Emmanuel Goldstein

Last updated

Emmanuel Goldstein (John Boswall) on a telescreen during a Two Minutes Hate programme in the film Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984) 1984EmmanuelGoldstein.jpg
Emmanuel Goldstein (John Boswall) on a telescreen during a Two Minutes Hate programme in the film Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)

In the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (published in 1949), by George Orwell, Emmanuel Goldstein is the principal enemy of the state of Oceania. The political propaganda of The Party portrays Goldstein as the leader of The Brotherhood, a secret, counter-revolutionary organization who violently oppose the leadership of Big Brother and the Ingsoc régime of The Party.

Contents

Goldstein also is the author of The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism (The Book) a treasonous counter-history of the revolution that installed The Party as the government of Oceania and which slanders Big Brother as traitor of the revolution. Throughout the story, Emmanuel Goldstein appears only in Minitrue propaganda films on a telescreen, while rumours claim that The Party wrote The Book. [1]

The character

Emmanuel Goldstein was a member of the Inner Party and brother-in-arms of Big Brother during the revolution that installed The Party as the government of Oceania. In their turn to totalitarianism, by way of English Socialism (Ingsoc), Goldstein broke with Big Brother and The Party, and then founded The Brotherhood to oppose their government of Oceania. [2] Party propaganda teaches that Goldstein is an enemy of the state and that The Brotherhood is a leaderless resistance of cells of secret agents waging counter-revolution against Big Brother and The Party with the ideology of The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism, The Book written by Goldstein. [3]

In the course of daily life in Oceania, Goldstein is always the subject of the Two Minutes Hate, a daily programme of propaganda that begins at 11:00 hours; the telescreen shows an over-sized image of Emmanuel Goldstein for the assembled citizens of Oceania to subject to loud insults and contempt. To prolong and deepen the anger of the spectators, the telescreen then shows images of Goldstein walking among the parading soldiers of the current enemy of Oceania — either Eurasia or Eastasia. The Two Minutes Hate programme shows Goldstein as both an ideological enemy of the Ingsoc régime of The Party and a traitor aiding the national enemy of Oceania. [4]

The Party’s scapegoating of Goldstein justified the voiding of civil rights, the implementation of universal surveillance, and poverty. Save for The Party’s cultivation of a vague, but fervent, patriotism for Oceania, the Proles were excluded from the politics of Oceania, and only members of the Inner Party concerned themselves with the existence or the non-existence of Emmanuel Goldstein and The Brotherhood; thus, when the protagonist Winston Smith asks O'Brien, a member of the Inner Party, if The Brotherhood exists, O'Brien replies:

That, Winston, you will never know. If we choose to set you free when we have finished with you, and if you live to be ninety years old, still you will never learn whether the answer to that question is Yes or No. As long as you live it will be an unsolved riddle in your mind. [5]

In the course of a session of torture, O'Brien tells Winston that members of the Inner Party, including himself, wrote The Book, yet O'Brien's reply does not answer Winston's questions about the existence or the non-existence of Emmanuel Goldstein and The Brotherhood. This claim may actually be a lie to deceive Winston. [6]

Trotsky as Goldstein

Enemies of the state

In the 1950s, soon after publication of the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, political commentators and literary critics noted the likeness between the fictional character Emmanuel Goldstein and the Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky, who had been a political partner of Vladimir Lenin in realising the Russian Revolution of 1917. [7] After the death of Lenin in 1924, despite being an Old Bolshevik, Trotsky lost the intramural party politics of succession to Joseph Stalin, who then assassinated the character of Trotsky to justify his expulsion, first from office, then from the Russian Communist Party in 1925, and then from the USSR in 1929 — public condemnation as an enemy of the people. [8]

Russian communist revolutionary Leon Trotsky has been suggested as the inspiration for the character Emmanuel Goldstein Portrait of Leon Trotsky.jpg
Russian communist revolutionary Leon Trotsky has been suggested as the inspiration for the character Emmanuel Goldstein

Exiled prophet

In foreign exile from the Communist politics of Soviet Russia, Trotsky wrote The Revolution Betrayed: What is the Soviet Union and Where is it Going? (1937), wherein he denounced Stalin as an ideologically illegitimate leader of the Russian Communist Party and of the Soviet state whose policies and actions betrayed the principles of the Russian Revolution (1917). [9] In the USSR, Stalin consolidated his absolute power over party and government with the Great Purges (1936–1938) by imprisoning and by killing his personal and political enemies — including every Old Bolshevik with a legitimate claim to be a candidate for leader of the Communist Party and for leader of the Soviet state. [10]

Enemy action

Moreover, throughout the 1930s, Stalinist propaganda called for the death of Trotsky, who was depicted as the enemy of the state who instigated every problem in the Soviet Union and in the Socialist world. Stalin succeeded against his nemesis when the NKVD secret agent Ramón Mercader assassinated Trotsky in Mexico City, in 1940. [11] Concerning the ideological differences between the varieties of Marxist philosophy that are Stalinism and Trotskyism, Orwell said:

The fact that Trotskyists are everywhere a persecuted minority, and that the accusation usually made against them, i.e. of collaborating with the Fascists, is obviously false, creates an impression that Trotskyism is intellectually and morally superior to Communism; but it is doubtful whether there is much difference. [12]

However, literary critic Jeffrey Meyers who reviewed the political allegories in Orwell’s work stated that:

"Orwell ignores the fact that Trotsky passionately opposed Stalin’s dictatorship from 1924 to 1940, which featured Siberian prison camps, the deliberately created Ukraine famine and the massive slaughter during the Moscow Purge Trials of 1937.” [13]

Meyers also added that Orwell drew on the views of a right-wing combatant to reinforce his arguments. In contrast, Meyers cited Isaac Deutscher's biographical account of Trotsky which presented him to be a more civilised figure than Stalin and suggested that he would not have purged the Red Army generals or millions of Soviet citizens. [14]

The Book

Regarding the likeness between fictional and true-life enemies of the state, in 1954, the writer Isaac Deutscher said that Emmanuel Goldstein’s book, The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism, was Orwell's paraphrasing of Trotsky’s The Revolution Betrayed — known as The Book in the story of Nineteen Eighty-Four. [15] In 1956, the literary critic Irving Howe praised the writing craft of the novelist Orwell in his replication of Trotsky's style of writing for The Book by Goldstein; thus Winston Smith's readings in The Book are the best-written passages of novelistic story-telling in Nineteen Eighty-Four. [7] The critic Adrian Wanner said that The Book is a political parody of the Marxist philosophy and analyses that Trotsky presents in The Revolution Betrayed, and noted that Orwell was politically ambivalent about Trotsky being a type of Communist different from Stalin. [16] In correspondence with the American writer Sidney Sheldon, Orwell said that the Stalinist world portrayed in Nineteen Eighty-Four:

was based chiefly on Communism, because that is the dominant form of totalitarianism, but I was trying chiefly to imagine what Communism would be like if it were firmly rooted in the English speaking countries, and was no longer a mere extension of the Russian Foreign Office. [17]

The contemporary Goldstein

Richard M. Nixon

In the article "The Orwell Hypothesis: Nixon's Quantum Jump?" (1971), the opportunistic geopolitics of U.S. President Richard M. Nixon's official visit (21–28 February 1972) to the People's Republic of China — then a Communist enemy of the U.S. during the tripolar stage (1956–1991) of the Cold War — were compared to the historical and political analyses of Emmanuel Goldstein about the continually shifting military alliances among the three super-states, Eastasia, Oceania, and Eurasia, described in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). [18]

In the critical essay "Compassion for Nixon Hard to Summon" (1974), by Nick Thimmesch, and in the defensive essay "Do We Really Need Vengeance from Nixon?" (1976), by Tom Tiede, the authors discuss the mass psychology of American society's vilification of ex-president Nixon is a consequence of the criminal Watergate scandal (1972–1974), and that such political and personal vilification was a form of the Two Minutes Hate programs, which focused the collective anger of the body politic against ex-president Nixon as an enemy of the people of the United States. [19] [20]

Osama bin Laden

About the aftermath of the 11 September 2001 attacks against the U.S., in the essay "Osama and Goldstein" (2001), Prof. William L. Anderson said that the ideological and political utility of publicly showing parallels between Emmanuel Goldstein and Osama bin Laden facilitated and justified the U.S. government's unilateral attacks against the perceived enemies of the state and the perceived enemies of the people of the United States of America. [21]

About the political utility of comparing Osama bin Laden, leader of al-Qaeda, to Emmanuel Goldstein, leader of The Brotherhood, in 11 September 2001: War, Terror and Judgement (2002), Bülent Gökay and R.B.J. Walker said that:

Goldstein is the Osama Bin Laden figure in Orwell's novel [Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949)], an extremely elusive person who is never seen, never captured, but believed by the leadership of Oceania to be still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters. Since Goldstein is never captured, the battle against his crimes, treacheries, sabotages must never end. [22]

In Worst-Case Scenarios (2009), the jurist Cass Sunstein coined the term the Goldstein Effect to describe a government's "ability to intensify public concern, by giving a definite face to the adversary, specifying a human source of the underlying threat." [23] In the case of the American War on Terrorism (2001), the government of the U.S. and the American news media respectively identified Saddam Hussein of Iraq (r. 1979–2003) and Osama bin Laden, of Saudi Arabia, as synonymous with terrorism, which parallels The Party's psychological manipulations of the population of Oceania with and during the sessions of Two Minutes' Hate featuring the sights and sounds of the wars and conspiracies of Emmanuel Goldstein and The Brotherhood against Oceania, The Party, and Big Brother. [23]

George Soros

In "The Ironies of George Soros's Foundation Leaving Budapest" (2018), the pseudonymous author, M.S., said that in right-wing Hungarian politics, the politically progressive financier George Soros is used as a Goldstein figure, an enemy of the people of Hungary, because Soros criticised Prime Minister Viktor Orbán for poorly managing the Syrian Refugee crisis of 2015. In right-wing circles, the reactionary politics of antisemitism facilitated and justified propagating conspiracy theories about the liberal millionaire Soros seeking to impose a foreign ideology upon the Magyar people:

Mr Orbán's Fidesz party [the Hungarian Civic Alliance] campaigned in the recent election by plastering the country with ominous posters of Mr Soros. He has come to serve the same role for the [Orbán] government as Emmanuel Goldstein did for the totalitarian state [of Oceania] in George Orwell's 1984: A mythical, shadowy enemy used to focus people's hatred, and whose imaginary schemes supposedly justify the régime's complete grip on power. [24]

Related Research Articles

Big Brother (<i>Nineteen Eighty-Four</i>) Literary character and symbol

Big Brother is a character and symbol in George Orwell's dystopian 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. He is ostensibly the leader of Oceania, a totalitarian state wherein the ruling party, Ingsoc, wields total power "for its own sake" over the inhabitants.

In the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, thoughtcrime is the offense of thinking in ways not approved by the ruling Ingsoc party. In the official language of Newspeak, the word crimethink describes the intellectual actions of a person who entertains and holds politically unacceptable thoughts; thus the government of The Party controls the speech, the actions, and the thoughts of the citizens of Oceania.

Telescreens are two-way video devices that appear in George Orwell's dystopian 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. Omnipresent and almost never turned off, they are an unavoidable source of propaganda and tools of surveillance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2 + 2 = 5</span> Mathematically incorrect slogan

2 + 2 = 5 or two plus two equals five is a mathematical falsehood which is used as an example of a simple logical error that is obvious to anyone familiar with basic arithmetic.

The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism is a fictional book in George Orwell's dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. The fictional book was supposedly written by Emmanuel Goldstein, the principal enemy of the state of Oceania's ruling party. The Party portrays Goldstein as a former member of the Inner Party who continually conspired to depose Big Brother and overthrow the government. In the novel, the fictional Goldstein's book is read by the protagonist, Winston Smith, after a supposed friend, O'Brien, provided one copy to him. Winston had recalled that "There were ... whispered stories of a terrible book, a compendium of all the heresies, of which Goldstein was the author, and which circulated clandestinely here and there. It was a book without a title. People referred to it, if at all, simply as The Book."

In the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) by George Orwell, the Two Minutes Hate is the daily period during which members of the Outer and Inner Party of Oceania must watch a film depicting Emmanuel Goldstein, the principal enemy of the state, and his followers, the Brotherhood, and loudly voice their hatred for the enemy and then their love for Big Brother.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thought Police</span> Secret police of Oceania in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four

In the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), by George Orwell, the Thought Police are the secret police of the superstate of Oceania, who discover and punish thoughtcrime. Using criminal psychology and omnipresent surveillance the Thinkpol monitor the citizens of Oceania and arrest all those who have committed thoughtcrime in challenge to the status quo authority of the Party and of the régime of Big Brother.

Julia is a fictional character in George Orwell's 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. Her last name is not revealed in the novel but she is called Dixon in the 1954 BBC TV production.

<i>1984</i> (1956 film) 1956 film by Michael Anderson

1984 is a 1956 British black-and-white science fiction film, based on the 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell, depicting a totalitarian future of a dystopian society. The film was the first feature-length adaptation of the story, and followed a previous Westinghouse Studio One adaptation and a BBC-TV made-for-TV adaptation. 1984 was directed by Michael Anderson and starring Edmond O'Brien as protagonist Winston Smith, and featured Donald Pleasence, Jan Sterling, and Michael Redgrave.

In the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), by George Orwell, Hate Week is a psychological operation designed to increase as much as possible the population's hatred of the current enemy of the totalitarian Party, whichever of the two opposing super-states that may be.

References to George Orwell's 1949 dystopian political novel Nineteen Eighty-Four themes, concepts and plot elements are also frequent in other works, particularly popular music and video entertainment.

1984 (<i>Westinghouse Studio One</i>) 1st episode of the 6th season of Westinghouse Studio One

"1984" is an episode of the American television series Westinghouse Studio One broadcast September 21, 1953, on CBS. Starring Eddie Albert, Norma Crane and Lorne Greene, it was the first adaptation of George Orwell's 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four.

<i>Nineteen Eighty-Four</i> (1984 film) Film directed by Michael Radford

Nineteen Eighty-Four, also known as 1984, is a 1984 dystopian drama film written and directed by Michael Radford, based upon George Orwell's 1949 novel of the same name. Starring John Hurt, Richard Burton, Suzanna Hamilton, and Cyril Cusack, the film follows the life of Winston Smith (Hurt), a low-ranking civil servant in a war-torn London ruled by Oceania, a totalitarian superstate. Smith struggles to maintain his sanity and his grip on reality as the regime's overwhelming power and influence persecutes individualism and individual thinking on both a political and personal level.

Political geography of <i>Nineteen Eighty-Four</i> Three fictional superstates in the novel 1984 by George Orwell

In George Orwell's 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, the world is divided into three superstates: Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia, who are all fighting each other in a perpetual war in a disputed area mostly located around the equator. All that Oceania's citizens know about the world is whatever the Party wants them to know, so how the world evolved into the three states is unknown; and it is also unknown to the reader whether they actually exist in the novel's reality, or whether they are a storyline invented by the Party to advance social control. The nations appear to have emerged from nuclear warfare and civil dissolution over 20 years between 1945 and 1965, in a post-war world where totalitarianism becomes the predominant form of ideology, through Neo-Bolshevism, English Socialism, and Obliteration of the Self.

Winston Smith (<i>Nineteen Eighty-Four</i>) Protagonist in George Orwells novel Nineteen Eighty-Four

Winston Smith is a fictional character and the protagonist of George Orwell's dystopian 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. The character was employed by Orwell as an everyman in the setting of the novel, a "central eye ... [the reader] can readily identify with."

Doublethink is a process of indoctrination in which subjects are expected to simultaneously accept two conflicting beliefs as truth, often at odds with their own memory or sense of reality. Doublethink is related to, but differs from, hypocrisy.

In the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), by George Orwell, Newspeak is the fictional language of Oceania, a totalitarian superstate. To meet the ideological requirements of Ingsoc in Oceania, the Party created Newspeak, which is a controlled language of simplified grammar and limited vocabulary designed to limit a person's ability for critical thinking. The Newspeak language thus limits the person's ability to articulate and communicate abstract concepts, such as personal identity, self-expression, and free will, which are thoughtcrimes, acts of personal independence that contradict the ideological orthodoxy of Ingsoc collectivism.

<i>Nineteen Eighty-Four</i> 1949 novel by George Orwell

Nineteen Eighty-Four is a dystopian novel and cautionary tale by English writer George Orwell. It was published on 8 June 1949 by Secker & Warburg as Orwell's ninth and final book completed in his lifetime. Thematically, it centres on the consequences of totalitarianism, mass surveillance, and repressive regimentation of people and behaviours within society. Orwell, a staunch believer in democratic socialism and member of the anti-Stalinist Left, modelled the Britain under authoritarian socialism in the novel on the Soviet Union in the era of Stalinism and on the very similar practices of both censorship and propaganda in Nazi Germany. More broadly, the novel examines the role of truth and facts within societies and the ways in which they can be manipulated.

O'Brien is a fictional character and the main antagonist in George Orwell's 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. The protagonist Winston Smith, living in a dystopian society governed by the Party, feels strangely drawn to Inner Party member O'Brien. Orwell never reveals O'Brien's first name. The name indicates that O'Brien is of Irish origin, but this background is never shown to have any significance.

The Ministry of Truth, the Ministry of Peace, the Ministry of Love, and the Ministry of Plenty are the four ministries of the government of Oceania in the 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, by George Orwell.

The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation. These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink.

References

  1. ↑ Orwell, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) in the omnibus George Orwell (1980) Book Club Associates, p. 894.
  2. ↑ Orwell, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) in the omnibus George Orwell (1980) Book Club Associates, p. 848.
  3. ↑ Orwell, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) in the omnibus George Orwell (1980) Book Club Associates, pp. 844–847.
  4. ↑ Orwell, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) in the omnibus George Orwell (1980) Book Club Associates, p. 749.
  5. ↑ Orwell, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) in the omnibus George Orwell (1980) Book Club Associates, p. 000.
  6. ↑ Orwell, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) in the omnibus George Orwell (1980) Book Club Associates, p. 894.
  7. 1 2 Howe, Irving (1963). "Orwell: History as Nightmare". In Sutton, Walter; Foster, Richard (eds.). Modern Criticism. New York City: Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 540, 542. Archived from the original on 9 November 2023. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  8. ↑ “Trotskyist”, Dictionary of Historical Terms Second Edition (1998) Chris Cook, Ed., pp. 323–324.
  9. ↑ “Trotskyist”, Dictionary of Historical Terms Second Edition (1998) Chris Cook, Ed., pp. 323–324.
  10. ↑ “Yezhovschina”, The New Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought Third Edition (1999) Alan Bullock and Stephen Trombley Eds. pp. 929–930.
  11. ↑ R.M.W. (9 July 1949). "A Vivid, Terrifying Story of What Could Be In 1984". Saskatoon Star-Phoenix. Saskatoon, Canada. p. 19. Archived from the original on 11 March 2021. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
  12. ↑ Orwell, George (May 1945). "Notes on Nationalism". Polemic . Archived from the original on 20 January 2013. Retrieved 22 December 2006.
  13. ↑ "Orwell and Trotsky". The Orwell Society. 4 May 2022.
  14. ↑ "Orwell and Trotsky". The Orwell Society. 4 May 2022.
  15. ↑ Deutscher, Isaac (2003). The Prophet Outcast: Trotsky, 1929–1940 (reprint ed.). New York City: Verso. p. 261. ISBN   1-85984-451-0. Archived from the original on 9 November 2023. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  16. ↑ Bloom, Harold (2007). George Orwell (2 ed.). New York City: Infobase Publishing. p. 58. ISBN   978-0-7910-9428-0. Archived from the original on 9 November 2023. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
  17. ↑ Sheldon, Sidney (2006). The Other Side of Me. New York City: Grand Central Publishing. p. 213. ISBN   978-0-7595-6732-0.
  18. ↑ Brodney, Kenneth (21 October 1971). "The Orwell Hypothesis: Nixon's Quantum Jump?". The Village Voice. p. 24. Archived from the original on 31 May 2021. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
  19. ↑ Thimmesch, Nick (7 November 1974). "Compassion for Nixon Hard to Summon". Observer-Reporter. p. A-4. Archived from the original on 31 May 2021. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
  20. ↑ Tiede, Tom (14 April 1976). "Do We Really Need Vengeance from Nixon?". Prescott Courier. p. 4. Archived from the original on 31 May 2021. Retrieved 27 June 2011.
  21. ↑ Anderson, William L. (19 September 2001). "Osama and Goldstein". LewRockwell.com . Archived from the original on 18 June 2015. Retrieved 25 November 2015.
  22. ↑ Gökay, Bülent; Walker, R. B. J. (2002). 11 September 2001: War, Terror and Judgment. Oxfordshire, England: Taylor & Francis. p. 106. ISBN   0-614-68403-X.
  23. 1 2 Sunstein, Cass R. (2009). Worst-Case Scenarios. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 63. ISBN   978-0-674-03251-4.
  24. ↑ "The ironies of George Soros's foundation leaving Budapest". The Economist. 16 May 2018. Archived from the original on 8 June 2021. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.