Dietary conservatism

Last updated

Dietary conservatism [1] is a foraging strategy in which individuals show a prolonged reluctance to eat novel foods, even after neophobia has been overcome. Within any given population of foragers, some will be conservative and some will be adventurous, an alternative strategy in which individuals readily accept novel food immediately after neophobia has waned. Dietary conservatism and neophobia are however distinct processes, [2] distinguished by the persistence of an individual's reluctance to eat over repeated encounters with novel food and over long time periods.

Contents

Background

Animals are often faced with a choice between eating familiar food or expanding their diet by consuming a novel item. It has long been recognised that animals hesitate to approach novel foods they encounter [3] [4] and this initial fear of novelty (the literal meaning of "neophobia") lasts only a matter of minutes in most animals. By contrast, a second response to novel food has been identified, in which, after the foragers have overcome their neophobia to approach and made contact with novel food, they continue to avoid eating it for considerable periods of time. [2] This much longer avoidance of novel food is called dietary conservatism, [1] and has a genetic basis. [5] Unlike neophobia, DC does not rapidly subside over repeated encounters. For example, Kelly (2001) [2] [6] found that among wild birds, some individuals avoided novel food for more than 2 years and 200 exposures, even though the novel food was conspicuous and fully palatable.

Prevalence

Dietary conservatism has been described in a range of vertebrate species including birds: Zebra Finch, [7] Japanese quail, [5] common blackbird, [1] European robin, both in the wild [8] and in captivity, [9] domestic chicken, [10] great tit [11] and Eurasian blue tit, [12] and fish: three-spined stickleback [13] and four species of the guppy genus Poecilia . [14] Dietary conservatism has never been demonstrated in humans, although the genetically influenced behaviour of "fussy eating" in children [15] [16] resembles the behaviour of non-human animals.

Alternative foraging strategies

One observation about dietary conservatism is that each of the forager populations examined so far has included some individuals that are consistently conservative in diet. However, the rest of the population exhibit a clearly different response to foraging encounters with novel foods. "Adventurous consumers" eat novel food as soon as they encounter it, or after their neophobia has waned enough for them to approach and touch it. In all vertebrate populations tested so far, both adventurous consumption and dietary conservatism strategies have been represented by a sizable proportion of the population (typically between 10 and 50% in dietary conservatism).[ citation needed ]

Plasticity in expression

Although dietary conservatism is a trait with a genetic basis, [5] its expression is, like any behaviour, a dynamic interaction between genes and the environment. Specifically, the expression of DC has been shown to be influenced by an individual's experience of the encounter with novel food in different contexts. For example, extended experience with multiple different colours of novel food makes a conservative individual more likely to accept an additional novel colour. [10] Conversely, encounters with novel food which is distasteful, increases the strength of the dietary conservatism response, making the individual extremely averse to novel foods thereafter. [10] Social cues can also be important. If a domestic chick (without direct access to food) observes another individual consuming novel food, then the avoidance of novel food by the observer is reduced. Alternatively, if chicks cannot see the food choice, and their companion is simply a competitor for food, then already-conservative individuals become more so, and only take the familiar food. [12] The strength of expression of DC also depends on the forager's perceived risk of predation pressure, hunger levels, and perceived availability of food.[ citation needed ]

Maintenance of DC and AC foraging strategies

The balance of foraging strategies in a population may be influenced by the forager's ecology. [10] For example, dietary conservatism may be favoured in habitats where prey are relatively cryptic, since it allows the predator to specialise on a single prey type. In this way conservative individuals could benefit from the use of a ‘search image’ for that prey type and the accumulation of experience of handling that prey. [17] [18] In addition, where there are many toxic prey types, conservative foragers may be favoured as they are less likely to be poisoned if they eat only nontoxic prey, with which they are already familiar. By contrast, adventurous foragers may be favoured in environments with a high diversity of prey, but a low abundance of individual prey types. In such an environment, adventurous predators would more quickly discover which of the available range of prey are edible and would then be able to exploit all of those prey types, rather than a familiar, but smaller, subset.[ citation needed ]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Predation</span> Biological interaction where a predator kills and eats a prey organism

Predation is a biological interaction where one organism, the predator, kills and eats another organism, its prey. It is one of a family of common feeding behaviours that includes parasitism and micropredation and parasitoidism. It is distinct from scavenging on dead prey, though many predators also scavenge; it overlaps with herbivory, as seed predators and destructive frugivores are predators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meerkat</span> Species of mongoose from Southern Africa

The meerkat or suricate is a small mongoose found in southern Africa. It is characterised by a broad head, large eyes, a pointed snout, long legs, a thin tapering tail, and a brindled coat pattern. The head-and-body length is around 24–35 cm (9.4–13.8 in), and the weight is typically between 0.62 and 0.97 kg. The coat is light grey to yellowish-brown with alternate, poorly-defined light and dark bands on the back. Meerkats have foreclaws adapted for digging and have the ability to thermoregulate to survive in their harsh, dry habitat. Three subspecies are recognised.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crepuscular animal</span> Animal behavior primarily characterized by activity during the twilight

In zoology, a crepuscular animal is one that is active primarily during the twilight period, being matutinal, vespertine/vespertinal, or both. This is distinguished from diurnal and nocturnal behavior, where an animal is active during the hours of daylight and of darkness, respectively. Some crepuscular animals may also be active by moonlight or during an overcast day. Matutinal animals are active only before sunrise, and vespertine only after sunset.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foraging</span> Searching for wild food resources

Foraging is searching for wild food resources. It affects an animal's fitness because it plays an important role in an animal's ability to survive and reproduce. Foraging theory is a branch of behavioral ecology that studies the foraging behavior of animals in response to the environment where the animal lives.

Neophobia is the fear of anything new, but is directly correlated with conditions such as OCD or autism spectrum disorder. In its milder form, it can manifest as the unwillingness to try new things or break from routine. In the context of children, the term is generally used to indicate a tendency to reject unknown or novel foods. Food neophobia, as it may be referred to, is an important concern in pediatric psychology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scaly-breasted munia</span> Species of bird native to South and Southeast Asia

The scaly-breasted munia or spotted munia, known in the pet trade as nutmeg mannikin or spice finch, is a sparrow-sized estrildid finch native to tropical Asia. A species of the genus Lonchura, it was formally described and named by Carl Linnaeus in 1758. Its name is based on the distinct scale-like feather markings on the breast and belly. The adult is brown above and has a dark conical bill. The species has 11 subspecies across its range, which differ slightly in size and color.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hoarding (animal behavior)</span> Behavior; storage of food in hidden locations

Hoarding or caching in animal behavior is the storage of food in locations hidden from the sight of both conspecifics and members of other species. Most commonly, the function of hoarding or caching is to store food in times of surplus for times when food is less plentiful. However, there is evidence that some amount of caching or hoarding is done in order to ripen the food, called ripening caching. The term hoarding is most typically used for rodents, whereas caching is more commonly used in reference to birds, but the behaviors in both animal groups are quite similar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aposematism</span> Honest signalling of an animals powerful defences

Aposematism is the advertising by an animal to potential predators that it is not worth attacking or eating. This unprofitability may consist of any defenses which make the prey difficult to kill and eat, such as toxicity, venom, foul taste or smell, sharp spines, or aggressive nature. These advertising signals may take the form of conspicuous coloration, sounds, odours, or other perceivable characteristics. Aposematic signals are beneficial for both predator and prey, since both avoid potential harm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banded mongoose</span> Species of mongoose from Africa

The banded mongoose is a mongoose species native from the Sahel to Southern Africa. It lives in savannas, open forests and grasslands and feeds primarily on beetles and millipedes. Mongooses use various types of dens for shelter including termite mounds. While most mongoose species live solitary lives, the banded mongoose live in colonies with a complex social structure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optimal foraging theory</span> Behavioral ecology model

Optimal foraging theory (OFT) is a behavioral ecology model that helps predict how an animal behaves when searching for food. Although obtaining food provides the animal with energy, searching for and capturing the food require both energy and time. To maximize fitness, an animal adopts a foraging strategy that provides the most benefit (energy) for the lowest cost, maximizing the net energy gained. OFT helps predict the best strategy that an animal can use to achieve this goal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bird intelligence</span> Study of intelligence in birds

The difficulty of defining or measuring intelligence in non-human animals makes the subject difficult to study scientifically in birds. In general, birds have relatively large brains compared to their head size. The visual and auditory senses are well developed in most species, though the tactile and olfactory senses are well realized only in a few groups. Birds communicate using visual signals as well as through the use of calls and song. The testing of intelligence in birds is therefore usually based on studying responses to sensory stimuli.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cannibalism</span> Consuming another individual of the same species as food

Cannibalism is the act of consuming another individual of the same species as food. Cannibalism is a common ecological interaction in the animal kingdom and has been recorded in more than 1,500 species. Human cannibalism is well documented, both in ancient and in recent times.

Cooperative breeding is a social system characterized by alloparental care: offspring receive care not only from their parents, but also from additional group members, often called helpers. Cooperative breeding encompasses a wide variety of group structures, from a breeding pair with helpers that are offspring from a previous season, to groups with multiple breeding males and females (polygynandry) and helpers that are the adult offspring of some but not all of the breeders in the group, to groups in which helpers sometimes achieve co-breeding status by producing their own offspring as part of the group's brood. Cooperative breeding occurs across taxonomic groups including birds, mammals, fish, and insects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flock (birds)</span>

A flock is a gathering of individual birds to forage or travel collectively. Avian flocks are typically associated with migration. Flocking also offers foraging benefits and protection from predators, although flocking can have costs for individual members.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tool use by non-humans</span>

Tool use by non-humans is a phenomenon in which a non-human animal uses any kind of tool in order to achieve a goal such as acquiring food and water, grooming, combat, defence, communication, recreation or construction. Originally thought to be a skill possessed only by humans, some tool use requires a sophisticated level of cognition. There is considerable discussion about the definition of what constitutes a tool and therefore which behaviours can be considered true examples of tool use. A wide range of animals, including mammals, birds, fish, cephalopods, and insects, are considered to use tools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Collective animal behavior</span> Animal cognition

Collective animal behaviour is a form of social behavior involving the coordinated behavior of large groups of similar animals as well as emergent properties of these groups. This can include the costs and benefits of group membership, the transfer of information, decision-making process, locomotion and synchronization of the group. Studying the principles of collective animal behavior has relevance to human engineering problems through the philosophy of biomimetics. For instance, determining the rules by which an individual animal navigates relative to its neighbors in a group can lead to advances in the deployment and control of groups of swimming or flying micro-robots such as UAVs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shoaling and schooling</span> In biology, any group of fish that stay together for social reasons

In biology, any group of fish that stay together for social reasons are shoaling, and if the group is swimming in the same direction in a coordinated manner, they are schooling. In common usage, the terms are sometimes used rather loosely. About one quarter of fish species shoal all their lives, and about one half shoal for part of their lives.

Native to both South and Central America, Cane toads were introduced to Australia in the 1930s and have since become an invasive species and a threat to the continent's native predators and scavengers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avian foraging</span>

Avian foraging refers to the range of activities and behaviours exhibited by birds in their quest for food. In addition to their unique body adaptations, birds have a range of described behaviours that differ from the foraging behaviours of other animal groups. According to the foraging habitat, birds may be grouped into foraging guilds. Foraging includes a range of activities, starting with the search for food, making use of sensory abilities, and which may involve one or more birds either of a single or even of multiple species. This is followed by locomotion and movements to obtain or capture the food, followed by the processing or handling of the foods prior to ingestion. Like all organisms foraging entails balancing the energy spent and energy gained. The high metabolic rate of birds, among the highest in the homoeotherm groups, constrains them to ensure a net positive gain in energy and have led evolutionary ethologists to develop the idea of optimal foraging.

A variety of behaviours whereby people are highly selective in what they eat and do not eat are known as picky eating or selective eating. Picky eating is common in younger children and can be a cause of concern for parents. It is also seen in many adults. There is no generally accepted definition of picky eating. It is generally associated with increased food neophobia. It can be associated with rejecting mixed or lumpy foods. It can also be associated with sensory sensitivity.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Marples, Nicola M.; Roper, Timothy J.; Harper, David G. C. (1998). "Responses of Wild Birds to Novel Prey: Evidence of Dietary Conservatism". Oikos. 83 (1): 161. doi:10.2307/3546557. JSTOR   3546557.
  2. 1 2 3 Marples, N. M.; Kelly, D. J. (1999). "Neophobia and Dietary Conservatism:Two Distinct Processes?". Evolutionary Ecology. 13 (7–8): 641–653. doi:10.1023/A:1011077731153. ISSN   0269-7653. S2CID   27737756.
  3. ↑ Barnett, Ca; Bateson, M.; Rowe, C. (2007). "State-dependent decision making: educated predators strategically trade off the costs and benefits of consuming aposematic prey". Behavioral Ecology. 18 (4): 645–651. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arm027 . ISSN   1465-7279.
  4. ↑ Sibley, R. M.; Brigham, A. J. (1999). A Review of the Phenomenon of Neophobia. In DP Cowan and CJ Feare (Eds.), Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management. Furth: Filander Verlag. pp. 67–84. ISBN   978-3930831166.
  5. 1 2 3 Marples, N. M.; Brakefield, P. M. (1995). "Genetic variation for the rate of recruitment of novel insect prey into the diet of a bird". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 55 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1016/0024-4066(95)90026-8.
  6. ↑ Kelly, D. J. (2001). Dietary conservatism in passerines: the influences of novel odour and novel colour (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Dublin, Republic of Ireland: Trinity College Dublin
  7. ↑ Kelly, David J.; Marples, Nicola M. (2004). "The effects of novel odour and colour cues on food acceptance by the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata". Animal Behaviour. 68 (5): 1049–1054. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.001. S2CID   53205231.
  8. ↑ Thomas, Robert J.; Bartlett, Laura A.; Marples, Nicola M.; Kelly, David J.; Cuthill, Innes C. (2004). "Prey selection by wild birds can allow novel and conspicuous colour morphs to spread in prey populations". Oikos. 106 (2): 285–294. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13089.x.
  9. ↑ Thomas, R. J.; Marples, N. M.; Cuthill, I. C.; Takahashi, M.; Gibson, E. A. (2003). "Dietary conservatism may facilitate the initial evolution of aposematism". Oikos. 101 (3): 458–466. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12061.x. ISSN   0030-1299.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Marples, N. M.; Quinlan, M.; Thomas, R. J.; Kelly, D. J. (2007-07-09). "Deactivation of dietary wariness through experience of novel food". Behavioral Ecology. 18 (5): 803–810. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arm053 . ISSN   1045-2249.
  11. ↑ Marples, Nicola M.; Mappes, Johanna (2011). "Can the dietary conservatism of predators compensate for positive frequency dependent selection against rare, conspicuous prey?". Evolutionary Ecology. 25 (4): 737–749. doi:10.1007/s10682-010-9434-x. ISSN   0269-7653. S2CID   22086923.
  12. 1 2 McMahon, Keith; Conboy, Allison; O'Byrne-White, Elise; Thomas, Robert J.; Marples, Nicola M. (2014). "Dietary wariness influences the response of foraging birds to competitors". Animal Behaviour. 89: 63–69. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.025. S2CID   54433290.
  13. ↑ Thomas, Robert J.; King, Tracey A.; Forshaw, Hannah E.; Marples, Nicola M.; Speed, Michael P.; Cable, Joanne (2010). "The response of fish to novel prey: evidence that dietary conservatism is not restricted to birds". Behavioral Ecology. 21 (4): 669–675. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arq037 . ISSN   1465-7279.
  14. ↑ Richards, E. Loys; Alexander, Lucille G.; Snellgrove, Donna; Thomas, Robert J.; Marples, Nicola M.; Cable, Joanne (2014). "Variation in the expression of dietary conservatism within and between fish species". Animal Behaviour. 88: 49–56. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.009. S2CID   53174146.
  15. ↑ Harris, Holly A.; Fildes, Alison; Mallan, Kimberley M.; Llewellyn, Clare H. (2016). "Maternal feeding practices and fussy eating in toddlerhood: a discordant twin analysis". International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 13 (1): 81. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0408-4 . ISSN   1479-5868. PMC   4944306 . PMID   27412445.
  16. ↑ Smith, Andrea D.; Herle, Moritz; Fildes, Alison; Cooke, Lucy; Steinsbekk, Silje; Llewellyn, Clare H. (2017). "Food fussiness and food neophobia share a common etiology in early childhood". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 58 (2): 189–196. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12647. PMC   5298015 . PMID   27739065.
  17. ↑ Pietrewicza, A. T., & Kamil, A. G. (1981). Search images and the detection of cryptic prey: an operant approach. In A. G. Kamil, & T. D. Sargent (Eds.), Foraging Behavior: Ethological and Psychological Approaches (pp. 311-332). New York: Garland STPM Press.
  18. ↑ Tinbergen, Niko (1960). "The natural control of insects in pine woods: vol. I. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds". Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie. 13 (3): 265–343. doi:10.1163/036551660X00053 – via eurekamag.com.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.