Weak stability boundary

Last updated

Weak stability boundary (WSB), including low-energy transfer, is a concept introduced by Edward Belbruno in 1987. The concept explained how a spacecraft could change orbits using very little fuel.

Contents

Weak stability boundary is defined for the three-body problem. This problem considers the motion of a particle P of negligible mass moving with respect to two larger bodies, P1, P2, modeled as point masses, where these bodies move in circular or elliptical orbits with respect to each other, and P2 is smaller than P1. [1]

The force between the three bodies is the classical Newtonian gravitational force. For example, P1 is the Earth, P2 is the Moon and P is a spacecraft; or P1 is the Sun, P2 is Jupiter and P is a comet, etc. This model is called the restricted three-body problem. [1] The weak stability boundary defines a region about P2 where P is temporarily captured. This region is in position-velocity space.  Capture means that the Kepler energy between P and P2 is negative. This is also called weak capture. [1]

Background

This boundary was defined for the first time by Edward Belbruno of Princeton University in 1987. [2] He described a Low-energy transfer which would allow a spacecraft to change orbits using very little fuel. It was for motion about Moon (P2) with P1 = Earth. It is defined algorithmically by monitoring cycling motion of P about the Moon and finding the region where cycling motion transitions between stable and unstable after one cycle. Stable motion means P can completely cycle about the Moon for one cycle relative to a reference section, starting in weak capture. P needs to return to the reference section with negative Kepler energy. Otherwise, the motion is called unstable, where P does not return to the reference section within one cycle or if it returns, it has non-negative Kepler energy. [2] [1]

The set of all transition points about the Moon comprises the weak stability boundary, W. The motion of P is sensitive or chaotic as it moves about the Moon within W. A mathematical proof that the motion within W is chaotic was given in 2004. [1] This is accomplished by showing that the set W about an arbitrary body P2 in the restricted three-body problem contains a hyperbolic invariant set of fractional dimension consisting of the infinitely many intersections Hyperbolic manifolds. [1]

The weak stability boundary was originally referred to as the fuzzy boundary. [3] [4] This term was used since the transition between capture and escape defined in the algorithm is not well defined and limited by the numerical accuracy. This defines a "fuzzy" location for the transition points. It is also due the inherent chaos in the motion of P near the transition points. It can be thought of as a fuzzy chaos region. As is described in an article in Discover magazine, the WSB can be roughly viewed as the fuzzy edge of a region, referred to as a gravity well, about a body (the Moon), where its force of gravity  becomes small enough to be dominated by force of gravity of another body (the Earth)  and the motion there is chaotic. [3]

A much more general algorithm defining W was given in 2007. [5] It defines W relative to n-cycles, where n = 1,2,3,..., yielding boundaries of order n. This gives a much more complex region consisting of the union of all the weak stability boundaries of order n. This definition was explored further in 2010. [6] The results suggested that W consists, in part, of the hyperbolic network of invariant manifolds associated to the Lyapunov orbits about the L1, L2 Lagrange points near P2. The explicit determination of the set W about P2 = Jupiter, where P1 is the Sun, is described in "Computation of Weak Stability Boundaries: Sun-Jupiter Case". [7] It turns out that a weak stability region can also be defined relative to the larger mass point, P1. A proof of the existence of the weak stability boundary about P1 was given in 2012, [8] but a different definition is used. The chaos of the motion is analytically proven in "Geometry of Weak Stability Boundaries". [8] The boundary is studied in "Applicability and Dynamical Characterization of the Associated Sets of the Algorithmic Weak Stability Boundary in the Lunar Sphere of Influence". [9]

Applications

There are a number of important applications for the weak stability boundary (WSB). Since the WSB defines a region of temporary capture, it can be used, for example, to find transfer trajectories from the Earth to the Moon that arrive at the Moon within the WSB region in weak capture, which is called ballistic capture for a spacecraft. No fuel is required for capture in this case. This was numerically demonstrated in 1987. [2] This is the first reference for ballistic capture for spacecraft and definition of the weak stability boundary. The boundary was operationally demonstrated to exist in 1991 when it was used to find a ballistic capture transfer to the Moon for Japan's Hiten spacecraft. [10] Other missions have used the same transfer type as Hiten , including Grail , Capstone , Danuri , Hakuto-R Mission 1 and SLIM . The WSB for Mars is studied in "Earth-Mars Transfers with Ballistic Capture" [11] and ballistic capture transfers to Mars are computed. The BepiColombo mission of ESA will achieve ballistic capture at the WSB of Mercury in 2025.

The WSB region can be used in the field of Astrophysics. It can be defined for stars within open star clusters. This is done in "Chaotic Exchange of Solid Material Between Planetary Systems: Implications for the Lithopanspermia Hypothesis" [12] to analyze the capture of solid material that may have arrived on the Earth early in the age of the Solar System to study the validity of the lithopanspermia hypothesis.

Numerical explorations of trajectories for P starting in the WSB region about P2 show that after the particle P escapes P2 at the end of weak capture, it moves about the primary body, P1, in a near resonant orbit, in resonance with P2 about P1. This property was used to study comets that move in orbits about the Sun in orbital resonance with Jupiter, which change resonance orbits by becoming weakly captured by Jupiter. [13] An example of such a comet is 39P/Oterma.

This property of change of resonance of orbits about P1 when P is weakly captured by the WSB of P2 has an interesting application to the field of quantum mechanics to the motion of an electron about the proton in a hydrogen atom. The transition motion of an electron about the proton between different energy states described by the Schrödinger equation is shown to be equivalent to the change of resonance of P about P1 via weak capture by P2 for a family of transitioning resonance orbits. [14] This gives a classical model using chaotic dynamics with Newtonian gravity for the motion of an electron.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lagrange point</span> Equilibrium points near two orbiting bodies

In celestial mechanics, the Lagrange points are points of equilibrium for small-mass objects under the gravitational influence of two massive orbiting bodies. Mathematically, this involves the solution of the restricted three-body problem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orbital resonance</span> Regular and periodic gravitational influence by two orbiting celestial bodies exerted on each other

In celestial mechanics, orbital resonance occurs when orbiting bodies exert regular, periodic gravitational influence on each other, usually because their orbital periods are related by a ratio of small integers. Most commonly, this relationship is found between a pair of objects. The physical principle behind orbital resonance is similar in concept to pushing a child on a swing, whereby the orbit and the swing both have a natural frequency, and the body doing the "pushing" will act in periodic repetition to have a cumulative effect on the motion. Orbital resonances greatly enhance the mutual gravitational influence of the bodies. In most cases, this results in an unstable interaction, in which the bodies exchange momentum and shift orbits until the resonance no longer exists. Under some circumstances, a resonant system can be self-correcting and thus stable. Examples are the 1:2:4 resonance of Jupiter's moons Ganymede, Europa and Io, and the 2:3 resonance between Neptune and Pluto. Unstable resonances with Saturn's inner moons give rise to gaps in the rings of Saturn. The special case of 1:1 resonance between bodies with similar orbital radii causes large planetary system bodies to eject most other bodies sharing their orbits; this is part of the much more extensive process of clearing the neighbourhood, an effect that is used in the current definition of a planet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jupiter trojan</span> Asteroid sharing the orbit of Jupiter

The Jupiter trojans, commonly called trojan asteroids or simply trojans, are a large group of asteroids that share the planet Jupiter's orbit around the Sun. Relative to Jupiter, each trojan librates around one of Jupiter's stable Lagrange points: either L4, existing 60° ahead of the planet in its orbit, or L5, 60° behind. Jupiter trojans are distributed in two elongated, curved regions around these Lagrangian points with an average semi-major axis of about 5.2 AU.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kirkwood gap</span> Gap or dip in the distribution of the semi-major axes of the orbits of main-belt asteroids

A Kirkwood gap is a gap or dip in the distribution of the semi-major axes of the orbits of main-belt asteroids. They correspond to the locations of orbital resonances with Jupiter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tidal locking</span> Situation in which an astronomical objects orbital period matches its rotational period

Tidal locking between a pair of co-orbiting astronomical bodies occurs when one of the objects reaches a state where there is no longer any net change in its rotation rate over the course of a complete orbit. In the case where a tidally locked body possesses synchronous rotation, the object takes just as long to rotate around its own axis as it does to revolve around its partner. For example, the same side of the Moon always faces the Earth, although there is some variability because the Moon's orbit is not perfectly circular. Usually, only the satellite is tidally locked to the larger body. However, if both the difference in mass between the two bodies and the distance between them are relatively small, each may be tidally locked to the other; this is the case for Pluto and Charon, as well as for Eris and Dysnomia. Alternative names for the tidal locking process are gravitational locking, captured rotation, and spin–orbit locking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Axial tilt</span> Angle between the rotational axis and orbital axis of a body

In astronomy, axial tilt, also known as obliquity, is the angle between an object's rotational axis and its orbital axis, which is the line perpendicular to its orbital plane; equivalently, it is the angle between its equatorial plane and orbital plane. It differs from orbital inclination.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interplanetary Transport Network</span> Low-energy trajectories in the Solar System

The Interplanetary Transport Network (ITN) is a collection of gravitationally determined pathways through the Solar System that require very little energy for an object to follow. The ITN makes particular use of Lagrange points as locations where trajectories through space can be redirected using little or no energy. These points have the peculiar property of allowing objects to orbit around them, despite lacking an object to orbit. While it would use little energy, transport along the network would take a long time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rings of Jupiter</span> Rings of the planet Jupiter

The planet Jupiter has a system of faint planetary rings. The Jovian rings were the third ring system to be discovered in the Solar System, after those of Saturn and Uranus. The main ring was discovered in 1979 by the Voyager 1 space probe and the system was more thoroughly investigated in the 1990s by the Galileo orbiter. The main ring has also been observed by the Hubble Space Telescope and from Earth for several years. Ground-based observation of the rings requires the largest available telescopes.

In spaceflight, an orbital maneuver is the use of propulsion systems to change the orbit of a spacecraft. For spacecraft far from Earth an orbital maneuver is called a deep-space maneuver (DSM).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hiten (spacecraft)</span> 1990 Japanese lunar probe

The Hiten spacecraft, given the English name Celestial Maiden and known before launch as MUSES-A, part of the MUSES Program, was built by the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science of Japan and launched on January 24, 1990. It was Japan's first lunar probe, the first robotic lunar probe since the Soviet Union's Luna 24 in 1976, and the first lunar probe launched by a country other than the Soviet Union or the United States. The spacecraft was named after flying heavenly beings in Buddhism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nix (moon)</span> Moon of Pluto

Nix is a natural satellite of Pluto, with a diameter of 49.8 km (30.9 mi) across its longest dimension. It was discovered along with Pluto's outermost moon Hydra on 15 May 2005 by astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope, and was named after Nyx, the Greek goddess of the night. Nix is the third moon of Pluto by distance, orbiting between the moons Styx and Kerberos.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moons of Pluto</span> Natural satellites orbiting Pluto

The dwarf planet Pluto has five natural satellites. In order of distance from Pluto, they are Charon, Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra. Charon, the largest, is mutually tidally locked with Pluto, and is massive enough that Pluto–Charon is sometimes considered a double dwarf planet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gliese 876 c</span> Gas giant orbiting Gliese 876

Gliese 876 c is an exoplanet orbiting the red dwarf Gliese 876, taking about 30 days to complete an orbit. The planet was discovered in April 2001 and is the second planet in order of increasing distance from its star.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gliese 876 b</span> Extrasolar planet orbiting Gliese 876

Gliese 876 b is an exoplanet orbiting the red dwarf Gliese 876. It completes one orbit in approximately 61 days. Discovered in June 1998, Gliese 876 b was the first planet to be discovered orbiting a red dwarf.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Irregular moon</span> Captured satellite following an irregular orbit

In astronomy, an irregular moon, irregular satellite or irregular natural satellite is a natural satellite following a distant, inclined, and often eccentric and retrograde orbit. They have been captured by their parent planet, unlike regular satellites, which formed in orbit around them. Irregular moons have a stable orbit, unlike temporary satellites which often have similarly irregular orbits but will eventually depart. The term does not refer to shape; Triton for example, is a round moon, but is considered irregular due to its orbit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Low-energy transfer</span> Fuel-efficient orbital maneuver

A low-energy transfer, or low-energy trajectory, is a route in space that allows spacecraft to change orbits using significantly less fuel than traditional transfers. These routes work in the Earth–Moon system and also in other systems, such as between the moons of Jupiter. The drawback of such trajectories is that they take longer to complete than higher-energy (more-fuel) transfers, such as Hohmann transfer orbits.

The poles of astronomical bodies are determined based on their axis of rotation in relation to the celestial poles of the celestial sphere. Astronomical bodies include stars, planets, dwarf planets and small Solar System bodies such as comets and minor planets, as well as natural satellites and minor-planet moons.

The stability of the Solar System is a subject of much inquiry in astronomy. Though the planets have been stable when historically observed, and will be in the short term, their weak gravitational effects on one another can add up in unpredictable ways.

Ballistic capture is a low energy method for a spacecraft to achieve an orbit around a distant planet or moon with no fuel required to go into orbit. In the ideal case, the transfer is ballistic after launch. In the traditional alternative to ballistic capture, spacecraft would either use a Hohmann transfer orbit or Oberth effect, which requires the spacecraft to burn fuel in order to slow down at the target. A requirement for the spacecraft to carry fuel adds to its cost and complexity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">514107 Kaʻepaokaʻawela</span> Retrograde asteroid discovered in 2014

514107 Kaʻepaokaʻāwela, provisionally designated 2015 BZ509 and nicknamed Bee-Zed, is a small asteroid, approximately 3 km (2 mi) in diameter, in a resonant, co-orbital motion with Jupiter. It is an unusual minor planet in that its orbit is retrograde, which is opposite to the direction of most other bodies in the Solar System. It was discovered on 26 November 2014, by astronomers of the Pan-STARRS survey at Haleakala Observatory on the island of Maui, United States. Kaʻepaokaʻāwela is the first example of an asteroid in a 1:–1 resonance with any of the planets. This type of resonance had only been studied a few years before the object's discovery. One study suggests that it was an interstellar asteroid captured 4.5 billion years ago into an orbit around the Sun.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Belbruno, Edward (2004). Capture Dynamics and Chaotic Motions in Celestial Mechanics. Princeton University Press. ISBN   9780691094809. Archived from the original on 2019-06-01. Retrieved 2022-09-01.
  2. 1 2 3 Belbruno, E. (May 1987). Lunar Capture Orbits, A method of Constructing Earth-Moon Trajectories and the Lunar GAS Mission (PDF). Proceedings of the 19th AIAA/DGGLR/JSASS International Electric Propulsion Conference. doi:10.2514/6.1987-1054. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-08-01. Retrieved 2023-09-08.
  3. 1 2 Frank, Adam (September 1, 1994). "Gravity's Rim: Riding Chaos to the Moon". Discover.
  4. Belbruno, E. (May–June 1992). "Through the Fuzzy Boundary: A New Route to the Moon" (PDF). Planetary Report. 7 (3): 8–10.
  5. Garcia, F.; Gomez, G. (2007). "A Note on the Weak Stability Boundary" (PDF). Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy . 97: 87–100. doi:10.1007/s10569-006-9053-6. S2CID   16767342. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-09-01. Retrieved 2022-09-01.
  6. Belbruno, E.; Gidea, M.; Topputo, F. (2010). "Weak Stability Boundary and Invariant Manifolds" (PDF). SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems. 9 (3): 1060–1089. doi:10.1137/090780638. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-09-01. Retrieved 2022-09-01.
  7. Topputo, F.; Belbruno, E. (2009). "Computation of Weak Stability Boundaries: Sun-Jupiter Case" (PDF). Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy . 105: 3–17. doi:10.1007/s10569-009-9222-5. S2CID   121915109. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-09-01. Retrieved 2022-09-01.
  8. 1 2 Belbruno, E.; Gidea, M.; Topputo, F. (2013). "Geometry of Weak Stability Boundaries". Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems. 12 (3): 53–55. arXiv: 1204.1502 . doi:10.1007/s12346-012-0069-x. S2CID   16086395.
  9. Sousa Silva, P. A.; Terra, M. O. (2012). "Applicability and Dynamical Characterization of the Associated Sets of the Algorithmic Weak Stability Boundary in the Lunar Sphere of Influence" (PDF). Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy . 113 (2): 141–168. Bibcode:2012CeMDA.113..141S. doi:10.1007/s10569-012-9409-z. S2CID   121436433. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-09-01. Retrieved 2022-09-01.
  10. Belbruno, E.; Miller, J. (1993). "Sun-Perturbed Earth-to-Moon Transfers with Ballistic Capture" (PDF). Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics . 9 (4): 770. Bibcode:1993JGCD...16..770B. doi:10.2514/3.21079. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2022-09-01. Retrieved 2022-09-01.
  11. Topputo, F.; Belbruno, E. (2015). "Earth-Mars Transfers with Ballistic Capture". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy . 121 (4): 329–346. arXiv: 1410.8856 . Bibcode:2015CeMDA.121..329T. doi:10.1007/s10569-015-9605-8. S2CID   119259095.
  12. Belbruno, E.; Moro-Martin, A.; Malhotra, R.; Savransky, D. (2012). "Chaotic Exchange of Solid Material Between Planetary Systems: Implications for the Lithopanspermia Hypothesis". Astrobiology. 12 (8): 754–774. arXiv: 1205.1059 . doi:10.1089/ast.2012.0825. PMC   3440031 . PMID   22897115.
  13. Belbruno, E.; Marsden, B. (1997). "Resonance Hopping in Comets". The Astronomical Journal. 113: 1433–44. Bibcode:1997AJ....113.1433B. doi:10.1086/118359. Archived from the original on 2022-09-01. Retrieved 2022-09-01.
  14. Belbruno, E. (2020). "Relation Between Solutions of the Schrodinger Equation with Transitioning Resonance Solutions of the Gravitational Three-Body Problem". Journal of Physics Communications. 4 (15012): 015012. arXiv: 1905.06705 . Bibcode:2020JPhCo...4a5012B. doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ab693f. S2CID   211076278. Archived from the original on 2020-02-16. Retrieved 2022-09-01.

Further reading