This article is part of a series on the |
Politics of the United States |
---|
The United States circuit courts were the intermediate level courts of the United States federal court system from 1789 until 1912. They were established by the Judiciary Act of 1789, [1] and had trial court jurisdiction over civil suits of diversity jurisdiction and major federal crimes. They also had appellate jurisdiction over the United States district courts. [1] The Judiciary Act of 1891 (26 Stat. 826, also known as the Evarts Act) transferred their appellate jurisdiction to the newly created United States circuit courts of appeals, which are now known as the United States courts of appeals. On January 1, 1912, the effective date of the Judicial Code of 1911, the circuit courts were abolished, with their remaining trial court jurisdiction transferred to the U.S. district courts.
During the 100 years that the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court "rode circuit", many justices complained about the effort required. [2] Riding circuit took a great deal of time (about half of the year) and was both physically demanding and dangerous. However, "members of Congress held firm to the belief that circuit riding benefited the justices and the populace, and they turned a deaf ear to the corps of justices that desired to abolish the practice." [2]
The Judiciary Act of 1869 established a separate circuit court (and allowed the hiring of judges specifically to handle the cases) but the act required that Supreme Court justices had to ride circuit once every two years. However, this came to a final end in 1891 when the Circuit Courts of Appeals Act was passed. [2]
Although the federal judicial districts were grouped into circuits, the circuit courts convened separately in each district and were designated by the name of the district (for example, the "U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts"), not by the name or number of the circuit. The designation of circuits served only for the purpose of designating the districts in which a particular Supreme Court Justice, and later a circuit judge, would sit on the circuit court. The circuit court districts were usually, but not always, the same as the districts established for the district courts.
Congress had borrowed the general idea of circuit courts from England, but at their creation, the new United States circuit courts were "a unique institution, whose composition and jurisdiction did not resemble any prior court in England or America." [1] Each circuit court was composed initially of two Supreme Court justices and the district judge of the district, [1] although in 1793 Congress provided that a quorum of one justice and one district judge could hold court. After 1802, only one justice was assigned to each circuit, and a quorum could consist of a single justice or judge. This "circuit riding" arrangement meant that the Supreme Court justices spent the majority of the year traveling to each district within their circuit to conduct trials, and spent far less time assembled at the capital to hear appeals. The burden of circuit riding was somewhat alleviated by the appointment of circuit judges under the Circuit Judges Act of 1869, but was not abolished until the creation of the intermediate courts of appeals in 1891.
In 1801, Congress attempted for the first time in its history to relieve the Supreme Court justices of this burden by enacting the Judiciary Act of 1801, commonly known as the Midnight Judges Act, but that proved to be highly controversial as the Act took effect with only 19 days remaining in John Adams's Federalist administration. Before the oppositional Democratic-Republican administration of Thomas Jefferson took power, Adams took advantage of the Act to nominate several new federal judges expected to support the Federalist agenda. Although Jefferson also nominated a few judges, the Act was repealed after only one year because Jefferson feared the judiciary would become too powerful.
The same act also created the United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia, a "circuit court" for the District of Columbia. This court had the same original jurisdiction and powers as the United States circuit courts but, unlike those courts, it continued to have its own judges even after the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801, and also exercised appellate jurisdiction over justices of the peace and other "local" courts of the District. The District of Columbia was not enumerated among the federal "circuits" at the time. This court was abolished in 1863.
Since each circuit court was initially staffed by sharing judges between the U.S. Supreme Court and each federal district court, the district court clerk usually acted as the circuit court clerk. This arrangement persisted for many years in most federal judicial districts, even after Congress authorized the appointment of circuit judges in 1869 and allowed such judges to appoint a clerk without the concurrence of the district court judge. [3]
Although any district court judge could be authorized to act as a circuit judge, only fifty judges solely designated as circuit court judges were ever appointed. These can be broadly categorized into four groups:
Three circuit court judges, Samuel M. Blatchford, David Josiah Brewer, and William Burnham Woods, were later appointed to the Supreme Court.
Judge [4] | Circuit | Began service | Ended service | Appointed by |
---|---|---|---|---|
Richard Bassett | Third | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams |
Thomas Bee | Fifth | Declined | – | John Adams (as chief judge) [5] |
Egbert Benson | Second | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams (as chief judge) [6] |
Benjamin Bourne | First | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams |
Joseph Clay | Fifth | Declined | – | John Adams |
William Griffith | Third | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams |
Dominic Hall | Fifth | July 1, 1801 Recess | July 1, 1802 | Thomas Jefferson |
Edward Harris | Fifth | May 3, 1802 | July 1, 1802 | Thomas Jefferson |
Samuel Hitchcock | Second | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams |
Jared Ingersoll | Third | Declined | – | John Adams (as chief judge) [6] |
Philip Key | Fourth | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams (as chief judge) [7] |
Charles Lee | Fourth | Declined | – | John Adams (as chief judge) [6] |
John Lowell | First | February 20, 1801 | May 6, 1802 | John Adams (as chief judge) [6] |
Charles Magill | Fourth | March 3, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams |
William McClung | Sixth | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams |
Henry Potter | Fifth | May 9, 1801 Recess | April 7, 1802 | Thomas Jefferson |
John Sitgreaves | Fifth | Declined | – | John Adams |
Jeremiah Smith | First | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams |
George Taylor | Fourth | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams |
William Tilghman | Third | March 3, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams (as chief judge) [8] |
Oliver Wolcott | Second | February 20, 1801 | July 1, 1802 | John Adams |
Judge | Circuit | Began service | Ended service | Appointed by |
---|---|---|---|---|
William Cranch | D.C. | February 28, 1801 | February 24, 1806 | John Adams |
February 24, 1806 | September 1, 1855 | Thomas Jefferson (as chief judge) [note 1] | ||
Allen Duckett | D.C. | March 17, 1806 | July 19, 1809 | Thomas Jefferson |
James Dunlop | D.C. | October 3, 1845 Recess | November 27, 1855 | James Polk |
November 27, 1855 Recess | March 3, 1863 | Franklin Pierce (as chief judge) [note 1] | ||
Nicholas Fitzhugh | D.C. | November 25, 1803 | December 31, 1814 | Thomas Jefferson |
Thomas Johnson | D.C. | Declined | – | John Adams (as chief judge) [9] |
William Kilty | D.C. | March 23, 1801 Recess | January 27, 1806 | Thomas Jefferson (as chief judge) |
James Marshall | D.C. | March 3, 1801 | November 16, 1803 | John Adams |
William Merrick | D.C. | December 14, 1855 | March 3, 1863 | Franklin Pierce |
James Morsell | D.C. | January 11, 1815 | March 3, 1863 | James Madison |
Buckner Thruston | D.C. | December 14, 1809 | August 30, 1845 | James Madison |
Judge | Circuit | Began service | Ended service | Appointed by |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marcus Acheson | Third | February 3, 1891 | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | Benjamin Harrison |
John Baxter | Sixth | December 13, 1877 | April 2, 1886 | Rutherford Hayes |
Samuel Blatchford | Second | March 4, 1878 | March 22, 1882 | Rutherford Hayes |
Hugh Bond | Fourth | July 13, 1870 | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | Ulysses Grant |
David Brewer | Eighth | March 31, 1884 | December 18, 1889 | Chester Arthur |
Henry Caldwell | Eighth | March 4, 1890 | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | Benjamin Harrison |
LeBaron Colt | First | July 5, 1884 | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | Chester Arthur |
John Dillon | Eighth | December 22, 1869 | September 1, 1879 | Ulysses Grant |
Thomas Drummond | Seventh | December 22, 1869 | July 18, 1884 | Ulysses Grant |
Halmer Emmons | Sixth | January 17, 1870 | May 14, 1877 | Ulysses Grant |
Walter Gresham | Seventh | October 28, 1884 Recess | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | Chester Arthur |
Howell Jackson | Sixth | April 12, 1886 | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | Grover Cleveland |
Alexander Johnson | Second | October 25, 1875 Recess | January 26, 1878 | Ulysses Grant |
Emile Lacombe | Second | May 26, 1887 Recess | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | Grover Cleveland |
John Lowell | First | December 18, 1878 | May 1, 1884 | Rutherford Hayes |
George McCrary | Eighth | December 9, 1879 | March 18, 1884 | Rutherford Hayes |
William McKennan | Third | December 22, 1869 | January 3, 1891 | Ulysses Grant |
Don Pardee | Fifth | May 13, 1881 | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | James Garfield |
Lorenzo Sawyer | Ninth | January 10, 1870 | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | Ulysses Grant |
George Shepley | First | December 22, 1869 | July 20, 1878 | Ulysses Grant |
William Wallace | Second | April 16, 1882 | June 16, 1891 [note 2] | Chester Arthur |
Lewis Woodruff | Second | December 22, 1869 | September 10, 1875 | Ulysses Grant |
William Woods | Fifth | December 22, 1869 | December 23, 1880 | Ulysses Grant |
Judge | Circuit | Began service | Ended service | Appointed by |
---|---|---|---|---|
Matthew McAllister | California | March 3, 1855 | January 12, 1863 | Franklin Pierce |
The United States courts of appeals are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal judiciary. The courts of appeals are divided into 11 numbered circuits that cover geographic areas of the United States and hear appeals from the U.S. district courts within their borders, the District of Columbia Circuit, which covers only Washington, D.C., and the Federal Circuit, which hears appeals from federal courts across the United States in cases involving certain specialized areas of law. The courts of appeals also hear appeals from some administrative agency decisions and rulemaking, with by far the largest share of these cases heard by the D.C. Circuit. Appeals from decisions of the courts of appeals can be taken to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee is the federal district court covering the western part of the state of Tennessee. Appeals from the Western District of Tennessee are taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is a United States court of appeals that has special appellate jurisdiction over certain types of specialized cases in the U.S. federal court system. It has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal cases involving patents, trademarks, government contracts, veterans' benefits, public safety officers' benefits, Federal employees' benefits, and various other categories. Unlike other federal courts, the Federal Circuit has no jurisdiction over cases involving criminal, bankruptcy, immigration, or U.S. state law.
The Midnight Judges Act represented an effort to solve an issue in the U.S. Supreme Court during the early 19th century. There was concern, beginning in 1789, about the system that required the Justices of the Supreme Court to "ride circuit" and reiterate decisions made in the appellate level courts. The Supreme Court Justices had often expressed concern and suggested that the judges of the Supreme and circuit courts be divided. The Act was repealed by Congress on January 22, 1802.
The federal judiciary of the United States is one of the three branches of the federal government of the United States organized under the United States Constitution and laws of the federal government. The U.S. federal judiciary consists primarily of the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts. It also includes a variety of other lesser federal tribunals.
In the United States, circuit riding was the practice of a judge, sometimes referred to as a circuit rider, traveling to a judicial district to preside over court cases there. A defining feature of American federal courts for over a century after the founding of the United States, circuit riding has since been mostly abolished. The term, however, lives on in the name "circuit court", a colloquialism commonly used to refer to the United States courts of appeals.
The Judiciary Act of 1869, formally An Act to amend the Judicial System of the United States and sometimes called the Circuit Judges Act of 1869, provided that the Supreme Court of the United States would consist of the chief justice of the United States and eight associate justices, established separate judgeships for the U.S. circuit courts, and for the first time included a provision allowing federal judges to retire without losing their salary. This is the most recent legislation altering the size of the Supreme Court. The Act was signed by President Ulysses S. Grant.
The Judiciary Act of 1891, also known as the Evarts Act after its primary sponsor, Senator William M. Evarts, created the United States courts of appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. Therefore, it is also called the Circuit Courts of Appeals Act.
The Judiciary Act of 1802 was a Federal statute, enacted on April 29, 1802, to reorganize the federal court system. It restored some elements of the Judiciary Act of 1801, which had been adopted by the Federalist majority in the previous Congress but then repealed by the Democratic-Republican majority earlier in 1802.
Stuart v. Laird, 5 U.S. 299 (1803), was a case decided by United States Supreme Court notably a week after its famous decision in Marbury v. Madison.
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee is the federal trial court for most of Middle Tennessee. Based at the Estes Kefauver Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Nashville, it was created in 1839 when Congress added a third district to the state. Tennessee—along with Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan—is located within the area covered by United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and appeals are taken to that court.
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee is the federal court in the Sixth Circuit whose jurisdiction covers most of East Tennessee and a portion of Middle Tennessee. The court has jurisdiction over 41 counties with 4 divisions. Based in Knoxville, Tennessee, it maintains branch facilities in Chattanooga, Tennessee; Greeneville, Tennessee; and Winchester, Tennessee.
The Government of Guam (GovGuam) is a presidential representative democratic system, whereby the president is the head of state and the governor is head of government, and of a multi-party system. Guam is an organized, unincorporated territory of the United States with policy relations between Guam and the US under the jurisdiction of the Office of Insular Affairs.
The United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia was a United States federal court which existed from 1801 to 1863. The court was created by the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801.
United States v. More, 7 U.S. 159 (1805), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it had no jurisdiction to hear appeals from criminal cases in the circuit courts by writs of error. Relying on the Exceptions Clause, More held that Congress's enumerated grants of appellate jurisdiction to the Court operated as an exercise of Congress's power to eliminate all other forms of appellate jurisdiction.
A certificate of division was a source of appellate jurisdiction from the circuit courts to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1802 to 1911. Created by the Judiciary Act of 1802, the certification procedure was available only where the circuit court sat with a full panel of two: both the resident district judge and the circuit-riding Supreme Court justice. As Chief Justice John Marshall wrote, he did not have "the privilege of dividing the court when alone."