Tim Selwyn

Last updated

Tim Selwyn (born 1974, Takapuna) is a New Zealand political activist who was found guilty of sedition on 8 June 2006, the first person charged with sedition in New Zealand for more than 30 years. [1] He is also editor of Tumeke! magazine, and has a blog with the same name.


He was sentenced to two months imprisonment for sedition and for conspiracy to commit wilful damage on 19 July 2006. Letters he wrote from prison were posted on his blog, prompting criticism and questions in Parliament from National's Corrections spokesman Simon Power. [2] Selwyn was also investigated by other government agencies after his initial arrest and was sentenced to a further 15 months for dishonesty offences against various government departments involving his theft of the identity of a dead baby and several other dead people, among other offences, [3] [4] - and a further 25 months for tax offences (on 14 February 2007). [5] He was released from prison in October 2007. [6]

Selwyn has previously attracted controversy. In 1996, he was imprisoned (but then released on appeal of sentence) for falsifying nomination signatures and was forced to resign as a member of the Glenfield Community Board, to which he had been elected unopposed the previous year. [7] He also wrote articles in Craccum criticising suicide prevention workers [8] and explaining how to rip off the student loan system; the former being condemned by the New Zealand Press Council in a ruling as "consistently irresponsible and malicious." [9] - a decision Selwyn later criticised as "ill-considered and hypocritical." [10] Selwyn has previously been a member of the ACT Party, but more recently has supported the Māori Party. [11]

Sedition controversy

Selwyn was arrested on charges of sedition and wilful damage in relation to throwing an axe through the Auckland electorate office window of then-Prime Minister Helen Clark over the foreshore and seabed controversy on 18 November 2004. [12] He pleaded guilty to being party to a conspiracy to commit wilful damage in 2005 [13] and said "Intentional damage is one thing, but attempting to criminalise speech and conscience is quite another... If the Crown is intent on using war-time offences to subdue people who oppose the government theft of native property and rights then they are opening the door to Pandora's box." [14]

Sedition is defined within New Zealand as being "speech, writing or behaviour intended to encourage rebellion or resistance against the government". Selwyn was charged under section 81(1)(c) of the New Zealand Crimes Act 1961, which forbids any publication which intends to "incite, procure, or encourage violence, lawlessness, or disorder". The New Zealand Police cite the pamphlet Confiscation Day as being seditious.

Selwyn admitted being in the vicinity of the electorate office that morning, and that he participated in the composition and distribution of both versions of the statements which explained that the protest was a symbolic act and also called upon "like-minded New Zealanders" (in the Confiscation Day statement) to take "similar action" of their own. During his trial Selwyn refused to answer questions concerning the other people involved.

Selwyn appealed against the sedition conviction, calling the decision "dangerous and undemocratic" [15] and having serious implications for freedom of speech . [16] However, Judge Josephine Bouchier said when summing up that Selwyn knew the documents were unlawful and intended to encourage lawlessness and disorder, and the police were quoted as saying the verdict was a "victory for society". [16]

Selwyn's appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 4 April 2007 - the day before the NZ Law Commission, chaired by former Prime Minister, Sir Geoffrey Palmer, released its report into seditious offences. [17] The report recommended a complete repeal. [18] The report said the current law was "an unjustifiable breach of the right of freedom of expression" and that "they have been inappropriately used in New Zealand in times of political unrest and perceived threats to established authority. They have been used to fetter vehement and unpopular political speech. The time has come to remove the seditious offences from the New Zealand statute book."

After much criticism of the sedition prosecution the Green Party, [19] United Future, Act, and the Māori Party committed themselves to abolition [20] and a bill based on the Law Commission's findings was introduced to parliament with the government's backing on 8 June 2007 that would repeal all seditious offences from 1 January 2008. [21] During debate on the bill the Justice Minister Mark Burton described Selwyn's case as "famous, and some would say infamous" and Māori Party MP Hone Harawira said of Selwyn's situation: "The Government passes legislation to steal away people’s rights and then it charges people with sedition for daring to oppose such theft... for daring to speak up for the Treaty... and for daring to speak out for human rights." [22] His colleague Tariana Turia read out the full text of Confiscation Day in parliament. [23] The bill was passed 114–7 (New Zealand First against) on 24 October 2007. [24]

Related Research Articles

Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech or organization, that tends toward rebellion against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent toward, or insurrection against, established authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel. A seditionist is one who engages in or promotes the interest of sedition.

The New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy is a debate in the politics of New Zealand. It concerns the ownership of the country's foreshore and seabed, with many Māori groups claiming that Māori have a rightful claim to title. These claims are based around historical possession and the Treaty of Waitangi. On 18 November 2004, the New Zealand Parliament passed a law which deems the title to be held by the Crown. This law, the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, was enacted on 24 November 2004. Some sections of the Act came into force on 17 January 2005. It was repealed and replaced by the Marine and Coastal Area Act 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Carter (politician)</span> New Zealand politician

Sir David Cunningham Carter is a New Zealand National Party politician who served as the 29th Speaker of the New Zealand House of Representatives from 2013 to 2017 and as a Cabinet Minister in the Fourth and Fifth National Governments. He represented the Selwyn electorate in the 44th Parliament and the Banks Peninsula electorate in the 45th Parliament. He served as a list MP from 1999 until he retired at the 2020 election.

Sedition and seditious libel were criminal offences under English common law, and are still criminal offences in Canada. Sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order: if the statement is in writing or some other permanent form it is seditious libel. Libel denotes a printed form of communication such as writing or drawing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sedition Act (Singapore)</span> Statute of the Parliament of Singapore

The Sedition Act 1948 was a Singaporean statute law which prohibited seditious acts and speech; and the printing, publication, sale, distribution, reproduction and importation of seditious publications. The essential ingredient of any offence under the Act was the finding of a "seditious tendency", and the intention of the offender is irrelevant. The Act also listed several examples of what is not a seditious tendency, and provides defences for accused persons in a limited number of situations.

Australian sedition law was an area of the criminal law of Australia relating to the crime of sedition.

The following lists events that happened during 2006 in New Zealand.

The Sedition Act 1948 in Malaysia is a law prohibiting discourse deemed as seditious. The act was originally enacted by the colonial authorities of British Malaya in 1948 to contain the local communist insurgence. The act criminalises speech with "seditious tendency", including that which would "bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against" the government or engender "feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races". The meaning of "seditious tendency" is defined in section 3 of the Sedition Act 1948 and in substance it is similar to the English common law definition of sedition, with modifications to suit local circumstances. The Malaysian definition includes the questioning of certain portions of the Constitution of Malaysia, namely those pertaining to the Malaysian social contract, such as Article 153, which deals with special rights for the bumiputra.

The Māori protest movement is a broad indigenous-rights movement in New Zealand. While there were a range of conflicts between Māori and European immigrants prior to the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840, the signing provided a legal context for protesting, as the Treaty of Waitangi made New Zealand a British colony with British law and governance applying. The British authorities had drafted the Treaty with the intention of establishing a British Governor of New Zealand, recognising Māori ownership of their lands, forests and other possessions, and giving Māori the rights of British subjects. However, the Māori and English texts of the Treaty differ in meaning significantly; particularly in relation to the meaning of having and ceding sovereignty. These discrepancies, and the subsequent colonisation by Pākehā settlers led to disagreements in the decades following the signing, including full-out warfare.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crimes (Substituted Section 59) Amendment Act 2007</span> New Zealand law concerning corporal punishment

The Crimes Amendment Act 2007 is an amendment to New Zealand's Crimes Act 1961 which removed the legal defence of "reasonable force" for parents prosecuted for assault on their children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral Finance Act 2007</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Electoral Finance Act 2007 was a controversial act in New Zealand. The Fifth Labour Government introduced the Electoral Finance Bill partly in response to the 2005 New Zealand election funding controversy, in particular to "third-party" campaigns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 New Zealand child discipline referendum</span>

The 2009 New Zealand Referendum on Child Discipline was held from 31 July to 21 August, and was a citizens-initiated referendum on parental corporal punishment. It asked:

Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crimes (Repeal of Seditious Offences) Amendment Act 2007</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Crimes Amendment Act 2007 is an Act of Parliament passed in New Zealand in 2007. It removed the crime of sedition from the New Zealand statute book.

Blogging in New Zealand is dominated by a community of around 600 blogs that comment largely on New Zealand politics, society and occurrences. One list of over 200 "author-operated, public discourse" blogs in New Zealand suggests New Zealand blogs cover a wide range of ideological positions but lack female contributors. Blogging is an active part of the media of New Zealand.

Common law offences are crimes under English criminal law, the related criminal law of some Commonwealth countries, and under some U.S. State laws. They are offences under the common law, developed entirely by the law courts, having no specific basis in statute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Seymour (New Zealand politician)</span> Politician from New Zealand (born 1983)

David Breen Seymour is a New Zealand politician serving as the Member of Parliament (MP) for Epsom and leader of ACT New Zealand since 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sentencing and Parole Reform Act 2010</span>

The Sentencing and Parole Reform Act 2010, now repealed, was an Act of Parliament in New Zealand that denied parole to repeat violent offenders, and imposed maximum terms of imprisonment on repeat offenders who commit three serious violent offences - unless it would be manifestly unjust. The law was known informally in New Zealand public, media and government circles as the "three-strikes law".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vehicle Confiscation and Seizure Bill (New Zealand)</span>

The New Zealand Vehicle Confiscation and Seizure Bill was a Government bill introduced to the NZ Parliament on 26 March 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2023 New Zealand general election</span> Future general election for the 54th Parliament of New Zealand

The 2023 New Zealand general election to determine the composition of the 54th Parliament of New Zealand is planned to be held on 14 October 2023, after the currently elected 53rd Parliament is dissolved or expires. Voters will elect 120 members to the unicameral New Zealand House of Representatives under the mixed-member proportional (MMP) voting system, a proportional representation system in which 72 members will be elected from single-member electorates and 48 members from closed party lists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Three Strikes Legislation Repeal Act 2022</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Three Strikes Legislation Repeal Act 2022 is an omnibus Act of Parliament passed by the New Zealand Parliament that repeals the elements of the Sentencing and Parole Reform Act 2010, which constitute the so-called three-strikes law. The bill passed its third reading on 9 August 2022 with the support of the governing Labour Party, the allied Green Party, the Māori Party but was opposed by the opposition National and ACT parties.


  1. Geoffrey Palmer (1990). "The Reform of the Crimes Act 1961", 20 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 9, 13 pages. Quoted in the No Right Turn blog: "Justice Department statistics reveal that two cases involving sedition were tried summarily in 1967 and resulted in convictions. No other records of these minor cases have been found."
  2. "Here is what was said about THIS site in Parliament today". 1 August 2006.
  3. "Axe protester got passport in dead baby's name". The New Zealand Herald. 18 July 2006.
  4. "Jail for axe attack on PM's office". The New Zealand Herald. 18 July 2006. Archived from the original on 22 February 2013.
  5. "Two years' prison for 146 tax offences". Inland Revenue. 15 February 2007. Retrieved 18 November 2010.
  6. "Guess who is back - back again, Tim is back - tell a friend". 26 September 2007.
  7. Stuff [ dead link ]
  8. Holm, Chris (7 March 2000). "Craccum Editors May Be Forced To Fall On Swords". Scoop.
  9. New Zealand Media Council [ dead link ]
  10. "TUMEKE!: Secret government and their agents" . Retrieved 1 December 2022.
  11. "probably not toeing the party line, but anyway..." 23 August 2005.
  12. NZ Herald [ dead link ]
  13. NZ Herald [ dead link ]
  14. "Sedition Case Depositions Set For June 15". Scoop News.
  15. RNZ [ dead link ]
  16. 1 2 News Hub [ dead link ]
  17. NZ Herald [ dead link ]
  18. Law Commission [ dead link ]
  19. Greens [ dead link ]
  20. Minor parties call for sedition repeal [ dead link ]
  21. New Zealand Parliament [ dead link ]
  22. New Zealand Parliament [ dead link ]
  23. New Zealand Parliament [ dead link ]
  24. New Zealand Parliament [ dead link ]