United Nations Dispute Tribunal

Last updated
United Nations Dispute Tribunal
Established2009
Location New York City, Geneva, Nairobi
Website https://www.un.org/en/internaljustice/undt/
President
Currently Joelle Adda

The United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT) is the court of first instance in the internal justice system of the United Nations. It became operational on 1 July 2009. [1] The UNDT "hears and decides cases" filed by current and former staff members "appealing administrative decisions alleged to be in non-compliance with their terms of appointment or contract of employment". [1] The staff members as well as the administration have a "right to appeal the judgments of the UNDT to the United Nations Appeals Tribunal (UNAT)". [1] In order to ensure the independence of this organ, it is composed not of officials of the organization, but by judges appointed by the member states of the United Nations through the General Assembly, from which UNDT derives its mandate. [2]

Contents

Procedures

As a first step in the formal system, a staff member who wishes to contest an administrative decision will have to request a management evaluation. When no resolution through informal means can be arrived at, and when the result of the management evaluation is not to the satisfaction of the staff member, the staff member can file an application to the United Nations Dispute Tribunal.

The UN Dispute Tribunal examines the facts of the case, and conducts, where necessary, oral proceedings. These proceedings are normally held in public. Cases before the Dispute Tribunal are usually considered by a single judge, but in cases that are particularly complex or important, a three-judge panel may be convened. The judgments of the Dispute Tribunal are binding. The full text of the Statute of the UN Dispute Tribunal is contained in the annex to General Assembly resolution A/RES/63/253. [2]

UNDT registries

UN Dispute Tribunal has registries in New York City, Geneva and Nairobi. The geographical coverage of these is as follows:

Records of Dispute Tribunal

Parties to the proceedings, i.e., the applicant and the respondent, have full access to all Judicial records which are defined as "Case-related materials which form part of the official case record of the tribunal as kept by the Registry, including, but not limited to, filings made by parties in the cases, issuances of the tribunal, transcripts, audio and video recordings of hearings and exhibits admitted in the cases." [3] The custodian of the records of the Dispute Tribunal is the Registry. [3] Access to audio-visual recordings of oral proceedings, is subject to "the need to protect personal data", and are granted, usually through electronic means, on a written request addressed to the registrar. [3]

Relative rank and power of judges

The judges in the tribunal are given an administrative rank, and protocol status, which is below Assistant Secretary General. The relatively low rank of judges, according to the New York Times, makes those higher in the UN hierarchy feel that it is "beneath them" to answer to the tribunal. [4] As indicated on Article 4(12) of the statute of the Dispute Tribunal, the judges of the Dispute Tribunal shall be considered officials other than secretariat officials under the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations. Judges do not have the power to declare people who do not do their bidding in contempt of court, and are thus dependent on the UN Secretariat to act in good faith in its dealings with the tribunal. [4] Judge Michael F. Adams, an Australian judge, at the end of his tenure in the tribunal commenting on accountability in UN system observed “Someone in the position of Under Secretary General is never confronted with the requirement that particular questions be answered.” There have been cases in which the orders of the judge to produce documents and witnesses, have been ignored by the United Nations. [4] The United Nations response to the tribunal has, its critics argue, been contradictory, even hypocritical, in view of the organizations standing as the international guardian and promoter of rule of law. George Irving, a former lawyer with over 30 years of experience in the UN Justice system, said, “The organization has to decide from the S.G. on down whether this is an organization that respects the rule of law or not”. [4]

UNDT judges

The UN Dispute Tribunal operates on a full-time basis. The UNDT was composed of "three full-time Judges, two half-time Judges and three ad litem judges". [5] The Judges are appointed by the General Assembly. [5] The resolution of the General Assembly adopted on 22 December 2018 changed the system. From July 2019, there are no longer ad litem judges, but only three full-time judges and six half-time judges. All of them have a seven years term. The current composition of the tribunal is as follows: [6]

Full-time judges

Half-time judges

The current president of the tribunal is Judge Sean Daniel Wallace

Former UNDT judges

1. Judge Agnieszka Klonowiecka-Milart (Poland) – from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2023

2. Judge Teresa Maria da Silva Bravo (Portugal) – from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2023

3. Judge Alexander W. Hunter Jr. (United States of America) – from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2023

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Court of Justice</span> Primary judicial organ of the United Nations

The International Court of Justice, or colloquially the World Court, is the only international court that adjudicates general disputes between nations, and gives advisory opinions on international legal issues. It is one of the six organs of the United Nations (UN), and is located in The Hague, Netherlands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia</span> 1993–2017 Netherlands-based United Nations ad hoc court

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) was a body of the United Nations that was established to prosecute the war crimes that had been committed during the Yugoslav Wars and to try their perpetrators. The tribunal was an ad hoc court located in The Hague, Netherlands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Permanent Court of Arbitration</span> Intergovernmental organization

The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) is a non-UN intergovernmental organization headquartered at the Peace Palace, in The Hague, Netherlands. Unlike a judicial court in the traditional sense, the PCA provides administrative support in international arbitrations involving various combinations of States, State entities, international organizations and private parties. The cases span a range of legal issues involving territorial and maritime boundaries, sovereignty, human rights, international investment, and international and regional trade. The PCA is constituted through two separate multilateral conventions with a combined membership of 124 Contracting Parties. The PCA is not a United Nations agency, but has been a United Nations observer since 1993.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda</span> 1994 court of the United Nations Security Council

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was an international court established in November 1994 by the United Nations Security Council in Resolution 955 in order to adjudicate people charged for the Rwandan genocide and other serious violations of international law in Rwanda, or by Rwandan citizens in nearby states, between 1 January and 31 December 1994. The court eventually convicted 61 individuals and acquitted 14.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen M. Schwebel</span> American judge

Stephen Myron Schwebel, is an American jurist and international judge, counsel and arbitrator. He previously served as judge of the World Bank Administrative Tribunal (2010–2017), as a member of the U.S. National Group at the Permanent Court of Arbitration, as president of the International Monetary Fund Administrative Tribunal (1993–2010), as president of the International Court of Justice (1997–2000), as vice president of the International Court of Justice (1994–1997), and as Judge of the International Court of Justice (1981–2000). Prior to his tenure on the ICJ, Schwebel served as deputy legal adviser to the U.S. Department of State (1974–1981) and as assistant legal adviser to the U.S. Department of State (1961–1967). He also served as a professor of law at Harvard Law School (1959–1961) and Johns Hopkins University (1967–1981). Schwebel is noted for his expansive opinions in momentous cases such as Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua and Oil Platforms .

Mark Philip Painter, served from 1995–2009 as a judge of the Ohio 1st District Court of Appeals in Hamilton County (Cincinnati), after 13 years on the Hamilton County Municipal Court. In March 2009, Painter became the first American to be elected by the United Nations General Assembly to the United Nations Appeals Tribunal. In 2012, Painter resigned from the Appeals Tribunal and joined the Cincinnati law firm Manley Burke as Of counsel.

The United Nations Office of Administration of Justice (OAJ) is responsible for coordinating the functions of the internal justice system of the United Nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 1931</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 2010

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1931, adopted unanimously on June 29, 2010, after recalling resolutions 827 (1993), 1581 (2005), 1597 (2005), 1613 (2005), 1629 (2005), 1660 (2006), 1668 (2006), 1800 (2008), 1837 (2008), 1849 (2008), 1877 (2009), 1900 (2009) and 1915 (2010), the Council noted that the 2010 target for the completion of trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) could not be met, and therefore extended the terms of 23 judges at the ICTY.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 1932</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 2010

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1932, adopted unanimously on June 29, 2010, after recalling resolutions 955 (1995), 1165 (1998), 1329 (2000), 1411 (2002), 1431 (2002), 1717 (2006), 1824 (2008), 1855 (2008), 1878 (2008) and 1901 (2009) on Rwanda, the Council noted that the 2010 target for the completion of trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) could not be met, and therefore extended the terms of 16 judges at the ICTR.

The United Nations Appeals Tribunal (UNAT), which replaces the former United Nations Administrative Tribunal, is an appellate court, of the two-tier formal system of administration of justice in the UN. It was established by the UN General Assembly in December 2008 to review appeals against judgments rendered by the United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT). UNAT, including its registry, is based in New York, and holds sessions in New York City, Geneva and Nairobi, as required by caseload. It held its first session in Geneva in 2010. The UNAT is a component of the UN's Internal Justice System, and is listed as an office, along with UNDT and the Office of the United Nations Ombudsman, under the UN secretariat. The UNAT like the UNDT, is dependent for its administrative, office, staffing, and travel needs including that of the judges, on the UN secretariat.

The UN General Assembly in December 2008 authorized the establishment of the Office of Staff Legal Assistance (OSLA) to strengthen "professional legal assistance for staff" to succeed the Panel of Counsel. OSLA has offices in New York, Addis Ababa, Beirut, Geneva and Nairobi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 1581</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 2005

United Nations Security Council resolution 1581, adopted unanimously on 18 January 2005, after recalling resolutions 1503 (2003) and 1534 (2004), the Council approved the extension of the terms of office of seven short-term judges at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in order to allow them to finish adjudicating the cases on which they had been working. It was the first Security Council resolution adopted in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Nations Security Council Resolution 1955</span> United Nations resolution adopted in 2010

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1955, adopted unanimously on December 14, 2010, after recalling resolutions 955 (1995), 1165 (1998), 1329 (2000), 1411 (2002), 1431 (2002), 1717 (2006), 1824 (2008), 1855 (2008), 1878 (2008), 1901 (2009) and 1931 (2010) on Rwanda, the Council permitted three judges to complete their cases at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) beyond their terms of office, and increased the number of temporary judges at the tribunal.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1824 was unanimously adopted on 18 July 2008.

Nkemdilim Amelia Izuako is a Nigerian judge. Since 2009, she has been one of the three judges on the United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT).

The United Nations Secretariat, in September 1999, promulgated Administrative Instruction (AI) on "Special Measures for the Achievement Of Gender Equality", to strengthen and expedite measures to achieve gender equality in the United Nations' staff, especially in posts in the Professional category. Gender Equality A/I (ST/AI/1999/9), which superseded ST/AI/412 of 5 January 1996, came into effect on 1 October 1999. In 2012, Ban Ki-moon, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, in his Annual Reports to the General Assembly, titled "Improvement of the status of women in the United Nations system" stated that Special Measures are "procedures designed to accelerate the achievement of gender parity at the Professional levels and above" and that the aim of these procedures was to ensure "gender balance in recruitment and promotion" and rectify "past and current forms and effects of discrimination against women". The Secretary General reiterated that Special measures for gender equality would remain in effect until the "goal of gender parity is achieved, and would be sustained for a period of time".

The United Nations Staff Selection System is a system of rules for recruitment, placement, promotion, and mobility of staff up to the D-2 level, incorporating mobility requirements and specific provisions for gender equality.

Agnieszka Klonowiecka-Milart is a Polish judge and member of the United Nations Dispute Tribunal. She was formerly a judge of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal and Supreme Court of Kosovo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solomon Areda</span> Ethiopian lawyer

Solomon Areda Waktolla is an Ethiopian lawyer who had served as the Deputy Chief Justice/Vice President of the Federal Supreme Court of Ethiopia from 2018 to 2023. Solomon is a prominent lawyer with 26 years of experience in the practice of law, public administration and policy research who is committed for seeing a free and independent judiciary in Ethiopia. Justice Waktolla served in the Ethiopian Judiciary mainly as a judge for 20 years on different levels of the court in both regional and federal positions. In addition, he has been appointed to the membership of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague, Netherlands for a six-year term to serve as an Arbitrator. Justice Solomon Waktolla was appointed on 15 November 2022 by the UN General Assembly as a Half-time Judge of the United Nations Dispute Tribunal for a mandate starting on 1 July 2023 and ending on 30 June 2030. In addition, He has been appointed by the Board of Directors of the African Development Bank as a Judge of the Administrative Tribunal of the African Development Bank, effective from November 2023. Justice Waktolla is an accomplished judge and jurist with many years of legal and judicial work experience at both national and international levels.

Sean Daniel Wallace is an American judge who served on Maryland's Circuit Court from 2002 to 2023. He presently serves as a judge of the United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT), being the first American to become a full-time UNDT judge.

References

  1. 1 2 3 UNDT. "Adout UNDT: Overview". Office of the administration of Justice UN Dispute Tribunal. New York: UN Web Services Section, Department of Public Information, United Nations. Retrieved 15 December 2014.
  2. 1 2 GA, United Nations (17 March 2009). "Administration of justice at the United Nations" (PDF). Resolution of General Assembly (A /RES/63/253): 20. Retrieved 15 December 2014.
  3. 1 2 3 UNITED NATIONS DISPUTE TRIBUNAL (27 April 2012). "PRACTICE DIRECTION ON RECORDS OF THE DISPUTE TRIBUNAL" (PDF). Practice Direction No. 6: 5. Retrieved 15 December 2014.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. 1 2 3 4 MacFARQUHAR, NEIL (June 16, 2010). "Review Panel Judges See a Culture of U.N. Secrecy". The New York Times. The New York Times. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
  5. 1 2 "UN Dispute Tribunal". Archived from the original on 2010-08-28.
  6. ↑ "UN Internal Justice System". www.un.org. Retrieved 2020-02-28.

Other international administrative tribunals

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.