United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. United States | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Decided June 4, 2001 | |
Full case name | United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. United States |
Citations | 532 U.S. 822 ( more ) |
Holding | |
An affiliated group's product liability loss must be figured on a consolidated, single-entity basis; a conglomerate cannot aggregate the product liability loss of its subsidiaries and report that sum as its product liability loss. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Souter, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsberg, Breyer |
Concurrence | Thomas |
Dissent | Stevens |
Laws applied | |
Internal Revenue Code of 1954 |
United Dominion Industries, Inc. v. United States, 532 U.S. 822 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an affiliated group's product liability loss must be figured on a consolidated, single-entity basis; a conglomerate cannot aggregate the product liability loss of its subsidiaries and report that sum as its product liability loss. [1] [2]
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .