War Precautions Act 1914

Last updated

War Precautions Act 1914
Coat of Arms of Australia.svg
Parliament of Australia
  • An Act to enable the Governor-General to make Regulations and Orders for the safety of the Commonwealth during the present state of war.
Citation No. 10 of 1914
Royal assent 29 October 1914
Effective 4 August 1914
Repealed2 December 1920
Status: Repealed

The War Precautions Act 1914 was an Act of the Parliament of Australia which gave the Government of Australia special powers for the duration of World War I and for six months afterwards. [1]

Contents

It was held by the High Court of Australia in Farey v Burvett [2] that during wartime, the scope of the federal Government's power under Section 51(vi) of the Australian Constitution (under which the Act was passed) expands to meet the exigencies of wartime. As a result, the responsibility for defence policy lies solely with the Parliament and the Executive. [3] There were 3,442 prosecutions under the Act, almost all of which were successful.

The Act

Under the Act, which was to be read as one with the Defence Act 1903–1912, [4] the Commonwealth could make regulations "for securing the public safety and the defence of the Commonwealth", [5] including:

  • preventing espionage and other activity that could "jeopardize the success of the operations of any of His Majesty's forces," securing "the safety of any means of communication", and preventing "the spread of reports likely to cause disaffection or alarm" (the breach of which was subject to trial by court-martial) [6]
  • prohibiting aliens from entering the Commonwealth, or requiring their deportation therefrom
  • prohibiting aliens from residing or remaining in a specified place, or requiring them to reside and remain in a specified place [lower-alpha 1]
  • regulating the registration and change of abode of aliens, and any travelling and trading done by them
  • imposing similar restriction on naturalsed citizens as could be imposed on aliens
  • requiring "any person to disclose any information in his possession as to any matter"
  • preventing "money or goods being sent out of Australia" except under certain conditions

Later amendments expanded the scope of regulations to cover:

  • the restriction the transmission abroad of all written communication other than through the post [7]
  • the ownership of property held by enemy aliens, and the regulation or restriction of any trade or business operated by them [8]
  • the conditions (ie, times, place and prices) of the disposal or use of any thing [8]
  • the requisitioning of any thing [8]

From 1915, [7] the scale of punishments for offences under the Act was:

  • on summary conviction: a fine of up to £100 or imprisonment up to six months, or both
  • on indictment: a fine of any amount or imprisonment for any term, or both
  • on court-martial: the same punishment as if the offender had been subject to military
  • where, on indictment or court-martial, an offence was committed with the intention of assisting the enemy: the person was liable to suffer death

Regulations issued under the Act required all persons over 16 years of age, on leaving Australia, to possess a passport. [9] [10]

Other wartime legislation

Although the Act possessed very broad scope, it was not omnipotent. Other Acts were passed by the Parliament during the war relating to:

Controversies

During the conscription referendums of 1916 and 1917, a regulation that banned statements likely to prejudice recruiting was used to hamper the anti-conscription campaign. Almost any anti-conscriptionist speech could be construed as offending, and a number of prominent anti-conscriptionists were charged, including John Curtin. [14]

When coal-miners in New South Wales went on strike in 1916, the Act was used to empower the Attorney-General to order the men back to work. The following year, a nationwide strike of Waterfront workers was defeated by the passing of a regulation that deprived the Waterside Workers Federation of preferences in seven of the busiest ports in Australia. Although in many cases the use of the Act in settling labour disputes could be seen as necessary for the war effort, some other uses appeared calculated to suppress the labour movement. For example, in September 1918 the Act was used to ban the use of the red flag, a traditional labour emblem.

On a number of occasions, the Aliens Restrictions Orders made under the act were used to deport radical left-wing activists, particularly members of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), without trial. In July 1918, New Zealand-born IWW leader Tom Barker was deported to Chile. The following year, strike leader Paul Freeman was secretly deported in a case that became a cause celebre for the labour movement. [15]

Following the end of the war, the Act's continued operation led to a series of violent demonstrations known as the Red Flag Riots. [16] [17]

Demise

The Act was later repealed by the War Precautions Act Repeal Act 1920. [18] [lower-alpha 2]

See also

Notes

  1. such as the Torrens Island Concentration Camp
  2. of which one provision still remains, currently cited as the Protection of Word "Anzac" Act 1920 (Act 54). 1920.

Related Research Articles

<i>War Measures Act</i> Canadian legislation which provided the government emergency powers (1914–88)

The War Measures Act was a statute of the Parliament of Canada that provided for the declaration of war, invasion, or insurrection, and the types of emergency measures that could thereby be taken. The Act was brought into force three times in Canadian history: during the First World War, Second World War, and the 1970 October Crisis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conscription in Australia</span> Overview of conscription in Australia

Conscription in Australia, also known as National Service following the Second World War, has a controversial history which dates back to the implementation of compulsory military training and service in the first years of Australia's nationhood. Military conscription for peacetime service was abolished in 1972.

The Australian labour movement began in the early 19th century and since the late 19th century has included industrial and political wings. Trade unions in Australia may be organised on the basis of craft unionism, general unionism, or industrial unionism. Almost all unions in Australia are affiliated with the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), many of which have undergone a significant process of amalgamations, especially in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The leadership and membership of unions hold and have at other times held a wide range of political views, including socialist, democratic and right-wing views.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the United Kingdom during the First World War</span>

The United Kingdom was a leading Allied Power during the First World War of 1914–1918. They fought against the Central Powers, mainly Germany. The armed forces were greatly expanded and reorganised—the war marked the founding of the Royal Air Force. The highly controversial introduction, in January 1916, of conscription for the first time in British history followed the raising of one of the largest all-volunteer armies in history, known as Kitchener's Army, of more than 2,000,000 men. The outbreak of war was a socially unifying event. Enthusiasm was widespread in 1914, and was similar to that across Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defence of the Realm Act 1914</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Defence of the Realm Act 1914 (DORA) was passed in the United Kingdom on 8 August 1914, four days after the country entered the First World War. It was added to as the war progressed. It gave the government wide-ranging powers during the war, such as the power to requisition buildings or land needed for the war effort, and to make regulations creating criminal offences.

In law, an alien is any person who is not a citizen or a national of a specific country, although definitions and terminology differ to some degree depending upon the continent or region. More generally, however, the term "alien" is perceived as synonymous with foreign national.

The reserved powers doctrine was a principle used by the inaugural High Court of Australia in the interpretation of the Constitution of Australia, that emphasised the context of the Constitution, drawing on principles of federalism, what the Court saw as the compact between the newly formed Commonwealth and the former colonies, particularly the compromises that informed the text of the constitution. The doctrine involved a restrictive approach to the interpretation of the specific powers of the Federal Parliament to preserve the powers that were intended to be left to the States. The doctrine was challenged by the new appointments to the Court in 1906 and was ultimately abandoned by the High Court in 1920 in the Engineers' Case, replaced by an approach to interpretation that emphasised the text rather than the context of the Constitution.

Section 51(vi) of the Australian Constitution, commonly called the defence power, is a subsection of Section 51 of the Australian Constitution that gives the Commonwealth Parliament the right to legislate with respect to the defence of Australia and the control of the defence forces. The High Court has adopted a different approach to the interpretation of the defence power, which emphasises the purpose of the legislation, primarily the defence of Australia, rather than the subject matter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Opposition to World War I</span>

Opposition to World War I was widespread during the conflict and included socialists, anarchists, syndicalists and Marxists as well as Christian pacifists, anti-colonial nationalists, feminists, intellectuals, and the working class.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Munitions of War Act 1915</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Munitions of War Act 1915 was a British Act of Parliament passed on 2 July 1915 during the First World War. It was designed to maximize munitions output and brought private companies supplying the armed forces under the tight control of the newly created Ministry of Munitions, under David Lloyd George. The policy, according to J. A. R. Marriott, was that:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bisbee Deportation</span> 1917 illegal deportation of miners attempting unionization in Arizona, United States

The Bisbee Deportation was the illegal kidnapping and deportation of about 1,300 striking mine workers, their supporters, and citizen bystanders by 2,000 members of a deputized posse, who arrested them beginning on July 12, 1917, in Bisbee, Arizona. The action was orchestrated by Phelps Dodge, the major mining company in the area, which provided lists of workers and others who were to be arrested to the Cochise County sheriff, Harry C. Wheeler. Those arrested were taken to a local baseball park before being loaded onto cattle cars and deported 200 miles (320 km) to Tres Hermanas in New Mexico. The 16-hour journey was through desert without food and with little water. Once unloaded, the deportees, most without money or transportation, were warned against returning to Bisbee. The US government soon brought in members of the US Army to assist with relocating the deportees to Columbus, New Mexico.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defence of India Act 1915</span>

The Defence of India Act 1915, also referred to as the Defence of India Regulations Act, was an emergency criminal law enacted by the Governor-General of India in 1915 with the intention of curtailing the nationalist and revolutionary activities during and in the aftermath of the First World War. It was similar to the British Defence of the Realm Acts, and granted the Executive very wide powers of preventive detention, internment without trial, restriction of writing, speech, and of movement. However, unlike the English law which was limited to persons of hostile associations or origin, the Defence of India act could be applied to any subject of the King, and was used to an overwhelming extent against Indians. The passage of the act was supported unanimously by the non-official Indian members in the Viceroy's legislative council, and was seen as necessary to protect against British India from subversive nationalist violence. The act was first applied during the First Lahore Conspiracy trial in the aftermath of the failed Ghadar Conspiracy of 1915, and was instrumental in crushing the Ghadr movement in Punjab and the Anushilan Samiti in Bengal. However its widespread and indiscriminate use in stifling genuine political discourse made it deeply unpopular, and became increasingly reviled within India. The extension of the law in the form of the Rowlatt Act after the end of World War I was opposed unanimously by the non-official Indian members of the Viceroy's council. It became a flashpoint of political discontent and nationalist agitation, culminating in the Rowlatt Satyagraha. The act was re-enacted during World War II as Defence of India act 1939. Independent India retained the law in a number of amended forms, which have seen use in proclaimed states of national emergency including Sino-Indian War, Bangladesh crisis, The Emergency of 1975 and subsequently the Punjab insurgency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tom Barker (trade unionist)</span>

Tom Barker was a New Zealand tram conductor, trade unionist and socialist. He was born in Crosthwaite, Westmorland, England. He was a leading member of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) and politician in New Zealand and Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom originally aimed at continuing and extending the provisions of the Aliens Restriction Act 1914, and the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act 1914 and to deal with former enemy aliens after the end of the World War I.

In Canada, the Office of the Custodian of Enemy Property, attached to the Secretary of State for Canada, was established in 1916 and existed until 1985, dealing with the property of Canada's enemies in both World Wars as well as with the seized property of Japanese Canadians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Enemy aliens in Queensland during World War I</span>

During World War I in Queensland, Australia, enemy aliens were frequently arrested and detained. Strong anti-German sentiment resulted in many arrests and investigations. German place names in Queensland were frequently renamed with British names.

<i>Farey v Burvett</i> Judgement of the High Court of Australia

Farey v Burvett is an early High Court of Australia case concerning the extent of the defence power of the Commonwealth. The majority of the Court took an expansive view of the defence power in a time of war, holding that the defence power extended to fixing the maximum price for bread. The Court adopted a different approach to the interpretation of the defence power which emphasised the purpose of the legislation, the defence of Australia, rather than the subject matter. As the law fell within a Commonwealth power, whether the law was necessary or appropriate for the defence of Australia was a matter for Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Passport Act of 1920</span>

Passport Act of 1920 or Passport Control Act, 1920 was a federal statute authored by the United States 66th Congress. The legislation was an appropriations bill authorizing a fiscal policy for the United States Diplomatic and Consular Service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong during World War I</span>

The British colony of Hong Kong saw no military action during World War I (1914–1918). The biggest external threat to the colony was perceived to be the German East Asia Squadron, but the squadron was eliminated in December 1914. Nonetheless, the colony served as an important port in East Asia, including as the headquarters of the British China Station, and saw significant socioeconomical changes during the war.

Paul Freeman was a political activist known for his deportation from Australia in 1919 and his subsequent role as a liaison between the Communist International and the Australian communist movement.

References

  1. War Precautions Act 1914 (Act 10). 1914., later amended by the War Precautions Act 1915 (Act 2). 1915., War Precautions Act (No. 2) 1915 (Act 39). 1915. and War Precautions Act 1916 (Act 3). 1916.
  2. Farey v Burvett [1916] HCA 36 , (1916) 21 CLR 433 (8 June 1916).
  3. Scott 1941, pp. 642–643.
  4. 1914 Act, s. 1
  5. 1914 Act, ss. 4–5
  6. 1914 Act, s. 4
  7. 1 2 1915 Act
  8. 1 2 3 1916 Act
  9. War Precautions (Passports) Regulations 1916 (SR 126). 1916., later replaced by War Precautions (Passports) Regulations 1916 (SR 206). 1916.
  10. "The History of the Australian Passport". passports.gov.au. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Archived from the original on 14 June 2006.
  11. Trading with the Enemy Act 1914 (Act 9). 1914.
  12. Enemy Contracts Annulment Act 1915 (Act 11). 1915.
  13. Income Tax Act 1915 (Act 41). 1915.
  14. Serle, Geoffrey (1993). "Curtin, John (1885–1945)". Australian Dictionary of Biography . Vol. 13. National Centre of Biography, Australian National University. ISSN   1833-7538.
  15. Evans, Raymond (1989). "Radical Departures: Paul Freeman and Political Deportation from Australia Following World War One". Labour History (57). Liverpool University Press: 16–26. doi:10.2307/27508951.
  16. Evans, Raymond (1992). "Agitation, ceaseless agitation: Russian radicals in Australia and the Red flag riots". In McNair, John; Poole, Thomas (eds.). Russia and the Fifth Continent. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press. pp. 126–171. ISBN   978-0-7022-2420-1..
  17. Coulthard-Clark, Christopher (1998). Where Australians Fought: The Encyclopaedia of Australia's Battles (1st ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin. p. 165. ISBN   1-86448-611-2..
  18. War Precautions Repeal Act 1920 (Act 54). 1920.

Further reading