Critical
The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "The film, though it has its gripping moments, is spoilt by its over-melodramatic ones which cause ominous titters. Jean Simmons as Caroline struggles to bring realism to her part, but as she has to appear to be completely unaware of her uncle's true character, despite some very obvious signs of it, it is impossible for her to do more than struggle gamely with the material at her disposal. There is not enough depth to Derrick de Marney's characterisation of the name part, and he only skims the surface of what could have been a sinister and interesting role." [7]
Kine Weekly wrote: "Crutch-propelled 'blood and thunder,' set in the early 'eighties. It starts out to thrill, but its purpose is defeated by a laboured script, uninspired direction and players who grossly overact. In the end, hoary macabre is reduced to laughter. ... Jean Simmons makes the most of a stagey part as the frightened Caroline, but Derrick de Marney might well be mistaken for Charley's Aunt as Uncle and Katina Paxinou is much too heavy-handed as Madame De La Rougierre ... The staging and photography are very good, but effective technical presentation fails to cloak the crude, old-fashioned plot or the overacting. [8]
Picturegoer wrote: "Jean Simmons is wasted as the heroine who is nearly terrified to death in the final sequences, while Derrick De Marney cuts almost a comic figure as the uncle. Even Katina Paxinou as a hard-drinking Frenchwoman over-emphasizes. In fact the whole cast seems to be thinking in terms of 'ham.' The camera work and staging is extremely good. It's a pity that it has been wasted on such dull hokum. Tod Slaughter could have done much better than this." [9]
Variety wrote: "Only excuse for this blood-and-thunder meller appears to have been the desire to screen what is alleged to be one of the first thrillers. That Sheridan le Fanu's novel is still in public demand probably explains why over $1,000,000 was spent on a yarn that should have been allowed to stay on the shelf." [10]
