Vagrancy Act 1898

Last updated

Vagrancy Act 1898
Act of Parliament
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (variant 1, 1952-2022).svg
Parliament of the United Kingdom
Long title An Act to amend the Vagrancy Act, 1824
Citation 61 & 62 Vict. c. 39
Introduced bySir Matthew Ridley, Home Secretary
Territorial extent  England and Wales
Dates
Royal assent 12 August 1898
Repealed2003
Other legislation
Amends Vagrancy Act 1824
Relates to Criminal Law Amendment Act 1912
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

The Vagrancy Act 1898 (61 & 62 Vict. c. 39) was a piece of legislation in England and Wales that criminalised men who lived off the earnings of prostitution (pimping) and who solicited in public places. The bill was generally viewed as successful in its impact, leading to the similar Immoral Traffic (Scotland) Act.[ citation needed ]

Contents

Introduction

Lord Salisbury, a Conservative and the British Prime Minister, was constantly aware of his party's enemy, Socialism, "Whenever an Act for the benefit of the people is introduced." [1]

Acting on the Parliamentary Select Committee's Report (1896) there were modifications to the Poor Laws. Already torn apart by the new secular dilemmas in education, the Cabinet juggled competing priorities as they considered the new social policy. Henry Chaplin, President of the Local Government Board, implemented the bill in 1899, his committee reported that "All needy and deserving poor over the age of 65 should receive 5 s. per week under strict conditions." [2] On 14 March 1898, Home Secretary Sir Matthew Ridley moved a bill to amend the Vagrancy Act of 1824. He described "rogues and vagabonds," as "bullies" and "enemies of society," rejoining with "those men who lived by the disgraceful earnings of the women whom they consorted with and controlled." [3] Vagrancy became a police matter. [4]

The bill was read a second time on 23 June 1898, [5] passing a third reading on 21 July. [6] One week later, it was moved into committee by the Lords. [7] On return to the Commons, Sir Charles Dilke, the radical MP, moved a procedural amendment, "A clause dealing, not simply with the matters of this Bill in particular, but dealing with the whole of the Vagrancy Acts." [8]

Background

Defending beggars and homelessness became one of Liberal leader William Gladstone's social concerns expressed in speeches, legislation, public oratory, and the opening of new hospitals, schools and workhouses. However, liberalism did not recognise poverty as a major causal factor in vagrancy or indeed any crime. Criminals were lesser and incapable therefore of rational thought, let alone legal and moral responsibility for their actions. The essential Protestant nature of the vagrancy offence meant violations were met by punishment such as, beatings, floggings, and whippings before they were sent home, without the adequate realisation that industrialisation caused migration across communities from the countryside.

From the 1860s onwards the tramping artisan began to disappear, as those in search of work intensified the experience to gain finality to it; whereas tramps came at last to accept, however reluctantly, their lot in life as "down and outs." In 1897, only 20% of "discharged soldiers" could justify their claim to be migrant workers to the Royal Commission and only 3% could in the workhouse population. Thus the Report of Minority Opinion was condemned in a scathing critique by Fabian Socialists, Beatrice and Sidney Webb, in their work The Break-Up of the Poor Law (1909), in which they described how only 3% could actually be categorised as "professional tramps." [9] [ failed verification ] The Fabian emphasis fell on assessing at least between 1⁄3 and 2⁄3 of all vagrants as "deserving" of classification as "genuine workmen" and therefore respectability. This was determined by the economic climate: if prosperity rose and then the numbers in work increased, the number of assessed casuals would shrink. But more Liberal gentlemen earlier in the period could hardly discern any deserving case in the East End. Hugh Owen, Secretary to the Local Government Board (1871), and Edward Denison (1867) were both strongly opposed to casualism. Both men were disparaging of the casual poor. [10]

The legislation

The 1824 Act defined persistent vagrants to be "incorrigible rogues." A justice of the Quarter Session could order whipping, when and if "in their discretion shall deem to be expedient." The 1890s witnessed a crackdown. Police statements were the only witness statements taken in such cases; women were convicted after only a short trial; and hardly any proof by way of evidence was required for submission. But by 1900 only 165 had been prosecuted under the new act, whereas 7,415 women were convicted for solicitation in the same period. By 1917 police were systematically arresting and fingerprinting women, even if just standing around (loitering) without much intent. The Victorian "annoyance clause," was lifted making it easier for police to prosecute.

Offences were defined as begging with the causes for prosecution including: wandering abroad or being in any street to beg or gather alms, or causing or procuring any child so to do. The Vagrancy Act, 1824 s.3 and s.4, relates to the offence when committed by a person who has been convicted as an idle and disorderly person. The Vagrancy Act, 1824 once again stood to penalise rough-sleepers, and punish drunkards, prostitutes, and sturdy beggars. It seems as though they were overwhelmingly concentrated in the big cities as that is where the data has survived. London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds, Newcastle, Bristol in England are the only areas with any correlated data in Victorian period for homelessness. Section 10 that punished by "whipping" was repealed, despite the fact that the Government reported that the punishment was used only on seven occasions in five years, and, as Lord Belper put it, "the offences were of such a seriously indecent character that I am sure your Lordships would not wish that the power should be parted with in such cases." [11] During debates one MP, Mr. Pickersgill, called the bill's punishment "capricious" declaring that no fewer than 1,265 persons were convicted in 1895. There was concern expressed among Liberal MPs that the legislation should amend the need "for some poor insane wretch to be flogged." [8] Sir Matthew Ridley accepted the Lords amendment.[ which? ] Much later a Liberal parliament went a step further in formalising these offences in the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1912. [12]

Consequences

The fin de siècle ushered in an era of libertines and sexual freedom. To combat the excesses, a new offence of "indecent exposure" became the legacy of the Lords amendment. The Home Secretary did consider amendments, its main purposes being to update the vagrancy legislation in the whole bill; living "on the prostitution of a woman" remained an offence. [13] On 8 May 1899 two men from Bristol were prosecuted for this new offence. [14] Yet in 1901 a new Home Secretary, C. T. Ritchie, wrote "To get rid of prostitution by legal enactment or by official interposition is out of the question so long as human nature is what it is, you will never be entirely rid of it." [15]

One of the results of Vagrancy Act 1898 was a growth in social purity legislation, including feminist campaigns to protect women and children against trafficking. Under s.21 of the Summary Jurisdiction (Married Women) Act 1879 any convicted offender who continued in cohabitation was granted an order for separation on the ground of desertion. A trafficker of women and children was deemed by the law as "a rogue and vagabond" under the Vagrancy Act 1898. The Committee for Outdoor Relief (COS) were committed to reform: it included two East End MPs, A. C. Crowder, MP for St George's-in-the-East, and W. A. Bailward, MP for Bethnal Green, both Guardians to the Poor Law Unions. The Brixworth Board elected Albert Fell MP. The proportion of homeless for 100,000 had continued to rise to about 400 per 100,000. But the service delivery was haphazard. And the 1895 Report by Sir Wilfred Chance recommended "strict" Unions. Then the High Court ruled that a person was not a vagrant if they were collecting money or food for strikers and their families (Pointon v Hill (1884) 12 QBD 306).

By 1902 the act was deemed to be working well, and so it was sent up to the Lords to be extended to Scotland. Lord Kinnaird said "it will be of great value in reducing this nefarious traffic by making provision for the punishment of offenders." Lord Balfour of Burleigh, the Conservative Secretary of State for Scotland had no objection to a second reading to "compel extremely undesirable persons to leave the Metropolis" of Glasgow. The bill was called the Immoral Traffic (Scotland) Act but performed a similar role as the Vagrancy Act. Subsequent amendments included the White Slave Traffic bill of 1910. On 25 November 1912, George Greenwood MP asked the Liberal Home Secretary if the Vagrancy Act could be amended of the s.10, 1824 Act. In a frenzied atmosphere of radicalism, Rescue Societies and suffragists posing a danger to British society,[ opinion ] Reginald McKenna answered that the punishment of flogging would be determined by the Court of Appeal and pending the decision the floggings would be suspended. Trafficking white slaves was later outlawed by the Treaty of Versailles and League of Nations Charter, although this was already law in England under the Criminal Law Amendment (White Slave Traffic) Act 1912. However, many MPs (e.g. Charles Hopwood, MP for Stockport) believed the legislation of 1912 to be repressive. They attempted to stiffen the legislation and uphold marriage instead of prostitution and homosexuality.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wolfenden report</span> Departmental committee report (1957)

The Report of the Departmental Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution was published in the United Kingdom on 4 September 1957 after a succession of well-known men, including Lord Montagu of Beaulieu, Michael Pitt-Rivers, John Gielgud, and Peter Wildeblood were convicted of homosexual offences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flagellation</span> Whipping as a punishment

Flagellation, flogging or whipping is the act of beating the human body with special implements such as whips, rods, switches, the cat o' nine tails, the sjambok, the knout, etc. Typically, flogging has been imposed on an unwilling subject as a punishment; however, it can also be submitted to willingly and even done by oneself in sadomasochistic or religious contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hudud Ordinances</span> Laws in Pakistan enacted in 1979

The Hudud Ordinances are laws in Pakistan enacted in 1979 as part of the Islamization of Pakistan by Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, the sixth president of Pakistan. It replaced parts of the British-era Pakistan Penal Code, adding new criminal offences of adultery and fornication, and new punishments of whipping, amputation, and stoning to death. After much controversy and criticism parts of the law were extensively revised in 2006 by the Women's Protection Bill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885, or "An Act to make further provision for the Protection of Women and Girls, the suppression of brothels, and other purposes," was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the latest in a 25-year series of legislation in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland beginning with the Offences against the Person Act 1861. It raised the age of consent from 13 years of age to 16 years of age and delineated the penalties for sexual offences against women and minors. It also strengthened existing legislation against prostitution and homosexuality. This act was also notable for the circumstances of its passage in Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder (Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1965</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Murder Act 1965 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It abolished the death penalty for murder in Great Britain. The act replaced the penalty of death with a mandatory sentence of imprisonment for life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual Offences Act 1967</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Sexual Offences Act 1967 is an act of Parliament in the United Kingdom. It legalised homosexual acts in England and Wales, on the condition that they were consensual, in private and between two men who had attained the age of 21. The law was extended to Scotland by the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1980 and to Northern Ireland by the Homosexual Offences Order 1982.

Section 11 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885, commonly known as the Labouchere Amendment, made "gross indecency" a crime in the United Kingdom. In practice, the law was used broadly to prosecute male homosexuals where actual sodomy could not be proven. The penalty of life imprisonment for sodomy was also so harsh that successful prosecutions were rare. The new law was much more enforceable. Section 11 was repealed and re-enacted by section 13 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956, which in turn was repealed by the Sexual Offences Act 1967, which partially decriminalised male homosexual behaviour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loitering</span> To remain in a place without an apparent purpose

Loitering is the act of standing or waiting around idly without purpose in some public places.

The Women's Protection Bill which was passed by the National Assembly of Pakistan on 15 November 2006 is an attempt to amend the heavily criticised 1979 Hudood Ordinance laws which govern the punishment for rape and adultery in Pakistan. Critics of the Hudood Ordinance alleged that it made it exceptionally difficult and dangerous to prove an allegation of rape, and thousands of women had been imprisoned as a result of the bill. The bill returned a number of offences from the Zina Ordinance to the Pakistan Penal Code, where they had been before 1979, and created an entirely new set of procedures governing the prosecution of the offences of adultery and fornication. Whipping and amputation were removed as punishments. The law meant women would not be jailed if they were unable to prove rape and their complaints of rape would not be seen as confession of adultery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">House of correction</span> Penal facility

The house of correction was a type of establishment built after the passing of the Poor Relief Act 1601, places where those who were "unwilling to work", including vagrants and beggars, were set to work. The building of houses of correction came after the passing of an amendment to the Elizabethan Poor Law. However the houses of correction were not considered a part of the Elizabethan Poor Law system because the Act distinguished between settled poor and wandering poor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vagabonds Act 1597</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Vagabonds Act 1597 was an Act of the Parliament of England, which aimed to address concerns of vagrancy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prostitution in Australia</span>

Prostitution in Australia is governed by state and territory laws, which vary considerably, although none ban the selling of sex itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vagrancy</span> Condition of homelessness without regular employment or income

Vagrancy is the condition of wandering homelessness without regular employment or income. Vagrants usually live in poverty and support themselves by travelling while engaging in begging, scavenging, or petty theft. In Western countries, vagrancy was historically a crime punishable with forced labor, military service, imprisonment, or confinement to dedicated labor houses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vagrancy Act 1824</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Vagrancy Act 1824 is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom that makes it an offence to sleep rough or beg in England and Wales. The legislation was passed in Georgian England to combat the increasing number of people forced to live on the streets due to the conclusion of the Napoleonic Wars and the social effects of the Industrial Revolution. Critics of the law included politician and abolitionist, William Wilberforce, who condemned the Act for making it a catch-all offence for vagrancy with no consideration of the circumstances as to why an individual might be homeless.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual Offences Act 1956</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Sexual Offences Act 1956 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that consolidated the English criminal law relating to sexual offences between 1957 and 2004. It was mostly repealed by the Sexual Offences Act 2003 which replaced it, but sections 33 to 37 still survive. The 2003 Act also added a new section 33A. These sections create offences to deal with brothels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial corporal punishment</span> Punitive practice

Judicial corporal punishment is the infliction of corporal punishment as a result of a sentence imposed on an offender by a court of law, including flagellation, forced amputations, caning, bastinado, birching, or strapping. Legal corporal punishment is forbidden in most countries, but it still is a form of legal punishment practiced according to the legislations of Brunei, Iran, Libya, the Maldives, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, Yemen, and Qatar, as well as parts of Indonesia and Nigeria.

The history of prostitution in Canada is based on the fact that Canada inherited its criminal laws from England. The first recorded laws dealing with prostitution were in Nova Scotia in 1759, although as early as August 19, 1675 the Sovereign Council of New France convicted Catherine Guichelin, one of the King's Daughters, with leading a "life scandalous and dishonest to the public", declared her a prostitute and banished her from the walls of Quebec City under threat of the whip. Following Canadian Confederation, the laws were consolidated in the Criminal Code. These dealt principally with pimping, procuring, operating brothels and soliciting. Most amendments to date have dealt with the latter, originally classified as a vagrancy offence, this was amended to soliciting in 1972, and communicating in 1985. Since the Charter of Rights and Freedoms became law, the constitutionality of Canada's prostitution laws have been challenged on a number of occasions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modern Slavery Act 2015</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Modern Slavery Act 2015 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is designed to combat modern slavery in the UK and consolidates previous offences relating to trafficking and slavery. The act extends essentially to England and Wales, but some provisions apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penal Servitude Act 1864</span> United Kingdom law

The Penal Servitude Act 1864 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The act amended the Penal Servitude Act 1853 and the Penal Servitude Act 1857. The act received royal assent on 25 July 1864.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Law Amendment Act 1912</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Law Amendment Act 1912, extended provisions of the 1824 Act to Scotland and Ireland and widened the scope of the original bill. The Amendment act is also known as the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1912; and the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1885.

References

  1. ↑ Speech in the Lords, 29 July 1897.
  2. ↑ R.Taylor, Salisbury, p.160
  3. ↑ Sir M. Ridley, Vagrancy Act Amendment Bill, HC Deb 14 March 1898 vol 54 cc1537-8
  4. ↑ Lord Belper in HL Deb 25 July 1898 vol 62 c976.
  5. ↑ "Vagrant Act Amendment Bill (1898)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 23 June 1898. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
  6. ↑ HC Deb 21 July 1898 vol 62 c759.
  7. ↑ HL Deb 28 July 1898 vol 63 cc175-6.
  8. 1 2 "Vagrancy Act Amendment Bill (1898)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Commons. 9 August 1898. col. 748. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
  9. ↑ Being Part 1 of the Minority Report (London 1909, p.85)
  10. ↑ Vorspan, Rachel (1977). "Vagrancy and the New Poor Law in Late Victorian and Edwardian England". English Historical Review. 92: 59–81. doi:10.1093/ehr/XCII.CCCLXII.59.
  11. ↑ "Vagrancy Act Amendment Bill (1898)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) . House of Lords. 4 August 1898. col. 23. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
  12. ↑ s.7(1), "Any female person for purposes of gain, controlling, directing, a prostitute to aid, compel, her prostitution." Criminal Law Amendment Act 1912, s.7(4).
  13. ↑ s.1(3) Vagrancy Act 1884 had prohibited this vice.
  14. ↑ Bristol Mercury, 29 May 1899.
  15. ↑ PRO: HO 45; B13517/35/41.; J. Weeks, Sex, Politics and Society, London, 1981, p.85
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.