West Indian Reports

Last updated

West Indian Reports
Editor
editors for 2022
  • Yonette Cummings-Edwards (Guyana)
  • Michael Barnett (Bahamas)
  • Patrick Brooks (Jamaica)
  • Mabel Abyemang (T&C)
  • Patterson Cheltenham (Barbados)
  • Narinder Hargun (Bermuda)
  • Michelle Arana (Belize)
  • Janice Pereira (ECS)
  • Adrian Saunders (CCJ)
  • Ivor Archie (T&T)
Categories Law reports
FrequencyBi-annual
PublisherButterworths (originally)
LexisNexis (now)
First issue1959 (1959)
Country United Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Website lexisweb.co.uk
OCLC 01769628

The West Indian Reports, abbreviated WIR, are a series of law reports of cases decided in the high and appellate courts of West Indian states and territories, and of appeals therefrom to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and the Caribbean Court of Justice. The Reports include judgements from The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, the Eastern Caribbean States, Guyana, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and the Turks and Caicos Islands. They were first published in 1959 and, as of 2022, are currently published in two volumes each year, in both digital and hard copy formats.

Contents

History

The Reports were first published in 1959 by Butterworths of London. [1] [note 1] Early volumes were published annually, edited by the chief justices of, and 'some other judges' in, Barbados, Guyana, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and the West Indies Associated States, and reported cases only from said jurisdictions. [2] [3] By 1988, the series were deemed essential stock for court libraries by a majority of 'legal officers, the judiciary and private practitioners of the Commonwealth Caribbean.' [4] As late as September 2004, the series were still deemed 'the only [regional] report[s] published on a regular basis.' [5] On 14 March 2007, the Caribbean Court of Justice directed that reference to the Reports 'should always' be given when cases cited in proceedings are reported in said series. [6] [note 2] By December 2018, the Reports had been digitised and disseminated online, thereby improving access to and discoverability of West Indian case law, resulting in a '[Commonwealth] Caribbean legal literature [which] has evolved rapidly in the last decade.' [7]

Reception

The Reports were initially criticised for an unusually restrictive, selective, and inconstruable editorial policy, and a prolonged time to publication, leading to 'inadequate' and 'defective' reporting. [1] [8] For instance, in April 1977, attendees of a workshop regarding legal education in the Caribbean noted 'the [continuing] need for an improved system of reporting [of] the decisions of the courts of the Commonwealth Caribbean.' [2] Further, in a July 1985 address to the Caribbean Association of Law Libraries, Claude Denbow, a tutor at the Hugh Wooding Law School, noted that the Reports were still not sufficiently referenced in proceedings before West Indian courts, especially by barristers trained in England, leading to judgements discordant with 'local conditions.' [9] Denbow attributed this state of affairs to, among other factors, the delayed publication of judgements in the Reports, and the confusing criteria employed by the Reports for the inclusion or exclusion of judgements. [10] [note 3]

Citation

Citations to the Reports are one of two standard references for proceedings before the Caribbean Court of Justice. [6] [note 4] Cases reported in the Reports are cited as in the accompanying table. [note 5] For instance, the first record of said table indicates that the decision of the Trinidad and Tobago Supreme Court, entitled Archbald v Camacho, was decided in 1960 and may be found in volume 3 of the West Indian Reports, starting on page 40.

Style of cause(year of decision)[year of report]volumereport(series)page
Archbald v Camacho(1960)3WIR40
Jorsingh v Attorney General(1997)52WIR501
Ali v David(2020)99WIR363

Notes and references

Explanatory footnotes

  1. ↑ First publication misdated to 1960 by Newton 1979, p. 2.
  2. ↑ The court further directed that reference be made to the UK Law Reports if applicable (Bastide 2007, p. 400, para. g).
  3. ↑
    When one looks at the [case] reporting system itself, there is a second area of considerable difficulty [precluding the development of 'any form of localised or West Indian jurisprudence,' the first area being a lack of secondary literature on West Indian case law]. This is because the West Indian reporting system [...] is not in the most satisfactory state. You will first of all find that the reports are quite out-of-date. Decisions made in 1979 may just be finding their way into the West Indian Reports [in] 1985. That may be overstating it a bit but I think you will find examples of that. So, long delay between the delivery of a judgement and its being carried in those reports is the first stumbling block in [the aforementioned, second] area. Secondly one is not very clear [on] what criteria are used [by the Reports], hence one finds some very trifling decisions reported and very serious decisions never find their way into the reports. They just remain as "No. 1100 of 1979" and you might pick it up by luck or chance [only]. So when you take those factors together – the delayed publication, and the confusing criteria as to what decisions make the Reports – you will find that the whole impact of West Indian decisions [on jurisprudence] is nullified in this part of the world [the West Indies itself] because people are not going to spend an inordinate length of time looking for a decision. [...] [I]n the professional field, the reality of it is that you are not going to find the West Indian decisions being pursued.
    —  Denbow 1986, p. 34, paras. 8-10
  4. ↑ The other being citations to the UK Law Reports (Bastide 2007, p. 400, para. g).
  5. ↑ Examples in proceeding table were taken from, from top to bottom, UKPC 2022, para. 56, UKSC 2011, para. 214, CCJ 2022, Cases referred to sec. on eighth unnumbered page.

Short citations

  1. 1 2 Patchett 1963, p. 964.
  2. 1 2 Newton 1979, p. 2.
  3. ↑ Mudge, Archibald & Pollard 1989, p. 37, sec. 2.a.
  4. ↑ Newton 1988, pp. 9–10.
  5. ↑ Wenger 2004, p. 14.
  6. 1 2 Bastide 2007, p. 400, para. f.
  7. ↑ Dina 2018, secs. 1, 7.
  8. ↑ Newton 1979, pp. 2–3.
  9. ↑ Denbow 1986, pp. 33–34, paras. 4-5, 8.
  10. ↑ Denbow 1986, pp. 33–34, paras. 6, 8, 9-10.

Full citations

  1. "Jogie v Sealey" (Appeal No. 0090 of 2017). London: Privy Council. 15 August 2022.
  2. "Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department". London: Supreme Court. 23 March 2011.
  3. "Sersland & Paz v St Matthews University School of Medicine Ltd". Port of Spain, Trinidad: Caribbean Court of Justice. 24 November 2022.
  4. Bastide, M. A. de la (14 March 2007). "Practice Direction (Caribbean Court of Justice: Citation of Judgments and Reported Cases)". West Indian Reports. pp. 399–401.
  5. Davies, Lisa; Tyson, Alice (February 2022). "Commonwealth countries: Commonwealth". IALS Library (Library guide). London: School of Advanced Study of the University of London.
  6. Denbow, Claude (July–November 1986). "West Indian Legal Material – Availability – Problems of the Researchers". Caribbean Law Librarian. Vol. 3, no. 2–3. Kingston, Jamaica: Caribbean Association of Law Libraries. pp. 33–36. hdl:2027/txu.059172018130807.
  7. Dina, Yemisi (November–December 2018) [First published May 2006]. "Guide to Caribbean Law Research". GlobaLex. Updated version. New York, NY: New York University.
  8. Newton, Velma (March 1979). "An Historical Perspective of Law Reporting in the English-Speaking Caribbean: A Case for Regional Law Reporting". International Journal of Law Libraries. 7 (1): 1–22. ISSN   0340-045X.
  9. Newton, Velma (September 1988). "Standards for Court Libraries". Caribbean Journal of Legal Information. 5 (2): 6–13. ISSN   0255-7118.
  10. Patchett, K. W. (July 1963). "English Law in the West Indies: A Conference Report". International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 12 (3): 922–966. JSTOR   756296.
  11. Mudge, Arthur W.; Archibald, Joseph; Pollard, Duke E. E. (July 1989). Caribbean Improvement of Justice Project (Eastern Caribbean and Belize): Midterm Evaluation (Report). Washington, DC: TvT Associates for USAID.
  12. Wenger, Jean M. (September 2004). "Caribbean Law Librarian Par Excellence Addresses Members in Boston". FCIL Newsletter. Vol. 19, no. 1. Chicago, IL: American Association of Law Libraries. pp. 14–15.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">West Indies Federation</span> 1958–1962 political union of British island colonies in the Caribbean

The West Indies Federation, also known as the West Indies, the Federation of the West Indies or the West Indian Federation, was a short-lived political union that existed from 3 January 1958 to 31 May 1962. Various islands in the Caribbean that were part of the British Empire, including Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, Jamaica, and those on the Leeward and Windward Islands, came together to form the Federation, with its capital in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. The expressed intention of the Federation was to create a political unit that would become independent from Britain as a single state — possibly similar to the Canadian Confederation, Australian Commonwealth, or Central African Federation. Before that could happen, the Federation collapsed due to internal political conflicts over how it would be governed or function viably. The formation of a West Indian Federation was encouraged by the United Kingdom, but also requested by West Indian nationalists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">University of the West Indies</span> International university in the Caribbean

The University of the West Indies (UWI), originally University College of the West Indies, is a public university system established to serve the higher education needs of the residents of 18 English-speaking countries and territories in the Caribbean: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, and Turks and Caicos Islands. Each country is either a member of the Commonwealth of Nations or a British Overseas Territory. The aim of the university is to help "unlock the potential for economic and cultural growth" in the West Indies, thus allowing improved regional autonomy. The university was originally instituted as an independent external college of the University of London.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caribbean Court of Justice</span>

The Caribbean Court of Justice is the judicial institution of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM). Established in 2005, it is based in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago.

Representation of the People Act is a stock short title used in Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belize, Ghana, Grenada, Guyana, India, Jamaica, Mauritius, Pakistan, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, the United Kingdom and Vanuatu for legislation dealing with the electoral system. Representation of the People Acts is a collective title for legislation relating to representation of the people, including Rating Acts and other Registration Acts. The title was first used in the United Kingdom in the 1832 Great Reform Act and was adopted in other countries of, or formerly part of, the British Empire thorugh the spread of the Westminster parliamentary system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court</span> Caribbean court system established under the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States

The Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (ECSC) is a superior court of record for the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), including six independent states: Antigua and Barbuda, the Commonwealth of Dominica, Grenada, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and three British Overseas Territories. It has unlimited jurisdiction in each member State.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Windward Islands</span> 1833–1959 British colonial division in the Caribbean

The British Windward Islands was an administrative grouping of British colonies in the Windward Islands of the West Indies, existing from 1833 until 31 December 1959 and consisting of the islands of Grenada, St Lucia, Saint Vincent, the Grenadines, Barbados, Tobago, and Dominica, previously included in the British Leeward Islands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dana Seetahal</span> Trinidad and Tobago lawyer (1955–2014)

Dana Saroop Seetahal SC was an Independent Senator in the Trinidad and Tobago Senate. She was an attorney at law in private practice and was formerly a lecturer at the Hugh Wooding Law School, Trinidad and Tobago, where she held the position of Course Director in Criminal Practice and Procedure. She was assassinated in Port of Spain on May 4, 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Barbados</span>

The Judiciary of Barbados is an independent branch of the Barbadian government, subject only to the Barbadian Constitution. It is headed by the Chief Justice of Barbados. Barbados is a common law jurisdiction, in which precedents from English law and British Commonwealth tradition may be taken into account.

The Chief Justice of Trinidad and Tobago is the highest judge of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago and presides over its Supreme Court of Judicature. He is appointed by a common decision of the president, the prime minister and the leader of the main opposition party.

<i>Yong Vui Kong v Public Prosecutor</i> Singapore Supreme Court case

Yong Vui Kong v. Public Prosecutor was a seminal case decided in 2010 by the Court of Appeal of Singapore which, in response to a challenge by Yong Vui Kong, a convicted drug smuggler, held that the mandatory death penalty imposed by the Misuse of Drugs Act ("MDA") for certain drug trafficking offences does not infringe Articles 9(1) and 12(1) of the Constitution of Singapore.

<i>Shadrake v Attorney-General</i>

Shadrake Alan v. Attorney-General is a 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeal of Singapore that clarified the law relating to the offence of scandalizing the court. Alan Shadrake, the author of the book Once a Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock (2010), was charged with contempt of court by way of scandalizing the court. The Prosecution alleged that certain passages in his book asserted that the Singapore judiciary lacks independence, succumbs to political and economic pressure, and takes a person's position in society into account when sentencing; and that it is the method by which Singapore's ruling party, the People's Action Party, stifles political dissent in Singapore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Threshold issues in Singapore administrative law</span> Legal requirements to be satisfied to bring cases to the High Court

Threshold issues are legal requirements in Singapore administrative law that must be satisfied by applicants before their claims for judicial review of acts or decisions of public authorities can be dealt with by the High Court. These include showing that they have standing to bring cases, and that the matters are amenable to judicial review and justiciable by the Court.

The Hugh Wooding Law School (HWLS) is a law school in Trinidad and Tobago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Queen of Trinidad and Tobago</span> Head of state of Trinidad and Tobago from 1962 to 1976

The Queen of Trinidad and Tobago was the head of state from independence in 1962 until the abolition of the monarchy in 1976. The monarch's constitutional roles were delegated to a governor-general, who acted on the advice of government ministers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ulric Cross</span> Trinidadian lawyer and diplomat (1917–2013)

Philip Louis Ulric Cross was a Trinidadian jurist, diplomat and Royal Air Force (RAF) navigator, recognised as possibly the most decorated West Indian of World War II. He is credited with helping to prevent some two hundred bombers from being shot down in a raid over Germany in 1943. He subsequently studied law at London's Middle Temple, and went on to fulfil a distinguished international career as a jurist across Africa and within Trinidad and Tobago. He also served as a diplomat for Trinidad and Tobago to the United Kingdom.

Anthony Amos Lucky is a judge of the United Nations International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. As a retired Court of Appeal Judge, Anthony served in the legal system of Trinidad and Tobago as a magistrate for ten years prior to becoming a judge for another 16 years. He is the recipient of the Chaconia Medal (Gold) for his long and meritorious service to Trinidad and Tobago.

Jason Jones is a gay LGBTQI+ activist from Trinidad and Tobago who successfully challenged the constitutionality of Sections 13 and 16 of the Sexual Offenses Act prohibiting consensual adult intercourse per anum and sexual acts between consenting same-sex adults. In a landmark judgment in the English-speaking Caribbean, Justice Devindra Rampersad ruled the clauses unconstitutional and null and void.

Michael de la Bastide, KC is a Trinidad and Tobago lawyer. He was the Chief Justice of Trinidad and Tobago from 1995 until 2002.

<i>Orozco v Attorney General</i> Belize Supreme Court case decided in 2016

Orozco v Attorney General (2016) 90 WIR 161, also known as Orozco v AG, the Orozco case, or the UNIBAM case, was a landmark case heard by the Supreme Court of Belize, which held that a long-standing buggery statute breached constitutional rights to dignity, equality before the law, freedom of expression, privacy, and non-discrimination on grounds of sex, and which declared the statute null and void to the applicable extent. The decision decriminalised consensual same-sex intercourse for the first time in 127 years, and established that the constitutional right to non-discrimination on grounds of sex extended to sexual orientation.

The Law Reports of the Commonwealth, abbreviated LRC, are a series of law reports of landmark cases decided in the high and appellate courts of members of the Commonwealth of Nations. The LRC were first published in 1985 and, as of 2022, are published in five volumes each year, in both digital and hard copy formats.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.