Transparency Serbia

Last updated
Transparency Serbia
AbbreviationTS
Formation2002 (2002)
Type Non-profit organization
PurposeFight against corruption
Headquarters Belgrade, Serbia
Key people
 Vladimir Goati, Nemanja Nenadić
Website www.transparentnost.org.rs

Transparency Serbia (abbr. TS) is a non-profit organization based in Belgrade, Serbia. It was founded in 2002 and granted the status of "national chapter in formation" by the Transparency International (TI) movement. Over the next four years, Transparency Serbia concentrated its efforts on advocating for the adoption and improvement of anti-corruption legislation through the use of promotional campaigns, draft amendments, comparative legal analysis of legislation. Transparency Serbia further worked to raise public awareness of anti-corruption legislation and identify implementation gaps where legislation was not being enforced. The priorities of work in that period were advocating for the adoption of the Law on Free Access to Information of Public Importance (2004), the Law on Prevention of Conflict of Interest (2004), full implementation of the Law on Financing of Political Parties (2003) and the Law on Public Procurement (2002), as well as the adoption of the National Anti-corruption Strategy (2005) and the accompanying action plan (2006).

Contents

Since October 2005, the Transparency Serbia has been a fully fledged member of the Transparency International movement. This entails participation in the implementation of the TI Global Strategy, a commitment to common goals with other national chapters and the Secretariat (based in Berlin, Germany), as well as the exchange of experiences and best practices in efforts to curb corruption. Nonetheless, Transparency Serbia is registered as a civil society organization (association of citizens) in accordance with Serbian legislation, and as such it exercises full autonomy from the rest of the movement when determining which areas and corruption issues to tackle and how best to approach them.

In 2006, Transparency Serbia opened the Advocacy and Legal Advice Center (ALAC) [1] in order to provide assistance to citizens and businesses in cases where they suspect that corruption is a barrier to the exercise of their rights.

Transparency Serbia was among the 100 Serbian companies, academic institutions and non-governmental organisations which signed up in 2007 to the UN Global Compact initiative aimed at promoting corporate responsibility. [2]

More recently, in September 2015, on the occasion of the International Right to Know Day, Transparency Serbia won the national annual award for special contribution to the promotion of the right to information in Serbia. [3]

Organization

Transparency Serbia is a civil society organization. Its internal structure includes: • an Assembly, which adopts the most important documents of organization and elect other bodies, • a Managerial Board, which is responsible for strategy and then implementing of planned activities • a Supervisory Board, with a control and oversight mandate.

The senior positions in the organization are the President (currently Vladimir Goati), the Executive Director, the Program Director and the Financial Director. According to report on its website, [4] Transparency Serbia is financed solely on the basis of donor contributions to projects, with funding coming mainly from international organizations and foundations, the European Union, and western governments.

Activities

Currently, Transparency Serbia is focusing primarily on public procurement, the political party funding, conflicts of interest, and continuing its efforts to promote access to information.

Among the organization’s notable successes is that its work in the area of financing of political parties resulted in the recovery of EUR 750,000 to the Serbian budget. In 2006, Transparency Serbia found that the Ministry of Finance had erroneously calculated the amount of money political parties should receive from the state budget, and launched public campaign to correct the error. While the Ministry never admitted its error, it issued an instruction to reduce the payments to political parties the following year. [5]

In 2011 and 2015, TS published the National Integrity System (NIS) Study for Serbia, a comprehensive assessment of how the most important sectors of society and the state can contribute to the prevention of corruption and their respective susceptibility to corruption. The NIS Serbia reports examined the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, the Ombudsman, the State Audit Institution, the Anti-corruption Agency, the judiciary, political parties, civil society, the executive, the state prosecutor’s office, the police, the legislature, the media, the business sector, the public sector, the Republic Electoral Commission and state-owned enterprises.

Overall, the 2015 study concluded that "corruption is widespread in Serbia, with most of the available data being about petty corruption and not enough data on the capture of institutions, political protection from prosecution for corruption, abuse of public funds for personal or group interests." According to the report, Serbia's National Integrity System overall is marked by a "notable imbalance between the independent and non-partisan institutions on one side and Public Sector, State Owned Enterprises and Electoral Management Body on the other side."

It also found that although "Serbia has adopted the most important anti-corruption legislation and established institutions for preventing and fighting corruption... practice has proved that some of the laws need to be amended while some of the institutions have been obstructed, ignored or not provided with sufficient resources." [6]

Transparency Serbia regularly presents to public TI's Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). In the 2016 CPI, Serbia scored 42 out of a possible 100 and it was ranked 72st among 176 countries and territories. [7] Transparency Serbia also regularly presents to public the TI's Global Corruption Barometer, which measures the direct experience of citizens about corruption. At the presentation of 2016 GCB, TS estimated that there are at least 374,000 undiscovered cases of bribery in Serbia each year. [8]

In 2015 Transparency Serbia also presented the Local Government Transparency Index (LTI). LTI ranked all cities and municipalities in Serbia on the basis of transparency. According to these data, the most transparent municipality in Serbia was Paracin. [9]

Related Research Articles

Political corruption Use of power by government officials for illegitimate private gain

Political corruption is the use of powers by government officials or their network contacts for illegitimate private gain.

Transparency International e.V. (TI) is a German non-governmental organization founded in 1993. Based in Berlin, its nonprofit purpose is to take action to combat global corruption with civil societal anti-corruption measures and to prevent criminal activities arising from corruption. Its most notable publications include the Global Corruption Barometer and the Corruption Perceptions Index. Transparency International has the legal status of a German registered voluntary association (Eingetragener Verein) and serves as an umbrella organization. Its members have grown from a few individuals to more than 100 national chapters which engage in fighting corruption in their home countries. TI is a member of UNESCO Consultative Status, United Nations Global Compact and shares the goals of peace, justice, strong institutions and partnerships of the United Nations Sustainable Development Group (UNSDG). TI confirmed the dis-accreditation of the national chapter of United States of America in 2017.

Corruption Perceptions Index Wikimedia list article

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is an index published annually by Transparency International since 1995 which ranks countries "by their perceived levels of public sector corruption, as determined by expert assessments and opinion surveys." The CPI generally defines corruption as "the misuse of public power for private benefit".

Corruption Dishonest or fraudulent conduct by those in power

Corruption is a form of dishonesty or criminal offense undertaken by a person or organization entrusted with a position of authority, to acquire illicit benefit or abuse power for one's private gain. Corruption may include many activities including bribery and embezzlement, though it may also involve practices that are legal in many countries. Political corruption occurs when an office-holder or other governmental employee acts in an official capacity for personal gain. Corruption is most commonplace in kleptocracies, oligarchies, narco-states and mafia states.

Open government is the governing doctrine which holds that citizens have the right to access the documents and proceedings of the government to allow for effective public oversight. In its broadest construction, it opposes reason of state and other considerations, which have tended to legitimize extensive state secrecy. The origins of open-government arguments can be dated to the time of the European Age of Enlightenment, during which philosophers debated the proper construction of a then nascent democratic society. It is also increasingly being associated with the concept of democratic reform.

Group of States Against Corruption

The Group of States against Corruption, the Council of Europe’s anti-corruption monitoring body with its Headquarters in Strasbourg (France), was established, in 1999, as an enlarged Partial Agreement by 17 Council of Europe member States.

Corruption in Armenia Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Armenia is a widespread and growing problem in Armenian society. Council of Europe's Group of States Against Corruption in its fourth evaluation round noted that corruption remains an important problem for Armenian society. Cases of bribery in the extremely corrupt court are just one of the major forms that corruption takes in this country.

Corruption in the Philippines Institutional corruption in the country

The Philippines suffers from widespread corruption. Means of corruption include graft, bribery, embezzlement, backdoor deals, nepotism, and patronage.

Corruption in Pakistan Major problem limiting international investment

Corruption in Pakistan is widespread, particularly in the government and lower levels of police forces. Transparency International's 2017 Corruption Perception Index ranks the country 117th out of 180 countries Pakistan saw a significant improvement in its statistics in 2013 when its ranking improved by 12 indices compared to its previous rankings – 139 out of 174 in 2012, 134 out of 182 in 2011, 143 out of 178 in 2010, and 139 out of 180 in 2009.

Corruption in Bangladesh Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Bangladesh has been a continuing problem. According to all major ranking institutions, Bangladesh routinely finds itself among the most corrupt countries in the world.

Paul Low Seng Kuan Malaysian politician

Datuk Paul Low Seng Kuan is a Malaysian Senator and former Minister in the Prime Minister's Department. He was the president of a non-governmental organisation called Transparency International - Malaysia (TI-M) until 24 May 2013. The organisation is a chapter of Transparency International (TI) - a world renowned anti-corruption NGO. After the 13th Malaysian general elections, Paul was appointed as a Senator and a Minister in the Prime Minister's Department of Malaysia. His portfolio involved collaborating with relevant stakeholders including federal ministries and state governments to promote good governance practice and strengthening of transparency and accountability.

Corruption in Poland Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Poland has declined over time in the recent years. In international rankings it is below the world average but not insignificant. Within Poland, surveys of Polish citizens reveal that it is perceived to be a major problem.

Corruption in the Czech Republic Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in the Czech Republic is considered to be widespread by a majority of the Czech public, according to Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer 2013.

Corruption in Malaysia Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption is seen as a major problem in Malaysia. According to a 2013 public survey in Malaysia by Transparency International, a majority of the surveyed households perceived Malaysian political parties to be highly corrupt. A quarter of the surveyed households consider the government's efforts in the fight against corruption to be ineffective.

Corruption in Cameroon Institutional corruption in the country

Since independence, corruption has been more than prevalent in Cameroon. In fact, corruption has become pervasive and has affected all sectors of the government and civil society including the executive, judiciary, police, and even the private sector. The main causes being a deep lack of political will to fight corruption and neopatrimonialism. Other causes include; personal interests & absence of duty conscience, weak judiciary & almost nonexistent opposition in the legislative, nepotism & favouritism, ineffective system of accountability, among others.

Corruption in Serbia Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption levels are perceived to be high by surveyed residents of Serbia, and public trust in key institutions remains low.

Giorgi Vashadze Georgian politician

Giorgi Vashadze is a Harvard Business School Executive Education alumnus, Georgian politician and international policy expert who served as a member of the Parliament of Georgia from 2012 to 2016. He is a founder and international key expert of Innovation and Development Foundation (IDF), international think-tank that is committed to design public policy solutions and reform packages. In May 2016, Giorgi Vashadze founded a political party ‘Political Platform - New Georgia’. He is also a founder of Computer Literacy Foundation that was established in 2012 and Georgia Reforms and Partnership Enterprise (GRAPE). Giorgi Vashadze previously served as a Deputy-Minister at the Ministry of Justice between 2010 and 2012, and a Chairman of Civil Registry Agency from 2006 to 2010.

Prozorro

ProZorro is a public e-procurement system and a symbol of dramatic reform of government procurement in Ukraine. ProZorro is a result of the collaboration between the Ukrainian government, the business sector, and civil society. This system was developed by the reputable international anti-corruption organization Transparency International Ukraine with a help of volunteers, NGOs, the business community and state bodies of Ukraine, the WNISEF fund, the EBRD, and other partners. During the pilot stage of the project, Transparency International Ukraine was administering the development of the system: the ProZorro central database and several additional modules. Innovative technologies help to ensure the system’s transparency and monitoring: currently, there are the analytics modules Qlik, public (bi.prozorro.org) and professional (bipro.prozorro.org). In December 2015 all ownership and relevant intellectual property rights for ProZorro system have been transferred to the state enterprise designated by Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine.

Corruption in Azerbaijan Institutional corruption in the country

Azerbaijan is a member of Council of Europe's Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) and OECD's Anti-Corruption Network. Its anti-corruption measures are regularly evaluated within their monitoring mechanisms. GRECO notes that despite of carried out anti-corruption policies and measures by the Government of Azerbaijan, corruption is referred as one of problematic areas in Azerbaijan.

Anti-corruption (anticorruption) comprise activities that oppose or inhibit corruption. Just as corruption takes many forms, anti-corruption efforts vary in scope and in strategy. A general distinction between preventive and reactive measures is sometimes drawn. In such framework, investigative authorities and their attempts to unveil corrupt practices would be considered reactive, while education on the negative impact of corruption, or firm-internal compliance programs are classified as the former.

References

  1. ↑ United Nations Global Compact. "Our Participants in Serbia". Unglobalcompact.org. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
  2. ↑ Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection. "Commissioner's Press Issue September 28, 2015". Poverenik.rs. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
  3. ↑ Transparency Serbia. "About Us". transparentnost.org.rs. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
  4. ↑ Politika daily, October 20, 2007. "Poslanici krivi za višak u stranačkim kasama?". Politika.rs. Retrieved 2016-11-01.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) (in Serbian only)
  5. ↑ "National Integrity Study," (PDF). Transparentnost.org.rs. Transparency Serbia, Belgrade, 2015. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
  6. ↑ Transparency Serbia's Press Issue on CPI 2016. "Stagnation in the list, the absence of substantive progress in reality," (PDF). Transparentnost.org.rs. Retrieved 2017-04-14.
  7. ↑ Transparency Serbia's Press Issue on GCB 2015. "Unreported corruption is the biggest problem, measures of the state so far without success,". Transparentnost.org.rs. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
  8. ↑ "Paraćin the most transparent local self-government,". Socijalnoukljucivanje.gov.rs. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.