2020 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

Last updated

Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down fourteen per curiam opinions during its 2020 term, which began October 5, 2020 and concluded October 3, 2021. [1]

Contents

Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All justices on the Court at the time the decision was handed down are assumed to have participated and concurred unless otherwise noted.

Court membership

Chief Justice: John Roberts

Associate Justices: Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett (confirmed Oct. 26, 2020)

Mckesson v. Doe

Full caption:DeRay Mckesson v. John Doe
Citations:592 U.S. ___
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Justia

592 U.S. ___
Decided November 2, 2020.
Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded.

Thomas dissented without separate opinion. Barrett did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case.

Taylor v. Riojas

Full caption:Trent Michael Taylor v. Robert Riojas, et al.
Citations:592 U.S. ___
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Cornell

592 U.S. ___
Decided November 2, 2020.
Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded.

Thomas dissented without separate opinion. Alito filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Barrett did not participate in the consideration or decision of the case.

Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo

Full caption:Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor Of New York
Citations:592 U.S. ___
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Oyez

592 U.S. ___
Decided November 25, 2020.
Application for injunctive relief granted.

The Court ordered New York State enjoined from enforcing Executive Order 202.68 with respect to religious groups, pending appeals.

Consolidated with Agudath Israel of America, et al. v. Cuomo. Gorsuch and Kavanaugh filed concurrences. Roberts filed a dissent. Breyer filed a dissent, joined by Sotomayor and Kagan. Sotomayor filed a dissent, joined by Kagan.

Shinn v. Kayer

Full caption:David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. George Russell Kayer
Citations:592 U.S. ___
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Oyez

592 U.S. ___
Decided December 14, 2020.
Ninth Circuit vacated and remanded.

Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissented without separate opinion.

Trump v. New York

Full caption:Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. State of New York, et al.
Citations:592 U.S. ___
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Oyez

592 U.S. ___
Argued November 30, 2020.
Decided December 18, 2020.
District Court for the Southern District of New York vacated and remanded with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Breyer filed a dissent, joined by Sotomayor and Kagan.

Mays v. Hines

Full caption:Tony Mays, Warden v. Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines
Citations:592 U.S. ___
Prior history:Petition denied, Hines v. Carpenter, No. 05–00002 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 16, 2015); rev'd, sub nom. Hines v. Mays , 814 Fed. Appx. 898 (6th Cir. 2020)
Laws applied: U.S. Const. amend. VI
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Cornell

592 U.S. ___
Decided March 29, 2021.
Sixth Circuit reversed.

Sotomayor dissented without separate opinion.

Tandon v. Newsom

Full caption:Ritesh Tandon, et al. v. Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, et al.
Citations:593 U.S. ___
Prior history:Injunction denied, 2021 WL 1185157 (9th Cir. 2021)
Laws applied: U.S. Const. amend. I
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Findlaw

593 U.S. ___
Decided April 9, 2021.
Application for injunctive relief granted.

Roberts noted without separate opinion that he would deny the application. Kagan filed a dissent, joined by Breyer and Sotomayor.

Alaska v. Wright

Full caption:Alaska v. Sean Wright
Citations:593 U.S. ___
Prior history:Petition denied, D. Alaska rev'd, 819 Fed. Appx. 544 (9th Cir. 2020)
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Cornell

593 U.S. ___
Decided April 26, 2021.
Ninth Circuit vacated and remanded.

Lombardo v. St. Louis

Full caption:Jody Lombardo, et al. v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.
Citations:594 U.S. ___
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Cornell

594 U.S. ___
Decided June 28, 2021.
Eighth Circuit vacated and remanded.

Alito filed a dissent, joined by Thomas and Gorsuch.

Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco

Full caption:Peyman Pakdel, et ux. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al.
Citations:594 U.S. ___
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Cornell

594 U.S. ___
Decided June 28, 2021.
Ninth Circuit vacated and remanded.

Dunn v. Reeves

Full caption:Jefferson S. Dunn, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections v. Matthew Reeves
Citations:594 U.S. ___
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Cornell

594 U.S. ___
Decided July 2, 2021.
Eleventh Circuit reversed and remanded.

Breyer dissented without separate opinion. Sotomayor filed a dissent, joined by Kagan.

Alabama Assn. of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Servs.

Full caption:Alabama Association of Realtors, et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
Citations:594 U.S. ___
----
Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion  · Findlaw

594 U.S. ___
Decided August 26, 2021.
In March 2020, Congress passed the CARES Act, which was designed to provide various forms of aid to people impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. One provision of the Act was a 120-day moratorium on evictions from properties that participated in federal assistance programs or were subject to federally backed loans. When the moratorium expired in July, Congress chose not to renew it statutorily. Instead, the Director of the CDC administratively imposed a new moratorium that barred evictions from all properties and levied criminal penalties on property owners that violated it. The administrative moratorium was originally scheduled to expire on December 31, 2020, but as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Congress renewed it until January 31, 2021. Before the new statutory deadline passed, the CDC moved again to administratively extend it - first through March, then through June, and finally through July 2021.

In May of 2021, the Alabama Association of Realtors sued, alleging that the CDC lacked the authority to extend the moratorium. The District Court granted summary judgement in favor of the realtors, but stayed its order pending appeal. The realtors appealed the stay in June, and the Supreme Court declined to vacate it. Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett noted that they would have vacated the stay, while Justice Kavanaugh wrote that due to the moratorium expiring in only a few weeks, he voted to allow the stay to continue, but that "clear and specific congressional authorization" would be required for the CDC to extend the moratorium beyond July 31. On August 3, 2021, the CDC Director imposed a new moratorium. The realtors returned to court to seek vacatur of the stay. The District Court noted that the four dissenting votes in addition to Justice Kavanaugh's statement meant that the realtors were now likely to succeed on the merits if the case proceeded to the Supreme Court. However, the District Court concluded that its hands were tied by the precedent against vacating the stay. The realtors again appealed to the Supreme Court, which vacated the stay and ended the eviction moratorium.

Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. In it, he argued that the realtors were not as likely to succeed on the merits as the majority claimed, and thus the moratorium should have been stayed while litigation proceeded.

See also

Notes

  1. The descriptions of two opinions have been omitted:
    • In Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer and White Sales, Inc., 592 U.S. ___ (2021), the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.
    • In Republic of Hungary v. Simon, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), the Court vacated the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's judgment and remanded for further proceedings consistent with Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp , 592 U.S. ___ (2021), which was handed down the same day.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2008 term, which began on October 6, 2008 and concluded October 4, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down ten per curiam opinions during its 2010 term, which began October 4, 2010 and concluded October 1, 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span> 2011 decisions of the US supreme court

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down fourteen per curiam opinions during its 2011 term, which began October 3, 2011 and concluded September 30, 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down six per curiam opinions during its 2012 term, which began October 1, 2012 and concluded October 6, 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2013 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down eight per curiam opinions during its 2013 term, which began October 7, 2013 and concluded October 5, 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2016 term, which began October 3, 2016 and concluded October 1, 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down seven per curiam opinions during its 2018 term, which began October 1, 2018, and concluded October 6, 2019.

June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a Louisiana state law placing hospital-admission requirements on abortion clinics doctors was unconstitutional. The law mirrored a Texas state law that the Court found unconstitutional in 2016 in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (WWH).

American Legion v. American Humanist Association, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the separation of church and state related to maintaining the Peace Cross, a World War I memorial shaped after a Latin cross, on government-owned land, though initially built in 1925 with private funds on private lands. The case was a consolidation of two petitions to the court, that of The American Legion who built the cross, and of the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission who own the land and maintain the memorial. Both petitions challenged the Fourth Circuit's ruling that, regardless of the secular purpose the cross was built for in honoring the deceased soldiers, the cross emboldened a religious symbol and had ordered it altered or razed. The Supreme Court reversed the Fourth Circuit's ruling in a 7–2 decision, determining that since the Cross had stood for decades without controversy, it did not violate the Establishment Clause and could remain standing.

Garza v. Idaho, 586 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 738 (2019), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the presumption of prejudice for Sixth Amendment purposes applies regardless of whether a defendant has waived the right to appeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2019 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down ten per curiam opinions during its 2019 term, which began October 7, 2019 and concluded October 4, 2020.

Barr v. American Assn. of Political Consultants, Inc., 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the use of robocalls made to cell phones, a practice that had been banned by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA), but which exemptions had been made by a 2015 amendment for government debt collection. The case was brought by the American Association of Political Consultants, an industry trade group, and others that desired to use robocalls to make political ads, challenging the exemption unconstitutionally favored debt collection speech over political speech. The Supreme Court, in a complex plurality decision, ruled on July 6, 2020, that the 2015 amendment to the TCPA did unconstitutionally favor debt collection speech over political speech and violated the First Amendment.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving eminent domain and labor relations. In its decision, the Court held that a regulation made pursuant to the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act that required agricultural employers to allow labor organizers to regularly access their property for the purposes of union recruitment constituted a per se taking under the Fifth Amendment. Consequently, the regulation may not be enforced unless “just compensation” is provided to the employers.

United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the Appointments Clause of the United States Constitution as it related to patent judges on the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In a complex decision, the Court ruled that these judges were considered "primary officers" under the Appointments Clause, normally subject to appointment through the US President and the US Senate, but to remedy the matter, the Court ruled that the constitutional issue is resolved by allowing the PTAB decisions to be subject to review by the appropriately-appointed Director of the Patent Office.

Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the classification of Alaska Native corporations (ANCs) for purposes of receiving funds set-aside for tribal governments under the CARES Act. In a 6–3 decision issued in June 2021, the Court ruled that ANCs were considered to be "Indian tribes" and were eligible to receive the set-aside funds.

TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Court case dealing with standing under Article III of the Constitution related to class-action suits against private defendants. In a 5–4 decision, the Court ruled that only those that can show concrete harm have standing to seek damages against private defendants.

United States v. Zubaydah, 595 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the state secrets privilege.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2021 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down eight per curiam opinions during its 2021 term, which began October 4, 2021 and concluded October 2, 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2023 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States has so far handed down multiple per curiam opinions during its 2023 term, which began October 2, 2023, and will conclude October 6, 2024.

References