Geoffrey of Vinsauf

Last updated
Geoffrey of Vinsauf
Born12th century  OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Died13th century  OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Occupation Writer, poet, rhetorician  OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg

Geoffrey of Vinsauf (fl. 1200) is a representative of the early medieval grammarian movement, termed preceptive grammar for its interest in teaching the ars poetica . [1]

Contents

Ars poetria is a subdivision of the grammatical art ( ars grammatica ) which synthesizes "rhetorical" and "grammatical" elements. The line of demarcation between these two fields is not firmly established in the Middle Ages. Gallo explains that "both of these liberal arts taught composition and taught the student to examine the diction, figurative language, and meters of the curriculum authors who were to serve as models for imitation. However it was rhetoric and not grammar that was concerned with Invention of subject matter and with disposition or organization of the work" as well as memory and delivery. [2]

Murphy explains that the medieval artes poetriae are divided into two types. First, there is the short, specialized type of treatise dealing with figurae , colores, tropi , and other verbal ornaments. They appeared separately all over Europe, usually anonymous, and were incorporated in elementary schooling, as adjuncts to ordinary grammar instruction. The second type of ars poetriae includes such works as the Ars versificatoria (c. 1175) of Matthew of Vendôme, the Laborintus (after 1213, before 1280) of Eberhard the German, the Ars versificaria (c. 1215) of Gervase of Melkley, the Poetria nova (1208–1213) and the Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi (after 1213) of Geoffrey of Vinsauf, and the De arte prosayca, metrica, et rithmica (after 1229) of John of Garland. [3] The artes poetriae constituted poetry as an academic discipline, and promoted its participation in the methods of logic. [4]

Biography

We know very little about the life of Geoffrey of Vinsauf. From his Poetria nova we learn that he was at one time in England before going to Rome during the pontificate of Innocent III, to whom the Poetria nova was prepared as a special gift. The traditional account of Geoffrey of Vinsauf provides further details of his biography: he is believed to be born in Normandy. It is sometimes claimed that he was then educated at St Frideswide's Priory. [5] He is said to have returned to the Continent for further university study, first in Paris and later in Italy. He incurred the displeasure of Bishop Adam, allegedly after a quarrel in Paris with a certain Robert, once his friend, and was forced to appeal to the mercy of the Archbishop of Canterbury. Later, perhaps through the intercession of that prelate, he journeyed back to England to become tutor at Hampton. At a still later date he is said to have been sent on an embassy to Innocent III, and thus to have developed relations with the Holy See. His designation as "Vinsauf", or "de Vino Salvo", is traceable to a treatise attributed to him on the keeping of the vine and other plants. [6]

Works and Bibliography

The Poetria nova is a 2,000-line poem written around 1210 in Latin hexameters and dedicated to Pope Innocent III. The Poetria nova aimed to replace the standard text on verse composition, Horace's Ars Poetica called the Poetria in the Middle Ages, which was widely read and commented upon in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Karsten Friis-Jensen suggests that Geoffrey of Vinsauf's "main incentive for writing independent arts of poetry was probably a wish to systematize the exegetical material which generations of commentators had collected around Horace's text, in a structure that was in better accordance with traditional didactics in the closely related art of rhetoric" (364). [7] The medieval teacher intended to reshape the Ars Poetica into an elementary textbook on composing poetry, "modeled on the Ciceronian rhetorics and their medieval derivatives, such as the artes dictandi and the treatises on the colores rhetorici". [8] The Poetria nova almost immediately became one of the standard textbooks in England and was incorporated into the curriculum on the Continent very soon thereafter. To its popularity testifies the number of manuscripts (200) in which this work is found and extensive commentary, which takes form of marginal glosses around a text of the Poetria nova and a text copied separately by itself.

Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi (Instruction in the Method and Art of Speaking and Versifying) written after 1213 is a prose counterpart of the Poetria nova which expands on amplification, abbreviation, and verbal ornamentation. It is preserved complete in three manuscripts and nearly complete in another two manuscripts. The thirteenth-century copies explicitly attribute the treatise to "magistri Galfridi" or "magistri Galfridi le Vin est sauf". Two other works are attributed to him: Summa de Coloribus Rhetoricis (A Summary of the Colors of Rhetoric), a briefer work, primarily on figures of speech, and the "Causa Magistri Gaufredi Vinesauf" ("The Apology of Master Geoffrey of Vinsauf"), a short poem of topical and political interest. He used to be regarded as the author of Itinerarium Regis Ricardi , a narrative of the Third Crusade, but this is certainly false.

Edmond Faral edited the texts of the Poetria nova, Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi, and Summa de coloribus rhetoricis. [9] The Poetria nova has been translated into English three times. [10] [11] [12] Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi is translated by Roger Parr. [13] In this article, quotations are from Kopp's translation.

The Poetria nova

The Poetria nova is a preceptive treatise, that is, it gives a specific advice to future writers about the composition of poetry. Its handbook genre is reinforced by multiple illustrations of its precepts entirely invented by Geoffrey of Vinsauf, rather than culled from classical authors. The text itself serves as an illustration of techniques it teaches. Thus, the treatment of amplification is amplified, the treatment of abbreviation is abbreviated, metaphor is discussed in figurative language. As Woods notes, the applicability of the instructions of Poetria nova to both verse and prose and the various ways it could be used in the classroom, combined with the range of styles that Geoffrey of Vinsauf used to illustrate techniques, made it the general all-purpose medieval rhetorical treatise par excellence. [14]

A thirteenth century anonymous commentary on the Poetria nova notes the twofold nature of this book: first, the five parts of the book are the five parts of rhetoric: Invention, disposition, style, memory, and delivery; second, the Poetria nova is itself a rhetorical discourse with the necessary parts: exordium , narratio, divisio, confutatio, and conclusio. Its author is, consequently, an accomplished theoretician, orator, and "a good teacher". [15]

The Poetria nova incorporates Ciceronian precept on invention and arrangement, Horatian doctrine on decorum, and instructions on style including the tropes, figures of words and figures of thought derived from the pseudo-Ciceronian Rhetorica ad Herennium. Gallo summarizes the major topics of the Poetria nova as follows (numbers in parentheses refer to line numbers of the original Latin verse), following the dedication, a panegyric to Pope Innocent III: [16]

  1. Introduction; Divisions of the art of rhetoric (verses 1-86).
  2. Arrangement, including the natural and artificial openings (vv. 87-202).
  3. Amplification and Abbreviation (vv. 203-741).
  4. Stylistic ornament (vv. 742-1592).
  5. Conversion (vv. 1593-1765).
  6. Determination (vv. 1766-1846).
  7. Miscellaneous advice on choice of words, humor, faults to avoid (vv. 1847-1973).
  8. Memory and delivery (vv. 1974-2070).

Figurative language is discussed in detail in the Poetria nova, which marks this treatise as grammatical. However, two of the central parts of the Poetria nova - Invention of subject matter and disposition or organization of the work - belong to the domain of rhetoric. Likewise, memory and delivery are traditionally affiliated with rhetoric. The Poetria nova thus constitutes an intersection of grammar and rhetoric in the medieval curriculum.

The Poetria nova opens with a famous passage about planning a poem and defining the limits of its subject matter. Geoffrey of Vinsauf distinguishes between the natural order and the artificial or artistic order in which the author can narrate the events.Geoffrey of Vinsauf prefers the artificial order and recommends a proverbial opening.

The subject matter can be presented either through a lengthy treatment or a brief recapitulation of the story. Among the methods of amplification are refining or dwelling on a point; periphrasis; comparison; apostrophe; prosopopeia; digression; description; and opposition. Brevity of the narration can be achieved by the following devices: emphasis, articulus, absolute ablative "without a rower" [i.e. a preposition], skillful indication of one thing among the rest, "chains removed from between clauses" [i.e. omitting conjunctions], the sense of many clauses in one, and omitting repetition of the same word.

Geoffrey of Vinsauf distinguishes between ornatus gravis ['difficult/serious/dignified ornament'] and ornatus levis ['easy/pleasant/light ornament']. Gravitas can be achieved by using the ten tropes listed in the pseudo-Ciceronian Rhetorica ad Herennium.The chief trope is metaphor. The ornatus levis includes the figures of diction and of thought given in the Rhetorica ad Herennium .These figures are for the most part non-metaphorical.

The doctrine of conversion is a systematic method of varying a given sentence while preserving its meaning to make the sequence of words pleasant. The doctrine of determination consists primarily of creating a long sequence of brief phrases. This is the method and the manner of Sidonius. The contrary practice is that of Seneca: to round off the verses with a quick conclusion. Geoffrey of Vinsauf, however, prefers to be "neither as long, nor as short, rather both long and short, being made both out of neither".

The remaining doctrines are treated very briefly. Words should be carefully chosen to keep the balance of meaning and form. The characters' actions and their speeches should be appropriate for their age, and the overall color should be in harmony with the subject. Excessive alliteration, awkward violation of word order, and overly long periods are stylistic faults to be avoided. To polish his work an author has to apply "first the mind, second the ear, and third and last, that which should conclude the matter - usage". Only delight fosters memory. In delivery, one must follow the sense imitating in a controlled manner the emotions called for by the subject. Geoffrey of Vinsauf concludes his treatise with the observation that "power comes from speech, since life and death rest in its hands; however, language may perchance be aided, in moderation, by both expression and gesture".

Influence

Popularity of Geoffrey of Vinsauf's didactic treatises has raised the question of possible influence on the later English poets such as Geoffrey Chaucer (ca. 1342-1400), Thomas Usk (d. 1388), and John Gower (ca. 1330-1408). Chaucer's parody in the Nun's Priest's Tale of Geoffrey of Vinsauf's use of apostrophe seems to ridicule the instruction provided in the Poetria nova, and has therefore been interpreted as Chaucer's contempt for Geoffrey of Vinsauf's doctrine. A more profound examination of Chaucer's principles of composition, however, reveals that the essential scheme of the Wife of Bath's Prologue (specifically, lines 193-828) conforms to the doctrine promulgated by Geoffrey of Vinsauf's Documentum. The integration of the Poetria nova precepts into Troilus and Criseyde I, 1065-71 reflects Chaucer's interest in rhetorical doctrine in general, and in Geoffrey of Vinsauf's in particular.

The contribution of Geoffrey of Vinsauf to the artes poetriae is acknowledged by such distinguished rhetoricians, as John of Garland (ca. 1180–ca. 1258), a teacher of grammar and literature at the University of Paris, in the Parisiana poetria (known also as De arte prosayca, metrica, et rithmica, written and revised probably between 1220 and 1235), and Eberhard the German in the Laborintus. Geoffrey of Vinsauf is praised by Gervais of Melkley and Desiderius Erasmus (1469–1536). Kelly asserts that understanding and appreciation of the writings of the great medieval poets, such as Chaucer, Dante, Gottfried von Strassburg, and Chrétien de Troyes, can only be fully achieved if studied in the light of the instruction contained in treatises like Geoffrey of Vinsauf's Poetria nova and Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi. [17]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetoric</span> Art of persuasion

Rhetoric is the art of persuasion, which along with grammar and logic, is one of the three ancient arts of discourse. Rhetoric aims to study the techniques writers or speakers use to inform, persuade, or motivate their audiences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George of Trebizond</span>

George of Trebizond was a Byzantine Greek philosopher, scholar, and humanist.

In rhetoric, zeugma and syllepsis are figures of speech in which a single phrase or word joins different parts of a sentence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latin school</span> School type in Europe from the 14th to 19th centuries

The Latin school was the grammar school of 14th- to 19th-century Europe, though the latter term was much more common in England. Other terms used include Lateinschule in Germany, or later Gymnasium. Latin schools were also established in Colonial America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decorum</span> Principle of classical rhetoric, poetry, and theatrical theory

Decorum was a principle of classical rhetoric, poetry, and theatrical theory concerning the fitness or otherwise of a style to a theatrical subject. The concept of decorum is also applied to prescribed limits of appropriate social behavior within set situations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homiletics</span> Application of rhetoric to public preaching

In religious studies, homiletics is the application of the general principles of rhetoric to the specific art of public preaching. One who practices or studies homiletics may be called a homilist, or more simply, a preacher.

<i>De vulgari eloquentia</i>

De vulgari eloquentia is the title of a Latin essay by Dante Alighieri. Although meant to consist of four books, it abruptly terminates in the middle of the second book. It was probably composed shortly after Dante went into exile, circa 1302–1305.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lawrence of Aquilegia</span>

Lawrence of Aquilegia was a thirteenth-century Italian canon and teacher. He is best known for his treatises on the ars dictaminis—the medieval art of letter writing. Lawrence’s major works found inspiration in Ciceronian rhetoric but introduced a new phatic element to writing and include the Summa dictaminis edita iuxta doctrinam Tullii and the Practica sive usus dictaminis edita ad utilitatem rudium. The Practica is his most popular work and characterizes his pragmatic, phatic approach to letter writing through the use of tables.

Owing to its origin in ancient Greece and Rome, English rhetorical theory frequently employs Greek and Latin words as terms of art. This page explains commonly used rhetorical terms in alphabetical order. The brief definitions here are intended to serve as a quick reference rather than an in-depth discussion. For more information, click the terms.

<i>De doctrina Christiana</i> Theological text by Augustine of Hippo

De doctrina Christiana is a theological text written by Augustine of Hippo. It consists of four books that describe how to interpret and teach the Scriptures. The first three of these books were published in 397 and the fourth added in 426. By writing this text, Augustine set three tasks for Christian teachers and preachers: to discover the truth in the contents of the Scriptures, to teach the truth from the Scriptures, and to defend scriptural truth when it was attacked.

Ars dictaminis is the art of letter-writing, which often intersects with the art of rhetoric.

Everardus, called Alemannus or Teutonicus, was a German cleric, university professor (magister) and poet. He specialized in grammar and rhetoric and served as a rector. His greatest work was a Latin poem entitled Laborintus ("Labyrinth"). It is a didactic work that endeavours to teach grammar and the finer points of poetic composition: metre, rhyme and, most importantly, the various forms of medieval hexameter. Its modern editor, Edmond Faral, in Les arts poétiques du XIIe et du XIIIe siècle, dated it no later than 1280 and not earlier than 1208–1213.

The Rhetoric to Alexander is a treatise traditionally attributed to Aristotle. It is now generally believed to be the work of Anaximenes of Lampsacus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ars historica</span>

Ars Historica was a genre of humanist historiography in the later Renaissance. It produced a small library of treatises underscoring the stylistic aspects of writing history as a work of art, but also introducing the contributions of philology and textual criticism in its precepts and evaluations.

In classical rhetoric, figures of speech are classified as one of the four fundamental rhetorical operations or quadripartita ratio: addition (adiectio), omission (detractio), permutation (immutatio) and transposition (transmutatio).

Anselm of Besate was an 11th-century churchman and rhetorician.

Gervase of Melkley or Gervase of Melkeley was a Norman scholar and poet.

<i>Pamphilus de amore</i>

Pamphilus de amore is a 780-line, 12th-century Latin comedic play, probably composed in France, but possibly Spain. It was "one of the most influential and important of the many pseudo-Ovidian productions concerning the 'arts of Love'" in medieval Europe, and "the most famous and influential of the medieval elegiac comedies, especially in Spain". The protagonists are Pamphilus and Galatea, with Pamphilus seeking to woo her through a procuress.

Jacqueline de Weever is a Guyanese-born literary scholar and poet. She is Professor Emerita at Brooklyn College, City University of New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pedro Juan Pepinyá</span> Spanish Jesuit humanist (b. 1530)

Pedro Juan Pepinyá, S.J. was a Spanish Jesuit humanist who contributed to the development of the Jesuit Cursus Conimbricensis commentaries on Aristotle and who revised Cypriano Soarez' De arte rhetorica.

References

  1. ↑ Murphy, James Jerome (1971). Three medieval rhetorical arts. University of California Press. p. vii. ISBN   978-0-520-01820-4.
  2. ↑ Gallo, Ernest (1978). "The grammarian's rhetoric: The Poetria nova of Geoffrey of Vinsauf". Medieval eloquence: Studies in the theory and practice of medieval rhetoric. University of California Press. pp. 68–84. ISBN   978-0-520-03345-0.
  3. ↑ Murphy 1971, p. xxi-xxii.
  4. ↑ Copeland, Rita (1991). Rhetoric, hermeneutics, and translation in the Middle Ages: Academic traditions and vernacular texts. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511597534. ISBN   978-0-521-38517-6.
  5. ↑ Manitius, Max (1911). Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters (in German). Vol. 1. Beck. pp. 188–189.
  6. ↑ Murphy 1971, p. 29–30.
  7. ↑ Friis-Jensen, Karsten (1995). "Horace and the early writers of arts of poetry". In Ebbesen, Sten (ed.). Sprachtheorien in Spätantike und Mittelalter. Gunter Narr Verlag. pp. 360–401. ISBN   9783878086734.
  8. ↑ Camargo, Martin (1999). "Tria sunt: The long and the short of Geoffrey of Vinsauf's Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi". Speculum. 74 (4): 935–955. doi:10.2307/2886969. ISSN   0038-7134. JSTOR   2886969. S2CID   162222139.
  9. ↑ Faral, Edmond (1924). Les arts poétiques du XIIᵉ et du XIIIᵉ siècle. Recherches et documents sur la technique littéraire du Moyen Âge. Champion. p. 197–262, 265–320, 321–327.
  10. ↑ Nims, Margaret F. (2010). Poetria nova. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies. ISBN   978-0-88844-299-4. OCLC   610211816.
  11. ↑ Gallo, Ernest (1971). The Poetria nova and its sources in early rhetorical doctrine. Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110873221. ISBN   978-3-11-087322-1.
  12. ↑ Kopp, Jane Baltzell (1971). "Poetria nova". Three medieval rhetorical arts. Berkeley, University of California Press. pp. 32–108. ISBN   978-0-520-01820-4.
  13. ↑ Parr, Roger P. (1968). Documentum de modo et arte dictandi et versificandi/Instruction in the method and art of speaking and versifying). Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press. ISBN   0-87462-217-4. OCLC   600869832.
  14. ↑ Woods, Marjorie Curry (2010). Classroom commentaries: Teaching the Poetria nova across medieval and Renaissance Europe. Ohio State University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1wn0r2n. ISBN   978-0-8142-7155-1. OCLC   741874872.
  15. ↑ Woods, Marjorie Curry (1991). "A Medieval rhetoric goes to school – and to the university: The commentaries on the Poetria nova". Rhetorica. 9 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1525/rh.1991.9.1.55. ISSN   0734-8584.
  16. ↑ Gallo 1978, p. 69.
  17. ↑ Kelly, Douglas (1969-01-01). "Theory of Composition in Medieval Poetry and Geoffrey of Vinsauf's Poetria Nova". Mediaeval Studies. 31: 117–148. doi:10.1484/J.MS.2.306061. ISSN   0076-5872.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.