Winner and loser culture

Last updated

A winner and loser culture is a culture which imagines many activities in society as a competition where one class of people are successful winners and another class are the losers who experience a lifestyle of failure.

Contents

Characteristics

Psychologist Oliver James described in a 1995 book how distribution of wealth results in some young people having more money for fortunate lives among a culture of winners while other young people are poor, surrounded by violence, and live in a culture where media and society describe much of what they do as loser culture. [1]

A 1997 socioeconomic study showed that a winner-loser culture encouraged violence in adolescents, with specific sociological emphasis on the role of violence. [2] In part, findings reflected that juvenile violence is perpetrated by the presence of a winner-loser culture, which creates an "us against them" mindset that can lead to physical or verbal altercations.

A 2005 sociological study of alcohol advertising examined the lifestyles of men which the ads portrayed. [3] Tropes in the ads included the men either being losers or having loser characteristics, but being comfortable and accepting of themselves. [3] Their leisure lives in the advertisements are separate from whatever labor they do as work. [3] They communicate desire for various kinds of relationships with females but the advertisements do not finish the story of how that plays out, and simply end with the men watching women or attempting to initiate a relationship. [3]

A 2011 study evaluating corporate culture found that competition culture (which places the worker in a winner and loser mentality), while more common than cooperation culture, was less effective. [4] Cooperation adds substantial value to the firm because it increases active communication between employees.

A 2014 sociological study of video game culture for massively multiplayer online role-playing games observed that some groups of players identify as "losers" and encourage other people in that subculture. [5] Greater success in the game requires more time spent in the game. [5] People who are not socializing, working, or in education may have more time to play the game. [5] When someone has more free time because they participate in loser subculture, then that identity may bring them success in playing the game. [5]

A 2014 study in the Sociological Review examined emotional reactions contextualized through the lens of academia by analyzing distinctions in emotional response to academia. [6] The study found that emotional bonds can be damaged by mismanaged emotions as a result in competition culture, and that structurally, mismanaged emotions based on perceived stress from a competition culture can have negative impact on an individual and those around them.

In a 2014 sociological study of a computer competition where motivation was measured after examining the competitive culture around getting into and participating in the computer competition, [7] findings found that students that performed well in competition ("winners") were more likely to seek out and participate in other competitions.

One advertising narrative in consumer culture is that gambling can transform a loser into a winner, and that state-sponsored games such as the lottery are worthwhile for uplifting some people in communities. [8] Many individuals in democratic societies personally identify with their political party of choice. [9] In various ways after an election, people who supported the elected party may feel and get treatment as winners, while supporters of the party which lost the vote may feel like losers. [10]

The success of a social media platform depends on a small number of Internet celebrities encouraging online activities from a large mass of other contributors. [11] One perspective of social media design is that there is a class of users who contribute to the platform to the benefit of others but not themselves, and that such contributors are losers in this scheme. [11]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subculture</span> Smaller culture within a larger culture

A subculture is a group of people within a cultural society that differentiates itself from the conservative and standard values to which it belongs, often maintaining some of its founding principles. Subcultures develop their own norms and values regarding cultural, political, and sexual matters. Subcultures are part of society while keeping their specific characteristics intact. Examples of subcultures include BDSM, hippies, hipsters, goths, steampunks, bikers, punks, skinheads, gopnik, hip-hoppers, metalheads, cosplayers, otaku, otherkin, furries, hackers and more. The concept of subcultures was developed in sociology and cultural studies. Subcultures differ from countercultures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moral panic</span> Fear that some evil threatens society

A moral panic is a widespread feeling of fear that some evil person or thing threatens the values, interests, or well-being of a community or society. It is "the process of arousing social concern over an issue", usually perpetuated by moral entrepreneurs and mass media coverage, and exacerbated by politicians and lawmakers. Moral panic can give rise to new laws aimed at controlling the community.

In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is described as the mental discomfort people feel when their beliefs and actions are inconsistent and contradictory, ultimately encouraging some change to align better and reduce this dissonance. Relevant items of information include peoples' actions, feelings, ideas, beliefs, values, and things in the environment. Cognitive dissonance is typically experienced as psychological stress when persons participate in an action that goes against one or more of those things. According to this theory, when an action or idea is psychologically inconsistent with the other, people do all in their power to change either so that they become consistent. The discomfort is triggered by the person's belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein the individual tries to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of sport</span> Sub-discipline of sociology

Sociology of sport, alternately referred to as sports sociology, is a sub-discipline of sociology which focuses on sports as social phenomena. It is an area of study concerned with the relationship between sociology and sports, and also various socio-cultural structures, patterns, and organizations or groups involved with sport. This area of study discusses the positive impact sports have on individual people and society as a whole economically, financially, and socially. Sociology of sport attempts to view the actions and behavior of sports teams and their players through the eyes of a sociologist.

Commodification is the process of transforming inalienable, free, or gifted things into commodities, or objects for sale. It has a connotation of losing an inherent quality or social relationship when something is integrated by a capitalist marketplace. Concepts that have been argued as being commodified include broad items such as the body, intimacy, public goods, animals and holidays.

Emotional labor is the process of managing feelings and expressions to fulfill the emotional requirements of a job. More specifically, workers are expected to regulate their personas during interactions with customers, co-workers, clients, and managers. This includes analysis and decision-making in terms of the expression of emotion, whether actually felt or not, as well as its opposite: the suppression of emotions that are felt but not expressed. This is done so as to produce a certain feeling in the customer or client that will allow the company or organization to succeed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subcultural theory</span>

In criminology, subcultural theory emerged from the work of the Chicago School on gangs and developed through the symbolic interactionism school into a set of theories arguing that certain groups or subcultures in society have values and attitudes that are conducive to crime and violence. The primary focus is on juvenile delinquency because theorists believe that if this pattern of offending can be understood and controlled, it will break the transition from teenage offender into habitual criminal. Some of the theories are functionalist, assuming that criminal activity is motivated by economic needs, while others posit a social class rationale for deviance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Masking (personality)</span> Social process

In psychology and sociology, masking is the process in which an individual camouflages their natural personality or behavior to conform to social pressures, abuse, or harassment. Masking can be strongly influenced by environmental factors such as authoritarian parents, rejection, and emotional, physical, or sexual abuse. Masking can be a behavior individuals adopt subconsciously as coping mechanisms or a trauma response, or it can be a conscious behavior an individual adopts to fit in within perceived societal norms. Masking is interconnected with maintaining performative behavior within social structures and cultures.

Emotion work is understood as the art of trying to change in degree or quality an emotion or feeling.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strain theory (sociology)</span> Theory that social structures within society may pressure citizens to commit crime

In the fields of sociology and criminology, strain theory is a theoretical perspective that aims to explain the relationship between social structure, social values or goals, and crime. Strain theory was originally introduced by Robert King Merton (1938), and argues that society's dominant cultural values and social structure causes strain, which may encourage citizens to commit crimes. Following on the work of Émile Durkheim's theory of anomie, strain theory has been advanced by Robert King Merton (1938), Albert K. Cohen (1955), Richard Cloward, Lloyd Ohlin (1960), Neil Smelser (1963), Robert Agnew (1992), Steven Messner, Richard Rosenfeld (1994) and Jie Zhang (2012).

Randall Collins is an American sociologist who has been influential in both his teaching and writing. He has taught in many notable universities around the world and his academic works have been translated into various languages. Collins is currently the Dorothy Swaine Thomas Professor of Sociology, Emeritus at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a leading contemporary social theorist whose areas of expertise include the macro-historical sociology of political and economic change; micro-sociology, including face-to-face interaction; and the sociology of intellectuals and social conflict. Collins's publications include The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change (1998), which analyzes the network of philosophers and mathematicians for over two thousand years in both Asian and Western societies. His current research involves macro patterns of violence including contemporary war, as well as solutions to police violence. He is considered to be one of the leading non-Marxist conflict theorists in the United States, and served as the president of the American Sociological Association from 2010 to 2011.

Hypermasculinity is a psychological and sociological term for the exaggeration of male stereotypical behavior, such as an emphasis on physical strength, aggression, and human male sexuality. In the field of clinical psychology, this term has been used ever since the publication of research by Donald L. Mosher and Mark Sirkin in 1984. Mosher and Sirkin operationally define hypermasculinity or the "macho personality" as consisting of three variables:

Teenage rebellion is a part of social development in adolescents in order for them to develop an identity independent from their parents or family and a capacity for independent decision-making. They may experiment with different roles, behaviors, and ideologies as part of this process of developing an identity. Teenage rebellion has been recognized within psychology as a set of behavioral traits that supersede class, culture, or race; some psychologists, however, have disputed the universality of the phenomenon. According to Terror Management Theory, the child's allegiance to parental authority and worldviews can weaken after the discovery that parents, like themselves and everyone else, are mortal. This realization creates an unconscious need for security that is broader than what the parents alone provide. This can lead to new cultural allegiances, in the search for a more enduring sense of meaning. Teenagers seek to perceive themselves a valued contributor to aspects of culture that more convincingly outlive or transcend the mortal individual's lifespan. However, since the parents also instill their cultural beliefs onto the child, if the child does not come to associate their parents' mortality with their cultural beliefs, the chances of rebellion decrease.

Fearmongering, or scaremongering, is a form of manipulation that causes fear by using exaggerated rumors of impending danger.

According to some theories, emotions are universal phenomena, albeit affected by culture. Emotions are "internal phenomena that can, but do not always, make themselves observable through expression and behavior". While some emotions are universal and are experienced in similar ways as a reaction to similar events across all cultures, other emotions show considerable cultural differences in their antecedent events, the way they are experienced, the reactions they provoke and the way they are perceived by the surrounding society. According to other theories, termed social constructionist, emotions are more deeply culturally influenced. The components of emotions are universal, but the patterns are social constructions. Some also theorize that culture is affected by the emotions of the people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Group cohesiveness</span> Bonding between members of a group

Group cohesiveness, also called group cohesion or social cohesion, arises when bonds link members of a social group to one another and to the group as a whole. Although cohesion is a multi-faceted process, it can be broken down into four main components: social relations, task relations, perceived unity, and emotions. Members of strongly cohesive groups are more inclined to participate readily and to stay with the group.

Susanne Karstedt is a German criminologist. She is a professor in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Griffith University in Queensland, Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminology</span> Study of crime and criminal actions/behavior

Criminology is the interdisciplinary study of crime and deviant behaviour. Criminology is a multidisciplinary field in both the behavioural and social sciences, which draws primarily upon the research of sociologists, political scientists, economists, legal sociologists, psychologists, philosophers, psychiatrists, social workers, biologists, social anthropologists, scholars of law and jurisprudence, as well as the processes that define administration of justice and the criminal justice system.

Social groups in male and female prisons in the United States differ in the social structures and cultural norms observed in men's and women's prison populations. While there are many underlying similarities between the two sets of populations, sociologists have historically noted different formal and informal social structures within inmate populations.

A functional account of emotions posits that emotions facilitate adaptive responses to environmental challenges. In other words, emotions are systems that respond to environmental input, such as a social or physical challenge, and produce adaptive output, such as a particular behavior. Under such accounts, emotions can manifest in maladaptive feelings and behaviors, but they are largely beneficial insofar as they inform and prepare individuals to respond to environmental challenges, and play a crucial role in structuring social interactions and relationships.

References

  1. ↑ James, Oliver (1995). Juvenile violence in a winner-loser culture : socio-economic and familial origins of the rise in violence against the person. London: Free Association Books. ISBN   978-1853433023.
  2. ↑ James, O. "Juvenile Violence in a Winner-Loser Culture: Socio-Economic and Familial Origins of the Rise in Violence against the Person". Adolescence. 32 (125): 246.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Messner, Michael A.; Montez de Oca, Jeffrey (March 2005). "The Male Consumer as Loser: Beer and Liquor Ads in Mega Sports Media Events". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 30 (3): 1879–1909. doi:10.1086/427523. S2CID   144238087.
  4. ↑ Kosfeld, M; Von Siemens, F. A. (2011). "Competition, cooperation, and corporate culture" (PDF). The RAND Journal of Economics. 42: 23–43. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00124.x. S2CID   16641210.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Snodgrass, Jeffrey G.; Dengah, H. J. François; Lacy, Michael G. (December 2014). "'I Swear to God, I Only Want People Here Who Are Losers!' Cultural Dissonance and the (Problematic) Allure of Azeroth: Cultural Dissonance and the Allure of Azeroth". Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 28 (4): 480–501. doi:10.1111/maq.12116. PMID   24947943.
  6. ↑ Bloch, C. (2002). "Managing the emotions of competition and recognition in Academia". The Sociological Review. 50 (2_suppl): 113-131. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2002.tb03594.x. S2CID   144412133.
  7. ↑ Bubica, N; Mladenovic, M; Boljat, I (2014). "Students motivation for computer science competition". In 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference: 288-295.
  8. ↑ Reiner, Robert; Livingstone, Sonia; Allen, Jessica (8 July 2019). "Casino Culture: Media and Crime in a Winner–Loser Society (2001)" (PDF). Crime and Media: 324–334. doi:10.4324/9780367809195-30. ISBN   9780367809195. S2CID   18647843.
  9. ↑ Curini, Luigi; Jou, Willy; Memoli, Vincenzo (April 2012). "Satisfaction with Democracy and the Winner/Loser Debate: The Role of Policy Preferences and Past Experience". British Journal of Political Science. 42 (2): 241–261. doi:10.1017/S0007123411000275. S2CID   153624167.
  10. ↑ Wu, Chun-Ying; Wu, Chin-en (18 August 2022). "Regime types and winner-loser Gaps in support for democracy in East Asia". Democratization. 29 (6): 1157–1175. doi:10.1080/13510347.2022.2036721. hdl: 10230/52781 . S2CID   247070819.
  11. 1 2 Petersen, Søren Mørk (2013). "Loser Generated Content: From Participation to Exploitation". First Monday. doi: 10.5210/fm.v13i3.2141 .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.