Montgomery v. Louisiana

Last updated
Montgomery v. Louisiana
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Argued October 13, 2015
Decided January 25, 2016
Full case nameHenry Montgomery, Petitioner v. Louisiana
Docket no. 14-280
Citations577 U.S. ___ ( more )
136 S. Ct. 718; 193 L. Ed. 2d 599
Argument Oral argument
Case history
Priorannulling verdict, 181 So. 2d 756 (1966), affirming life sentence, 242 So.2d 818 (1970), denying motion to correct illegal sentence, 141 So.3d 264 (2014).
Subsequentvacating sentence and remanding, 194 So.3d 606 (2016).
Holding
Miller's prohibition on life in prison without the possibility of parole for juvenile homicide offenders is a substantive rule that must be applied retroactively.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia  · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
DissentScalia, joined by Thomas, Alito
DissentThomas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. VIII

Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U.S. 190 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that its previous ruling in Miller v. Alabama (2012), [1] that a mandatory life sentence without parole should not apply to persons convicted of murder committed as juveniles, should be applied retroactively. This decision potentially affects up to 2,300 cases nationwide.

Contents

This case is one in a series since 2005 that have mitigated the harshness of sentencing of juveniles and persons who committed crimes as juveniles. It is based in part on scientific evidence showing that juvenile brains are not equivalent to those of adults.

Background

Issue

In Roper v. Simmons (2005), the Supreme Court of the United States by a 5–4 vote established that the death penalty for children under 18 was unconstitutional. In Graham v. Florida (2010), the Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to impose mandatory life sentence without parole on prisoners who committed non-murder crimes as juveniles.

Two years later, in Miller v. Alabama (2012), the Court by a 5–4 vote decided that mandatory life sentence without parole should not apply to persons who committed the crime as juveniles. [2] [3]

Petitioner

Henry Montgomery was 17 years old on November 13, 1963, when he shot and killed police officer Charles Hurt, a sheriff's deputy, in East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [ excessive citations ] A jury convicted Montgomery of murder and sentenced him to death in February 1964 but, in January 1966, the divided Louisiana Supreme Court annulled that verdict, finding he had not received a fair trial due to public prejudice. [13] [14] [15] In October 1966, Montgomery escaped from the parish jail and was rearrested two hours later. [16]

In February 1969, a jury again convicted Montgomery of murder, triggering an automatic sentence of life in prison without parole, which was affirmed by the Louisiana Supreme Court in November 1970, over the dissent of Justice Mack Barham. [16]

Montgomery became a model member of the prison community, serving as a coach on the prison boxing team, working in the prison's silk-screen program, and offering advice to younger prisoners. [17] After the U.S. Supreme Court decided Miller v. Alabama, Montgomery made a motion to correct an illegal sentence, which, in June 2014, was denied by the Louisiana Supreme Court, over the dissent of Chief Justice Bernette Joshua Johnson. [18]

Supreme Court of the United States

In September 2014, Montgomery filed a petition for a writ of certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court, which was granted. [19] Seventy-five minutes of oral arguments were heard on October 13, 2015, with attorneys appearing for the prisoner and the state as well as an amicus curiae appointed by the Court, arguing against the Court's jurisdiction, and the U.S. Deputy Solicitor General, arguing as a friend of the prisoner. [20]

Opinion of the Court

On January 25, 2016, the Supreme Court delivered judgment in favor of the prisoner, by a vote of 6–3. [17] Writing for the Court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, along with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, applied the Miller v. Alabama rule retroactively, holding that prisoners previously given automatic life sentences with no chance of parole for crimes committed as juveniles must have their cases reviewed for re-sentencing or be considered for parole. [21]

The Court first found that it had jurisdiction over Louisiana's prisoner because the rule governing retroactivity is constitutional, not statutory. [21] Next, Justice Kennedy wrote that "prisoners like Montgomery must be given the opportunity to show their crime did not reflect irreparable corruption; and if it did not, their hope for some years of life outside prison walls must be restored." [22] Applying the presumption from Teague v. Lane (1989) that a new rule is not retroactive on collateral review unless it is substantive or "watershed", Kennedy said the decision was founded on substantive grounds, based "on the diminished culpability of all juvenile offenders, who are, he said, immature, susceptible to peer pressure and capable of change. [21] Very few, he said, are incorrigible. But he added that as a general matter the punishment was out of bounds." [17]

Dissents

Justice Antonin Scalia, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented. [21] Criticizing the majority's "sleight of hand", Scalia wrote that Kennedy had twisted the language in the Miller decision to make it sound categorical when it merely required a new sentencing procedure. [21] Scalia also stated that it would be very difficult for judges and juries to decide whether defendants were incorrigible decades after they were originally sentenced. [22]

Justice Thomas filed another dissenting opinion, alone, stating that the majority's decision "repudiates established principles of finality". [23]

Subsequent developments

On June 28, 2016, the Louisiana Supreme Court vacated Montgomery's life sentence and remanded for resentencing in a per curiam decision, with Justice Scott Crichton additionally concurring. [24] In February 2017, Montgomery, now 70 years old, remained a prisoner at the Louisiana State Penitentiary in Angola. [25] In February 2018 and April 2019, Montgomery had parole hearings, and was denied both times. [26] [27] On November 17, 2021, the Louisiana Board of Pardons and Parole granted parole to Montgomery by a unanimous vote of 3–0. Following the vote, Montgomery was freed from prison and released. [28] His release was opposed by some of Hurt's family members, however, two of Hurt's daughters had met with Montgomery in prison and forgiven him. [29]

In March 2020, the Supreme Court certified a related case, Jones v. Mississippi , involving a person who had killed his grandfather when he was 15 in 2004 and given the mandatory sentence of life without parole. Due to the reactive rulings in Miller and Montgomery, Jones was given a rehearing but was still resentenced to life in prison, and appealed, claiming the court did not evaluate any aspect of his incorrigibility as required under Montgomery. Oral hearings were held on November 3, 2020. [30] [31] [32] [33] [ excessive citations ]

See also

Related Research Articles

Life imprisonment is any sentence of imprisonment for a crime under which convicted criminals are to remain in prison for the rest of their lives or indefinitely until pardoned, paroled, or otherwise commuted to a fixed term. Crimes that warrant life imprisonment are usually violent and/or dangerous. Examples of crimes that result in life sentences are murder, torture, terrorism, child abuse resulting in death, rape, espionage, treason, drug trafficking, drug possession, human trafficking, severe fraud and financial crimes, aggravated criminal damage, arson, kidnapping, burglary, and robbery, piracy, aircraft hijacking, and genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, severe cases of child pornography, or any three felonies in case of three-strikes law.

Measure 11, also known as "One Strike You're Out", was a citizens' initiative passed in 1994 in the U.S. State of Oregon. This statutory enactment established mandatory minimum sentencing for several crimes. The measure was approved in the November 8, 1994 general election with 788,695 votes in favor, and 412,816 votes against.

Lee Boyd Malvo, also known as John Lee Malvo, is a convicted murderer who, along with John Allen Muhammad, committed a series of murders dubbed the D.C. sniper attacks over a three-week period in October 2002. Malvo was aged 17 during the span of the shootings. Currently, he is serving multiple life sentences at Red Onion State Prison in Virginia, a supermax prison. Muhammad was executed in 2009.

Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that it is unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under the age of 18. The 5–4 decision overruled Stanford v. Kentucky, in which the court had upheld execution of offenders at or above age 16, and overturned statutes in 25 states.

Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause allowed a state to impose a life sentence without the possibility of parole for the possession of 672 grams (23.70 oz) of cocaine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gary Tyler</span>

Gary Tyler, from St. Rose, Louisiana, is an African-American man who is a former prisoner at the Louisiana State Prison in Angola, Louisiana. He was convicted of the October 7, 1974 shooting death of a white 13-year-old boy and the wounding of another, on a day of violent protests by whites against black students at Destrehan High School in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana. He was tried as an adult and convicted of first-degree murder at age 17 by an all-white jury; he received the mandatory death sentence for that crime, according to state law. When he entered Louisiana State Prison (Angola), he was the youngest person on death row.

On January 27, 2001, Dartmouth College professors Half and Susanne Zantop, aged 62 and 55 respectively, were stabbed to death at their home in Etna, New Hampshire. Originally from Germany, the couple had been teaching at Dartmouth since the 1970s. High school classmates James J. Parker, age 16, and Robert W. Tulloch, age 17, were charged with first-degree murder.

The Richland High School shooting was a school shooting that occurred on Wednesday, November 15, 1995, in Lynnville, Tennessee, a small community located in Giles County. Seventeen-year-old James Ellison "Jamie" Rouse, a senior student at the school, killed one teacher and one student, and seriously wounded another teacher.

In the United States, life imprisonment is amongst the most severe punishments provided by law, depending on the state, and second only to the death penalty. According to a 2013 study, 1 of every 20,000 inhabitants of the U.S. were imprisoned for life as of 2012. Many U.S. states can release a convict on parole after a decade or more has passed, but in California, people sentenced to life imprisonment can normally apply for parole after seven years. The laws in the United States categorize life sentences as "determinate life sentences" or "indeterminate life sentences," the latter indicating the possibility of an abridged sentence, usually through the process of parole. For example, sentences of "15 years to life," "25 years to life," or "life with mercy" are called "indeterminate life sentences", while a sentence of "life without the possibility of parole" or "life with no mercy" is called a "determinate life sentence". The potential for parole is not assured but discretionary, making it an indeterminate sentence. Even if a sentence explicitly denies the possibility of parole, government officials may have the power to grant an amnesty to reprieve, or to commute a sentence to time served.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal sentencing in the United States</span> Overview of criminal sentencing in the United States

In the United States, sentencing law varies by jurisdiction. The jurisdictions in the US legal system are federal, state, regional, and county. Each jurisdictional entity has governmental bodies that create common, statutory, and regulatory law, although some legal issues are handled more often at the federal level, while other issues are the domain of the states. Civil rights, immigration, interstate commerce, and constitutional issues are subject to federal jurisdiction. Issues such as domestic relations, which includes domestic violence; marriage and divorce; corporations; property; contracts; and criminal laws are generally governed by states, unless there is federal preemption.

Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that juvenile offenders cannot be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for non-homicide offenses.

The murder of Cassie Jo Stoddart took place in Pocatello, Idaho on September 22, 2006, when Cassie Jo Stoddart, a student at Pocatello High School, was stabbed to death by classmates Brian Lee Draper and Torey Michael Adamcik. Both perpetrators received sentences of life imprisonment without parole on August 21, 2007.

Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders. The ruling applied even to those persons who had committed murder as a juvenile, extending beyond Graham v. Florida (2010), which had ruled juvenile life without parole sentences unconstitutional for crimes excluding murder.

Kristina Joy Fetters was an Iowa woman who was convicted of the murder of her 73-year-old great-aunt, Arlene Klehm, on October 25, 1994, when she was 14 years old. At age 15, Fetters became the youngest woman in Iowa sentenced to life in prison without parole on December 18, 1995. Following the 2012 Supreme Court decision of Miller v. Alabama, which declared mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders to be unconstitutional, Fetters became the first inmate in Iowa to be re-sentenced in November 2013. The following month, she was recommended for compassionate parole due to a prognosis of inoperable stage-four breast cancer, and she was released to a hospice care center in Des Moines, Iowa in December 2013. She succumbed to her cancer in July 2014, at age 34.

The Equal Justice Initiative (EJI) is a non-profit organization, based in Montgomery, Alabama, that provides legal representation to prisoners who may have been wrongly convicted of crimes, poor prisoners without effective representation, and others who may have been denied a fair trial. It guarantees the defense of anyone in Alabama in a death penalty case.

Jones v. Mississippi, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the imposition of life sentences for juveniles. The Supreme Court had previously ruled in Miller v. Alabama in 2012 that mandatory life sentences without parole for juvenile offenders was considered cruel and unusual punishment outside of extreme cases of permanent incorrigibility, and made this decision retroactive in Montgomery v. Louisiana in 2016. In Jones, a juvenile offender who was 15 at the time of his offense, challenged his life sentence following Montgomery but was denied by the state. In a 6–3 decision with all six conservative justices upholding the life sentence without parole for Jones, the Court ruled that the states have discretionary ability to hold juvenile offenders to life sentences without parole without having to make a separate assessment of their incorrigibility.

The Louisiana Parole Project, also known as The Parole Project, is a non-profit organization dedicated to parole, probation, and sentencing reform in the United States. The project advocates through parole and clemency petitions and assists formerly incarcerated people as they reenter society.

Sumner v. Shuman, 483 U.S. 66 (1987), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a mandatory death penalty for a prison inmate who is convicted of murder while serving a life sentence without possibility of parole is unconstitutional. The decision in this case was a significant development in the Court's capital punishment jurisprudence, further clarifying the limits on the application of the death penalty in the United States.

References

  1. Miller v. Alabama , 567 U.S. 460 (2012).
  2. Savage, David G. (June 25, 2012). "Supreme Court rules mandatory juvenile life without parole cruel and unusual". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 18, 2017.
  3. The Supreme Court, 2011 Term — Leading Cases, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 276 (2012).
  4. "Parole Hearing for Inmate Convicted in 1963 Slaying of Louisiana Sheriff's Deputy Delayed". Officer.com. December 14, 2017.
  5. Segura, Liliana (June 2, 2019). "Henry Montgomery Paved the Way for Other Juvenile Lifers to Go Free. Now 72, He May Never Get The Same Chance". The Intercept.
  6. Santana, Rebecca (April 12, 2019). "Board denies parole for inmate in landmark juvenile case". 4wwl. The Associated Press.
  7. Toohey, Grace (April 11, 2019). "After 55 years in prison, Baton Rouge man key to Supreme Court ruling again denied freedom". nola.com. theadvocate.com.
  8. Santana, Rebecca (April 11, 2019). "Inmate at center of landmark juvenile case loses parole bid". The Daily Herald. The Associated Press.
  9. Reckdahl, Katy (October 11, 2015). "Split-Second Flash of a Gun Still Resonates 52 Years Later". The Center for Public Integrity.
  10. Reckdahl, Katy (October 11, 2015). "Man Jailed 50 Years for Murder Is at Center of Supreme Court Hearing on Youth Life Sentences". jjie.org.
  11. Khan, Naureen (October 15, 2015). "After 52 years in prison, SCOTUS may help set Henry Montgomery Free". Aljazeera America. The Associated Press.
  12. Dahlia Lithwick (October 14, 2015). "Is Life Retroactive? He was sentenced to life without parole at 17. Fifty years later, the Supreme Court weighs setting him free". Slate.
  13. State v. Montgomery, 181 So. 2d 756, 248 La. 713 (1966).
  14. "Henry Montgomery, at center of juvenile life debate, is free". wric.com. November 17, 2021.
  15. "Will Supreme Court Decision be Death Knell for Juvenile Life without Parole? | Casetext".
  16. 1 2 State v. Montgomery, 242 So. 2d 818, 257 La. 461 (1970).
  17. 1 2 3 Adam Liptak (January 26, 2016). "Justices Expand Parole Rights for Juveniles Sentenced to Life for Murder". The New York Times . p. A18. Retrieved April 18, 2017.
  18. State v. Montgomery, 141 So. 3d 264 (La. 2014).
  19. "Montgomery v. Louisiana". SCOTUSblog . Retrieved January 25, 2016.
  20. "Montgomery v. Louisiana". IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 The Supreme Court, 2015 Term — Leading Cases, 130 Harv. L. Rev. 377 (2016).
  22. 1 2 Sherman, Mark (January 25, 2016). "Justices Extend Bar on Automatic Life Terms for Teenagers". ABC News. Associated Press.
  23. "Supreme Court rules in major Eighth Amendment sentencing case". Yahoo! News. January 26, 2016.
  24. State v. Montgomery, 194 So. 3d 606 (La. 2016).
  25. Berman, Douglas A. (February 3, 2017). "Sentencing Law and Policy: Lamenting that Henry Montgomery (and many other juve LWOPers) may not much or any benefit from Montgomery". Sentencing Law and Policy Blog. Retrieved April 18, 2017.
  26. Toohey, Grace (February 19, 2018). "Board denies parole to man who served more than 50 years after killing deputy when he was juvenile". The Advocate. Retrieved June 2, 2019.
  27. Segura, Liliana (June 2, 2019). "Henry Montgomery Paved the Way for Other Juvenile Lifers to Go Free. Now 72, He May Never Get the Same Chance". The Intercept. Retrieved June 2, 2019.
  28. Santana, Rebecca (November 17, 2021). "Henry Montgomery, at center of juvenile life debate, is free". Associated Press . Retrieved November 19, 2021.
  29. "An inmate whose story was key to the debate over juvenile life sentences gets parole". NPR . November 17, 2021. Retrieved November 19, 2021.
  30. Liptak, Adam (March 9, 2020). "Supreme Court to Consider When Juveniles May Get Life Without Parole". The New York Times . Retrieved November 3, 2020.
  31. Liptak, Adam (March 9, 2020). "Supreme Court to Consider When Juveniles May Get Life Without Parole". The New York Times.
  32. "Jones v. Mississippi". Cornell Law School. 29 October 2020.
  33. Rizer, Arthur (November 3, 2020). "It's immoral to sentence a teenager to life in prison". Las Vegas Sun.