Algebra of sets

Last updated

In mathematics, the algebra of sets, not to be confused with the mathematical structure of an algebra of sets, defines the properties and laws of sets, the set-theoretic operations of union, intersection, and complementation and the relations of set equality and set inclusion. It also provides systematic procedures for evaluating expressions, and performing calculations, involving these operations and relations.

Contents

Any set of sets closed under the set-theoretic operations forms a Boolean algebra with the join operator being union, the meet operator being intersection, the complement operator being set complement, the bottom being and the top being the universe set under consideration.

Fundamentals

The algebra of sets is the set-theoretic analogue of the algebra of numbers. Just as arithmetic addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, so are set union and intersection; just as the arithmetic relation "less than or equal" is reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, so is the set relation of "subset".

It is the algebra of the set-theoretic operations of union, intersection and complementation, and the relations of equality and inclusion. For a basic introduction to sets see the article on sets, for a fuller account see naive set theory, and for a full rigorous axiomatic treatment see axiomatic set theory.

Fundamental properties of set algebra

The binary operations of set union () and intersection () satisfy many identities. Several of these identities or "laws" have well established names. [2]

Commutative property:
Associative property:
Distributive property:

The union and intersection of sets may be seen as analogous to the addition and multiplication of numbers. Like addition and multiplication, the operations of union and intersection are commutative and associative, and intersection distributes over union. However, unlike addition and multiplication, union also distributes over intersection.

Two additional pairs of properties involve the special sets called the empty set and the universe set ; together with the complement operator ( denotes the complement of . This can also be written as , read as "A prime"). The empty set has no members, and the universe set has all possible members (in a particular context).

Identity:
Complement:

The identity expressions (together with the commutative expressions) say that, just like 0 and 1 for addition and multiplication, and are the identity elements for union and intersection, respectively.

Unlike addition and multiplication, union and intersection do not have inverse elements. However the complement laws give the fundamental properties of the somewhat inverse-like unary operation of set complementation.

The preceding five pairs of formulaethe commutative, associative, distributive, identity and complement formulaeencompass all of set algebra, in the sense that every valid proposition in the algebra of sets can be derived from them.

Note that if the complement formulae are weakened to the rule , then this is exactly the algebra of propositional linear logic [ clarification needed ].

Principle of duality

Each of the identities stated above is one of a pair of identities such that each can be transformed into the other by interchanging and , while also interchanging and .

These are examples of an extremely important and powerful property of set algebra, namely, the principle of duality for sets, which asserts that for any true statement about sets, the dual statement obtained by interchanging unions and intersections, interchanging and and reversing inclusions is also true. A statement is said to be self-dual if it is equal to its own dual.

Some additional laws for unions and intersections

The following proposition states six more important laws of set algebra, involving unions and intersections.

PROPOSITION 3: For any subsets and of a universe set , the following identities hold:

idempotent laws:
domination laws:
absorption laws:

As noted above, each of the laws stated in proposition 3 can be derived from the five fundamental pairs of laws stated above. As an illustration, a proof is given below for the idempotent law for union.

Proof:

by the identity law of intersection
by the complement law for union
by the distributive law of union over intersection
by the complement law for intersection
by the identity law for union

The following proof illustrates that the dual of the above proof is the proof of the dual of the idempotent law for union, namely the idempotent law for intersection.

Proof:

by the identity law for union
by the complement law for intersection
by the distributive law of intersection over union
by the complement law for union
by the identity law for intersection

Intersection can be expressed in terms of set difference:

Some additional laws for complements

The following proposition states five more important laws of set algebra, involving complements.

PROPOSITION 4: Let and be subsets of a universe , then:

De Morgan's laws:
double complement or involution law:
complement laws for the universe set and the empty set:

Notice that the double complement law is self-dual.

The next proposition, which is also self-dual, says that the complement of a set is the only set that satisfies the complement laws. In other words, complementation is characterized by the complement laws.

PROPOSITION 5: Let and be subsets of a universe , then:

uniqueness of complements:
  • If , and , then

Algebra of inclusion

The following proposition says that inclusion, that is the binary relation of one set being a subset of another, is a partial order.

PROPOSITION 6: If , and are sets then the following hold:

reflexivity:
antisymmetry:
  • and if and only if
transitivity:
  • If and , then

The following proposition says that for any set S, the power set of S, ordered by inclusion, is a bounded lattice, and hence together with the distributive and complement laws above, show that it is a Boolean algebra.

PROPOSITION 7: If , and are subsets of a set then the following hold:

existence of a least element and a greatest element:
existence of joins:
  • If and , then
existence of meets:
  • If and , then

The following proposition says that the statement is equivalent to various other statements involving unions, intersections and complements.

PROPOSITION 8: For any two sets and , the following are equivalent:

The above proposition shows that the relation of set inclusion can be characterized by either of the operations of set union or set intersection, which means that the notion of set inclusion is axiomatically superfluous.

Algebra of relative complements

The following proposition lists several identities concerning relative complements and set-theoretic differences.

PROPOSITION 9: For any universe and subsets , and of , the following identities hold:

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Probability axioms</span> Foundations of probability theory

The standard probability axioms are the foundations of probability theory introduced by Russian mathematician Andrey Kolmogorov in 1933. These axioms remain central and have direct contributions to mathematics, the physical sciences, and real-world probability cases.

In mathematical analysis and in probability theory, a σ-algebra on a set X is a nonempty collection Σ of subsets of X closed under complement, countable unions, and countable intersections. The ordered pair is called a measurable space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open set</span> Basic subset of a topological space

In mathematics, an open set is a generalization of an open interval in the real line.

In topology, the closure of a subset S of points in a topological space consists of all points in S together with all limit points of S. The closure of S may equivalently be defined as the union of S and its boundary, and also as the intersection of all closed sets containing S. Intuitively, the closure can be thought of as all the points that are either in S or "very near" S. A point which is in the closure of S is a point of closure of S. The notion of closure is in many ways dual to the notion of interior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Union (set theory)</span> Set of elements in any of some sets

In set theory, the union of a collection of sets is the set of all elements in the collection. It is one of the fundamental operations through which sets can be combined and related to each other. A nullary union refers to a union of zero sets and it is by definition equal to the empty set.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Complement (set theory)</span> Set of the elements not in a given subset

In set theory, the complement of a set A, often denoted by , is the set of elements not in A.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interior (topology)</span> Largest open subset of some given set

In mathematics, specifically in topology, the interior of a subset S of a topological space X is the union of all subsets of S that are open in X. A point that is in the interior of S is an interior point of S.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boundary (topology)</span> All points not part of the interior of a subset of a topological space

In topology and mathematics in general, the boundary of a subset S of a topological space X is the set of points in the closure of S not belonging to the interior of S. An element of the boundary of S is called a boundary point of S. The term boundary operation refers to finding or taking the boundary of a set. Notations used for boundary of a set S include and .

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Symmetric difference</span> Elements in exactly one of two sets

In mathematics, the symmetric difference of two sets, also known as the disjunctive union and set sum, is the set of elements which are in either of the sets, but not in their intersection. For example, the symmetric difference of the sets and is .

In topology and related branches of mathematics, the Kuratowski closure axioms are a set of axioms that can be used to define a topological structure on a set. They are equivalent to the more commonly used open set definition. They were first formalized by Kazimierz Kuratowski, and the idea was further studied by mathematicians such as Wacław Sierpiński and António Monteiro, among others.

In abstract algebra, a semiring is an algebraic structure. It is a generalization of a ring, dropping the requirement that each element must have an additive inverse. At the same time, it is a generalization of bounded distributive lattices.

A lattice is an abstract structure studied in the mathematical subdisciplines of order theory and abstract algebra. It consists of a partially ordered set in which every pair of elements has a unique supremum and a unique infimum. An example is given by the power set of a set, partially ordered by inclusion, for which the supremum is the union and the infimum is the intersection. Another example is given by the natural numbers, partially ordered by divisibility, for which the supremum is the least common multiple and the infimum is the greatest common divisor.

A Dynkin system, named after Eugene Dynkin, is a collection of subsets of another universal set satisfying a set of axioms weaker than those of 𝜎-algebra. Dynkin systems are sometimes referred to as 𝜆-systems or d-system. These set families have applications in measure theory and probability.

In mathematics, there are two different notions of a ring of sets, both referring to certain families of sets.

In abstract algebra, a skew lattice is an algebraic structure that is a non-commutative generalization of a lattice. While the term skew lattice can be used to refer to any non-commutative generalization of a lattice, since 1989 it has been used primarily as follows.

In the mathematical field of set theory, an ideal is a partially ordered collection of sets that are considered to be "small" or "negligible". Every subset of an element of the ideal must also be in the ideal, and the union of any two elements of the ideal must also be in the ideal.

In mathematics, a filter on a set is a family of subsets such that:

  1. and
  2. if and , then
  3. If , and , then
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intersection (set theory)</span> Set of elements common to all of some sets

In set theory, the intersection of two sets and denoted by is the set containing all elements of that also belong to or equivalently, all elements of that also belong to

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ultrafilter on a set</span> Maximal proper filter

In the mathematical field of set theory, an ultrafilter on a set is a maximal filter on the set In other words, it is a collection of subsets of that satisfies the definition of a filter on and that is maximal with respect to inclusion, in the sense that there does not exist a strictly larger collection of subsets of that is also a filter. Equivalently, an ultrafilter on the set can also be characterized as a filter on with the property that for every subset of either or its complement belongs to the ultrafilter.

References

  1. Paul R. Halmos (1968). Naive Set Theory. Princeton: Nostrand. Here: Sect.4
  2. Many mathematicians [1] assume all set operation to be of equal priority, and make full use of parantheses. So does this article.