Godfrey v. Georgia

Last updated

Godfrey v. Georgia
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 20, 1980
Decided May 19, 1980
Full case nameRobert Franklin Godfrey v. The State of Georgia
Citations446 U.S. 420 ( more )
100 S. Ct. 1759; 64 L. Ed. 2d 398
Holding
The Court reversed the judgment insofar as it leaves standing the death sentences, and the case was remanded.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr.  · Potter Stewart
Byron White  · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun  · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist  · John P. Stevens
Case opinions
PluralityStewart, joined by Blackmun, Powell, Stevens
ConcurrenceMarshall, joined by Brennan
DissentBurger
DissentWhite, joined by Rehnquist
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. VIII, XIV

Godfrey v. Georgia, 446 U.S. 420 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a death sentence could not be granted for a murder when the only aggravating factor was that the murder was found to be "outrageously or wantonly vile."

Contents

The Court reversed and remanded the Georgia death penalty sentence because, under Furman v. Georgia , such a factor did not help sentencing judges or juries avoid arbitrary and capricious infliction of the death penalty.

Background

Robert Franklin Godfrey was a Georgia death row inmate. He was sentenced to death for the murders of his estranged wife Mildred and her mother, Chessie Wilkerson, [1] which he committed on September 20, 1977.

After threatening his estranged wife of 28 years, Mildred Godfrey, with a knife and tearing her clothes during a drunken argument on September 5, Mildred left their house, secured a warrant against Godfrey charging him with aggravated assault, and officially filed for divorce, after which she moved into her mother's home. Godfrey and Mildred were scheduled to attend a court hearing regarding the divorce petition on September 22. Two days prior, September 20, Mildred confirmed in a phone call with Godfrey that she would never reconcile with him. Godfrey, believing his mother-in-law was responsible for his estranged wife's rejection of his offers to reconcile, went to the home where they were staying alongside the 11-year-old daughter Godfrey and Mildred shared. Godfrey shot Mildred through a window with a shotgun, killing her instantly, and then entered the home, beat his and Mildred's daughter with the barrel of his shotgun when she attempted to run for help, and instantly killed his mother-in-law, Chessie Wilkerson, by shooting her as well. [2] [3]

Subsequently, Polk County courts charged Godfrey with two counts of first-degree murder and one count of aggravated assault. Despite pleading not guilty by reason of temporary insanity, Godfrey's jury convicted him of all three counts on March 9, 1978. During the sentencing phase of his trial (which took place before the same jurors), the prosecutor stated that Godfrey's case did not contain allegations of "torture" or of an "aggravated battery," after which the trial judge provided the jury with instructions regarding the standards they were to use in imposing a sentence for Godfrey. The jury imposed death sentences for both murder counts, finding that the sole aggravating circumstance for each murder was "that the offense of murder was outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible and inhuman". The trial judge, in filling out a required post-conviction report, confirmed neither murder victim was "physically harmed or tortured ... excluding the actual murdering of the two victims" during the commission of the crime. [2]

Procedural history

In 1979, the Supreme Court of Georgia upheld Godfrey's death sentences and affirmed his convictions, rejecting Godfrey's argument that the state's death penalty legislation and requirements for imposing a death sentence were "unconstitutionally vague" and also noting that the U.S. Supreme Court had previously upheld Georgia's death penalty legislation in the 1976 ruling Gregg v. Georgia . The Supreme Court of Georgia also found that the jury did not impose Godfrey's death sentence "under the influence of passion, prejudice, or any other arbitrary factor," and concluded that the sentence was "neither excessive nor disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases." Two Georgia Supreme Court members dissented. [2]

Opinion of the Court

In a 6–3 plurality, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in favor of Godfrey. Justice Potter Stewart delivered the opinion, deciding that Georgia's death penalty legislation was unconstitutionally vague and did not properly distinguish between cases that would be eligible for the death penalty and cases that would be ineligible. Additionally, the Court decided Godfrey's crimes did not meet Georgia's preexisting criteria regardless of whether or not Georgia's death penalty legislation was constitutional. [4] Justice Thurgood Marshall and Justice William J. Brennan Jr. concurred with Stewart's opinion and added that, while death penalty sentencing should require stricter sentencing guidelines, the death penalty was inherently unconstitutional and in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [4]

Chief Justice Warren E. Burger dissented, arguing that the plurality's decision would lead to more arbitrary enforcement of the death penalty due to the law being imposed on a case-by-case basis. Justice Byron White filed a second dissenting opinion arguing that Georgia law was sufficiently strict in ensuring juries would not disproportionately impose the death penalty for crimes that did not warrant it, and White also argued that the U.S. Supreme Court should not interfere with Georgia Supreme Court decisions when the latter was "responsibly and consistently interpreting state law"; Justice William Rehnquist joined in White's dissent. [4]

Subsequent developments

The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated Godfrey's death sentence. In addition to Godfrey's death sentence being overturned, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision resulted in the immediate overturning of five other Georgia death row inmates' sentences—James Richard Patrick, Kenneth Hardy, Joseph Holcombe Mulligan, Keith Fair, and Kenneth Dampier—all of whom had the "outrageously or wantonly vile" aggravating circumstance to justify their death sentences. By October 1980, the Georgia Supreme Court reinstated all six inmates' death sentences, [5] although Godfrey would still receive a re-sentencing hearing the next year.

In 1981, a second jury re-sentenced Godfrey to death for the two murders. [6] Godfrey filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in 1985, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia granted Godfrey's request for habeas relief, vacating Godfrey's conviction and sentence and further deciding that to attempt to obtain a third death sentence against him would violate Godfrey's right against double jeopardy. In 1988, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the federal district court's decision. [3] Subsequently, Godfrey's death sentence was commuted to a sentence of life imprisonment. [1]

Godfrey died on May 31, 2005. [7]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1791 amendment regulating forms of punishment

The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against imposing excessive bail, excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishments. This amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the United States Bill of Rights. The amendment serves as a limitation upon the state or federal government to impose unduly harsh penalties on criminal defendants before and after a conviction. This limitation applies equally to the price for obtaining pretrial release and the punishment for crime after conviction. The phrases in this amendment originated in the English Bill of Rights of 1689.

Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), was a landmark criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that arbitrary and inconsistent imposition of the death penalty violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. It was a per curiam decision. Five justices each wrote separately in support of the decision. Although the justices did not rule that the death penalty was unconstitutional, the Furman decision invalidated the death sentences of nearly 700 people. The decision mandated a degree of consistency in the application of the death penalty. This case resulted in a de facto moratorium of capital punishment throughout the United States. Dozens of states rewrote their death penalty laws, most of which were upheld in the 1976 case Gregg v. Georgia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in the United States</span>

In the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty in 27 states, throughout the country at the federal level, and in American Samoa. It is also a legal penalty for some military offenses. Capital punishment has been abolished in the other 23 states and in the federal capital, Washington, D.C. It is usually applied for only the most serious crimes, such as aggravated murder. Although it is a legal penalty in 27 states, 20 of them have authority to execute death sentences, with the other 7, as well as the federal government and military, subject to moratoriums.

The U.S. state of Washington enforced capital punishment until the state's capital punishment statute was declared null and void and abolished in practice by a state Supreme Court ruling on October 11, 2018. The court ruled that it was unconstitutional as applied due to racial bias; however, it did not render the wider institution of capital punishment unconstitutional and rather required the statute to be amended to eliminate racial biases. From 1904 to 2010, 78 people were executed by the state; the last was Cal Coburn Brown on September 10, 2010. In April 2023, Governor Jay Inslee signed SB5087 which formally abolished capital punishment in Washington State and removed provisions for capital punishment from state law.

Gregg v. Georgia, Proffitt v. Florida, Jurek v. Texas, Woodson v. North Carolina, and Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 153 (1976), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. It reaffirmed the Court's acceptance of the use of the death penalty in the United States, upholding, in particular, the death sentence imposed on Troy Leon Gregg. The set of cases is referred to by a leading scholar as the July 2 Cases, and elsewhere referred to by the lead case Gregg. The court set forth the two main features that capital sentencing procedures must employ in order to comply with the Eighth Amendment ban on "cruel and unusual punishments". The decision essentially ended the de facto moratorium on the death penalty imposed by the Court in its 1972 decision in Furman v. Georgia (1972). Justice Brennan's dissent famously argued that "The calculated killing of a human being by the State involves, by its very nature, a denial of the executed person's humanity ... An executed person has indeed 'lost the right to have rights.'"

Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6–3 that executing people with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but that states can define who has an intellectual disability. At the time Atkins was decided, 18 of the 38 death penalty states exempted mentally disabled offenders from the death penalty.

McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case, in which the death sentence of Warren McCleskey for armed robbery and murder was upheld. The Court said the "racially disproportionate impact" in the Georgia death penalty indicated by a comprehensive scientific study was not enough to mitigate a death penalty determination without showing a "racially discriminatory purpose." McCleskey has been described as the "most far-reaching post-Gregg challenge to capital sentencing."

Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977), held that the death penalty for rape of an adult was grossly disproportionate and excessive punishment, and therefore unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld two important aspects of the capital sentencing scheme in Arizona—judicial sentencing and the aggravating factor "especially heinous, cruel, or depraved"—as not unconstitutionally vague. The Court overruled the first of these holdings in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). The second holdings was not overturned.

Morgan v. Illinois, 504 U.S. 719 (1992), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. The case established the right of defendants to challenge for cause any juror that would automatically impose the death penalty in all capital cases.

Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 (1967), found in favor of the petitioner (Whitus), who had been convicted for murder, and as such reversed their convictions. This was due to the Georgia jury selection policies, in which it was alleged racial discrimination had occurred.

Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that sentencing authorities must have the discretion to consider at least some mitigating factors, rather than being limited to a specific list of factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Florida</span>

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Florida.

Spaziano v. Florida was two United States Supreme Court cases dealing with the imposition of the death penalty. In the first case, 454 U.S. 1037 (1981), the Supreme Court, with two dissents, refused Spaziano's petition for certiorari. However, the Florida Supreme Court would reverse Spaziano's death sentence based on the judge's receipt of a confidential report which was not received by either party. On remand, the judge reimposed the death penalty and the Florida Supreme Court upheld the sentence. In the second case, 468 U.S. 447 (1984), the Court heard Spaziano's appeal of his death sentence.

Capital punishment is currently a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Kansas, although it has not been used since 1965.

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Georgia. Georgia reintroduced the death penalty in 1973 after Furman v. Georgia ruled all states' death penalty statutes unconstitutional. The first execution to take place afterwards occurred in 1983.

In the United States and other nations that use jury trials, a judicial override is when a judge overrules a jury's sentencing determination.

Hurst v. Florida, 577 U.S. 92 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, in an 8–1 ruling, applied the rule of Ring v. Arizona to the Florida capital sentencing scheme, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty. In Florida, under a 2013 statute, the jury made recommendations but the judge decided the facts.

Hildwin v. Florida, 490 U. S. 638 (1972), is a United States Supreme Court case which addresses the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution. It considers if imposition of the death penalty when no specific finding of aggravating factors was made by the jury. In a per curiam decision, the court ruled that there is no need for the jury to present specific findings when imposing the death penalty, as the judge is the one who decides the fact while the jury merely gives recommendations to the judge.

Sumner v. Shuman, 483 U.S. 66 (1987), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a mandatory death penalty for a prison inmate who is convicted of murder while serving a life sentence without possibility of parole is unconstitutional. The decision in this case was a significant development in the Court's capital punishment jurisprudence, further clarifying the limits on the application of the death penalty in the United States.

References

  1. 1 2 "Special Update: Georgia's Death Row". The Atlanta Constitution . November 17, 1996. p. 79. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 "Robert Franklin GODFREY, Petitioner, v. State of GEORGIA | Supreme Court | US Law". Cornell Law School. May 19, 1980. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  3. 1 2 "Robert Franklin Godfrey, Petitioner-appellee, Cross-appellant, v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center, Respondent- Appellant, Cross-appellee, 836 F.2d 1557 (11th Cir. 1988)". Justia. March 1, 1988. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  4. 1 2 3 "Godfrey v. Georgia". Oyez. May 19, 1980. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  5. ↑ Mooney, Brenda (October 7, 1980). "Court Refuses Georgia Death Cases". The Atlanta Constitution . p. 13. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  6. ↑ "Godfrey v. Francis, 613 F. Supp. 747 (N.D. Ga. 1985)". Justia. June 28, 1985. Retrieved October 17, 2024.
  7. ↑ "United States, Social Security Numerical Identification Files (NUMIDENT), 1936-2007", database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:6KS2-DJJ4 : 10 February 2023), Robert Franklin Godfrey.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.