Madison v. Alabama

Last updated

Madison v. Alabama
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 2, 2018
Decided February 27, 2019
Full case nameVernon Madison, Petitioner v. Alabama
Docket no. 17-7505
Citations586 U.S. ___ ( more )
139 S. Ct. 718; 203 L. Ed. 2d 103
Case history
PriorPetition denied, sub nom. Madison v. Commissioner, Ala. Dept. of Corrections; rev'd in part, remanded, 677 F.3d 1333 (11th Cir. 2012); cert. denied, sub nom. Thomas v. Madison, 568 U.S. 1019(2012); petition denied, sub nom. Madison v. Commissioner, Ala. Dept. of Corrections; aff'd, 761 F.3d 1240 (11th Cir. 2014); cert. denied, sub nom. Madison v. Thomas, 135 S. St. 1562 (2015); rehearing denied, 135 S. Ct. 2346 (2015); petition denied, S.D. Ala., May 10, 2016; rev'd, 851 F.3d 1173 (11th Cir. 2017); reversed sub. nom., Dunn v. Madison, 138 S. Ct. 9 (2017); remanded, 879 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2018); cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 1172 (2018).
Holding
The Eighth Amendment may permit executing a prisoner even if he or she cannot remember committing his or her crime, but it may prohibit executing a prisoner who suffers from dementia or another disorder, rather than psychotic delusions.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch  · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinions
MajorityKagan, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
DissentAlito, joined by Thomas, Gorsuch
Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. VIII

Madison v. Alabama, 586 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, barring cruel and unusual punishment. The case deals with whether the Eighth Amendment prohibits executing a person for a crime they do not remember.

Contents

Background

Vernon Madison (August 22, 1950 – February 22, 2020) [1] shot police officer Julius Schulte twice in the back of the head in Mobile, Alabama in April 1985. Schulte was mediating a domestic disturbance between Madison and his ex-girlfriend; Madison also shot and injured her. Madison was an inmate at Holman Correctional Facility from September 1985 up until his death on February 22, 2020 [2] [3] [4] [5]

Three trials were held, as the convictions from the first two were overturned: the first because prosecutors unconstitutionally excluded black people from the jury and the second because they introduced evidence improperly. In the third trial, the jury decided on a sentence of life in prison, but the judge Ferrill McRae [6] overruled them and gave Madison a sentence of death in 1994. [2] [4]

The execution was scheduled to occur in May 2016; the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a stay on the day of the execution, which the Supreme Court upheld 5-3 (at the time, one seat on the nine-member court was empty owing to Justice Antonin Scalia's death 3 months prior). [4] [7] [8]

In Dunn v. Madison , in November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned a 2-1 decision by the 11th Circuit, which had stopped the execution on the basis that Madison "does not rationally understand the connection between his crime and his execution". [9] The Circuit Court was overruling a state court decision that had denied Madison's petition on the basis that Supreme Court precedent only barred execution if he lacked "understanding he is being executed as punishment for a crime". [7] [10] The Supreme Court did not rule on the merits of the case, but ruled that the Circuit Court overstepped its authority under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, which set the standard for which federal courts can overturn a lower court's decision. [10]

The execution was scheduled for January 2018; the Supreme Court granted a stay 30 minutes before Madison was scheduled to be executed, with Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting. [2] [3] [4] [7]

Madison's health

Madison had severe strokes in 2015 and 2016, resulting in vascular dementia and leaving him unable to remember killing officer Schulte. [4] [7] [11] Prior to his death, he was blind and had suffered a severe mental decline; he only remembered the alphabet up to the letter G and had slurred speech. The strokes caused physical damage as well, leaving him incontinent and unable to walk without a walker. [12] However, according to the psychologist appointed by Alabama courts seeking his execution, he understood that he would be executed and the reason for that. [4] [7]

Precedent

In Ford v. Wainwright , [13] the Supreme Court held in 1986 that executing the insane is not allowed due to the Eighth Amendment, and in Panetti v. Quarterman , [14] they held in 2007 that to be sentenced to death, an inmate must understand "the meaning and purpose of" his death sentence. [11] [15]

Case

The Supreme Court decided to hear the case in February 2018. [4] Oral arguments were held on October 2, 2018. [5] [15] At oral argument, Alabama Deputy Attorney General Thomas Govan surprised some observers as well as Justices by agreeing with defense counsel Bryan Stevenson that dementia could be a form of incapacitation sufficient to meet the Ford and Panetti standards prohibiting the execution of some incapacitated inmates. [6] Govan argued only that Madison's condition did not meet those tests because he still had the cognitive ability to understand why he was being executed, even if he could not recall the crime. [6] Stevenson argued that Madison was disabled beyond solely memory loss and thus his execution would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. [6]

Decision

In a 5-3 opinion, authored by Justice Kagan, the Court held that the Eighth Amendment may permit executing a prisoner even if he or she cannot remember committing his or her crime, but it may prohibit executing a prisoner who suffers from dementia or another disorder, rather than psychotic delusions. The Court held that if a prisoner is unable to rationally understand the reasons for his sentence, the Eighth Amendment forbids his execution. [16]

Justice Alito in dissent, joined by Justice Thomas and Justice Gorsuch, would not have reached this question, stating that Madison presented only the first question (whether a state can execute a prisoner who cannot remember committing his crime) in his petition.

The Court remanded the case for the lower court to determine whether Madison was able to rationally understand the reasons for his sentence.

On Saturday, February 22, 2020, Vernon Madison died at the age of 69. He was never executed. Officials did not cite a cause of death, but they did say that foul play was unlikely. News reports said shortly after his death that results of an autopsy were pending. [17]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in the United States</span>

In the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty in 27 states, throughout the country at the federal level, and in American Samoa. It is also a legal penalty for some military offenses. Capital punishment has been abolished in 23 states and in the federal capital, Washington, D.C. It is usually applied for only the most serious crimes, such as aggravated murder. Although it is a legal penalty in 27 states, 19 of them have authority to execute death sentences, with the other 8, as well as the federal government and military, subject to moratoriums.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment by the United States federal government</span> Legal penalty in the United States

Capital punishment is a legal punishment under the criminal justice system of the United States federal government. It is the most serious punishment that could be imposed under federal law. The serious crimes that warrant this punishment include treason, espionage, murder, large-scale drug trafficking, or attempted murder of a witness, juror, or court officer in certain cases.

Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6–3 that executing people with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but that states can define who has an intellectual disability. At the time Atkins was decided, 18 of the 38 death penalty states exempted mentally disabled offenders from the death penalty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Texas</span>

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Texas for murder, and participation in a felony resulting in death if committed by an individual who has attained or is over the age of 18.

Wrongful execution is a miscarriage of justice occurring when an innocent person is put to death by capital punishment. Opponents of capital punishment often cite cases of wrongful execution as arguments, while proponents argue that innocence concerns the credibility of the justice system as a whole and does not solely undermine the use of the death penalty.

Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, ruling that criminal defendants sentenced to death may not be executed if they do not understand the reason for their imminent execution, and that once the state has set an execution date death-row inmates may litigate their competency to be executed in habeas corpus proceedings. This decision reaffirmed the Court's prior holdings in Ford v. Wainwright, and Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal.

Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the common law rule that the insane cannot be executed; therefore the petitioner is entitled to a competency evaluation and to an evidentiary hearing in court on the question of their competency to be executed.

In the United States criminal justice system, a competency evaluation is an assessment of the ability of a defendant to understand and rationally participate in a court process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Alabama</span>

Capital punishment in Alabama is a legal penalty. Alabama has the highest per capita capital sentencing rate in the United States. In some years, its courts impose more death sentences than Texas, a state that has a population five times as large. However, Texas has a higher rate of executions both in absolute terms and per capita.

Wilkerson v. Utah, 99 U.S. 130 (1879), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court affirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah in stating that execution by firing squad, as prescribed by the Utah territorial statute, was not cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) is a non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C., that focuses on disseminating studies and reports related to the death penalty. Founded in 1990, DPIC is primarily focused on the application of capital punishment in the United States.

Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court Case that held that the Eighth and the Fourteenth Amendments do not require mandatory appellate review of death penalty cases and that individuals cannot file cases as a next friend unless there is a prior relationship to the appellant and unless the appellant is "unable to litigate his own cause due to mental incapacity, lack of access to court, or other similar disability".

Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 5–4, that lethal injections using midazolam to kill prisoners convicted of capital crimes do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court found that condemned prisoners can only challenge their method of execution after providing a known and available alternative method.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doyle Hamm</span> American convicted murderer and botched execution survivor

Doyle Lee Hamm was an American death row inmate in Alabama, who was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1987 murder of Patrick Cunningham, whom he killed while committing a robbery. While on death row, Hamm developed lymphatic cancer, which made it difficult to impossible to achieve the venous access necessary to administer the drugs used in lethal injections. Despite months of warning by Hamm's attorney and human rights observers and a decades' long legal battle, the Alabama Department of Corrections attempted to execute Hamm on February 22, 2018. The unsuccessful execution attempt lasted nearly three hours and drew international attention. In March 2018, Hamm and the state of Alabama reached a confidential settlement, the terms of which precluded a second execution attempt, giving Hamm a de facto sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole, although his sentence was not formally commuted. Hamm remained in prison until his death from cancer-related complications in 2021.

Dunn v. Ray, 586 U.S. ___ (2019), was a February 2019 United States Supreme Court case related to religious freedom. The case attracted media attention in early February 2019.

Bucklew v. Precythe, 587 U.S. 119 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the standards for challenging methods of capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that when a convict sentenced to death challenges the State's method of execution due to claims of excessive pain, the convict must show that other alternative methods of execution exist and clearly demonstrate they would cause less pain than the state-determined one. The Court's opinion emphasized the precedential force of its prior decisions in Baze v. Rees and Glossip v. Gross.

Capital punishment remains a legal penalty for multiple crimes in The Gambia. However, the country has taken recent steps towards abolishing the death penalty.

Nance v. Ward, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to death row inmates' as-applied challenges to methods of execution.

Nelson v. Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court considering whether a prisoner's appeal of proposed execution procedures was equivalent to a habeas corpus petition. The court held unanimously that an appeal of proposed execution procedures is different from a habeas corpus petition because it is not an appeal of a conviction or sentence.

References

  1. ↑ "Alabama Department of Corrections". doc.state.al.us. Archived from the original on October 24, 2012.
  2. 1 2 3 Almasy, Steve; Mayra, Cuevas (January 26, 2018). "Supreme Court stays execution of Alabama inmate who lawyers say is not competent". CNN. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  3. 1 2 Palmer, Evan (February 27, 2018). "Inmate who spent 30 years on death row may be spared execution—as he can't remember carrying out the crime". Newsweek. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Liptak, Adam (March 5, 2018). "Too Old to Be Executed? Supreme Court Considers an Aging Death Row". The New York Times. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  5. 1 2 Epps, Garrett (September 18, 2018). "The Machinery of Death Is Back on the Docket". The Atlantic. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Bravin, Jess (October 2, 2018). "Supreme Court Grapples With Planned Execution of Convicted Killer With Dementia". WSJ. Retrieved December 3, 2018.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 "Supreme Court to hear case where man can't remember killing". Associated Press. February 26, 2018. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  8. ↑ Stein, Kelsey (May 13, 2016). "What's next for Alabama death row inmate Vernon Madison after execution was stayed?". AL.com. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  9. ↑ Madison v. Commissioner, Ala. Dept. of Corrections, 851 F.3d 1173 (11th Cir. 2017); reversed sub. nom., Dunn v. Madison, 138 S. Ct. 9 (2017).
  10. 1 2 Barnes, Robert (November 6, 2017). "Supreme Court won't stop execution of man who can't remember murder". Washington Post. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  11. 1 2 "Justices consider whether a man with dementia may be put to death". The Economist. October 6, 2018. Retrieved October 6, 2018.
  12. ↑ "Vernon Madison, Alabama Death Row Prisoner with Dementia, Has Died". Equal Justice Initiative (EJI). February 24, 2020. Retrieved March 18, 2020.
  13. ↑ Ford v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399 (1986).
  14. ↑ Panetti v. Quarterman , 551 U.S. 930 (2007).
  15. 1 2 Howe, Amy (October 2, 2018). "Argument analysis: A narrow victory possible for death-row inmate with dementia?". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  16. ↑ "Madison v. Alabama". Oyez. Retrieved June 2, 2020.
  17. ↑ Hrynkiw, Ivana (February 24, 2020). "Vernon Madison, One of the Longest-Serving Alabama Death Row Inmates, Dies". AL.com. Advance Local Media LLC. Retrieved March 18, 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.