United States v. Will

Last updated

United States v. Will
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided December 15, 1980
Full case nameUnited States v. Will
Citations449 U.S. 200 ( more )
Holding
Congress can repeal or modify a statutorily defined formula for annual cost-of-living increases to the compensation of federal judges, but Congress must act with respect to any particular increase before the increase takes effect.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr.  · Potter Stewart
Byron White  · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun  · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist  · John P. Stevens
Case opinion
MajorityBurger, joined by unanimous
Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Compensation Clause

United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200(1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that congress can repeal or modify a statutorily defined formula for annual cost-of-living increases to the compensation of federal judges, but Congress must act with respect to any particular increase before the increase takes effect. [1] [2]

Contents

Background

An interlocking network of federal statutes fixes the compensation of high-level federal officials, including federal judges, and provides for annual cost-of-living adjustments in salary determined in the same way as those for federal employees generally. In four consecutive fiscal years (hereafter Years 1, 2, 3, and 4), Congress, with respect to these high-level officials, enacted statutes to stop or reduce previously authorized cost-of-living increases initially intended to be automatically operative under that statutory scheme. In Years 2 and 3, the statutes became law before the start of the fiscal year, and in Years 1 and 4 became law on or after the first day of the fiscal year. A number of United States District Court judges filed class actions against the United States in District Court, challenging the validity of the statutes under the Compensation Clause of the Constitution, which provides that federal judges shall receive compensation which "shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office." The federal District Court granted summary judgments for the judges. [1]

Opinion of the court

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on December 15, 1980. The case addressed the jurisdiction of the District Court judges deciding the cases about their own compensation before moving on to the substance of the Compensation Clause claim. [1]

Later developments

References

  1. 1 2 3 United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200 (1980).
  2. "ArtIII.S1.10.3.2 Compensation Clause Doctrine". Constitution Annotated . Retrieved October 26, 2025.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates public domain material from this U.S government document.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .