CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.

Last updated
CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 5, 2019
Decided March 30, 2020
Full case nameCITGO Asphalt Refining Company, et al., Petitioners v. Frescati Shipping Company, Ltd., et al.
Docket no. 18-565
Citations589 U.S. ___ ( more )
140 S. Ct. 1081; 206 L. Ed. 2d 391
Case history
Prior
  • In re Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd., No. 05-cv-00305, 2011 WL 1436878 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2011);
  • United States v. Citgo Asphalt Ref. Co., No. 08-cv-02898, 2011 WL 1379647 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2011);
  • Affirmed in part, vacated in part, 718 F.3d 184 (3d Cir. 2013);
  • Cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1197(2014);
  • No. 05-cv-00305, 2016 WL 4035994 (E.D. Pa. July 25, 2016);
  • Affirmed in part, reversed in part, 886 F.3d 291 (3d Cir. 2018);
  • Cert. granted, 139 S. Ct. 1599 (2019)
Holding
The plain language of the parties' safe-berth clause establishes a warranty of safety.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch  · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinions
MajoritySotomayor, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh
DissentThomas, joined by Alito

CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., 589 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the responsibility of costs of cleanup resulting from a 2004 oil spill on the Delaware River near Paulsboro, New Jersey from the result of a hull rupture. The ship's owner, the Frescati Shipping Company, was responsible for the costs of the cleanup, coming to more than US$143 million, but under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, believed that Citgo, who had ordered the shipment, bore responsibly for the shipping route through shallow waters that led to the spill. After years of litigation, the Supreme Court ruled in its 7–2 decision that the contract language established between Citgo and Frescati established that Citgo would provide safe berth for the vessel, and thus ultimately responsible for the spill. [1]

Contents

Case background

Athos1 0-NOAA.jpg
Athos2 1-NOAA.jpg
The Athos I (top) a day after its hull was ruptured in 2004, and oil spills still on the Delaware River (bottom) three days later

On November 26, 2004, the Athos I, a 750-foot (230 m) single-hull oil tanker carrying 13.3 million US gallons (50×10^6 L) of oil that had traveled from Venezuela was maneuvering to dock at a Citgo dock on the Delaware River near its refinery at Paulsboro. An anchor in the river's bed, known to have been there since at least 2001, caught on the ship's hull and tore a 6-foot (1.8 m) gash into it, releasing more than 260,000 US gallons (980,000 L) of oil into the river. [2] The spill spread downstream affecting the shoreline in more than three states (Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware), killing over 11,000 birds, temporarily shut down the Salem Nuclear Power Plant, and halted commercial use of the river for several weeks during cleanup efforts. [3] [4] At the time, it was considered the second worst oil spill in the United States following the Exxon Valdez oil spill, with cleanup costs over US$267 million. [5] The spill led to passage of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2006 which among provisions, tripled fines resulting from oil spills from single-hulled vessels to encourage double-hull use, as well as requiring those with knowledge of obstructions in waterways to inform the Coast Guard for immediate removal. [5]

The Athos I was under a time charter from the Frescati Shipping Co. to Star Tankers Inc. under a multi-year contract, while the specific transport from Venezuela to New Jersey was a standard voyage charter between Star Tanker and Citgo. Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, Frescati was considered to be the responsible party and was to pay for more than US$140 million in cleanup, though the Act limited Frescati's responsibility to about US$45 million, with the rest paid out of the government's Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, approximately US$87 million. The United States Coast Guard also bore some of the costs. [5]

As the Oil Pollution Act allows for recovery of cleanup funds from liable parties after the matter, Frescati and the United States Government filed suit against Citgo in 2011 to recover their costs, asserting it was their responsibility to make sure the area around their docks had safe berth for the vessel. [6] The anchor was found to be just within the 37 feet (11 m) safe berth clause in the Star-Citgo voyage charter. [7] Frescati sought to recover their US$45 million with the US$35 million interest in addition to US$10 million in costs to repair the Argos I. [5] Heard in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge John P. Fullam ruled in favor of Citgo, stating in his ruling that the ultimate responsible was on the party that left the anchor in the river, which was impossible to identify as any markings had long worn off from it. [5] Frescati appealed to the Third Circuit, which partially vacated the District Court's ruling. [8] The Third Circuit stated that the District Court had ignored the language of the contract law that still applied to the matter, and remanded the case back for review on this matter.

On review, District Judge Joel Slomsky (taking over for the retiring Judge Fullam) did affirm in his 2016 ruling that it was Citgo's responsibly to provide safe berth to the Athos I near its port under terms of the contract, and thus partially responsible for the cleanup spills, ordering Citgo to pay US$71.5 million (US$55.5 million and interest) to Frescati and US$48.6 million to the government. [9] Citgo appealed again to the Third Circuit, arguing on the terms that the safe berth passage was considered a duty of due diligence rather than an assurance of safe passage. The Third Circuit rejected Citgo's argument and upheld the ruling in 2018 and further found that Citgo should be held responsible for more of the government's sought damages, as it rejected Citgo's claim that removing the anchor was the Coast Guard's responsibility. [10] [11] [7] In their opinion, the Third Circuit stated that Citgo was attempting to argue for equitable relief in terms of splitting the costs for cleanup, but the case was about contractual relief under the terms of the charter contracts and the Oil Pollution Act. [7]

Supreme Court

Citgo petitioned to the Supreme Court on the question of the safe berth clause being an assurance of safe travel or duty of due diligence, as their case along with others from the Second and Fifth Circuits created a split decision. The Supreme Court accepted the writ of certiorari in April 2019. [12]

Oral arguments were heard on November 9, 2019. Reporters found the Justices mostly sided on a strict contract reading supporting the intention that the safe berth clause was to be read as an assurance of safe travel, as if Citgo wanted to use other less-strict language to reduce their liability, there was many other contract mechanisms available they could have used. [13]

The Court issued its decision on March 30, 2020, affirming the Third Circuit's decision. [1] In the 7-2 majority opinion, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that "We conclude that the language of the safe-berth clause here unambiguously establishes a warranty of safety", and thus Citgo was responsible for assuring the safe berth for the Athos I and the subsequent cleanup from the oil spill. [1] [14] Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion joined by Justice Samuel Alito, in which he wrote that the language of the safe berth clause was not clear that it implied a warranty, and that there should be an evaluation if this was considered a standard practice in the industry. [15]

Related Research Articles

<i>Exxon Valdez</i> oil spill 1989 industrial disaster in Alaska

The Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred in the Prince William Sound, Alaska, on March 24, 1989. Exxon Valdez, an oil supertanker owned by Exxon Shipping Company bound for Long Beach, California struck Prince William Sound's Bligh Reef, 6 mi (9.7 km) west of Tatitlek, Alaska at 12:04 a.m. and spilled 10.8 million US gallons (260,000 bbl) of crude oil over the next few days.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delaware River</span> Major river on the East Coast of the United States

The Delaware River is a major river in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. From the meeting of its branches in Hancock, New York, the river flows for 282 miles (454 km) along the borders of New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, before emptying into Delaware Bay. It is the longest free-flowing river in the Eastern United States.

<i>Exxon Valdez</i> Oil tanker

The Exxon Valdez was an oil tanker that gained notoriety after running aground in Prince William Sound, spilling its cargo of crude oil into the sea. On 24 March 1989, while owned by the former Exxon Shipping Company, captained by Joseph Hazelwood and First Mate James Kunkel, and bound for Long Beach, California, the vessel ran aground on the Bligh Reef, resulting in the second largest oil spill in United States history. The size of the spill is estimated to have been 40,900 to 120,000 m3. In 1989, the Exxon Valdez oil spill was listed as the 54th-largest spill in history.

The Incoterms or International Commercial Terms are a series of pre-defined commercial terms published by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) relating to international commercial law. Incoterms define the responsibilities of exporters and importers in the arrangement of shipments and the transfer of liability involved at various stages of the transaction. They are widely used in international commercial transactions or procurement processes and their use is encouraged by trade councils, courts and international lawyers. A series of three-letter trade terms related to common contractual sales practices, the Incoterms rules are intended primarily to clearly communicate the tasks, costs, and risks associated with the global or international transportation and delivery of goods. Incoterms inform sales contracts defining respective obligations, costs, and risks involved in the delivery of goods from the seller to the buyer, but they do not themselves conclude a contract, determine the price payable, currency or credit terms, govern contract law or define where title to goods transfers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oil Pollution Act of 1990</span> US federal law

The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) was passed by the 101st United States Congress and signed by President George H. W. Bush. It works to avoid oil spills from vessels and facilities by enforcing removal of spilled oil and assigning liability for the cost of cleanup and damage; requires specific operating procedures; defines responsible parties and financial liability; implements processes for measuring damages; specifies damages for which violators are liable; and establishes a fund for damages, cleanup, and removal costs. This statute has resulted in instrumental changes in the oil production, transportation, and distribution industries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Port of Philadelphia</span> Port in United States

The Port of Philadelphia is located on the Delaware River in Philadelphia in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania.

<i>New Carissa</i> 20th-century freighter

<i>Prestige</i> oil spill 2002 environmental disaster off the coast of Galicia, Spain

The Prestige oil spill occurred off the coast of Galicia, Spain in November 2002, caused by the sinking of the 26-year-old, structurally deficient oil tanker MV Prestige, carrying 77,000 tonnes of heavy fuel oil. During a storm, it burst a tank on 13 November, and French, Spanish, and Portuguese governments refused to allow the ship to dock. The vessel subsequently sank on 19 November, about 210 kilometres (130 mi) from the coast of Galicia. It is estimated that it spilled 60,000 tonnes or a volume of 67,000 m3 (17.8 million US gal) of heavy fuel oil.

O'Brien's Response Management is the largest oil spill management company in the United States

Oil tanker Ship that carries oil

An oil tanker, also known as a petroleum tanker, is a ship designed for the bulk transport of oil or its products. There are two basic types of oil tankers: crude tankers and product tankers. Crude tankers move large quantities of unrefined crude oil from its point of extraction to refineries. Product tankers, generally much smaller, are designed to move refined products from refineries to points near consuming markets.

Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court ruled in a 5-3 decision that the punitive damages awarded to the victims of the Exxon Valdez oil spill should be reduced from $2.5 billion to $500 million.

Admiralty law in the United States is a matter of federal law.

The civil and criminal proceedings stemming from the explosion of Deepwater Horizon and the resulting massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico began shortly after the April 20, 2010 incident and have continued since then. They have included an extensive claims settlement process for a guilty plea to criminal charges by BP, and an ongoing Clean Water Act lawsuit brought by the U.S. Department of Justice and other parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stringfellow Acid Pits</span> Superfund site

The Stringfellow Acid Pits are a toxic waste dump, and a Superfund site, located in Jurupa Valley, California, United States, just north of the neighborhood of Glen Avon. The site became the center of national news coverage in the early 1980s, in part because it was considered one of the most polluted sites in California, and because it became linked with mismanagement and scandal in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

<i>Rena</i> oil spill

The Rena oil spill occurred off the coast of Tauranga, New Zealand in October 2011. The spill was caused by the grounding of MV Rena on the Astrolabe Reef. The Rena was a container ship and cargo vessel owned by the Greek shipping company Costamare Inc., through one of its subsidiary companies Daina Shipping. The spill has been described as New Zealand's worst maritime environmental disaster.

The Port of Paulsboro is located on the Delaware River and Mantua Creek in and around Paulsboro, in Gloucester County, New Jersey, approximately 78 miles (126 km) from the Atlantic Ocean. Traditionally one of the nation's busiest for marine transfer operations, notably for crude oil and petroleum products, such as jet fuel and asphalt, it is a port of entry with several facilities within a foreign trade zone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penns Grove Secondary</span>

Penns Grove Secondary is a rail freight line in the Delaware Valley in the southwestern part of New Jersey. Part of Conrail's South Jersey/Philadelphia Shared Assets it runs for approximately 20 miles (32 km) between its it southern terminus at Penns Grove and Woodbury at the north where it joins the Vineland Secondary about 8.5 miles (13.7 km) south of Pavonia Yard in Camden. At its southern end the Deepwater Point Running Track continues another 3.7 miles (6 km) through Carneys Point to Deepwater.

MV <i>Wakashio</i> oil spill 2020 oil spillage event on the Mauritius coast arising from a grounded bulk carrier

The MV Wakashio oil spill occurred after the Japanese bulk carrier Wakashio ran aground on a coral reef on 25 July 2020 at around 16:00 UTC. The ship began to leak fuel oil in the following weeks, and broke apart in mid August. Although much of the oil on board Wakashio was pumped out before she broke in half, an estimated 1,000 tonnes of oil spilled into the ocean in what was called by some scientists the worst environmental disaster ever in Mauritius. Two weeks after the incident, the Mauritian government declared the incident a national emergency.

Guam v. United States, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with a dispute on fiscal responsibility for environmental and hazardous cleanup of the Ordot Dump created by the United States Navy on the island of Guam in the 1940s, which Guam then ran after becoming a territory in 1950 until the landfill's closure in 2011. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, Guam had filed its lawsuit to recover a portion of cleanup costs for the landfill from the United States government in a timely manner, allowing their case to proceed.

The Amazon Venture oil spill occurred at the port of Savannah on the Savannah River in the U.S. state of Georgia. The spill, which occurred from December 4 to 6, 1986, was caused by three defective valves in the piping system of the oil tanker MV Amazon Venture, which leaked approximately 500,000 US gallons of fuel oil into the river.

References

  1. 1 2 3 CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co.,No. 18-565 , 589 U.S. ___(2020).
  2. ↑ George, Jason (November 29, 2004). "Delaware River Oil Spill Leaves Wildlife Imperiled". The New York Times . Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  3. ↑ "Infographic: 10 Years After Delaware River Oil Spill". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. January 26, 2018. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  4. ↑ "When the Dynamics of an Oil Spill Shut Down a Nuclear Power Plant". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. November 19, 2014. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 "Citgo cleared of $177M cleanup of Delaware River in Paulsboro after 2004 oil spill". The Associated Press. March 15, 2011. Retrieved May 23, 2020– via NJ.com.
  6. ↑ Chinn, Hannah (April 3, 2020). "Citgo ruled liable for millions in Delaware River cleanup costs from 2004 oil spill". NPR . Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  7. 1 2 3 Kutner, Brad (March 29, 2018). "Third Circuit Says Citgo Must Pay Lion's Share for Spill Cleanup". Courthouse News. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  8. ↑ In re Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd., 718F.3d184 ( 3d Cir. 2013).
  9. ↑ Lloyd, Linda (September 7, 2016). "Judge makes $120M ruling against Citgo in massive 2004 Delaware River spill". The Philadelphia Inquirer . Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  10. ↑ In re Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd., 886F.3d291 (3d Cir.2018).
  11. ↑ Grzincic, Barbara (March 29, 2018). "3rd Circuit adds to Citgo's bill for 2004 oil spill near Philadelphia". Reuters . Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  12. ↑ Lessmiller, Kevin (April 22, 2019). "Supreme Court Takes Up Citgo Liability in Oil Spill". Courthouse News. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  13. ↑ Gimmer, Ellen M. (November 5, 2019). "CITGO's Bid to Avoid Oil Spill Liability Probed by Supreme Court". Bloomberg News . Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  14. ↑ Maykuth, Andrew (March 30, 2020). "Citgo must pay for a massive 2004 Delaware River oil spill, Supreme Court rules". The Philadelphia Inquirer . Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  15. ↑ Frazin, Rachel (March 30, 2020). "Supreme Court rules Citgo responsible for 2004 oil spill". The Hill . Retrieved May 23, 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.