Payne v. Tennessee

Last updated

Payne v. Tennessee
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 24, 1991
Decided June 27, 1991
Full case namePervis Tyrone Payne v. Tennessee
Citations501 U.S. 808 ( more )
111 S.Ct. 2597; 115 L. Ed. 2d 720
Argument Oral argument
Case history
PriorState v. Payne, 791 S.W.2d 10 (Tenn. 1990); cert. granted, 498 U.S. 1076(1991).
Holding
The admission of a victim impact statement does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
Byron White  · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun  · John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor  · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy  · David Souter
Case opinions
MajorityRehnquist, joined by White, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter
ConcurrenceO'Connor, joined by White, Kennedy
ConcurrenceScalia, joined by O'Connor, Kennedy
ConcurrenceSouter, joined by Kennedy
DissentMarshall, joined by Blackmun
DissentStevens, joined by Blackmun
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amends. VIII, XIV
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Booth v. Maryland (1987)
South Carolina v. Gathers (1989)

Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case authored by Chief Justice William Rehnquist which held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial and, in death penalty cases, does not violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment. [1] Payne overturned two of the Courts' precedents: Booth v. Maryland (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989). [2] [3]

Contents

Background

Pervis Tyrone Payne (born March 1, 1967) was the defendant in this trial prosecuted in Tennessee. According to his criminal conviction, on Saturday, June 27, 1987, he attempted to rape an acquaintance of his, Charisse Christopher, and murdered her and her two-year-old daughter, Lacie Jo. Neighbors allegedly heard noises and yelling, and called the police. Upon arriving, a police officer "immediately encountered Payne who was leaving the apartment building, so covered in blood that he appeared to be 'sweating blood'".

The defendant, in contrast, said that he was in the building on a visit to his girlfriend and hearing screams from the room of the murder victims he went in to help. Payne and many other witnesses saw a man leaving the crime scene shortly before Payne arrived. He had found the knife still stuck in the throat of Charisse and pulled it out. He fled when he saw police arrive.

The police found "a horrifying scene." Forty-two stab wounds were on Charisse's body, and Lacie Jo and Nicholas, Charisse's three-year-old son, had suffered stab wounds as well. [4] Payne fled to his girlfriend's house, and discarded his clothes, which were allegedly soaked in blood. Meanwhile, Nicholas Christopher held in his intestines while the emergency medical technicians transported him to the emergency room. The physical evidence implicating the defendant was: his fingerprints on cans of malt liquor, the victims' blood soaked into his clothes, and his property left at the scene of the crime.

Dozens of witnesses, including the police, friends, the neighbors, and experts, testified at the trial. The evidence that he perpetrated the attacks was "overwhelming," according to Chief Justice Rehnquist. Payne denied the charges, claiming he came upon the bloody victims. The district attorney stressed, in his closing arguments, the senselessness of the killings, the violence displayed by the defendant, and the innocence of the victims. The jury convicted him of two counts of first-degree murder and two counts of attempted murder and a related charge.

At the sentencing phase, the judge allowed both the public defender to adduce mitigating testimony from the defendant's friends and family, and the district attorney (DA) to introduce evidence from the grandmother/mother of the victims. Payne appealed to the Tennessee Supreme Court, and then asked for a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court. Certiorari was granted, with the Court noting that it would have to reconsider its past precedent. The case was argued on April 24, 1991 and decided on June 27, 1991. [5]

Opinion of the Court

The Court held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement was admissible and constitutional in death penalty cases, overturning Booth v. Maryland (1987) and South Carolina v. Gathers (1989). In Booth the Court stated that victim impact statements had nothing to do with the "blameworthiness of a particular defendant". [6]

Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Rehnquist provided a variety of reasons for the decision to allow victim impact statements:

  1. The sentencer has the right to consider all relevant evidence, within the rules of evidence.
  2. The principle that the punishment should fit the crime is relevant here, and this was a particularly aggravated and savage murder.
  3. Stare decisis is "not an inexorable command", and the Supreme Court, since Marbury v. Madison (1803), has decided what the law is.
  4. Because the defendant has the right to present mitigating evidence at the sentencing phase, the prosecution should be able to present aggravating evidence about the victim (Justice Stevens, in dissent, characterizes this argument as a non sequitur: the defendant has constitutional rights because he is on trial - the victim is not on trial and has no constitutional rights in the proceeding).
  5. The trial was fair in all respects, and mitigating evidence ought to be presented with damaging evidence when available.

Justices Stevens and Marshall wrote dissenting opinions, with Justice Blackmun joining each of them. [7]

Impact

Payne has had a significant, ongoing impact in victim's rights, criminology, stare decisis, and the lives of the parties involved.

The case allowed victim impact statements in U.S. courts, and the overwhelming majority of states now allow such use in the sentencing phase of trials, and was a significant development in the victims' rights movement. [7] [8] [9] [10] One scholar wrote:

Among the most significant products of the Victim's Rights Movement over the past decade has been the revival of the use of victim impact evidence—evidence relating to the victim's personal characteristics and the emotional impact of the crime on others--during capital sentencing. With its decision in Payne v. Tennessee (1991), the US Supreme Court not only reversed its own recent precedent holding such evidence to be unconstitutional, it left only a vague and malleable standard for limiting its admissibility.

— Joel F. Donahue [10]

Another scholar calls the verdict in Payne an example of "symbolic violence." [11] It was pointed out that:

Rehnquist's reliance on this image of the perpetrator as a rabid animal that is foaming at the mouth helps to justify the violence of Payne's death sentence while it also obscures that violence. The majority opinion in Payne, like the prosecutor's arguments before the jury, hinges on contrasting little Nicholas to Pervis Payne, juxtaposing Nicholas's smallness and vulnerability to Payne's murderous and inhuman power. The smaller and more innocent the victim, the stronger and more guilty the defendant appears.

— Jennifer K. Wood [11]

The case was one in a line of cases that showed how the Rehnquist Court shifted to the conservative or "right" on criminal cases. [8] The case is cited by at least one major college text book as a "capstone case." [12] Colin Starger has pointed out that the current split in the Court's jurisprudence between "strong" and "weak" conceptions of stare decisis (both of which are ultimately descended from a 1932 dissenting opinion by Louis Brandeis [ clarification needed ]) arises from the disagreement between the Rehnquist majority opinion and the Marshall dissenting opinion in this case. [13]

Scheduled executions

Payne's execution was stayed in April 2007, [14] and after protracted litigation, [15] [16] again scheduled in December 2007, [17] and stayed again that month. [18] [19] [20] [21]

Payne was later scheduled to be executed on December 3, 2020. [22] However, he was granted a temporary reprieve until April 9, 2021, due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Tennessee. [23] [24]

Subsequent developments

Payne continues to maintain his innocence and has attracted supporters such as The Innocence Project [25] and The Southern Christian Leadership Conference [26] founded by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. In September 2020, DNA testing was ordered to investigate Paynes claims of innocence. [27]

On November 18, 2021, the Shelby County District Attorney General announced that Payne was no longer on death row and would instead serve two consecutive life sentences. Since 2002, executions of people with intellectual disabilities have been ruled unconstitutional in the United States, and a law passed by the Tennessee General Assembly in April 2021 allowed for death row inmates to appeal their sentences on intellectual disability grounds. After a review of the evidence, Payne was found to have an intellectual disability, making him ineligible for execution. [28] [29] [30] On January 31, 2022, Payne was resentenced to two concurrent life sentences, including credit for time served for an assault charge; Payne will be eligible for parole by 2027. [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in the United States</span> Killing a person as punishment for allegedly committing a crime

In the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty throughout the country at the federal level, in 27 states, and in American Samoa. It is also a legal penalty for some military offenses. Capital punishment has been abolished in 23 states and in the federal capital, Washington, D.C. It is usually applied for only the most serious crimes, such as aggravated murder. Although it is a legal penalty in 27 states, 20 of them have authority to execute death sentences, with the other 7, as well as the federal government and military, subject to moratoriums.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Louisiana</span>

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Louisiana.

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Indiana. The last man executed in the state, excluding federal executions at Terre Haute, was the murderer Matthew Wrinkles in 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in California</span>

Capital punishment is not allowed to be carried out in the U.S. state of California, due to both a standing 2006 federal court order against the practice and a 2019 moratorium on executions ordered by Governor Gavin Newsom. The litigation resulting in the court order has been on hold since the promulgation of the moratorium. Should the moratorium end and the freeze concluded, executions could resume under the current state law.

The U.S. state of Washington enforced capital punishment until the state's capital punishment statute was declared null and void and abolished in practice by a state Supreme Court ruling on October 11, 2018. The court ruled that it was unconstitutional as applied due to racial bias however it did not render the wider institution of capital punishment unconstitutional and rather required the statute to be amended to eliminate racial biases. From 1904 to 2010, 78 people were executed by the state; the last was Cal Coburn Brown on September 10, 2010. In April 2023, Governor Jay Inslee signed SB5087 which formally abolished capital punishment in Washington State and removed provisions for capital punishment from state law.

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Nebraska. In 2015, the state legislature voted to repeal the death penalty, overriding governor Pete Ricketts' veto. However, a petition drive secured enough signatures to suspend the repeal until a public vote. In the November 2016 general election, voters rejected the repeal measure, preserving capital punishment in the state. Nebraska currently has 12 inmates on death row.

Gregg v. Georgia, Proffitt v. Florida, Jurek v. Texas, Woodson v. North Carolina, and Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 153 (1976), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. It reaffirmed the Court's acceptance of the use of the death penalty in the United States, upholding, in particular, the death sentence imposed on Troy Leon Gregg. The set of cases is referred to by a leading scholar as the July 2 Cases, and elsewhere referred to by the lead case Gregg. The court set forth the two main features that capital sentencing procedures must employ in order to comply with the Eighth Amendment ban on "cruel and unusual punishments". The decision essentially ended the de facto moratorium on the death penalty imposed by the Court in its 1972 decision in Furman v. Georgia (1972). Justice Brennan's dissent famously argued that "The calculated killing of a human being by the State involves, by its very nature, a denial of the executed person's humanity ... An executed person has indeed 'lost the right to have rights.'"

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Texas</span>

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Texas for murder, and participation in a felony resulting in death if committed by an individual who has attained or is over the age of 18.

Wrongful execution is a miscarriage of justice occurring when an innocent person is put to death by capital punishment. Cases of wrongful execution are cited as an argument by opponents of capital punishment, while proponents say that the argument of innocence concerns the credibility of the justice system as a whole and does not solely undermine the use of the death penalty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Japan</span>

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Japan. The Penal Code of Japan and several laws list 14 capital crimes. In practice, though, it is applied only for aggravated murder. Executions are carried out by long drop hanging, and take place at one of the seven execution chambers located in major cities across the country. The only crime punishable by a mandatory death sentence is instigation of foreign aggression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Taiwan</span>

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Taiwan. The long list of capital offences, for which the death penalty can be imposed, includes murder, treason, drug trafficking, piracy, terrorism, and especially serious cases of robbery, rape, and kidnapping, as well as for military offences, such as desertion during war time. In practice, however, all executions in Taiwan since the early 2000s have been for murder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Alabama</span>

Capital punishment in Alabama is a legal penalty. Alabama has the highest per capita capital sentencing rate in the United States. In some years, its courts impose more death sentences than Texas, a state that has a population five times as large. However, Texas has a higher rate of executions both in absolute terms and per capita.

Capital punishment was abolished in Colorado in 2020. It was legal from 1974 until 2020 prior to it being abolished in all future cases.

Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court decision that ruled that a person's rights of association and due process, as granted under the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, cannot be infringed upon if such an association has no bearing on the case at hand.

Capital punishment is currently a legal penalty in the U.S. state of Kansas, although it has not been used since 1965.

South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that testimony in the form of a victim impact statement is admissible during the sentencing phase of a trial only if it directly relates to the "circumstances of the crime." This case was later overruled by the Supreme Court decision in Payne v. Tennessee.

Capital punishment in Delaware was abolished after being declared unconstitutional by the Delaware Supreme Court on August 2, 2016. The ruling retroactively applies to earlier death sentences, and remaining Delaware death row inmates had their sentences commuted to life imprisonment. Despite this, the capital statute for first-degree murder under Title 11, Chapter 42, Section 09, of the Delaware Code has yet to be repealed, though it is unenforceable.

Capital punishment is a legal punishment in Tennessee.

Capital punishment is a legal punishment in Pennsylvania. Despite remaining a legal penalty, there have been no executions in Pennsylvania since 1999, and only three since 1976. In February 2015, Governor Tom Wolf announced a formal moratorium on executions that is still in effect as of 2023, with incumbent Governor Josh Shapiro continuing Wolf's moratorium. However, capital crimes are still prosecuted and death warrants are still issued.

Oscar Franklin Smith is an American man convicted of capital murder in Tennessee and sentenced to death. Smith has maintained innocence and was scheduled to be executed on April 21, 2022, however, his execution was temporarily reprieved by Governor Bill Lee due to an oversight in the preparation for lethal injection.

References

  1. ↑ Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991).
  2. ↑ "Table of Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions". constitution.congress.gov. Retrieved July 9, 2022.
  3. ↑ Payne 501 US at 830
  4. ↑ Bonvillian, Crystal (September 16, 2020). "Lawyers for death row inmate Pervis Payne seek to halt Dec. 3 execution for 1987 double murder". WHBQ. Retrieved December 12, 2020.
  5. ↑ Facts are re-worded from the decision, q.v., Findlaw.com. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  6. ↑ Payne 501 US at 818
  7. 1 2 "Victims of Crime - Victims' Rights" on Library Index website. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  8. 1 2 AP, "Excerpts from Rehnquist opinions: Chief justice oversaw conservative shift in court during tenure," September 4, 2005, found at nbcnews.com website. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  9. ↑ Myers, Linda (February 28, 2002). "Forum examines effect of victim impact statements on death penalty verdicts". Cornell News. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  10. 1 2 Donahoe, Joel F. (1999). "The Changing Role of Victim Impact Evidence in Capital Cases". Western Criminology Review. 2 (1). Archived from the original on May 13, 2008. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  11. 1 2 Wood, Jennifer K, "Refined raw: The symbolic violence of victims' rights reforms," College Literature , Winter 1999, found at BNet FindArticles.com. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  12. ↑ Schmalleger, Frank (2006). Criminal Law Today: An Introduction with Capstone Cases (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. pp. 34–42. ISBN   0-13-170287-4.
  13. ↑ Starger, Colin (2013). "The Dialectic of Stare Decisis Doctrine". In Peters, Christopher J. (ed.). Precedent in the United States Supreme Court. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media. pp. 19–46. ISBN   978-94-007-7950-1. Available via SpringerLink.
  14. ↑ Pro death Penalty website. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  15. ↑ In re Pervis T. Payne (2007), list found at Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts government website. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  16. ↑ Tennessee Coalition to Abolish State Killing website. Retrieved September 22, 2008. Archived September 27, 2008, at the Wayback Machine
  17. ↑ Tneesse Corrections Department website. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  18. ↑ Life on Death Row website. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  19. ↑ Capital Defense Weekly website. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  20. ↑ Payne v. Bredesen, No. 3-07-0714 (U.S.D.S. M.D. Tenn. 2007), found at US District Court, Middle District of Tennessee government website. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  21. ↑ Jared Allen, "Stay granted for Dec. 12 execution", Nashville City Paper , December 7, 2007, found at Nashville City Paper website. Retrieved September 22, 2008.
  22. ↑ Tamburin, Adam (February 24, 2020). "Tennessee Supreme Court sets two new execution dates for 2020". The Tennessean . Retrieved February 27, 2020.
  23. ↑ Burgess, Katherine (November 6, 2020). "Gov. Bill Lee grants temporary reprieve for death row inmate Pervis Payne". The Tennessean . Retrieved November 7, 2020.
  24. ↑ Bonvillian, Crystal (November 11, 2020). "Tennessee governor grants death row inmate Pervis Payne temporary reprieve due to COVID-19". KIRO-TV . Retrieved April 10, 2021.
  25. ↑ "8 Things You Need to Know About Pervis Payne".
  26. ↑ Lemley, Tasha (July 15, 2021). "Activists Gear Up As Court Weighs Whether Pervis Payne Should Be Spared From Execution". WPLN.
  27. ↑ "Pervis Payne: Death row inmate nearing execution granted bid for DNA testing in double murder". September 17, 2020.
  28. ↑ Sarkar, Alisha Rahaman (November 19, 2021). "Tennessee spares death row inmate who killed mother and daughter because of 'intellectual disability'" . The Independent . Archived from the original on May 25, 2022. Retrieved November 19, 2021.
  29. ↑ "Pervis Payne's death penalty sentence removed, DA says". WHBQ-TV . November 18, 2021. Retrieved November 19, 2021.
  30. ↑ Lemley, Tasha (February 4, 2022). "When an Intellectual Disability Means Life or Death". Scientific American.
  31. ↑ Burgess, Katherine. "Pervis Payne to be eligible for parole in 5 years with concurrent life sentences, judge rules". The Commercial Appeal. Retrieved January 31, 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.