| Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank | |
|---|---|
| Decided January 21, 2015 | |
| Full case name | Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank |
| Citations | 574 U.S. 418 ( more ) |
| Holding | |
| Whether two trademarks may be tacked for purposes of determining priority is a question for the jury. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Sotomayor, joined by unanimous |
Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, 574 U.S. 418(2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that whether two trademarks may be tacked for purposes of determining priority is a question for the jury. [1] [2]
Hana Financial, Inc. and Hana Bank both provided financial services to individuals in the United States. When Hana Financial sued Hana Bank for trademark infringement, Hana Bank invoked in defense the tacking doctrine, under which courts have provided that a trademark user may make certain modifications to its mark over time while, in limited circumstances, retaining its priority position. Hana Financial's claim was tried before a jury, and the federal District Court adopted in substantial part the jury instruction on tacking proposed by Hana Financial. The jury returned a verdict in Hana Bank's favor. Affirming, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals explained that the tacking inquiry was an exceptionally limited and highly fact-sensitive matter reserved for juries, not judges. [1]
| | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2025) |
The Supreme Court issued an opinion on January 21, 2015. [1]
| | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (October 2025) |
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .