Status attainment

Last updated

Status attainment refers to the process through which individuals achieve their positions within society, including their social class. [1] This process is influenced by both achieved factors, such as educational attainment and career accomplishments, and ascribed factors, such as family income and social background. [2] Status attainment theories emphasize the possibility of social mobility, whether upward or downward, within a class-based system. [3] Achieved factors highlight personal efforts and choices, while ascribed factors reflect the impact of circumstances individuals are born into. [4] Together, these dynamics shape an individual’s opportunities and outcomes in social stratification system.s [5]

Contents

History

Peter M. Blau (1918–2002) and Otis Duncan (1921–2004) were the first sociologists to isolate the concept of status attainment. Their initial thesis stated that the lower the level from which a person starts, the greater is the probability that he will be upwardly mobile, simply because many more occupational destinations entail upward mobility for men with low origins than for those with high ones. After continued research, the initial statement proved to be incorrect. Blau and Duncan realized that people couldn't possibly think that the best way to get a high-social status position is to start at the bottom. They continued to find that the flaw was in the question the information was based upon. They found their research shouldn't be founded upon the question of "How are people mobile" but on "how do people attain their statuses". Peter Blau and Otis Duncan continued to conduct a landmark research study to provide answers to their new question. [6]

There are two similar working models in regards to status attainment theory. As Haller & Portes (1973)[ incomplete short citation ] noted there is the Blau and Duncan's (1967)[ incomplete short citation ] model which focuses on status transmission, that there is some direct effect of parental influence. However, ultimately the level of education affects occupational attainment. Also, the Wisconsin model comes to similar conclusion however notes that the effects of parental status vanish when other factors are considered. (Haller & Portes, 1973)[ incomplete short citation ].

Sociologists usually group education, income, and the occupation as the main groups of socioeconomic status. This can be related within, and across generations. Individuals that are of higher status attainment, will often have children later in life, which will usually, in turn, create the space for smaller families. This can then help the children to reach for higher levels of education, and achieve higher status attainment themselves. [7]

In the United States

The occupation of household heads, their level of education, and household income are highly correlated with status attainment and capital. [8] A strong indicator that points to the variation of status attainment is measured through various standardized achievement tests, that reflect academic aptitude. Therefore, the ascribed ability and relation to the constellation of household, strongly affects educational attainment. Academic performance and aptitude carries an influence on status attainment since the highest level of education attained, is a strong predictor of an individual's future occupational positions and the type of work they qualify for. [9]

In a study conducted by Blane et al. (2005) it was found that the higher the IQ in childhood the higher the social class in middle life. Furthermore, it was found that the IQ at age 11 was significantly related to occupational class at middle life.

Encouragement from family and friends will affect education and occupational attainment. These aspirations create an expectation of achieving a certain educational level or occupation. Educational attainment strongly influences occupational attainment. It is clear that all of these factors are linked together and continue to affect each other throughout one's lifespan. [10]

Status attainment in the U.S. is the process of acquiring positions in educational and occupational hierarchies. Major influential factors include: parental social background, cognitive ability, motivation and education. Very trivial[ according to whom? ], but nonetheless imperative[ according to whom? ] to one's starting status, family background and upbringing play a major role in status attainment. [11] For example, being born into a wealthy family gives an individual a better starting point than an individual being born into poverty.

Cognitive ability or one's intellect can contribute to the probability of one seeking higher education in life. An individual's level of educational attainment provides a better chance for moving up the occupational ladder. Cognitive ability is linked to motivation and education which are the other two major influential contributors of status attainment. This aspect of status attainment has nothing to do with one's parental social background, but rather acts on its own as an attribute for achieving higher status attainment. Being a factor independent from family background or motivation and education, cognitive ability cannot be enhanced or a predicate of the likelihood of one achieving a higher status. Someone of great intellect could have no motivation to accomplish anything, and someone of lesser intellect could be motivated and do great things.[ according to whom? ][ citation needed ]

Perhaps the most influential factor in determining one's status attainment is motivation and education.[ citation needed ] "This plays an important role in status attainment research and has been found to influence both educational attainment and occupational aspirations of young people, as well as the timing of life course transitions" (Schoon, 72)[ full citation needed ]. The higher the motivation a person has the more likely they are to receive higher education and eventually gain a higher paying occupation.[ citation needed ]

African Americans follow the same path, but their steps are limited.[ according to whom? ][ dubious discuss ][ citation needed ] Differences in educational and occupational attainment have declined among African Americans[ citation needed ]. However, on average, African Americans and Whites begin at different status levels and end in different status levels. Increased schooling benefits everyone, but due to discrimination, white males benefit more[ according to whom? ][ dubious discuss ]. [ peacock prose ] The same results occur in other minority groups and among females. [12]

As Kerckhoff (1976) notes, African Americans' educational attainments and occupational attainments are lower than those of white people. [13]

Socialization vs. allocation

Socialization and Allocation are two different types of status attainment. Both models discuss the importance of how others effect attainments of an individual. "While both are the same in that aspect both differentiate on theoretical interpretations of the same observations and direct our attention to different kinds of phenomena." (Kerckhoff 368-379).[ incomplete short citation ]

Allocation

According to Rodney Stark, allocation theories argue the primary function of schools is to allocate status, to place students in the stratification system, rather than to train them. (Stark 641)[ incomplete short citation ]. "In other words teachers identify and classify students according to externally imposed criteria." (Kerckhoff 368-379)[ incomplete short citation ]. "Since this seems to imply that social order rests upon consensual values, and that the prestige hierarchy is a function of widespread convergence in moral evaluations, the approach has been criticized as an extension of the functional theory of stratification—although its practitioners strenuously deny this charge." (Marshall 1998)[ incomplete short citation ]. In this model "social agencies" try to determine the path of the individual and the individual is constricted to what they can do. Allocation is "based on "plans" and "exceptions" rather than "wishes" or "aspirations". As children get older they become less convinced that everyone has an equal chance to obtain "good things" in life." (Kerckhoff 368-379)[ incomplete short citation ]. The clearest examples of this model are discrimination of race and individual characteristics. In the article "The Status Attainment Process: Socialization or Allocation?" Alan C. Kerckhoff states "rewards black receive for any level of accomplishment are lower than those of whites at the same level".

Socialization

Socialization, on the other hand, looks for the characteristics that affect the individual. This term is used by many but most commonly used by psychologist, sociologists and educationalists to describe the learning of ones culture and how to fit in. Also it teaches one how to act and participate in the society. Referring to the book Sociology, Socialization is the process by which culture is learned and internalized by each member of society-much of which occurs during childhood. (Stark 657)[ incomplete short citation ]. Or it can be explained as "the process by which we learn to become members of society, both by internalizing the norms and values of society, and also by learning to perform our social roles." (Marshall 1998). Unlike allocation adults can be enabled to perform new roles. With this model motivation and ability are important factors to help one attain status, this means "Individuals are free to move within the social system, attainments being determined by what the individual does and how well they choose to do it." (Kerckhoff)[ incomplete short citation ].

Gender

Gender dynamics have evolved significantly over recent decades, with notable shifts in the pathways to status attainment for women. As labor force participation for women has increased globally, the influence of individual achievements, such as education and occupational status, on status attainment has grown. Historically, family background and marriage played a more central role in shaping women’s socioeconomic outcomes. However, modernization processes have enabled a greater emphasis on personal attributes, such as education and work experience, in determining occupational and social mobility​. [14]

Despite these advancements, disparities remain. Women from lower socioeconomic or educational backgrounds often face barriers to securing full-time employment or attaining higher occupational status, reflecting persistent inequalities in access to resources and opportunities.​ [14] For example, evidence from historical analyses indicates that maternal occupational status has had a measurable, though historically undervalued, effect on children’s outcomes, particularly for daughters, signaling the importance of cross-gender influences in status transmission. [14]

Comparative studies suggest that the gendered nature of labor markets continues to influence the types of jobs accessible to women, often channeling them into lower-paying or part-time roles. In some cases, women from higher socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to secure full-time employment, as they may have greater access to education and networks that facilitate upward mobility. [14] Research also indicates that in households where women were homemakers, children’s status attainment benefited from the transmission of non-economic resources, such as cultural and social capital.​ [14]

Even though women hold fewer jobs than men in some societies[ neutrality is disputed ], women hold jobs of higher prestige than their male counterparts.[ neutrality is disputed ][ citation needed ] This is probably because it is not beneficial[ neutrality is disputed ] for women who are married with children to go out and get lower-paying, lower status jobs because the economic benefits cancel themselves out in the end. Married working women also hold less prestigious jobs than their spouses[ citation needed ]. This is partially because married people tend to share the same economic backgrounds as well as education levels, and partially because in the process of evolutions, sexual dimorphism has triggered women to prefer wealthy husbands. [15]

In the past, females generally attained their status through family background or marriage.[ citation needed ] While hypergamy exists today, females are becoming more independent and socially mobile in many parts of the world. The increased independence and social mobility has led to an increase in women attaining their own status rather than attaining their status through family circumstances and/or through marriage. [ neutrality is disputed ]. [16]

Treiman and Terrel (1975)[ incomplete short citation ] cautiously note that the mother's educational level strongly affects the education level of the daughter more so than the educational level of the father.

"Many researchers have found that male and female status attainment processes are virtually identical while others have reported gender differences in the importance of mental ability and family background variables as predictors of attainment". [17]

As a result[ clarification needed ] women face a different type of socialization process than men do. Early childhood experiences are very influential for women. In particular, family, marriage, and early child bearing have great importance for the attainment of women. There is a strong association between early child bearing and a decrease in education moving forward. [18] (Wilson & Peterson)[ incomplete short citation ].

Occupational status

Status attainment is directly related to occupational status. Occupational status and the attainment thereof is perhaps the core idea of status attainment. Status in the workforce is affected by many factors, most notably, gender, parent status, and work trends. [ citation needed ]

Education is the most important determinant for men and women when it comes to occupational status (McClendon, 1976)[ incomplete short citation ].

In the 1973 survey conducted in Canada, Porter began to explore ideas of occupational status attainment. John Porter started his study believing that Canadians were less mobile than Americans in terms of climbing the occupational status ladder. In fact it was quite the opposite, Canadians as well as Americans had higher occupational statuses if their parents were high on the status ladder. This study also showed that gender can be important as well.[ according to whom? ][ neutrality is disputed ] Women who have full-time jobs come from families higher up on the occupational ladder than men do.[ citation needed ] Work trends as well are a major factor in determining the occupational status of a person. We have seen a large shift of the workforce move from the agriculture aspect to largely skilled jobs. Since, few are left to labor in the agricultural field, we’ve found that those left are not unskilled laborers but rather farm owners.[ neutrality is disputed ] Thus a large shift in the occupational status of an average person in the agricultural sector has occurred.[ citation needed ]

Current research

See also

Notes

  1. Marshall, Gordon (1998). "Status Attainment".
  2. Blau, Peter M.; Duncan, Otis Dudley (1967). The American Occupational Structure (Report). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  3. Sewell, William H.; Haller, Archibald O.; Portes, Alejandro (1969). "The Educational and Early Occupational Attainment Process". American Sociological Review. 34 (1): 82–92. doi:10.2307/2092789. ISSN   0003-1224.
  4. Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. August 28, 1977. ISBN   978-0-12-698750-8.
  5. Lin, Nan (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815447. ISBN   978-0-521-47431-3.
  6. Blau, Peter M.; Blau, Peter; Duncan, Otis Dudley (September 1992). "Mobility and Status Attainment". Contemporary Sociology. 21 (5): 596. doi:10.2307/2075538.
  7. "Status Attainment | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved November 14, 2024.
  8. "Page One Economics: Education, Income, and Wealth" (PDF).
  9. Sumanen, Hilla (Summer 2019). "Interrelationships between education, occupational class and income as determinants of sickness absence among young employees in 2002–2007 and 2008–2013". BMC Public Health. 15: 332. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1718-1 . PMC   4393569 . PMID   25888526.
  10. Melby, Janet N.; Conger, Rand D.; Fang, Shu-Ann; Wickrama, K. A. S.; Conger, Katherine J. (2008). "Adolescent family experiences and educational attainment during early adulthood". Developmental Psychology. 44 (6): 1519–1536. doi:10.1037/a0013352. ISSN   1939-0599.
  11. Conger, Rand D.; Conger, Katherine J.; Martin, Monica J. (June 2010). "Socioeconomic Status, Family Processes,and Individual Development". Journal of Marriage and Family. 72 (3): 685–704. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x. ISSN   0022-2445.
  12. Beeghley, Leonard (2008), The Structure of Social Stratification in the United States (5th ed.), Pearson Education Inc., pp. 129, 133, ISBN   978-0-205-53052-6
  13. Kerckhoff, Alan C. (December 1976). "The Status Attainment Process: Socialization or Allocation?". Social Forces. 55 (2): 368. doi:10.2307/2576228.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Kong, Siyang; Maas, Ineke; van Leeuwen, Marco H. D. (October 1, 2020). "Like My Mother Before Me: Gender and Cross-Gender Effects on Status Attainment during Modernization". Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 69: 100541. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100541. ISSN   0276-5624.
  15. Buss, D. M. (1992). Do women have evolved preferences for men with resources? Ethology and Sociobiology, 12.
  16. McGinn, Kathleen L; Oh, Eunsil (December 2017). "Gender, social class, and women's employment". Current Opinion in Psychology. 18: 84–88. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.012.
  17. Peterson, Gary W. & Wilson, Stephan M. (1993), "The Process of Educational and Occupational Attainment of Adolescent Females from Low-Income, Rural Families", 55, National Council on Family Relations, pp. 158–163
  18. Moore, Kristin A.; Waite, Linda J. (September 1977). "Early Childbearing and Educational Attainment". Family Planning Perspectives. 9 (5): 220. doi:10.2307/2134432.
  19. Saunders, P. (1997), Social Mobility in Britain: An Empirical Evaluation of two Competing Theories (31 ed.), Sociology, pp. 261–88
  20. Breen & Goldthorpe, R. & H. (1999), Class Inequality and Meritocracy: A critique of Saunders and An Alternative Analysis, British Journal of Sociology, pp. 1–27

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social status</span> Position within social structure

Social status is the relative level of social value a person is considered to possess. Such social value includes respect, honor, assumed competence, and deference. On one hand, social scientists view status as a "reward" for group members who treat others well and take initiative. This is one explanation for its apparent cross-cultural universality. On the other hand, while people with higher status experience a litany of benefits—such as greater health, admiration, resources, influence, and freedom—those with lower status experience poorer outcomes across all of those metrics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social class in the United States</span> Grouping Americans by some measure of social status

Social class in the United States refers to the idea of grouping Americans by some measure of social status, typically by economic status. However, it could also refer to social status and/or location. The idea that American society can be divided into social classes is disputed, and there are many competing class systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social mobility</span> Mobility to move social classes

Social mobility is the movement of individuals, families, households or other categories of people within or between social strata in a society. It is a change in social status relative to one's current social location within a given society. This movement occurs between layers or tiers in an open system of social stratification. Open stratification systems are those in which at least some value is given to achieved status characteristics in a society. The movement can be in a downward or upward direction. Markers for social mobility such as education and class, are used to predict, discuss and learn more about an individual or a group's mobility in society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social stratification</span> Concept in sociology

Social stratification refers to a society's categorization of its people into groups based on socioeconomic factors like wealth, income, race, education, ethnicity, gender, occupation, social status, or derived power. It is a hierarchy within groups that ascribe them to different levels of privileges. As such, stratification is the relative social position of persons within a social group, category, geographic region, or social unit.

Achieved status is a concept developed by the anthropologist Ralph Linton for a social position that a person can acquire on the basis of merit and is earned or chosen through one's own effort. It is the opposite of ascribed status and reflects personal skills, abilities, and efforts. Examples of achieved status include being an Olympic medalist, college graduate, technical professional, tenured professor, or tournament winner.

Otis Dudley Duncan was an American sociologist and statistician. According to sociologist and statistician Leo Goodman he was "the most important quantitative sociologist in the world in the latter half of the 20th century". His book The American Occupational Structure, which received the American Sociological Association's Sorokin Award, documented how parents transmit their societal status to their children. Duncan compiled his thoughts on the major issues of the field into Notes on Social Measurement, which he considered his greatest work.

Sociologists use the concept of occupational prestige to measure the relative social-class positions people may achieve by practicing a given occupation. Occupational prestige results from the consensual rating of a job - based on the belief of that job's worthiness. The term prestige itself refers to the admiration and respect that a particular occupation holds in a society. Occupational prestige is prestige independent of particular individuals who occupy a job. Sociologists have identified prestige rankings for more than 700 occupations based on results from a series of national surveys. They have created a scale and then rank given occupations based on survey results. Occupational prestige differentials have wide ranging implications regarding the distribution of social resources and life chances, which can translate into nested sets of social inclusion and exclusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of education</span> Study of how public institutions and individual experiences affect education and its outcomes

The sociology of education is the study of how public institutions and individual experiences affect education and its outcomes. It is mostly concerned with the public schooling systems of modern industrial societies, including the expansion of higher, further, adult, and continuing education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cultural reproduction</span> Cultural concept

Cultural reproduction, a concept first developed by French sociologist and cultural theorist Pierre Bourdieu, is the mechanisms by which existing cultural forms, values, practices, and shared understandings are transmitted from generation to generation, thereby sustaining the continuity of cultural experience across time. In other words, reproduction, as it is applied to culture, is the process by which aspects of culture are passed on from person to person or from society to society.

Life chances is a theory in sociology which refers to the opportunities each individual has to improve their quality of life. The concept was introduced by German sociologist Max Weber in the 1920s. It is a probabilistic concept, describing how likely it is, given certain factors, that an individual's life will turn out a certain way. According to this theory, life chances are positively correlated with one's socioeconomic status.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Educational attainment in the United States</span> American levels of education

The educational attainment of the U.S. population refers to the highest level of education completed. The educational attainment of the U.S. population is similar to that of many other industrialized countries with the vast majority of the population having completed secondary education and a rising number of college graduates that outnumber high school dropouts. As a whole, the population of the United States is spending more years in formal educational programs. As with income, levels differ by race, age, household configuration, and geography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Socioeconomic status</span> Economic and social measure of a persons affluence and/or influence

Socioeconomic status (SES) is an economic and sociological combined total measure of a person's work experience and of an individual's or family's access to economic resources and social position in relation to others. When analyzing a family's SES, the household income and the education and occupations of its members are examined, whereas for an individual's SES only their own attributes are assessed. Recently, research has revealed a lesser-recognized attribute of SES as perceived financial stress, as it defines the "balance between income and necessary expenses". Perceived financial stress can be tested by deciphering whether a person at the end of each month has more than enough, just enough, or not enough money or resources. However, SES is more commonly used to depict an economic difference in society as a whole.

The Wisconsin model of socio-economic attainment is a model that describes and explains an individual's social mobility and its economic, social, and psychological determinants. The logistics of this model are primarily attributed to William H. Sewell and colleagues including Archibald Haller, Alejandro Portes and Robert M. Hauser. The model receives its name from the state in which a significant amount of the research and analysis was completed. Unlike the previous research on this topic by Peter Blau and Otis Dudley Duncan, this model encompasses more than just educational and occupational factors and their effect on social mobility for American males. The Wisconsin model has been described as "pervasive in its influence on the style and content of research in several subfields of sociology."

Joseph Woelfel is an American sociologist. Born in Buffalo, New York, Dr. Woelfel is an Emeritus Professor in the Department of Communication at the University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.

Academic achievement or academic performance is the extent to which a student, teacher or institution has attained their short or long-term educational goals. Completion of educational benchmarks such as secondary school diplomas and bachelor's degrees represent academic achievement.

Homogamy is marriage between individuals who are, in some culturally important way, similar to each other. It is a form of assortative mating. The union may be based on socioeconomic status, class, gender, caste, ethnicity, or religion, or age in the case of the so-called age homogamy.

In sociology, the term ethnic penalty is used in reference to the economic and non-economic disadvantages that ethnic minorities experience in the labour market compared to other ethnic groups. As an area of study among behavioral economists, psychologists, and sociologists, it ranges beyond discrimination so non-cognitive factors can also be taken into consideration in order to explain why unwarranted differences exist between individuals with similar abilities because they are members of different ethnicities.

Nan Dirk de Graaf is a Dutch sociologist working in Nuffield College, University of Oxford. He is known for his work on social stratification, religion, political sociology, the impact of social mobility on a variety of social issues, pro-social behaviour, as well as his books.

Michael Hout is a Professor of Sociology at New York University. His contributions to sociology include using demographic methods to study social change in inequality, religion, and politics. His current work used the General Social Survey (GSS) to estimate the social standing of occupations introduced into the census classification since 1990. He digitized all occupational information in the GSS (1972–2014) and coded it all to the 2010 standard. Other recent projects used the GSS panel to study Americans' changing perceptions of class, religion, and happiness. In 2006, Mike and Claude Fischer published Century of Difference, a book on twentieth-century social and cultural trends in the United States. Other books include Truth about Conservative Christians with Andrew Greeley, Following in Father's Footsteps: Social Mobility in Ireland, and Inequality by Design

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen L. Morgan</span> American sociologist (born 1971)

Stephen Lawrence Morgan is a Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Education at the Johns Hopkins University School of Arts and Sciences and Johns Hopkins School of Education. A quantitative methodologist, he is known for his contributions to quantitative methods in sociology as applied to research on schools, particularly in models for educational attainment, improving the study of causal relationships, and his empirical research focusing on social inequality and education in the United States.

References