Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission

Last updated

The Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission, as constituted under the Industrial Relations Act 1979, [1] conciliates and arbitrates industrial disputes, sets conditions of employment and fixes wages and salaries by making industrial awards, approves enterprise agreements and decides claims of unfair dismissal in the State of Western Australia, with respect to those employers not regulated by the Commonwealth of Australia under the Fair Work Act 2009 .

Contents

History

The industrial conciliation system, modelled on New Zealand's Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1894 , was created in Western Australia in 1900, before the formation of the Commonwealth of Australia the following year. [2] It provided for the division of the Colony (later the State) into Industrial Districts [3] (each with its own Board of Conciliation), [4] the decisions of which were subject to appeal to a Court of Arbitration. [5] The first Board of Conciliation did not commence operation until 11 July 1901, and the Court of Arbitration did not first sit until 2 April 1902. [6]

The Court of Arbitration became the Western Australia Industrial Commission in 1963, [7] and later became the Western Australia Industrial Relations Commission in 1979. [8] The scope of its jurisdiction was significantly restricted in 2006 when the Commonwealth's WorkChoices legislation came into effect, later revised by the Fair Work Act 2009 . [9] Of all the States, WA was the only one not to exercise its referral power to delegate further jurisdiction to the Fair Work Commission.

Jurisdiction

The commission has jurisdiction to hear applications for industrial awards in respect of employees and to vary those awards. It also considers applications to register Industrial Agreements between employers and employees.

Where there is an industrial dispute, it will consider applications for compulsory Conferences to settle those disputes.

The commission can also consider applications by employers claiming unfair dismissal or that their contractual rights haven’t been fulfilled.

Composition

The commission consists of a chief commissioner; a senior commissioner; and other commissioners as required. Each is appointed by the Governor of Western Australia. Prior to 2019 a commissioned role of President heard appeals made disputing any tribunal orders\decisions.

The bulk of the work is carried out in the commission by commissioners. However, some work must be dealt in separate divisions of the commission. The Registrar of the courts along with the Deputy Registrars operations internally, executives to the state department hosting multiple tribunal (or quasi-judicial) proceedings before Industrial Magistrates (State justice), Public Appeal Board members (varies), Road Freight Transport Industry Tribunal, Employment Dispute Resolution, Occupational Safety and Health Tribunal. [10]

In 2018 amendments to the states Industrial Relations Act 1979 removed requirements for the Presidents role, the president was abolished with all role duties transferred to the chief commissioner. The president at that time; her honour J.H Smith, was dual appointed and a sworn Judge to the Supreme Court. Notably former W.A.I.R.C. president Jennifer H. Smith will forever be the first, last and only female ever appointed president. Circa both roles J.H. Smith became the first female senior commissioner appointed in W.A.I.R.C. The first female appointed a chief Commissioner was (and is currently) Chief Commissioner P.E. Scott.

A trifecta occurring when Susan Bastian became the first female Registrar as successor to John Spurling (JP.) as the dual appointed CEO and Registrar of the courts; heading the Department of the Registrar. This department provides the Registry handling applications from public, state\local agencies, Inquiry or even private hosted administration disputes of and provides preliminary conference conciliation aiming to mediation matter resolutions and saving formal court proceeds.

Western Australian Industrial Appeal Court, which hears appeals from decisions of the president (former appeals heard from 2016 or prior), the full bench, and the commission in court session.

The Full Bench of the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission hears appeals from the decisions of industrial magistrates and commissioners. The Full Bench was constituted by the President and at least two other Commissioners prior to 2019. In the future, it will consist of the Chief Commissioner and two suitable commission members.

The Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission in Court Session deals with the State Wage Case and other cases of importance that are referred to it. In 2006 the State Wage Case held by WAIRC was the first Australian court to webcast proceedings live to the public. All wage case since and up until 2018 are direct feeds from internal digital court recordings; further to this WAIRC was the first Australian courts to implement Audia digital signal processors from BiAMP. [11] Prior to federal formation of the Australian Fair Work Commission the then A.I.R.C. co-located admin services within the Registry to WAIRC.

Further reading

Related Research Articles

The Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC), known from 1956 to 1973 as the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission and from 1973 to 1988 as the Australian Conciliation and Arbitration Commission, was a tribunal with powers under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 that existed from 1956 until 2010. It was the central institution of Australian labour law. The AIRC replaced a previous system of industrial courts, which broadly speaking, was engaged in the same functions, but with superior independence and powers.

Australian labour law concerns Commonwealth, state, and common law on rights and duties of workers, unions and employers in Australia. Australian labour law has a dual structure, where some employment issues and relationships are governed by Commonwealth laws, and others are governed by state and territory laws or the common law. It shares a heritage with laws across the Commonwealth of Nations, UK labour law and standards set by the International Labour Organization, the Australian legislature and courts have a built a comprehensive charter of rights at work.

<i>R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers Society of Australia</i> Judgement of the High Court of Australia

R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia, known as the Boilermakers' Case, was a 1956 decision of the High Court of Australia which considered the powers of the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration to punish the Boilermakers' Society of Australia, a union which had disobeyed the orders of that court in relation to an industrial dispute between boilermakers and their employer body, the Metal Trades Employers' Association.

<i>Harvester case</i> Australian labour law decision

Ex parte H.V. McKay, commonly referred to as the Harvester case, is a landmark Australian labour law decision of the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration. The case arose under the Excise Tariff Act 1906 which imposed an excise duty on goods manufactured in Australia, £6 in the case of a stripper harvester, however if a manufacturer paid "fair and reasonable" wages to its employees, it was be excused from paying the excise duty. The Court therefore had to consider what was a "fair and reasonable" wage for the purpose of the act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration</span> Australian court (1904 to 1956)

The Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration was an Australian court that operated from 1904 to 1956 with jurisdiction to hear and arbitrate interstate industrial disputes, and to make awards. It also had the judicial functions of interpreting and enforcing awards and hearing other criminal and civil cases relating to industrial relations law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Court of Australia</span> Australian superior federal court

The Federal Court of Australia is an Australian superior court of record which has jurisdiction to deal with most civil disputes governed by federal law, along with some summary and indictable criminal matters. Cases are heard at first instance mostly by single judges. In cases of importance, a Full Court comprising three judges can be convened upon determination by the Chief Justice. The Court also has appellate jurisdiction, which is mostly exercised by a Full Court comprising three judges, the only avenue of appeal from which lies to the High Court of Australia. In the Australian court hierarchy, the Federal Court occupies a position equivalent to the supreme courts of each of the states and territories. In relation to the other courts in the federal stream, it is superior to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for all jurisdictions except family law. It was established in 1976 by the Federal Court of Australia Act.

Common rule awards are a particular form of industrial award used in Australia to regulate minimum terms and conditions of employment. Awards are the end product of the processes of conciliation and arbitration where an industrial tribunal makes an award in settlement of an industrial dispute. Whereas awards are legally binding on all parties to the dispute which are named in the award, with common rule awards all employers in the industry or occupation covered by the award are bound by it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales</span>

The Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales conciliates and arbitrates industrial disputes, sets conditions of employment and fixes wages and salaries by making industrial awards, approves enterprise agreements and decides claims of unfair dismissal in New South Wales, a state of Australia. The Commission was established with effect from 2 September 1996 pursuant to the Industrial Relations Act 1996.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial officers of the Republic of Singapore</span>

The judicial officers of the Republic of Singapore work in the Supreme Court and the State Courts to hear and determine disputes between litigants in civil cases and, in criminal matters, to determine the liability of accused persons and their sentences if they are convicted.

The Court of Arbitration was the first court in New South Wales, a state of Australia which dealt exclusively with industrial relation disputes in the early twentieth century. Justice Lance Wright claims that it perhaps was the first court of its type in the world. The court was unique at that time as it was the first court of its type to deal with labour relations between employer and employees on a compulsory basis. Previous arbitration measures between employer and employee had been on a voluntary basis or had been based on the criminal justice system through the use of criminal penalties. The conventional economic model is that both employer and employee enjoy equal bargaining power to set wages and conditions. This asserts that both parties are able to agree on a fair market price for the cost of labour free from distortions. However, where employers or employees group together, these outcomes can be distorted particularly in “boom” or “bust” economic conditions. The purpose of the court was to change the manner in which employers and employees negotiated pay and conditions. It was an attempt to reduce the power imbalances between employer groups or employee unions that arose from using collective bargaining, and the resulting use of that market power to influence wages, and also to reduce the threat of lockout or strikes to achieve those ends.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fair Work Commission</span> Australian industrial relations tribunal

The Fair Work Commission (FWC), until 2013 known as Fair Work Australia (FWA), is the Australian industrial relations tribunal created by the Fair Work Act 2009 as part of the Rudd Government's reforms to industrial relations in Australia. Operations commenced on 1 July 2009. It is the successor of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, and also performs functions previously performed by the Workplace Authority and the Australian Fair Pay Commission.

In labour law, unfair dismissal is an act of employment termination made without good reason or contrary to the country's specific legislation.

Hon. Edward Arthur DunphyQC was a justice within the Australian federal court system.

<i>Australian Boot Trade Employees Federation v Whybrow & Co</i> Judgement of the High Court of Australia

Australian Boot Trade Employees Federation v Whybrow & Co, commonly known as Whybrow's case or the Boot Trades case was the third of a series of decisions of the High Court of Australia in 1910 concerning the boot manufacturing industry and the role of the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration in preventing and settling industrial disputes. In doing so the High Court considered the constitutional power of the Federal Parliament to provide for common rule awards and the jurisdiction of the High Court to grant prohibition against the Arbitration Court. The majority held in Whybrow that the Arbitration Court could not make an award that was inconsistent with a State law, but that different minimum wages were not inconsistent as it was possible to obey both laws. In Whybrow the High Court established the doctrine of ambit, with the emphasis on the precise claim made and refused, and the practice with respect to "paper disputes" being treated "prima facie as genuine and real", with the majority holding that the High Court had power to order prohibition to correct jurisdictional error as part of its original jurisdiction. Finally in Whybrow the High Court unanimously held that the Federal Parliament had no constitutional power to provide for common rule awards.

<i>Federated Sawmill Employees Association v James Moore & Sons Pty Ltd</i> Landmark Australian court case

Federated Sawmill Employees Association v James Moore & Sons Pty Ltd, commonly known as the Woodworkers case or the Sawmillers case was a decision of the High Court of Australia in 1909 concerning the question whether the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration could make an award that was inconsistent with a State wages board determination. The High Court was divided 2:2 and thus the decision of the Chief Justice prevailed, in what is sometimes described as a statutory majority. Griffith CJ, O'Connor J agreeing, held that the Arbitration Court could not make an award that was inconsistent with the minimum wages fixed by a Wages Board under a State law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commonwealth Industrial Court</span> Former Court of Australia, replaced by the Federal Court of Australia

The Commonwealth Industrial Court, known as the Australian Industrial Court from 1973, was a specialist court to deal with industrial matters, principally the enforcement of awards and orders of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission. Over time it took on more matters and its judges were allocated a wide range of judicial tasks until it was replaced in 1977 by the Federal Court of Australia which had a more general jurisdiction covering matters arising under Australian federal law.

The South Australian Employment Tribunal, which also sits as the South Australian Employment Court is a South Australian tribunal empowered to adjudicate on rights and liabilities arising out of employment. It has existed in some form or another since 1912, under various names.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nicholas Blain</span> Australian economist

Alexander Nicholas John Blain is an economist, specialising in industrial relations. He served as: a Presidential Member of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission; Chief Adviser to Western Australia's Labour Relations Minister, The Hon. Graham Kierath MLA, in Premier Richard Court's Liberal-National Government; and Head of Department of Industrial Relations at The University of Western Australia.

The Department of the Registrar Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission is a department of the Government of Western Australia.

References

  1. ↑ currently consolidated as the "Industrial Relations Act 1979". Act No. 114 of 1979 (PDF).
  2. ↑ "Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1900". Act No. 20 of 1900 (PDF)., later replaced by the "Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1902". Act No. 21 of 1902 (PDF).
  3. ↑ 1900 Act, s. 26
  4. ↑ 1900 Act, s. 31
  5. ↑ 1900 Act, s. 53
  6. ↑ "Before the Western Industrial Relations Commission: Full Bench Centenary Sitting" (PDF). www.wairc.wa.gov.au. 2 April 2002.
  7. ↑ "Industrial Arbitration Act Amendment (No. 2) Act, 1963". Act No. 76 of 1963 (PDF).
  8. ↑ "Industrial Arbitration Act 1979". Act No. 114 of 1979 (PDF).
  9. ↑ "Coverage Of Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA)". wairc.wa.gov.au. Retrieved 9 January 2019.
  10. ↑ "Home". wairc.wa.gov.au.
  11. ↑ "Well that's disappointing".
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.