In computational geometry, the visibility polygon or visibility region for a point p in the plane among obstacles is the possibly unbounded polygonal region of all points of the plane visible from p. The visibility polygon can also be defined for visibility from a segment, or a polygon. Visibility polygons are useful in robotics, video games, and in various optimization problems such as the facility location problem and the art gallery problem.
If the visibility region is bounded then it is a star-shaped polygon. A visibility polygon is bounded if all rays shooting from the point eventually terminate in some obstacle. This is the case, e.g., if the obstacles are the edges of a simple polygon and p is inside the polygon. In the latter case the visibility polygon may be found in linear time. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Formally, we can define the planar visibility polygon problem as such. Let be a set of obstacles (either segments, or polygons) in . Let be a point in that is not within an obstacle. Then, the point visibility polygon is the set of points in , such that for every point in , the segment does not intersect any obstacle in .
Likewise, the segment visibility polygon or edge visibility polygon is the portion visible to any point along a line segment.
Visibility polygons are useful in robotics. For example, in robot localization, a robot using sensors such as a lidar will detect obstacles that it can see, which is similar to a visibility polygon. [5]
They are also useful in video games, with numerous online tutorials explaining simple algorithms for implementing it. [6] [7]
Given a simple polygon and a point , a linear time algorithm is optimal for computing the region in that is visible from . Such an algorithm was first proposed in 1981. [2] However, it is quite complicated. In 1983, a conceptually simpler algorithm was proposed, [3] which had a minor error that was corrected in 1987. [4]
The latter algorithm will be briefly explained here. It simply walks around the boundary of the polygon , processing the vertices in the order in which they appear, while maintaining a stack of vertices where is the top of the stack. The stack constitutes the vertices encountered so far which are visible to . If, later during the execution of the algorithm, some new vertices are encountered that obscure part of , then the obscured vertices in will be popped from the stack. By the time the algorithm terminates, will consist of all the visible vertices, i.e. the desired visibility polygon. An efficient implementation was published in 2014. [8]
For a point in a polygon with holes and vertices in total, it can be shown that in the worst case, a algorithm is optimal. Such an algorithm was proposed in 1995 together with its proof of optimality. [9] However, it relies on the linear time polygon triangulation algorithm by Chazelle, which is extremely complex.
For a point among a set of segments that do not intersect except at their endpoints, it can be shown that in the worst case, a algorithm is optimal. This is because a visibility polygon algorithm must output the vertices of the visibility polygon in sorted order, hence the problem of sorting can be reduced to computing a visibility polygon. [10]
Notice that any algorithm that computes a visibility polygon for a point among segments can be used to compute a visibility polygon for all other kinds of polygonal obstacles, since any polygon can be decomposed into segments.
A divide-and-conquer algorithm to compute the visibility polygon was proposed in 1987. [11]
An angular sweep, i.e. rotational plane sweep algorithm to compute the visibility polygon was proposed in 1985 [12] and 1986. [10] The idea is to first sort all the segment endpoints by polar angle, and then iterate over them in that order. During the iteration, the event line is maintained as a heap. An efficient implementation was published in 2014. [8]
For a point among generally intersecting segments, the visibility polygon problem is reducible, in linear time, to the lower envelope problem. By the Davenport–Schinzel argument, the lower envelope in the worst case has number of vertices, where is the inverse Ackermann function. A worst case optimal divide-and-conquer algorithm running in time was created by John Hershberger in 1989. [13]