Atom interferometer

Last updated

An atom interferometer uses the wave-like nature of atoms in order to produce interference. In atom interferometers, the roles of matter and light are reversed compared to the laser based interferometers, i.e. the beam splitter and mirrors are lasers while the source emits matter waves (the atoms) rather than light. Atom interferometers measure the difference in phase between atomic matter waves along different paths. Matter waves are controlled an manipulated using systems of lasers. [1] : 420–1  Atom interferometers have been used in tests of fundamental physics, including measurements of the gravitational constant, the fine-structure constant, and universality of free fall. Applied uses of atom interferometers include accelerometers, rotation sensors, and gravity gradiometers. [2]

Contents

Overview

Interferometry splits a wave into a superposition along two different paths. A spatially dependent potential or a local interaction differentiates the paths, introducing a phase difference between waves. Atom interferometers use center of mass matter waves with short de Broglie wavelength. [3] [4] Experiments using molecules have been proposed to search for the limits of quantum mechanics by leveraging the molecules' shorter De Broglie wavelengths. [5]

Interferometer types

A compact Magneto-optical Trap, the first step in generating an atom interferometer. Atom interferometer.jpg
A compact Magneto-optical Trap, the first step in generating an atom interferometer.

While the use of atoms offers easy access to higher frequencies (and thus accuracies) than light, atoms are affected much more strongly by gravity. In some apparatuses, the atoms are ejected upwards and the interferometry takes place while the atoms are in flight, or while falling in free flight. In other experiments gravitational effects by free acceleration are not negated; additional forces are used to compensate for gravity. While these guided systems in principle can provide arbitrary amounts of measurement time, their quantum coherence is still under discussion. Recent theoretical studies indicate that coherence is indeed preserved in the guided systems, but this has yet to be experimentally confirmed.

The early atom interferometers deployed slits or wires for the beam splitters and mirrors. Later systems, especially the guided ones, used light forces for splitting and reflecting of the matter wave. [6]

Examples

GroupYearAtomic speciesMethodMeasured effect(s)
Pritchard 1991 Na, Na2Nano-fabricated gratings Polarizability, index of refraction
Clauser1994 K Talbot-Lau interferometer
Zeilinger1995 Ar Standing light wave diffraction gratings
Helmke
Bordé		1991 Ramsey–Bordé Polarizability,
Aharonov–Bohm effect: exp/theo ,
Sagnac effect 0.3 rad/s/Hz
Chu1991
1998		Na

Cs

Kasevich - Chu interferometer
Light pulses Raman diffraction		 Gravimeter:
Fine-structure constant:
Kasevich1997
1998		CsLight pulses Raman diffractionGyroscope: rad/s/Hz,
Gradiometer:
BermanTalbot-Lau
Mueller2018CsRamsey-Bordé interferometer Fine-structure constant:

History

Interference of atom matter waves was first observed by Immanuel Estermann and Otto Stern in 1930, when a sodium (Na) beam was diffracted off a surface of sodium chloride (NaCl). [7] The first modern atom interferometer reported was a double-slit experiment with metastable helium atoms and a microfabricated double slit by O. Carnal and Jürgen Mlynek in 1991, [8] and an interferometer using three microfabricated diffraction gratings and Na atoms in the group around David E. Pritchard at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). [9] Shortly afterwards, an optical version of a Ramsey spectrometer typically used in atomic clocks was recognized also as an atom interferometer at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) in Braunschweig, Germany. [10] The largest physical separation between the partial wave packets of atoms was achieved using laser cooling techniques and stimulated Raman transitions by Steven Chu and his coworkers in Stanford University. [11]

In 1999, the diffraction of C60 fullerenes by researchers from the University of Vienna was reported. [12] Fullerenes are comparatively large and massive objects, having an atomic mass of about 720 u. The de Broglie wavelength of the incident beam was about 2.5  pm, whereas the diameter of the molecule is about 1  nm, about 400 times larger. In 2012, these far-field diffraction experiments could be extended to phthalocyanine molecules and their heavier derivatives, which are composed of 58 and 114 atoms respectively. In these experiments the build-up of such interference patterns could be recorded in real time and with single molecule sensitivity. [13]

In 2003, the Vienna group also demonstrated the wave nature of tetraphenylporphyrin [14] —a flat biodye with an extension of about 2 nm and a mass of 614 u. For this demonstration they employed a near-field Talbot Lau interferometer. [15] [16] In the same interferometer they also found interference fringes for C60F48, a fluorinated buckyball with a mass of about 1600 u, composed of 108 atoms. [14] Large molecules are already so complex that they give experimental access to some aspects of the quantum-classical interface, i.e., to certain decoherence mechanisms. [17] [18] In 2011, the interference of molecules as heavy as 6910 u could be demonstrated in a Kapitza–Dirac–Talbot–Lau interferometer. [19] In 2013, the interference of molecules beyond 10,000 u has been demonstrated. [20]

The 2008 comprehensive review by Alexander D. Cronin, Jörg Schmiedmayer, and David E. Pritchard documents many new experimental approaches to atom interferometry. [21] More recently atom interferometers have begun moving out of laboratory conditions and have begun to address a variety of applications in real world environments. [22] [23]

Applications

Gravitational physics

A precise measurement of gravitational redshift was made in 2009 by Holger Muller, Achim Peters, and Steven Chu. No violations of general relativity were found to 7 × 10-9. [24]

In 2020, Peter Asenbaum, Chris Overstreet, Minjeong Kim, Joseph Curti, and Mark A. Kasevich used atom interferometry to test the principle of equivalence in general relativity. They found no violations to about 10-12. [25] [26]

Inertial navigation

The first team to make a working model, Pritchard's, was propelled by David Keith. [27] Atomic interferometer gyroscopes (AIG) and atomic spin gyroscopes (ASG) use atomic interferometer to sense rotation or in the latter case, uses atomic spin to sense rotation with both having compact size, high precision, and the possibility of being made on a chip-scale. [28] [29] "AI gyros" may compete, along with ASGs, with the established ring laser gyroscope, fiber optic gyroscope and hemispherical resonator gyroscope in future inertial guidance applications. [30]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bose–Einstein condensate</span> State of matter

In condensed matter physics, a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter that is typically formed when a gas of bosons at very low densities is cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero. Under such conditions, a large fraction of bosons occupy the lowest quantum state, at which microscopic quantum-mechanical phenomena, particularly wavefunction interference, become apparent macroscopically. More generally, condensation refers to the appearance of macroscopic occupation of one or several states: for example, in BCS theory, a superconductor is a condensate of Cooper pairs. As such, condensation can be associated with phase transition, and the macroscopic occupation of the state is the order parameter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Double-slit experiment</span> Physics experiment, showing light and matter can be modelled by both waves and particles

In modern physics, the double-slit experiment demonstrates that light and matter can satisfy the seemingly incongruous classical definitions for both waves and particles. This ambiguity is considered evidence for the fundamentally probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics. This type of experiment was first performed by Thomas Young in 1801, as a demonstration of the wave behavior of visible light. In 1927, Davisson and Germer and, independently George Paget Thomson and his research student Alexander Reid demonstrated that electrons show the same behavior, which was later extended to atoms and molecules. Thomas Young's experiment with light was part of classical physics long before the development of quantum mechanics and the concept of wave–particle duality. He believed it demonstrated that Christiaan Huygens' wave theory of light was correct, and his experiment is sometimes referred to as Young's experiment or Young's slits.

Matter waves are a central part of the theory of quantum mechanics, being half of wave–particle duality. At all scales where measurements have been practical, matter exhibits wave-like behavior. For example, a beam of electrons can be diffracted just like a beam of light or a water wave.

In physics, coherence expresses the potential for two waves to interfere. Two monochromatic beams from a single source always interfere. Physical sources are not strictly monochromatic: they may be partly coherent. Beams from different sources are mutually incoherent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Squeezed coherent state</span> Type of quantum state

In physics, a squeezed coherent state is a quantum state that is usually described by two non-commuting observables having continuous spectra of eigenvalues. Examples are position and momentum of a particle, and the (dimension-less) electric field in the amplitude and in the mode of a light wave. The product of the standard deviations of two such operators obeys the uncertainty principle:

Atomic coherence is the induced coherence between levels of a multi-level atomic system.

Quantum metrology is the study of making high-resolution and highly sensitive measurements of physical parameters using quantum theory to describe the physical systems, particularly exploiting quantum entanglement and quantum squeezing. This field promises to develop measurement techniques that give better precision than the same measurement performed in a classical framework. Together with quantum hypothesis testing, it represents an important theoretical model at the basis of quantum sensing.

In physics, an atomic mirror is a device which reflects neutral atoms in a way similar to the way a conventional mirror reflects visible light. Atomic mirrors can be made of electric fields or magnetic fields, electromagnetic waves or just silicon wafer; in the last case, atoms are reflected by the attracting tails of the van der Waals attraction. Such reflection is efficient when the normal component of the wavenumber of the atoms is small or comparable to the effective depth of the attraction potential. To reduce the normal component, most atomic mirrors are blazed at the grazing incidence.

Atom optics "refers to techniques to manipulate the trajectories and exploit the wave properties of neutral atoms". Typical experiments employ beams of cold, slowly moving neutral atoms, as a special case of a particle beam. Like an optical beam, the atomic beam may exhibit diffraction and interference, and can be focused with a Fresnel zone plate or a concave atomic mirror.

David Edward Pritchard is a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), working on atomic physics and educational research.

Within quantum technology, a quantum sensor utilizes properties of quantum mechanics, such as quantum entanglement, quantum interference, and quantum state squeezing, which have optimized precision and beat current limits in sensor technology. The field of quantum sensing deals with the design and engineering of quantum sources and quantum measurements that are able to beat the performance of any classical strategy in a number of technological applications. This can be done with photonic systems or solid state systems.

In magnetism, a nanomagnet is a nanoscopic scale system that presents spontaneous magnetic order (magnetization) at zero applied magnetic field (remanence).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trojan wave packet</span> Wave packet that is nonstationary and nonspreading

A trojan wave packet is a wave packet that is nonstationary and nonspreading. It is part of an artificially created system that consists of a nucleus and one or more electron wave packets, and that is highly excited under a continuous electromagnetic field. Its discovery as one of significant contributions to the Quantum Theory was awarded the 2022 Wigner Medal for Iwo Bialynicki-Birula

Diffraction in time is a phenomenon associated with the quantum dynamics of suddenly released matter waves initially confined in a region of space. It was introduced in 1952 by Marcos Moshinsky with the shutter problem. A matter-wave beam stopped by an absorbing shutter exhibits an oscillatory density profile during its propagation after removal of the shutter. Whenever this propagation is accurately described by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, the transient wave functions resemble the solutions that appear for the intensity of light subject to Fresnel diffraction by a straight edge. For this reason, the transient phenomenon was dubbed diffraction in time and has since then been recognised as ubiquitous in quantum dynamics. The experimental confirmation of this phenomenon was only achieved about half a century later in the group of ultracold atoms directed by Jean Dalibard.

A single-photon source is a light source that emits light as single particles or photons. Single-photon sources are distinct from coherent light sources (lasers) and thermal light sources such as incandescent light bulbs. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle dictates that a state with an exact number of photons of a single frequency cannot be created. However, Fock states can be studied for a system where the electric field amplitude is distributed over a narrow bandwidth. In this context, a single-photon source gives rise to an effectively one-photon number state.

The Aharonov–Casher effect is a quantum mechanical phenomenon predicted in 1984 by Yakir Aharonov and Aharon Casher, in which a traveling magnetic dipole is affected by an electric field. It is dual to the Aharonov–Bohm effect, in which the quantum phase of a charged particle depends upon which side of a magnetic flux tube it comes through. In the Aharonov–Casher effect, the particle has a magnetic moment and the tubes are charged instead. It was observed in a gravitational neutron interferometer in 1989 and later by fluxon interference of magnetic vortices in Josephson junctions. It has also been seen with electrons and atoms.

Photonic molecules are a form of matter in which photons bind together to form "molecules". They were first predicted in 2007. Photonic molecules are formed when individual (massless) photons "interact with each other so strongly that they act as though they have mass". In an alternative definition, photons confined to two or more coupled optical cavities also reproduce the physics of interacting atomic energy levels, and have been termed as photonic molecules.

Quantum microscopy allows microscopic properties of matter and quantum particles to be measured and imaged. Various types of microscopy use quantum principles. The first microscope to do so was the scanning tunneling microscope, which paved the way for development of the photoionization microscope and the quantum entanglement microscope.

Spin squeezing is a quantum process that decreases the variance of one of the angular momentum components in an ensemble of particles with a spin. The quantum states obtained are called spin squeezed states. Such states have been proposed for quantum metrology, to allow a better precision for estimating a rotation angle than classical interferometers.

In quantum physics, entanglement depth characterizes the strength of multiparticle entanglement. An entanglement depth means that the quantum state of a particle ensemble cannot be described under the assumption that particles interacted with each other only in groups having fewer than particles. It has been used to characterize the quantum states created in experiments with cold gases.

References

  1. ↑ Hecht, Eugene (2017). Optics (5th ed.). Pearson. ISBN   978-0-133-97722-6.
  2. ↑ Stray, Ben; Lamb, Andrew; Kaushik, Aisha; Vovrosh, Jamie; Winch, Jonathan; Hayati, Farzad; Boddice, Daniel; Stabrawa, Artur; Niggebaum, Alexander; Langlois, Mehdi; Lien, Yu-Hung; Lellouch, Samuel; Roshanmanesh, Sanaz; Ridley, Kevin; de Villiers, Geoffrey; Brown, Gareth; Cross, Trevor; Tuckwell, George; Faramarzi, Asaad; Metje, Nicole; Bongs, Kai; Holynski, Michael (2020). "Quantum sensing for gravity cartography". Nature. 602 (7898): 590–594. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04315-3 . PMC   8866129 . PMID   35197616.
  3. ↑ Cronin, A. D.; Schmiedmayer, J.; Pritchard, D. E. (2009). "Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules". Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (3): 1051–1129. arXiv: 0712.3703 . Bibcode:2009RvMP...81.1051C. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1051. S2CID   28009912.
  4. ↑ Adams, C. S.; Sigel, M.; Mlynek, J. (1994). "Atom Optics". Phys. Rep. 240 (3): 143–210. Bibcode:1994PhR...240..143A. doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(94)90066-3 .
  5. ↑ Hornberger, K.; et al. (2012). "Colloquium: Quantum interference of clusters and molecules". Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (1): 157. arXiv: 1109.5937 . Bibcode:2012RvMP...84..157H. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.157. S2CID   55687641.
  6. ↑ Rasel, E. M.; et al. (1995). "Atom Wave Interferometry with Diffraction Gratings of Light". Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (14): 2633–2637. Bibcode:1995PhRvL..75.2633R. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.2633. PMID   10059366.
  7. ↑ Estermann, I.; Stern, Otto (1930). "Beugung von Molekularstrahlen". Z. Phys. 61 (1–2): 95. Bibcode:1930ZPhy...61...95E. doi:10.1007/bf01340293. S2CID   121757478.
  8. ↑ Carnal, O.; Mlynek, J. (1991). "Young's double-slit experiment with atoms: A simple atom interferometer". Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (21): 2689–2692. Bibcode:1991PhRvL..66.2689C. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.2689. PMID   10043591.
  9. ↑ Keith, D.W.; Ekstrom, C.R.; Turchette, Q.A.; Pritchard, D.E. (1991). "An interferometer for atoms". Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (21): 2693–2696. Bibcode:1991PhRvL..66.2693K. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.2693. PMID   10043592. S2CID   6559338.
  10. ↑ Riehle, F.; Th; Witte, A.; Helmcke, J.; Ch; Bordé, J. (1991). "Optical Ramsey spectroscopy in a rotating frame: Sagnac effect in a matter-wave interferometer". Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (2): 177–180. Bibcode:1991PhRvL..67..177R. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.177. PMID   10044514.
  11. ↑ Kasevich, M.; Chu, S. (1991). "Atomic interferometry using stimulated Raman transitions". Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (2): 181–184. Bibcode:1991PhRvL..67..181K. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.181. PMID   10044515. S2CID   30845889.
  12. ↑ Arndt, Markus; O. Nairz; J. Voss-Andreae, C. Keller, G. van der Zouw, A. Zeilinger (14 October 1999). "Wave–particle duality of C60". Nature. 401 (6754): 680–682. Bibcode:1999Natur.401..680A. doi:10.1038/44348. PMID   18494170. S2CID   4424892.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ↑ Juffmann, Thomas; et al. (25 March 2012). "Real-time single-molecule imaging of quantum interference". Nature Nanotechnology. 7 (5): 297–300. arXiv: 1402.1867 . Bibcode:2012NatNa...7..297J. doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.34. PMID   22447163. S2CID   5918772.
  14. 1 2 Hackermüller, Lucia; Stefan Uttenthaler; Klaus Hornberger; Elisabeth Reiger; Björn Brezger; Anton Zeilinger; Markus Arndt (2003). "The wave nature of biomolecules and fluorofullerenes". Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (9): 090408. arXiv: quant-ph/0309016 . Bibcode:2003PhRvL..91i0408H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.090408. PMID   14525169. S2CID   13533517.
  15. ↑ Clauser, John F.; S. Li (1994). "Talbot von Lau interefometry with cold slow potassium atoms". Phys. Rev. A. 49 (4): R2213–2217. Bibcode:1994PhRvA..49.2213C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.49.R2213. PMID   9910609.
  16. ↑ Brezger, Björn; Lucia Hackermüller; Stefan Uttenthaler; Julia Petschinka; Markus Arndt; Anton Zeilinger (2002). "Matter-wave interferometer for large molecules". Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (10): 100404. arXiv: quant-ph/0202158 . Bibcode:2002PhRvL..88j0404B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.100404. PMID   11909334. S2CID   19793304.
  17. ↑ Hornberger, Klaus; Stefan Uttenthaler; Björn Brezger; Lucia Hackermüller; Markus Arndt; Anton Zeilinger (2003). "Observation of Collisional Decoherence in Interferometry". Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (16): 160401. arXiv: quant-ph/0303093 . Bibcode:2003PhRvL..90p0401H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.160401. PMID   12731960. S2CID   31057272.
  18. ↑ Hackermüller, Lucia; Klaus Hornberger; Björn Brezger; Anton Zeilinger; Markus Arndt (2004). "Decoherence of matter waves by thermal emission of radiation". Nature. 427 (6976): 711–714. arXiv: quant-ph/0402146 . Bibcode:2004Natur.427..711H. doi:10.1038/nature02276. PMID   14973478. S2CID   3482856.
  19. ↑ Gerlich, Stefan; et al. (2011). "Quantum interference of large organic molecules". Nature Communications . 2 (263): 263. Bibcode:2011NatCo...2..263G. doi:10.1038/ncomms1263. PMC   3104521 . PMID   21468015.
  20. ↑ Eibenberger, S.; Gerlich, S.; Arndt, M.; Mayor, M.; Tüxen, J. (2013). "Matter–wave interference of particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10 000 amu". Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 15 (35): 14696–14700. arXiv: 1310.8343 . Bibcode:2013PCCP...1514696E. doi:10.1039/c3cp51500a. PMID   23900710. S2CID   3944699.
  21. ↑ Cronin, Alexander D.; Schmiedmayer, Jörg; Pritchard, David E. (2009). "Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules". Reviews of Modern Physics. 81 (3): 1051–1129. arXiv: 0712.3703 . Bibcode:2009RvMP...81.1051C. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1051. S2CID   28009912.
  22. ↑ Bongs, K.; Holynski, M.; Vovrosh, J.; Bouyer, P.; Condon, G.; Rasel, E.; Schubert, C.; Schleich, W.P.; Roura, A. (2019). "Taking atom interferometric quantum sensors from the laboratory to real-world applications". Nat. Rev. Phys. 1 (12): 731–739. Bibcode:2019NatRP...1..731B. doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0117-4. S2CID   209940190.
  23. ↑ Vovrosh, J.; Dragomir, A.; Stray, B.; Boddice, B. (2023). "Advances in Portable Atom Interferometry-Based Gravity Sensing". Sensors. 23 (7): 7651. Bibcode:2023Senso..23.7651V. doi: 10.3390/s23177651 . PMC   10490657 . PMID   37688106.
  24. ↑ Muller, Holger; Peters, Achim; Chu, Steven (2010). "A precision measurement of the gravitational redshift by the interference of matter waves". Nature. 463 (7283): 926–929. Bibcode:2010Natur.463..926M. doi:10.1038/nature08776. PMID   20164925. S2CID   4317164.
  25. ↑ Asenbaum, Peter; Overstreet, Chris; Kim, Minjeong; Curti, Joseph; Kasevich, Mark A. (2020). "Atom-Interferometric Test of the Equivalence Principle at the 10−12 Level". Physical Review Letters. 125 (19): 191101. arXiv: 2005.11624 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.191101. PMID   33216577. S2CID   218869931.
  26. ↑ Conover, Emily (October 28, 2020). "Galileo's famous gravity experiment holds up, even with individual atoms". Science News. Retrieved August 6, 2023.
  27. ↑ Rotman, David (February 8, 2013). "A Cheap and Easy Plan to Stop Global Warming". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
  28. ↑ Fang, Jiancheng; Qin, Jie (2012). "Advances in Atomic Gyroscopes: A View from Inertial Navigation Applications". Sensors. 12 (5): 6331–6346. Bibcode:2012Senso..12.6331F. doi: 10.3390/s120506331 . PMC   3386743 . PMID   22778644.
  29. ↑ Advances in Atomic Gyroscopes: A View from Inertial Navigation Applications. Full PDF
  30. ↑ Cold Atom Gyros – IEEE Sensors 2013
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.