Wojciech Sadurski

Last updated

Wojciech Sadurski in 2019 Wojciech Sadurski.JPG
Wojciech Sadurski in 2019

Wojciech Sadurski (born 5 June 1950) is a Polish and Australian scholar of constitutional law. As of 2023, he is Challis Professor in Jurisprudence at the University of Sydney [1] and Professor in the Centre for Europe in the University of Warsaw.

Contents

Academic career

Sadurski was born on 5 June 1950 in Warsaw; [2] his father was a peasant farmer. [3] Sadurski emigrated to Australia in 1981 and holds dual citizenship. [4] According to Associated Press, Sadurski is "a law professor of international renown". [5] He has written several books on constitutional law and has served as a visiting professor at Yale Law School, New York University Law School, Cardozo Law School, and University of Trento. He first gained tenure at the Department of Jurisprudence at the University of Sydney, then under Alice Erh-Soon Tay. From 1999 to 2009 he was a professor at European University Institute in Florence and, from 2003 to 2006, the dean of the Faculty of Law of the European University Institute. [6] [2] As of 2020, he is Challis Professor in Jurisprudence at the University of Sydney and Professor in the Centre for Europe in the University of Warsaw. [6]

Sadurski is on the editorial board of European Law Journal, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, and Law and Philosophy Library. Since 2011, he chairs the academic advisory board of Community of Democracies. [6]

Criticism of the Polish government

Sadurski is a vocal critic of the Law and Justice (PiS) party in Poland, [4] [5] which he describes as autocratic and authoritarian. [7] In 2019, he published a book with Oxford University Press titled "Poland's Constitutional Breakdown". [8] [9] The book was translated into Polish by Anna Wójcik; the Polish edition was published in October 2020. [10] Three cases have been brought against him by the ruling party and those affiliated with it. According to Sadurski, the cases "are totally and unambiguously politically motivated. Further, I believe that they are coordinated and syncronised." [11] PiS has also brought libel cases against other critics of the government. [11]

Responses

Hundreds of law professors signed a letter in support of Sadurski, stating that there was "a coordinated harassment campaign by the Polish ruling party against a well-known and respected academic who has clearly struck a nerve with his powerful critique of the situation in his native country". [4] [16] [11] According to the open letter, the cases have little chance to succeed if appealed to the European Court of Human Rights or an EU court, because freedom of speech is guaranteed by treaties to which Poland is a party. [16] Questions about Sadurski's case have been raised in the European Parliament [17] and Dutch Parliament. [18] The Human Rights Institute of the International Bar Association also called for charges against Sadurski to be dropped. Former Australian High Court judge Michael Kirby commented: "Poland’s citizens, including Professor Sadurski, must always have the ability to criticise the government without fear of retribution or imprisonment." [19] Scholars at Risk characterizes the prosecution of Sadurski as "apparent retaliation for the peaceful exercise of the right to freedom of expression" and states that state crackdowns on free expression cause "a chilling effect on academic freedom and undermine democratic society generally". [20]

Works

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Court of Human Rights</span> Supranational court established by the Council of Europe

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), also known as the Strasbourg Court, is an international court of the Council of Europe which interprets the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The court hears applications alleging that a contracting state has breached one or more of the human rights enumerated in the convention or its optional protocols to which a member state is a party. The court is based in Strasbourg, France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wojciech Jaruzelski</span> Leader of Poland from 1981 to 1989

Wojciech Witold Jaruzelski was a Polish military general, politician and de facto leader of the Polish People's Republic from 1981 until 1989. He was the First Secretary of the Polish United Workers' Party between 1981 and 1989, making him the last leader of the Polish People's Republic. Jaruzelski served as Prime Minister from 1981 to 1985, the Chairman of the Council of State from 1985 to 1989 and briefly as President of Poland from 1989 to 1990, when the office of President was restored after 37 years. He was also the last commander-in-chief of the Polish People's Army, which in 1990 became the Polish Armed Forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law and Justice (Poland)</span> Political party in Poland

Law and Justice is a right-wing populist and national-conservative political party in Poland. Its chairman is Jarosław Kaczyński.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman Giertych</span> Polish politician and lawyer (born 1971)

Roman Jacek Giertych is a Polish political figure, historian, advocate, and dissident against the PiS government. Giertych served in PiS government as Deputy Prime Minister of Poland and Minister of National Education from May 2006 to August 2007. He was a member of the Sejm from 2001 to 2007 and the chairman of the League of Polish Families party.

The term "illiberal democracy" describes a governing system that hides its "nondemocratic practices behind formally democratic institutions and procedures". There is a lack of consensus among experts about the exact definition of illiberal democracy or whether it even exists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Poland</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Poland face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. According to ILGA-Europe's 2023 report, the status of LGBTQ rights in Poland is the worst among the European Union countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Venice Commission</span> Advisory body of the Council of Europe

The Venice Commission, officially European Commission for Democracy through Law, is an advisory body of the Council of Europe, composed of independent experts in the field of constitutional law. It was created in 1990 after the fall of the Berlin Wall, at a time of urgent need for constitutional assistance in Central and Eastern Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renate Weber</span> Romanian politician

Renate Weber is a Romanian lawyer and human rights activist who, in November 2007, was elected as Member of the European Parliament. She is the first Romanian appointed as Chief of an EU Election Observation Mission. Between 2004–2005 she was Advisor on constitutional and legislative matters to then President of Romania, Traian Băsescu. She previously served as the Romanian Ombudsman as well from June 2019 until mid June 2021.

Constitutionalism is "a compound of ideas, attitudes, and patterns of behavior elaborating the principle that the authority of government derives from and is limited by a body of fundamental law".

The judiciary of Poland are the authorities exercising the judicial power of the Polish state on the basis of Chapter 8 of the Constitution of Poland. As in almost all countries of continental Europe, the Polish judiciary operates within the framework of civil law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2015 Polish parliamentary election</span>

Parliamentary elections were held in Poland on 25 October 2015 for the eighth term of the Sejm and Senate, which ran from 12 November 2015 until 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adam Bodnar</span> Polish human rights activist and ombudsman

Adam Piotr Bodnar is a Polish lawyer, educator, human rights activist and politician who currently serves as Minister of Justice. He was the 7th Polish Ombudsman from 2015 until July 2021.

The Amendment to the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance of 2018 is a partly repealed Polish law that criminalized public speech attributing responsibility for the Holocaust to Poland or the Polish nation; the criminal provisions were removed again later that year, after international protests. Article 2a, addressing crimes against "Polish citizens" by "Ukrainian nationalists", also caused controversy. The legislation is part of the historical policy of the Law and Justice party which seeks to present a narrative of ethnic Poles exclusively as victims and heroes. The law was widely seen as an infringement on freedom of expression and on academic freedom, and as a barrier to open discussion on Polish collaborationism, leading to what has been described as "the biggest diplomatic crisis in [Poland's] recent history".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offending religious feelings (Poland)</span> Polish blasphemy law

Offending religious feelings is a blasphemy law in Poland. According to Article 196 of the Penal Code: "Whoever offends the religious feelings of other persons by publicly insulting an object of religious worship, or a place designated for public religious ceremonies, is liable to pay a fine, have their liberty limited, or be deprived of their liberty for a period of up to two years."

Ran Hirschl is a political scientist and comparative legal scholar. He is the David R. Cameron Distinguished Professor of Law and Politics at the University of Toronto. Previously, he held the Canada Research Chair in Constitutionalism, Democracy and Development at the University of Toronto. He is the author of several major books and over one hundred and fifty articles on constitutional law and its intersection with comparative politics and society. In 2014, he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. In 2021, he was awarded the Stein Rokkan Prize for Comparative Social Science Research for his book City, State: Constitutionalism and the Megacity.

The Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation is a 1998 Polish law that created the Institute of National Remembrance. This memory law was amended twice, in 2007 and 2018.

A captured court rubber-stamps the wishes of a political party or interest group rather than applying the law. It may be nominally independent, but judicial appointments, disciplinary measures for judges who rule against the government, or other control mechanisms are used to influence judicial rulings.

The Polish constitutional crisis, also known as the Polish rule-of-law crisis, is a political conflict ongoing since 2015 in which the Polish government has been accused of failing to comply with European and Polish constitutional law. The 2015 elections resulted in the Law and Justice party winning control of both the presidency and the parliament. With this government trifecta, PiS used its power to appoint judges to the Constitutional Tribunal in 2015, leading to the 2015 Polish Constitutional Court crisis. The government of Poland continued to expand its hold on the judiciary resulting in the 2017 Supreme Court crisis, and the 2019 Polish judicial disciplinary panel law. These events allowed the legislature and executive of the Polish government to have de facto control over judges and their appointments.

Events in the year 2021 in Poland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Identity Clause</span>

National Identity Clause is a legal principle enshrined in article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union. Its original purpose can be linked to the protection of cultural identity, apparently threatened by the free movement of services and goods in the cultural domain. It was supposed to prevent EU competence creep in the areas belonging to complementary competencies. Today it is most typically associated with limits to European integration and protection of core competences of the nation states within the EU.

References

  1. https://www.sydney.edu.au/law/about/our-people/academic-staff/wojciech-sadurski.html
  2. 1 2 Sobszak, Krzysztof (5 May 2010). "Prof. Wojciech Sadurski kandydatem na rzecznika praw obywatelskich?". Prawo.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  3. "Sroczyński kontra Sadurski. Spór o "plebs" i język krytyki obozu władzy". TOK FM (in Polish). Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ticher, Mike (3 October 2020). "Long arm of Law and Justice: the Sydney professor under attack from Poland's ruling party". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  5. 1 2 3 Scislowska, Monika (27 November 2020). "Polish professor defends himself against defamation charge". ABC News . Associated Press . Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  6. 1 2 3 "Staff Profile". The University of Sydney. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  7. Sadurski, Wojciech (16 January 2020). "Poland's autocratic government is at it again". POLITICO. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  8. 1 2 Mikuli, Piotr (2020). "Poland's Constitutional Breakdown". International Journal of Constitutional Law. 18 (1): 293–297. doi: 10.1093/icon/moaa017 .
  9. "What went wrong with Poland's democracy". OUPblog. 14 August 2019. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  10. Adam Bodnar [@Abodnar] (27 October 2020). "Już można zamawiać polskie wydanie książki prof. Wojciecha Sadurskiego o kryzysie konstytucyjnym. Wydawcą jest @liberteworld - oryginalne wydanie ukazało się nakładem" (Tweet) via Twitter.
  11. 1 2 3 Walsh, David (13 May 2019). "Critic of Poland's ruling party PiS slams "politically motivated" libel cases". euronews. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  12. von Bogdandy, Armin; Spieker, Luke Dimitrios (6 March 2019). "Countering the Judicial Silencing of Critics: Novel Ways to Enforce European Values". Verfassungsblog . Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  13. Pempel, Anna Koper, Kacper (11 November 2019). "Polish far-right groups march on independence anniversary". Reuters. Retrieved 18 October 2020.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. "PiS pozwał prof. Sadurskiego za "zorganizowaną grupę przestępczą". "Nazwałem schemat działania władzy"". oko.press. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  15. "Poland". RSF. Reporters without borders . Retrieved 27 September 2020.
  16. 1 2 de Búrca, Gráinne; Morijn, John (6 May 2019). "Open Letter in Support of Professor Wojciech Sadurski". Verfassungsblog. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  17. Parliamentary questions 31 January 2020: Question for written answer E-000590/2020 to the Commission from Frances Fitzgerald (EPP) Subject: The legal harassment of Professor Wojciech Sadurksi in Poland
  18. "Detail 2019D31358". www.tweedekamer.nl (in Dutch).
  19. "IBA - IBAHRI calls on Poland to drop charges against law professor Wojciech Sadurski". www.ibanet.org. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  20. "2019-01-20 University of Warsaw". Scholars at Risk. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  21. Grafstein, Robert (1986). "Giving Desert Its Due: Social Justice and Legal Theory. By Wojciech Sadurski. (Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1985. Pp. xvii + 329. $47.00.)". American Political Science Review. 80 (4): 1333. doi:10.1017/S0003055400185247.
  22. Gardocki, Lech (1992). "Wojciech Sadurski, Moral Pluralism and Legal Neutrality, Dodrecht - Boston - London 1990, Kluwert Academic Publishers, 221 pages". Contemporary Central & East European Law (1-4(93-96)): 53–55. ISSN   2719-4256.
  23. Shiner, Roger A. (2000). "Wojciech Sadurski, "Freedom of Speech and its Limits."". Philosophy in Review. 20 (4): 284–286. ISSN   1920-8936.
  24. "Freedom of Speech and Its Limits". www.lawcourts.org. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  25. Czarnota, A. (2007). "Rights before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe". International Journal of Constitutional Law. 5 (3): 568–571. doi: 10.1093/icon/mom020 .
  26. Kraus, Peter A. (2009). "Political Rights under Stress in 21st Century Europe. Edited by Wojciech Sadurski. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. 288p". Perspectives on Politics. 7 (2): 436–437. doi:10.1017/S1537592709091324. S2CID   145704462.
  27. Koncewicz, Tomasz Tadeusz (2013). "Book Review: Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe, by Wojciech Sadurski. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)". Common Market Law Review. 50 (6): 1848–1852. doi:10.54648/COLA2013171.
  28. Parau, Cristina E. (2013). "Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe". West European Politics. 36 (5): 1117–1119. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.820430. S2CID   154050074.
  29. Hein, Michael (2015). "Wojciech Sadurski, Constitutionalism and the Enlargement of Europe (Oxford 2012: Oxford University Press). A Comment". Southeastern Europe. 39 (3): 421–430. doi:10.1163/18763332-03903008.
  30. Daly, Tom Gerald (2019). "Between Fear and Hope: Poland's Democratic Lessons for Europe (and Beyond) - Wojciech Sadurski, Poland's Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press2019) 304 pp. English". European Constitutional Law Review. 15 (4): 752–767. doi:10.1017/S1574019619000439. S2CID   213118345.
  31. "Poland's Constitutional Breakdown". EU Law Live. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  32. Hanelt, Etienne (2020). "Wojciech Sadurski, Poland's Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford Comparative Constitutionalism)". Political Studies Review. doi:10.1177/1478929920931440. S2CID   225731540.

Further reading