Wrongful conviction of Andrew Malkinson

Last updated

Andrew Malkinson (born 23 January 1966) is a British man who was wrongfully convicted and jailed in 2004 for the rape of a 33-year-old woman in Salford, Greater Manchester. He was released from prison in 2020 after serving 16 years, still maintaining his innocence, and his conviction was finally quashed by the Court of Appeal in 2023 after DNA evidence proved he was not the attacker. [1] [2]

Contents

Incident

The 33-year-old female victim had been walking home in Little Hulton in the early hours of 19 July 2003, when she was dragged down a motorway embankment, strangled until unconscious, and sustained the following injuries: swollen left eye, which she could barely open, a fractured cheekbone, bruising to her neck, scratches and scrapes to her back, legs and arms, and severe injury to her left nipple. [3] After losing consciousness she was raped. [4]

Conviction

Malkinson was identified by the victim in an identity parade line-up. Several key details did not match the description of the perpetrator, for example she described the attacker as being 3 inches shorter than Malkinson, with a hairless chest and no tattoos. Malkinson had chest hair and prominent tattoos on his forearms. She also said the attacker would have a "deep scratch" to his face. Malkinson was seen at work the next day with no scratch to his face. [5]

There was no DNA evidence linking him to the crime at the time. [6]

At trial, he was presented as a drifter and was found guilty of two counts of rape and attempting to choke, suffocate or strangle with intent to commit rape but found not guilty of attempted murder after a jury at Manchester Crown Court (Crown Square) spent nine hours considering their verdicts. [7] He was convicted by a 10–2 majority jury verdict and sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 6½ years. [7] [8] [9]

Incarceration

Malkinson appealed his conviction in 2006, and applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) for review in 2009 and, assisted by the charity Appeal, in 2018; all were denied. [10] The CCRC was warned in 2013 about the potential for exculpating DNA evidence after a review of a separate case with a similar fact pattern to Malkinson's, the wrongful imprisonment of Victor Nealon, but this was not acted upon. [11]

Before he was exonerated, a chief constable of Greater Manchester Police had suspended the force's misconduct investigation into the case. [12] Re-testing of cold case samples in 2007 revealed another man's DNA in a sample taken from the victim, with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) aware of this by December 2009. At the time, there was no match in the National DNA Database for this other man. The CPS advised against further examination, and the CCRC also declined to review Malkinson's case on cost–benefit grounds, despite the potentially exonerating evidence. [13]

Malkinson could have been released after 6½ years but was not due to his maintaining his innocence. [14] He was released in 2020 for good behaviour. [10]

Conviction quashed

Malkinson made another application to the CCRC in 2021, and, in 2022, a man was arrested in connection with the original crime. [10] The CCRC referred the case for appeal, [10] and the conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal in July 2023, [15] using evidence from the 2007 re-testing of samples, which identified a man who had subsequently been placed in the National DNA Database. [13]

Malkinson also asked why wrongfully convicted prisoners should be charged jail living costs, which is deducted from any compensation received. [16] After it emerged that Malkinson may have money deducted from his compensation to pay for his prison living costs, senior Conservative MP Sir Bob Neill urged the UK government to change the rule, stating that "Any fair-minded person thinks this is just wrong." [17] Agreeing that the situation was unfair, a spokeswoman for Rishi Sunak, UK Prime Minister at the time, subsequently said Sunak had "been speaking with the Home Office and with others in government to establish the facts and ensure that the approach is right and fair". [18]

On 6 August, Secretary of State for Justice Alex Chalk confirmed the rule would be scrapped, describing it as a "common sense change which will ensure victims do not face paying twice for crimes they did not commit". [19] Chalk subsequently announced that he was looking at other cases of wrongful conviction with a view to backdating the rules. [20]

Reaction

Upon his name being cleared, Malkinson stated that he felt he was "forcibly kidnapped ... by the state". [21] Greater Manchester Police apologised [22] although this apology was not accepted by Malkinson, who called it "meaningless". [23] The Independent Office for Police Conduct opened a review into the GMP's handling of Malkinson's complaints. [13]

Edward Garnier, a former Solicitor General, called for a public inquiry and criticised the justice system's handling of the case and particularly the conduct of the CCRC, saying that the decision to reject Malkinson's 2009 appeal on cost–benefit grounds despite the lead of the unknown man's DNA had, in fact, led to significant costs both to Malkinson and to the state in compensation to be paid; further, he suggested that exemplary damages may be due "because of the oppressive and arbitrary behaviour of agents of the state". [13] Former Director of Public Prosecutions Ken Macdonald and barrister Michael Mansfield also called for an inquiry. [24]

The Criminal Cases Review Commission announced on 17 August 2023 that it had appointed an external KC to review into its handling of the case. [25] On 24 August, the Justice Secretary, Alex Chalk, announced the launch of a non-statutory inquiry to investigate the role of the Crown Prosecution Service, Greater Manchester Police and the Criminal Cases Review Commission. [26]

On 13 September 2023, the Independent Office for Police Conduct announced it would investigate Greater Manchester Police's handling of the Malkinson case. [27]

Aftermath

After release from prison, Malkinson lived in a tent in Spain. [28]

The case was featured in the academic journal Medicine, Science, and the Law in 2021, [29] and is also the subject of a dedicated podcast. [30] The case was also the subject of the BBC Two documentary The Wrong Man: 17 Years Behind Bars, which aired on 6 June 2024. [31]

Inquiry

An inquiry into the wrongful conviction, led by Judge Sarah Munro KC , began on 26 October 2023. The hearing will examine the original investigation by Greater Manchester Police and why it took so long for the conviction to be overturned. Munro said she would be "fearless" in seeking the truth. [32]

Related Research Articles

Innocence Project, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit legal organization that works to exonerate the wrongly convicted through DNA testing and other forms of post-conviction relief, as well as advocate for criminal justice reform to prevent future injustice. The group cites various studies estimating that in the United States between 1% and 10% of all prisoners are innocent. The Innocence Project was founded in 1992 by Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld who gained national attention in the mid-1990s as part of the "Dream Team" of lawyers who formed part of the defense in the O. J. Simpson murder case.

David Milgaard was a Canadian man who was wrongfully convicted for the 1969 rape and murder of nursing student Gail Miller in Saskatoon and imprisoned for 23 years. He was eventually released and exonerated. Up until his death, he lived in Alberta and was employed as a community support worker. Milgaard was also a public speaker who advocated for the wrongfully convicted and for all prisoners' rights.

The Guildford Four and Maguire Seven were two groups of people, mostly Northern Irish, who were wrongly convicted in English courts in 1975 and 1976 of the Guildford pub bombings of 5 October 1974 and the Woolwich pub bombing of 7 November 1974. All the convictions were eventually overturned in 1989 and 1991 after long campaigns for justice, and the cases, along with those of the Birmingham Six, diminished public confidence in the English criminal justice system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miscarriage of justice</span> Conviction of a person for a crime that they did not commit

A miscarriage of justice occurs when an unfair outcome occurs in a criminal or civil proceeding, such as the conviction and punishment of a person for a crime they did not commit. Miscarriages are also known as wrongful convictions. Innocent people have sometimes ended up in prison for years before their conviction has eventually been overturned. They may be exonerated if new evidence comes to light or it is determined that the police or prosecutor committed some kind of misconduct at the original trial. In some jurisdictions this leads to the payment of compensation.

Michael Stone was convicted of the 1996 murders of Lin and Megan Russell and the attempted murder of Josie Russell. He was sentenced to three life sentences with a tariff of 25 years for the Russell killings.

Darryl Hunt was an African-American man from Winston-Salem, North Carolina, who, in 1984, was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape and the murder of Deborah Sykes, a young white newspaper copy editor. After being convicted in that case, Hunt was tried in 1987 for the 1983 murder of Arthur Wilson, a 57-year-old black man of Winston-Salem. Both convictions were overturned on appeal in 1989. Hunt was tried again in the Wilson case in 1990; he was acquitted by an all-white jury. He was tried again on the Sykes charges in 1991; he was convicted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Cases Review Commission</span> Statutory body in the United Kingdom

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is the statutory body responsible for investigating alleged miscarriages of justice in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. It was established by Section 8 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1995 and began work on 31 March 1997. The commission is the only body in its area of jurisdiction with the power to send a case back to an appeals court if it concludes that there is a real possibility that the court will overturn a conviction or reduce a sentence. Since starting work in 1997, it has on average referred 33 cases a year for appeal.

The Jeanine Nicarico murder case was a complex and influential homicide investigation and prosecution in which two men, Rolando Cruz and Alejandro Hernandez, both Latinos, were wrongfully convicted of abduction, rape and murder in 1985 in DuPage County, Illinois. They were both sentenced to death. The case was scrutinized during appeals for being weak in evidence.

Rolando Cruz is an American man known for having been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death, along with co-defendant Alejandro Hernandez, for the 1983 kidnapping, rape, and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico in DuPage County, Illinois. The police had no substantive physical evidence linking the two men to the crime. Their first trial was jointly in 1987, and their statements were used against each other and a third defendant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder of Teresa De Simone</span> 1979 murder of an Englishwoman

Teresa Elena De Simone was murdered in Southampton, England, in 1979. Her murder led to one of the longest proven cases of a miscarriage of justice in English legal history. The murder occurred outside the Tom Tackle pub and was the subject of a three-year police investigation which resulted in the arrest of Sean Hodgson. Hodgson was convicted of the murder by a unanimous jury verdict in 1982 and was sentenced to life imprisonment. After serving 27 years in prison he was exonerated and released in March 2009. DNA analysis of semen samples that had been preserved from the original crime scene showed that they could not have come from him.

Rough Justice is a British television programme that was broadcast on BBC, and which investigated alleged miscarriages of justice. It was broadcast between 1982 and 2007 and played a role in overturning the convictions of 18 people involved in 13 separate cases where miscarriages of justice had occurred. The programme was similar in aim and approach to The Court of Last Resort, the NBC programme that aired in the United States from 1957–58. It is credited with contributing to the establishment of the Criminal Cases Review Commission in 1997.

Cornelius Dupree Jr. is an American who was declared innocent of a 1980 conviction for aggravated robbery, which was alleged to have been committed during a rape in 1979. He was paroled in July 2010 after serving 30 years of a 75-year prison sentence in Texas. Prosecutors cleared him of the crime after a test of his DNA profile did not match traces of semen evidence from the case. Dupree, who was represented by the Innocence Project, spent more time in prison in Texas than any other inmate who was eventually exonerated by DNA evidence.

Events from 2004 in England

The innocent prisoner's dilemma, or parole deal, is a detrimental effect of a legal system in which admission of guilt can result in reduced sentences or early parole. When an innocent person is wrongly convicted of a crime, legal systems which need the individual to admit guilt — as, for example, a prerequisite step leading to parole — punish an innocent person for their integrity, and reward a person lacking in integrity. There have been cases where innocent prisoners were given the choice between freedom, in exchange for claiming guilt, and remaining imprisoned and telling the truth. Individuals have died in prison rather than admit to crimes that they did not commit, including in the face of a plausible chance at release.

The wrongful imprisonment of Victor Nealon occurred in 1996 when the British postman Victor Nealon was mistakenly convicted of attempted rape. He was released in 2013 after spending 17 years in jail, 10 years more than his recommended tariff, because he continued to protest his innocence. He was sentenced to a discretionary life sentence in 1998 and was refused parole because he refused to admit guilt. He was denied legal aid and in 2014, the Ministry of Justice turned down his claim for compensation and demanded he pay £2,500 costs claiming the DNA analysis "did not show beyond reasonable doubt that the claimant did not commit the offence."

Robert Brown is a Scottish man who spent 25 years in jail for a crime he did not commit, the murder of worker Annie Walsh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Derek Ridgewell</span> Scottish police officer and criminal (1945–1982)

Derek Arnold Ridgewell was a Scottish police officer in the British Transport Police (BTP) who was involved with a series of arrests followed by court cases in which it was later found that he had framed innocent people, and was eventually jailed for mail theft. When allegations against Ridgewell were first made, BTP moved him to another team instead of dismissing him. Several of those convicted by courts based on Ridgewell's false testimony, including the Oval Four and the Stockwell Six, had their convictions quashed decades later. Ridgewell died of a heart attack in Ford open prison on 31 December 1982.

The New Zealand Criminal Cases Review Commission is an independent Crown entity that was set up under the Criminal Cases Review Commission Act 2019 to investigate potential miscarriages of justice. If the Commission considers a miscarriage may have occurred, it can refer the case back to the Court of Appeal to be reconsidered.

Sarah Munro is a British barrister and judge.

References

  1. ↑ "Police officers involved in wrongful rape conviction of Andrew Malkinson under investigation". Sky News. Retrieved 5 October 2024.
  2. ↑ "Andrew Malkinson's rape conviction quashed after 20-year fight". BBC News. 26 July 2023. Retrieved 5 October 2024.
  3. ↑ "Raped and left for dead". The Bolton News. 6 February 2004.
  4. ↑ "Rapist sentenced to life in jail". BBC News. 30 March 2004.
  5. ↑ Dugan, Emily (27 January 2023). "Andrew Malkinson is still fighting to clear his name 20 years after rape case". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 July 2023.
  6. ↑ Dugan, Emily (3 May 2023). "Greater Manchester police failure led to man spending 17 years in prison, court told". The Guardian.
  7. 1 2 Thomas George (15 December 2020). "Man jailed for life 16 years ago after woman raped next to M61 claims fresh DNA evidence proves his innocence". Manchester Evening News.
  8. ↑ Dugan, Emily (24 May 2023). "Greater Manchester police won't oppose appeal of man jailed for 17 years for rape". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 July 2023.
  9. ↑ Gregory, Andy (24 January 2023). "He spent 17 years in jail for rape. Now another man has been arrested for the crime". The Independent.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Dugan, Emily (15 August 2023). "Rape, DNA and injustice: a timeline of the Andrew Malkinson case". The Guardian .
  11. ↑ Casciani, Dominic (24 January 2024). "Andy Malkinson: DNA warnings made years before rape case overturned". BBC News .
  12. ↑ "Andrew Malkinson: Police chief stops inquiry into rape case mishandling". The Times.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Casciani, Dominic (16 August 2023). "Andy Malkinson: DNA evidence identified three years after rape conviction". BBC News .
  14. ↑ Steve Robson (2 May 2021). "I served 17 years in jail for a horrific rape I didn't commit – and now the DNA evidence proves it'". Manchester Evening News.
  15. ↑ Dugan, Emily (26 July 2023). "Appeal court overturns Manchester rape conviction of man who spent 17 years in jail". The Guardian.
  16. ↑ Callum May (26 July 2023). "Andrew Malkinson: Why are some wrongfully convicted prisoners charged jail living costs?". BBC News.
  17. ↑ Jackson, Marie (29 July 2023). "Andrew Malkinson: End living cost charge for wrongfully convicted, Tory MP says". BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
  18. ↑ "Andrew Malkinson: Living costs for wrongfully convicted unfair – PM". BBC News. BBC. 31 July 2023. Retrieved 31 July 2023.
  19. ↑ Seddon, Sean (6 August 2023). "Prison living costs rule scrapped for wrongly convicted". BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 6 August 2023.
  20. ↑ "Andrew Malkinson: Justice secretary considering backdating jail cost rules". BBC News. BBC. 8 August 2023. Retrieved 8 August 2023.
  21. ↑ Dugan, Emily (26 July 2023). "'I started shaking': Andrew Malkinson on being told he is a free man". The Guardian.
  22. ↑ Lauren Hirst; Tom Mullen (26 July 2023). "Andrew Malkinson's rape conviction quashed after 20-year fight". BBC News.
  23. ↑ Harrison (26 July 2023). "Andrew Malkinson calls police apology for wrongful rape conviction 'meaningless'". Evening Standard .
  24. ↑ Seddon, Sean (16 August 2023). "Andrew Malkinson: Calls for inquiry into wrongful rape conviction". BBC News .
  25. ↑ Dugan, Emily (17 August 2023). "Andrew Malkinson case to be reviewed by body that investigates miscarriages of justice 17 August 2023". The Guardian. Guardian. Retrieved 17 August 2023.
  26. ↑ Casciani, Dominic (24 August 2023). "Andrew Malkinson: Government announces inquiry into wrongful rape conviction". BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 24 August 2023.
  27. ↑ Casciani, Dominic (13 September 2023). "Andrew Malkinson: Police investigated over man's wrongful jailing". BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 13 September 2023.
  28. ↑ McCubbin, Jayne (18 October 2023). "Andrew Malkinson: Wrongly jailed man 'broke' and living in tent". BBC News. Retrieved 18 April 2024.
  29. ↑ Samuels, A. (2022). "Andrew Malkinson: A miscarriage of justice?" . Medicine, Science, and the Law. 62 (2): 95–96. doi:10.1177/00258024211038075. PMID   34397298. S2CID   237095545.
  30. ↑ The Times and The Sunday Times, in collaboration with Wireless Studios, true crime podcast 6 episode series; Seventeen Years: The Andrew Malkinson Story Emily Dugan (Sunday Times journalist)
  31. ↑ Topping, Stephen (6 June 2024). "GMP issues statement ahead of BBC documentary on Andrew Malkinson". Manchester Evening News. Retrieved 6 June 2024.
  32. ↑ Casciani, Dominic (26 October 2023). "Andrew Malkinson: Wrongful conviction inquiry judge pledges 'fearless' review". bbc.co.uk. BBC. Retrieved 26 October 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.