico court. | ||
| Shular v. United States | 18–6662 | February 26,2020 |
| The definition of "serious drug offense" in the Armed Career Criminal Act (18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A)(ii)) requires only that the state statute involve conduct specified in the federal statute; it does not require that the state offense match a generic offense crafted by a federal court. | ||
| Kansas v. Garcia | 17–834 | March 3,2020 |
| The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 neither expressly nor impliedly preempts Kansas's application of its state identity-theft and fraud statutes to the noncitizens in this case. | ||
| Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr | 18–876 | March 23,2020 |
| The statutory phrase "questions of law" includes the application of a legal standard to facts when those facts are undisputed. | ||
| Allen v. Cooper | 18–877 | March 23,2020 |
| Kahler v. Kansas | 18–6135 | March 23,2020 |
| The due process clause of the United States Constitution does not require states to adopt a definition of the insanity defense that turns on whether the defendant knew that their actions were morally wrong. | ||
| Comcast Corp. v. Nat'l Ass'n of African-Am. Owned Media | 18–1171 | March 23,2020 |
| A §1981 plaintiff bears the burden of showing that the plaintiff's race was a but-for cause of its injury, and that burden remains constant over the life of the lawsuit. | ||
| Davis v. United States | 19–5421 | March 23,2020 |
| CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co. | 18–565 | March 30,2020 |
| The plain language of the parties' safe-berth clause establishes a warranty of safety. | ||
| Kansas v. Glover | 18–556 | April 6,2020 |
| When the officer lacks information negating an inference that the owner is driving the vehicle, an investigative traffic stop made after running a vehicle’s license plate and learning that the registered owner’s driver’s license has been revoked is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. | ||
| Babb v. Wilkie | 18–882 | April 6,2020 |
| Section 633 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 permits federal employees to sue over any adverse personnel action that is influenced by age, even if age was not the determinating factor. | ||
| Republican Nat'l Comm. v. Democratic Nat'l Comm. | 19A1016 | April 6,2020 |