Wilkie v Commonwealth

Last updated

Wilkie v Commonwealth; Australian Marriage Equality v Minister for Finance
Coat of Arms of Australia.svg
Court High Court of Australia
Decided
  • 7 September 2017 – Pronouncement of orders
  • 28 September 2017 – Reasons for judgement delivered
Citation(s) [2017] HCA 40
Transcript(s)
Case opinions
7:0 expenditure for the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey had been approved by Parliament and was the collection of "statistical information"
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Kiefel CJ, Bell, Gageler, Keane, Nettle, Gordon, Edelman JJ

Wilkie v Commonwealth and Australian Marriage Equality v Minister for Finance, [1] [2] were two cases heard simultaneously by the High Court which held that the expenditure for the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey had been approved by Parliament and involved the collection of "statistical information" that could be conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The case was heard urgently and the Court pronounced its orders on 7 September 2017, [3] and delivered their reasons for judgment on 28 September 2017. [1]

Contents

Background

When the idea of a postal plebiscite/vote was first raised in August, several legal experts warned of concerns regarding the capacity for such an event to be held without parliamentary approval through enactment of specific legislation. [4]

Constitutional expert George Williams described the proposal of the postal survey as a "poorly constructed vote for which [the government] doesn't have the correct [legal] procedures". [5] Anne Twomey, a constitutional law expert from the University of Sydney expressed scepticism over the role of the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) in the survey, stating that "the power of the ABS is to collect statistics...rather than opinions. Someone might therefore challenge it on the ground that it does not fall within the legislative functions of the ABS". [5] Both experts further doubted the capacity of the Finance Minister to allocate the necessary funding ($122 million) to the ABS, considering that such a non-legislated advance to a department can only be made in "urgent" and "unforeseen circumstances". [5] [6] Some constitutional law experts said the survey was likely to be struck down by the courts because "[g]iven the long-running debate on same-sex marriage, it is far from obvious that it fits into these [urgent and unforeseen] categories." [7]

The government refused to release to the public the legal advice it received, though Attorney-General George Brandis stated in an interview with the ABC 7.30 program that "we have acted on Solicitor-General's advice in which we are confident". [8] During court proceedings, the government revealed it was investigating ways to continue with the postal survey even if the legal challenges were successful. [9]

Two legal challenges were lodged contesting the legality of the survey with the High Court of Australia, both on the grounds of unlawful funding from legally-specified funds and unlawful operation by the ABS. The High Court agreed to hear arguments in its cases on 5 and 6 September 2017 without ordering any temporary injunction. [10] [11]

An additional complaint was lodged by a 17-year-old boy with the Australian Human Rights Commission in August 2017, on the basis that the rules did not allow provisionally enrolled 16- and 17-year-old Australians the right to participate in the survey. [12] [13] The complaint could have led to a federal court case to argue for the right of about 50,000 Australians aged 16 and 17 on the electoral roll to vote, however the boy dropped his complaint on 22 September, after a Greens amendment to the Marriage Law Survey (Additional Safeguards) Act 2017 was rejected by the Parliament earlier in the month. [14] Legal counsel to the boy advised that the rejected amendment would make the age discrimination complaint much more difficult to argue, because parliament had considered and rejected extending the vote to enrolled 16- and 17-year-olds. [14]

Argent–Marlowe–Wilkie challenge

Same-sex marriage advocates Shelley Argent (national spokeswoman of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays) and Felicity Marlowe (member of Rainbow Families), along with independent MP Andrew Wilkie, announced they would challenge the postal survey in the High Court on 9 August 2017 and seek a temporary injunction. [15] [16] The Argent-Marlowe-Wilkie challenge was against the Commonwealth of Australia, Mathias Cormann, Scott Morrison, David Kalisch and Tom Rogers, the electoral commissioner. [17] In the government's submissions to this court challenge the government responded that "[i]t is not correct to characterise the activity [of participation in the survey] as a vote." [18] The court questioned the validity of Wilkie's claim to standing on the case by virtue of his being a member of Parliament, but did not challenge Marlowe's claim to standing as being in a same-sex relationship. [19] Solicitor-General Stephen Donaghue, for the government, argued that this was not enough for Marlowe to bring the case. [20]

Australian Marriage Equality–Rice challenge

On 10 August, the Human Rights Law Centre filed a legal action on behalf of Australian Marriage Equality and Greens Senator Janet Rice. [21] [22] [23] The Australian Marriage Equality-Rice challenge was against Cormann and Kalisch, and argued that the provisions used by Cormann to finance the survey could only be used for ordinary government business. [17]

High Court judgment

The High Court handed down a summary ruling in both cases on 7 September 2017. The court determined that the survey was lawful, allowing it to proceed as scheduled. [24] [25] The challengers have been ordered to pay costs. [26] The High Court handed down its unanimous reasons on 28 September 2017, finding that $295 million had been appropriated by parliament, and that whether the expenditure was unforeseen was a matter for the Minister's satisfaction and there was no error of law in either his reasoning or his conclusion. The information to be collected was "statistical information" of matters prescribed in the Census and Statistics Regulation 2016 (Cth). As the court had considered and rejected the grounds of the application, there was no need to decide whether or not whether the plaintiffs had standing. [1] [2]

See also

Related Research Articles

Same-sex marriage Marriage of persons of the same sex or gender identity

Same-sex marriage, also known as gay marriage or homosexual marriage, is the marriage of two people of the same sex or gender. There are records of same-sex marriage dating back to the first century. In the modern era, marriage equality for same-sex couples was first legally acknowledged in the Netherlands on 1 April 2001.

Rodney Croome

Rodney Peter Croome AM is an Australian LGBT rights activist and academic. He worked on the campaign to decriminalise homosexuality in Tasmania, was a founder of Australian Marriage Equality, and currently serves as the spokesperson for the Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group and a spokesperson for Just.Equal. He resigned from Australian Marriage Equality to campaign against a national plebiscite on same-sex marriage.

Marriage Act 1961 (Australia)

In Australia, the Marriage Act 1961 is an Act of the Australian Parliament to regulate marriage law in Australia.

LGBT rights in Australia Rights of LGBT people in Australia

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights in Australia have advanced over the later half of the twentieth century and early twenty-first century to make Australia one of the most LGBT-accepting countries in the world, with opinion polls and the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey indicating widespread popular support for same-sex marriage. A 2013 Pew Research poll found that 79% of Australians agreed that homosexuality should be accepted by society, making it the fifth-most supportive country surveyed in the world. With its long history of LGBT activism and annual Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras festival, Sydney has been named one of the most gay-friendly cities in Australia, and the world as a whole.

Australian Bureau of Statistics Federal statistics and census agency of the Australian Government

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) is the independent statutory agency of the Australian Government responsible for statistical collection and analysis, and for giving evidence-based advice to federal, state and territory governments. The ABS collects and analyses statistics on economic, population, environmental and social issues, publishing many on their website. The ABS also operates the national Census of Population and Housing that occurs every five years.

Same-sex marriage in Australia has been legal since 9 December 2017. Legislation to allow same-sex marriage, the Marriage Amendment Act 2017, passed the Australian Parliament on 7 December 2017 and received royal assent from the Governor-General the following day. The law came into effect on 9 December, immediately recognising overseas same-sex marriages. The first same-sex wedding under Australian law was held on 15 December 2017. The passage of the law followed a voluntary postal survey of all Australians, in which 61.6% of respondents supported legalisation of same-sex marriage.

Mathias Cormann Secretary-General of the OECD

Mathias Hubert Paul Cormann is a Belgian-born Australian politician and diplomat who currently serves as the Secretary-General of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). He assumed the office on 1 June 2021, upon the retirement of his predecessor José Ángel Gurría. Previously, he served as the Australian Minister for Finance from 2013 to 2020 and Western Australian senator for the Liberal Party from 2007 to 2020. His seven year, 42 day tenure as Minister for Finance was the longest in Australian history, spanning the Abbott, Turnbull, and Morrison governments. He additionally served as Minister for the Public Service from 2018 to 2019.

Same-sex marriage is legal in the Australian Capital Territory, and in the rest of Australia, after the Federal Parliament legalised same-sex marriage in December 2017.

Australian Marriage Equality (AME) is an advocacy group driven by volunteers who have come together to pursue the legalisation of same-sex marriage in Australia. AME partners with a diverse range of organisations and supporters across the country to end the exclusion of same-sex LGBTIQ couples from marriage in Australia. It is the pre-eminent group campaigning for same-sex marriage in Australia.

<i>Marriage Equality (Same Sex) Act 2013</i>

The Marriage Equality Act 2013 was an act of parliament of the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly that was intended to legalise same-sex marriage in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). It was first presented to the ACT Legislative Assembly on 19 September 2013 by the ACT Attorney-General, Simon Corbell. The law intended to build on the existing recognition of same-sex unions in the Australian Capital Territory, which included recognition of de facto partners, civil partnerships and same-sex-only civil unions. The act was passed in the Legislative Assembly on 22 October 2013. It came into operation on 7 November although wedding ceremonies under the provisions of the Act did not occur until 7 December 2013.

LGBT rights in Tasmania

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the Australian state of Tasmania have the same legal rights as non-LGBT residents. Tasmania has a transformative history with respect to the rights of LGBT people. Initially dubbed "Bigots Island" by international media due to intense social and political hostility to LGBT rights up until the late 1990s, the state has subsequently been recognised for LGBT law reforms that have been described by activists such as Rodney Croome as among the most extensive and noteworthy in the world. Tasmania imposed the harshest penalties in the Western world for homosexual activity until 1997, when it was the last Australian jurisdiction to decriminalise homosexuality after a United Nations Human Rights Committee ruling, the passage of federal sexual privacy legislation and a High Court challenge to the state's anti-homosexuality laws. Following decriminalisation, social and political attitudes in the state rapidly shifted in favour of LGBT rights ahead of national trends with strong anti-LGBT discrimination laws passed in 1999, and the first state relationship registration scheme to include same-sex couples introduced in 2003. In 2019, Tasmania passed and implemented the world’s most progressive gender-optional birth certificate laws.

LGBT rights in the Australian Capital Territory

The Australian Capital Territory (ACT) is one of Australia's leading jurisdictions with respect to the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) people. The ACT has made a number of reforms to territory law designed to prevent discrimination of LGBT people; it was the only state or territory jurisdiction in Australia to pass a law for same-sex marriage, which was later overturned by the High Court of Australia. The Australian Capital Territory, Victoria and Queensland are the only jurisdictions within Australia to legally ban conversion therapy on children. The ACT's laws also apply to the smaller Jervis Bay Territory.

David Wayne Kalisch is an Australian economist and public servant. From 2014 to 2019, he was the Australian Statistician in charge of the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).

The history of same-sex marriage in Australia includes its express prohibition by the Howard Government in 2004 and its eventual legalisation by the Parliament in December 2017. Although a same-sex marriage law was passed by the Australian Capital Territory in 2013, it was struck down by the High Court on the basis of inconsistency with federal law. The Court's decision closed the possibility of concurrent state or territory laws that would allow same-sex marriage where federal law did not. A law legalising same-sex marriage passed the Parliament on 7 December 2017 and received royal assent the following day.

Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey National survey to gauge support for legalising same-sex marriage in Australia

The Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey was a national survey designed to gauge support for legalising same-sex marriage in Australia. The survey was held via the postal service between 12 September and 7 November 2017. Unlike voting in elections and referendums, which is compulsory in Australia, responding to the survey was voluntary.

A number of politicians, public figures, media outlets, businesses and other organisations endorsed voting either in favour or against same-sex marriage during the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey.

Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia

Debate has occurred throughout Asia over proposals to legalize same-sex marriage as well as civil unions.

Public opinion of same-sex marriage in Australia has shifted from 38% support in 2004 to consistent majority support of 61% in 2017.

Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Act 2017 Enacted law in Australia

The Marriage Amendment Act 2017 is an Act of the Parliament of Australia, which legalises same-sex marriage in Australia by amending the Marriage Act 1961 to allow marriage between two persons of marriageable age, regardless of their gender.

Human Rights Law Centre

The Human Rights Law Centre or HRLC is an Australian human rights group, with locations in South Melbourne and Sydney.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Wilkie v Commonwealth; Australian Marriage Equality v Minister for Finance [2017] HCA 40.
  2. 1 2 "Judgment summary" (PDF). High Court. 28 September 2017.
  3. ↑ Wilkie v Commonwealth; Australian Marriage Equality v Minister for Finance [2017] HCATrans 176 (7 September 2017).
  4. ↑ "A Marriage Equality Postal Plebiscite Would Likely Be Found Invalid by the High Court, Lawyers Claim". BuzzFeed. 6 August 2017.
  5. 1 2 3 "Postal plebiscite a 'stretch' and will face High Court challenge, warn experts". The Sydney Morning Herald. 8 August 2017.
  6. ↑ "Using the ABS to conduct a same-sex marriage poll is legally shaky and lacks legitimacy". The Conversation Australia. 10 August 2017.
  7. ↑ Lewis, R (30 August 2017). "Same-sex marriage postal survey 'likely to be struck down by High Court'". The Australian. Retrieved 2 September 2017. Lock-red.svg
  8. ↑ "Geprge Brandis predicts same-sex marriage will be legal by Christmas". abc.net.au/7.30. 8 August 2017.
  9. ↑ Koziol, Michael (7 September 2017). "Turnbull government discussing ways to hold postal survey even if it is rejected by High Court". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  10. ↑ "Australian High Court to hear challenge to same-sex postal ballot in September". ABC News. 11 August 2017.
  11. ↑ "SSM: High Court to hand down decision on same-sex marriage survey tomorrow". ABC News. 6 September 2017.
  12. ↑ "Schoolboy, 17, lodges discrimination complaint over same-sex marriage survey". The Guardian. 23 August 2017.
  13. ↑ "Meet The Teen Who Wants To Take The Govt To Court Over The Marriage Survey". Junkee.com. 25 August 2017.
  14. 1 2 "Schooboy drops age discrimination complaint against same-sex marriage survey". The Guardian. 25 September 2017.
  15. ↑ "Marriage equality postal vote to be challenged in high court by Andrew Wilkie and advocates". Guardian Australia. 9 August 2017.
  16. ↑ "Submissions for Wilkie, Marlowe and Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays" (PDF). 23 August 2017 – via Hcourt.gov.au.
  17. 1 2 Sainty, Lane (4 September 2017). "Here's Your Guide to the Big High Court Hearing Against The Same-Sex Marriage Survey". BuzzFeed. Retrieved 4 September 2017.
  18. ↑ Aly, Waleed (31 August 2017). "We all deserve a little more respect from Turnbull & Co". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2 September 2017.
  19. ↑ Sainty, Lane (5 September 2017). "This Is What You Missed at the First Day of the High Court Case Against The Same-Sex Marriage Survey". BuzzFeed. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
  20. ↑ "Government lawyers make case for same-sex marriage survey in High Court". ABC News. 6 September 2017. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
  21. ↑ "Marriage equality campaign launches High Court challenge against postal plebiscite". Human Rights Law Centre. 10 August 2017.
  22. ↑ Australian Marriage Equality Ltd & Rice v Minister for Finance & Kalisch [2017] HCATrans 152 No M106 of 2017.
  23. ↑ "Submissions for Australian Marriage Equality and Rice" (PDF). 23 August 2017 – via Hcourt.gov.au.
  24. ↑ "SSM: High Court rules Government can run same-sex marriage postal survey". ABC News. 7 September 2017.
  25. ↑ "Same-sex marriage postal survey is lawful, high court finds". The Guardian. 7 September 2017.
  26. ↑ "High Court gives the green light to the same-sex marriage survey". The Sydney Morning Herald. 7 September 2017.
  27. ↑ Williams v Commonwealth [2012] HCA 23 , (2012) 248 CLR 156(20 June 2012), High Court.
  28. ↑ Williams v Commonwealth (No 2) [2014] HCA 23 , (2014) 252 CLR 416(19 June 2014), High Court.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.