HEXACO model of personality structure

Last updated
The six HEXACO personality traits HEXACO 1.png
The six HEXACO personality traits

The HEXACO model of personality structure is a six-dimensional model of human personality that was created by Ashton and Lee and explained in their book, The H Factor of Personality, [1] based on findings from a series of lexical studies involving several European and Asian languages. The six factors, or dimensions, include honesty-humility (H), emotionality (E), extraversion (X), agreeableness (A), conscientiousness (C), and openness to experience (O). Each factor is composed of traits with characteristics indicating high and low levels of the factor. The HEXACO model was developed through similar methods as other trait taxonomies and builds on the work of Costa and McCrae [2] and Goldberg. [3] The model, therefore, shares several common elements with other trait models. However, the HEXACO model is unique mainly due to the addition of the honesty-humility dimension. [4]

Contents

Concept

A visualization of a young woman's HEXACO scores Hexaco Results 1.png
A visualization of a young woman's HEXACO scores

The HEXACO model of personality conceptualizes human personality in terms of six dimensions.

The HEXACO model was developed from several previous independent lexical studies. Language-based taxonomies for personality traits have been widely used as a method for developing personality models. This method, based on the logic of the lexical hypothesis, uses adjectives found in language that describe behaviours and tendencies among individuals. Factor analysis is used on the adjectives to identify a minimal set of independent groups of personality traits. [5]

Research studies based on the lexical hypothesis described above were first undertaken in the English language. Subsequent lexical studies were conducted in other languages and, by comparing the results, six emergent factors were revealed in similar form across all languages tested, including English. [6] [7]

Personality is often assessed using a self-report inventory or observer report inventory. The six factors are measured through a series of questions designed to rate an individual on levels of each factor. [8] Ashton and Lee have developed self- and observer report forms of the HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-PI-R). [9] The HEXACO-PI-R assesses the six broad HEXACO personality factors, each of which contains four "facets", or narrower personality characteristics. (An additional 25th narrow facet, called altruism, is also included and represents a blend of the honesty-humility, emotionality, and agreeableness factors.)

The six factors, their facets, and the personality-descriptive adjectives that typically belong to these six groups are as follows: [10]

  • Honesty-humility (H):
    • Facets: Sincerity, fairness, greed avoidance, modesty
    • Adjectives: {sincere, honest, faithful, loyal, modest/unassuming} versus {sly, deceitful, greedy, pretentious, hypocritical, boastful, pompous}
  • Emotionality (E):
    • Facets: Fearfulness, Anxiety, Dependence, Sentimentality
    • Adjectives: {emotional, oversensitive, sentimental, fearful, anxious, vulnerable} versus {brave, tough, independent, self-assured, stable}
  • Extraversion (X):
    • Facets: Social self-esteem, social boldness, sociability, liveliness
    • Adjectives: {outgoing, lively, extraverted, sociable, talkative, cheerful, active} versus {shy, passive, withdrawn, introverted, quiet, reserved}
  • Agreeableness (A):
    • Facets: Forgivingness, gentleness, flexibility, patience
    • Adjectives: {patient, tolerant, peaceful, mild, agreeable, lenient, gentle} versus {ill-tempered, quarrelsome, stubborn, choleric}
  • Conscientiousness (C):
    • Facets: Organization, diligence, perfectionism, prudence
    • Adjectives: {organized, disciplined, diligent, careful, thorough, precise} versus {sloppy, negligent, reckless, lazy, irresponsible, absent-minded}
  • Openness to experience (O):
    • Facets: Aesthetic appreciation, inquisitiveness, creativity, unconventionality
    • Adjectives: {intellectual, creative, unconventional, innovative, ironic} versus {shallow, unimaginative, conventional}

History

The HEXACO model of personality started initial development in 2000. [11] It was derived from earlier used models of personality such as the Big Five factors covered in the NEO-PI. These Big Five personality traits (conscientiousness, agreeableness, openness to experience, neuroticism, and extraversion) were the result of earlier lexical studies of personality and were popularized in the 1980s. However, when similar lexical studies were conducted in multiple languages rather than only English, a sixth factor emerged, which was called the honesty-humility factor. [12] The other languages included: Dutch, French, Korean, Polish, Croatian, Filipino, Greek, German, Italian, Hungarian, and Turkish. [13] Additionally, the lexical studies in other languages revealed different sub-facets of the emotionality and agreeableness factors than the original five factor model suggested. [12] Today, the HEXACO model has become a widely used model of personality. [14]

Relations with Big Five model

Currently, the most widely used model of personality structure is also based on analyses of personality-descriptive adjectives. This model consists of the five personality factors collectively known as the "Big Five". [3] Three of the Big Five factors are similar to the extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness to experience factors of the HEXACO model. The two remaining Big Five factors, called agreeableness and neuroticism (with the opposite pole of the latter factor being emotional stability), are similar to the agreeableness and emotionality factors of the HEXACO model – but with some differences in the content of the factors. Agreeableness and emotionality from the HEXACO model represent rotated variants of their Big Five counterparts, for example, characteristics related to a quick temper are associated with neuroticism or low emotional stability in the Big Five framework, but with low agreeableness in the HEXACO framework. Therefore, the Big Five's agreeableness and HEXACO's agreeableness are not identical. The Big Five factors do not include an honesty-humility factor, but some of the characteristics belonging to honesty-humility are incorporated into the Big Five's agreeableness factor. Although earlier investigations found only the Big Five factors, more recent studies conducted in various languages (including English) with larger sets of adjectives recovered six factors, as summarized above. [6] [15] The names of four of the HEXACO factors (all except honesty-humility and emotionality) were adopted from existing labels for the Big Five factors. Factor names were selected on the basis of the common meaning of the characteristics within each factor. Still, other studies that compare the two show that some traits can be analyzed using the HEXACO model instead of the Big Five. For the sake of example, traits like narcissism or manipulativeness can be evaluated with the honesty-humility trait included in the model. [16]

Research topics

Theoretical basis of agreeableness, honesty-humility and emotionality

The HEXACO model is often used in research studies when behaviors or traits found on the agreeableness, honesty-humility and emotionality dimensions are of specific interest. The factors of agreeableness, honesty-humility and emotionality are distinctly different from their counterparts on the five factor model (FFM). Honesty-humility, emotionality and agreeableness are proposed to be measures of altruistic versus antagonistic behavior. Honesty-humility and agreeableness both measure two different aspects of reciprocal altruism, high levels of which indicate a propensity for helping behavior and cooperation as opposed to the exploitation of others. The honesty-humility factor represents a person's tendency for pro-social altruistic behaviors, [17] while agreeableness indicates an individual's tendency to forgive and to show tolerance. Emotionality is a measure of kin altruism, that is, the tendency to show empathy and attachment to one's kin.

Honesty-humility and the dark triad

The honesty-humility factor has been used in a variety of studies as a measure of ethical or pro-social behavior (See Ashton and Lee (2008) [18] for further details). Low levels of the honesty-humility factor are associated with greater levels of materialism, unethical business practices and deviant sexual behavior. The honesty-humility factor has been found to predict endorsement of unethical business practices [19] and even the degree to which a person will take health and safety risks (even towards fellow employees). [20] An individual who scores low on the honesty-humility factor may have a proclivity for anti-social acts. Which anti-social acts an individual is likely to commit may be related to their personality profile along the other factors of the HEXACO model. For example, someone who scores low on honesty-humility and low on conscientiousness and agreeableness are more likely to engage in delinquency in the workplace. [18]

The dark triad of personality consists of psychopathy, Machiavellianism and narcissism. Psychopathy is identified by characteristics such as remorselessness, antisociality and selfishness. Machiavellianism consists of selfishness, in that one will focus on their own needs, primarily by manipulating others. Narcissism can also be defined as selfishness, but is different as this person would consider themselves of a higher importance than those around them. [21] However, these constructs are said to be not fully represented in common five-factor models of personality. The dark triad can be conceptualized as being on the opposite pole of honesty-humility (sincere, faithful, loyal etc.), which would mean that low levels of honesty-humility corresponds to higher levels of psychopathy, Machiavellianism and/or narcissism. [8] [22] The dark triad personality constructs tend to only correlate with disagreeableness on the Big Five Inventory, otherwise they are represented inconsistently on measures of the Big Five traits. [23] For that reason, several researchers have used the HEXACO model to gain a more detailed understanding of the personality characteristics of individuals who exhibit traits/behaviors that would be considered along the dark triad dimension. [24]

ACT Behavioral Skills Framework

The Behavioral Skills Framework (BSF) [25] was developed by the ACT board to focus on building knowledge and skills to be successful in education and work environments. It was structured around, but did not directly replicate, the six HEXACO facets and emphasizes the hierarchical structure of personality. [26]

The HEXACO dimensions visualized in two-dimensions according to the Atlas of Personality, Emotion and Behavior HEXACO visualised in the two dimensions of the Atlas of Personality, Emotion and Behaviour.svg
The HEXACO dimensions visualized in two-dimensions according to the Atlas of Personality, Emotion and Behavior

Visualization in two dimensions

The dimensions of the HEXACO model of personality has been visualized in two dimensions using the Atlas of Personality, Emotion and Behavior. [27] The adjectives used to describe each HEXACO dimension are scored using the atlas' two orthogonal dimensions of affiliation and dominance. The scored points are then visualized using kernel density plots in two dimensions. The vectors drawn on each of the six plots is a representation of the HEXACO dimension expressed in the two dimensions of the atlas.

Psychological effects

Social behavior

The addition of the sixth factor, as well as the rotation of agreeableness and emotionality, allows for examination and prediction of behavior based on less prosocial behavior. Studies using the HEXACO model have found support for the relationship between agreeableness and honesty-humility on pro-social and ethical behavior. One study showed a significant relationship between levels of Honesty-Humility and the endorsement of revenge, [28] while another found that levels of Agreeableness were related to the tendency to forgive. [29]

Creativity

Levels of honesty-humility have also been found to be related to levels of creativity. Specifically, low levels of honesty-humility were found to be related to higher levels of self-reported creativity; though, no relationship between creativity and agreeableness was found. [30]

Risk taking

Further research using the HEXACO model has examined the relationship between its various domains and scores on risk taking behavior. In one study: levels of emotionality were related to perceptions of risk; levels of conscientiousness were related to perceived benefits; while openness and honesty-humility predicted social risk taking and health/safety risk taking respectively. [31]

Sexuality

The HEXACO model has also been used in studies of sexuality, including the association of seductive behavior and endorsement of sexual activity without emotional attachment to emotionality and honesty-humility. [32] As well, levels of honesty-humility were associated with being faithful to one's partner in a relationship. [33] Other topics of study that utilized the HEXACO model include: religiosity, [34] prejudice, [35] ethical decision making, [19] academic performance, [36] [37] and political attitudes/behaviors. [38] [39] [40]

Education

Research shows the H-H and conscientious factors of HEXACO model are useful for predicting counterproductive student behaviors in college students. Conscientiousness may be the most consistent facet of the six in its association to student GPA. [26]

Cognitive ability

Meta-analytic research shows that openness has a small positive correlation with intelligence and emotionality has a small negative correlation with intelligence. Facets of openness related to inquisitiveness and unconventionality show the strongest correlation with intelligence, in contrast to creativity and aesthetic appreciation. Of the emotionality facets, fearfulness showed the strongest negative correlation with intelligence. Other domains of HEXACO including honesty-humility appear to be uncorrelated with intelligence, although there are several differential correlations at the facet-level. Notably, across conscientiousness facets, a preference for structure and order ("organization") has a small negative correlation with intelligence, whereas prudence had a small positive correlation with intelligence. [41]

Employment

Strong meaningful associations are shown between the HEXACO model and job satisfaction, most notably the extraversion trait. Research also suggested relationships between the HEXACO, mostly Honesty-Humility trait, and negative work behaviors like sexual harassment, unethical decision making and counterproductive work behavior. [26] [42]

With the exception of the emotionality factor, strong correlations between the other 5 HEXACO factors and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) have been found. Overall, the HEXACO sub-facets have been shown to be better predictors of OCB than the broader 6 traits, with sub-facets like diligence (conscientiousness), liveliness and sociability (extraversion), and fairness (honesty-humility) being the best predictors. [42]

Pro-environment attitudes and behavior

Studies show that individual personality differences have a role in shaping environmentalism and HEXACO traits have been shown to predict who is more likely to adopt pro-environment attitudes and behaviors, which are attitudes and actions that are shown to positively affect the environment. The traits of honesty-humility and openness to experience are the strongest predictors of pro-environmental attitudes/behaviors. [43]

Subjective well-being

HEXACO traits and sub-facets have been shown to predict self-reported psychological and subjective well-being. Extraversion is the largest predictor of well-being closely followed by Conscientiousness. The extraversion sub-facets of liveliness and self-esteem have the highest positive correlations with well-being and the emotionality facet of anxiety has the highest negative correlation with wellbeing. Neuroticism is the best predictor of well-being in the Big Five model, and even though it is closely related to HEXACO emotionality, slight differences between the two traits mean that emotionality is not as good of a predictor of well-being as Big Five neuroticism is. [44]

Criticisms

The HEXACO model of personality is a trait-based taxonomy of personality. As such, the criticism and limitations of the model are similar to that of other trait-based measures (see Big Five personality traits § Critique). Trait-based measures, including the HEXACO model, typically rely on factor analysis. Unfortunately, factor analysis does not always ensure replicable results. Models created through factor analysis can vary between samples, depending on: (i) how the researcher organizes the measures (e.g., using unipolar versus bipolar ratings), and (ii) the amount of ratings/variables that are included in the analysis. [45]

De Raad et al. have argued that only three personality traits have fully replicated (i.e., appeared in all analyses) across cultures (extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness). These authors argue that beyond three traits, the factor markers become unreliable. They further argue that claims of universality for the HEXACO model should be cautiously considered, since many languages and cultures have yet to be assessed with appropriate personality trait studies. [46] Furthermore, the Honesty-Humility dimension is not always consistently replicated. Several past studies have identified inconsistent sixth-factor dimensions (e.g. hedonism–spontaneity) [47] while other research has identified potentially more than six factors. [17] The above criticism is not unique to the HEXACO model, given that there has been considerable debate regarding the identity of the fifth factor of personality in the Five-Factor Model, especially across cultures. [48]

Many studies using the HEXACO model support the usefulness of the dimensions of agreeableness, emotionality and honesty–humility. However, the HEXACO model may not necessarily be a better personality tool in every situation. When the HEXACO model was compared to a modified five-factor model that included a dimension of honesty-humility, the predictive ability of the HEXACO model was similar in several instances to that of the modified FFM (five factor model). [32] The authors further acknowledge that the HEXACO model may have an advantage when the predictor variables are conceptually related to the honesty-humility factor, and that in many cases the modified FFM-plus-honesty-humility model produced similar results.

See also

Related Research Articles

In psychology, trait theory is an approach to the study of human personality. Trait theorists are primarily interested in the measurement of traits, which can be defined as habitual patterns of behavior, thought, and emotion. According to this perspective, traits are aspects of personality that are relatively stable over time, differ across individuals, are relatively consistent over situations, and influence behaviour. Traits are in contrast to states, which are more transitory dispositions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Personality test</span> Method of assessing human personality constructs

A personality test is a method of assessing human personality constructs. Most personality assessment instruments are in fact introspective self-report questionnaire measures or reports from life records (L-data) such as rating scales. Attempts to construct actual performance tests of personality have been very limited even though Raymond Cattell with his colleague Frank Warburton compiled a list of over 2000 separate objective tests that could be used in constructing objective personality tests. One exception however, was the Objective-Analytic Test Battery, a performance test designed to quantitatively measure 10 factor-analytically discerned personality trait dimensions. A major problem with both L-data and Q-data methods is that because of item transparency, rating scales and self-report questionnaires are highly susceptible to motivational and response distortion ranging all the way from lack of adequate self-insight to downright dissimulation depending on the reason/motivation for the assessment being undertaken.

Conscientiousness is the personality trait of being careful or diligent. Conscientiousness implies a desire to do a task well, and to take obligations to others seriously. Conscientious people tend to be efficient and organized as opposed to easy-going and disorderly. They tend to show self-discipline, act dutifully, and aim for achievement; they display planned rather than spontaneous behavior; and they are generally dependable. Conscientiousness manifests in characteristic behaviors such as being neat, systematic, careful, thorough, and deliberate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Big Five personality traits</span> Personality model consisting of five broad dimensions

The Big Five personality traits, sometimes known as "the Five-Factor model of personality" or "OCEAN model", is a grouping of five unique characteristics used to study personality. It has been developed from the 1980s onward in psychological trait theory.

In the study of psychology, neuroticism has been considered a fundamental personality trait. In the Big Five approach to personality trait theory, individuals with high scores for neuroticism are more likely than average to be moody and to experience such feelings as anxiety, worry, fear, anger, frustration, envy, jealousy, pessimism, guilt, depressed mood, and loneliness. Such people are thought to respond worse to stressors and are more likely to interpret ordinary situations, such as minor frustrations, as appearing hopelessly difficult. The responses can include maladaptive behaviors, such as dissociation, procrastination, substance use, etc., which aids in relieving the negative emotions and generating positive ones.

Agreeableness is a personality trait that manifests as behavior that is perceived as kind, sympathetic, cooperative, warm, frank, and considerate. In contemporary personality psychology, agreeableness is one of the five major dimensions of personality structure, reflecting individual differences in cooperation and social harmony.

Openness to experience is one of the domains which are used to describe human personality in the Five Factor Model. Openness involves six facets, or dimensions: active imagination (fantasy), aesthetic sensitivity, attentiveness to inner feelings, preference for variety (adventurousness), intellectual curiosity, and challenging authority. A great deal of psychometric research has demonstrated that these facets or qualities are significantly correlated. Thus, openness can be viewed as a global personality trait consisting of a set of specific traits, habits, and tendencies that cluster together.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affective events theory</span> Psychological model

Affective events theory (AET) is an industrial and organizational psychology model developed by organizational psychologists Howard M. Weiss and Russell Cropanzano to explain how emotions and moods influence job performance and job satisfaction. The model explains the linkages between employees' internal influences and their reactions to incidents that occur in their work environment that affect their performance, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction. The theory proposes that affective work behaviors are explained by employee mood and emotions, while cognitive-based behaviors are the best predictors of job satisfaction. The theory proposes that positive-inducing as well as negative-inducing emotional incidents at work are distinguishable and have a significant psychological impact upon workers' job satisfaction. This results in lasting internal and external affective reactions exhibited through job performance, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment.

The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF) is a self-report personality test developed over several decades of empirical research by Raymond B. Cattell, Maurice Tatsuoka and Herbert Eber. The 16PF provides a measure of personality and can also be used by psychologists, and other mental health professionals, as a clinical instrument to help diagnose psychiatric disorders, and help with prognosis and therapy planning. The 16PF can also provide information relevant to the clinical and counseling process, such as an individual's capacity for insight, self-esteem, cognitive style, internalization of standards, openness to change, capacity for empathy, level of interpersonal trust, quality of attachments, interpersonal needs, attitude toward authority, reaction toward dynamics of power, frustration tolerance, and coping style. Thus, the 16PF instrument provides clinicians with a normal-range measurement of anxiety, adjustment, emotional stability and behavioral problems. Clinicians can use 16PF results to identify effective strategies for establishing a working alliance, to develop a therapeutic plan, and to select effective therapeutic interventions or modes of treatment. It can also be used within other areas of psychology, such as career and occupational selection.

Sensation seeking is a personality trait defined by the search for experiences and feelings, that are "varied, novel, rich and intense", and by the readiness to "take physical, social, legal, and financial risks for the sake of such experiences." Risk is not an essential part of the trait, as many activities associated with it are not risky. However, risk may be ignored, tolerated, or minimized and may even be considered to add to the excitement of the activity. The concept was developed by Marvin Zuckerman of the University of Delaware. In order to assess this trait he created a personality test called the Sensation Seeking Scale. This test assesses individual differences in terms of sensory stimulation preferences. So there are people who prefer a strong stimulation and display a behavior that manifests a greater desire for sensations and there are those who prefer a low sensory stimulation. The scale is a questionnaire designed to measure how much stimulation a person requires and the extent to which they enjoy the excitement. Zuckerman hypothesized that people who are high sensation seekers require a lot of stimulation to reach their Optimal Level of Arousal. When the stimulation or sensory input is not met, the person finds the experience unpleasant.

The Revised NEO Personality Inventory is a personality inventory that assesses an individual on five dimensions of personality. These are the same dimensions found in the Big Five personality traits. These traits are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion(-introversion), agreeableness, and neuroticism. In addition, the NEO PI-R also reports on six subcategories of each Big Five personality trait.

Within personality psychology, it has become common practice to use factor analysis to derive personality traits. The Big Five model proposes that there are five basic personality traits. These traits were derived in accordance with the lexical hypothesis. These five personality traits: Extraversion, Neuroticism, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience have garnered widespread support.

The Big Five personality traits are Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism. The Big Five Personality is a test that people can take to learn more about their personality in relation to the five personality traits. Cross-cultural psychology as a discipline examines the way that human behavior is different and/or similar across different cultures. One important and widely studied area in this subfield of psychology is personality, particularly the study of Big Five. The Big Five model of personality has become the most extensively studied model of personality and has broad support, starting in the United States and later in many different cultures. The Big Five model of personality started in the United States, and through the years has been translated into many different languages and has been used in many countries. Some researchers were attempting to determine the differences in how other cultures perceive this model. Some research shows that the Big Five holds up across cultures even with its origin in the English language. However, there is also some evidence which suggests that the Big Five traits may not be sufficient to completely explain personality in other cultures. In countries such as South America and East Asia, the results weren't as accurate because they weren't as open as some people in other countries are.

In psychology, a facet is a specific and unique aspect of a broader personality trait. Both the concept and the term "facet" were introduced by Paul Costa and Robert McCrae in the first edition of the NEO-Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) Manual. Facets were originally elaborated only for the neuroticism, openness to experience, and extraversion traits; Costa and McCrae introduced facet scales for the agreeableness and conscientiousness traits in the Revised NEO-PI. Each of the Big Five personality traits in the five factor model contains six facets, each of which is measured with a separate scale. The use of facets and facet scales has since expanded beyond the NEO PI-R, with alternative facet and domain structures derived from other models of personality. Examples include the HEXACO model of personality structure, psycholexical studies, circumplex models, the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ), and the California Psychological Inventory.

The honesty-humility factor is one of the six basic personality traits of the HEXACO model of personality. Honesty-humility is a basic personality trait representing the tendency to be fair and genuine when dealing with others, in the sense of cooperating with others, even when someone might utilize them without suffering retaliation. People with very high levels of the honesty-humility avoid manipulating for personal gain, feel little desire to break rules, are uninterested in wealth and luxuries, and feel no special right to elevated social status. Conversely, persons with very low levels on this scale will compliment others to get whatever they want, are inclined to break the rules for personal gains, are motivated by material gain, and feel a strong sense of self-importance.

Most scientists agree that religiosity is not an independent personality trait, despite there being some commonality between their characteristics. Religiosity and personality traits both relate to one's feelings, thoughts, and behaviors. However, unlike for personality, one's level of religiosity is often measured by the presence or lack of belief in and relationship with a higher power, certain lifestyles or behaviors adopted for a higher power, and a sense of belonging with other followers of one's religion. Additionally, personality traits tend to follow a normal distribution, such that the majority of individuals' scores for a personality trait will be concentrated towards the middle, rather than being extremely high or low. Distributions for religiosity, however, follow a non-normal distribution, such that there are more individuals who score particularly high or low on religiosity scales.

The alternative five model of personality is based on the claim that the structure of human personality traits is best explained by five broad factors called impulsive sensation seeking (ImpSS), neuroticism–anxiety (N-Anx), aggression–hostility (Agg-Host), sociability (Sy), and activity (Act). The model was developed by Marvin Zuckerman and colleagues as a rival to the well-known five factor model of personality traits and is based on the assumption that "basic" personality traits are those with a strong biological-evolutionary basis. One of the salient differences between these two models is that the alternative five model lacks any equivalent to the dimension called openness to experience in the five factor model.

The biological basis of personality it is the collection of brain systems and mechanisms that underlie human personality. Human neurobiology, especially as it relates to complex traits and behaviors, is not well understood, but research into the neuroanatomical and functional underpinnings of personality are an active field of research. Animal models of behavior, molecular biology, and brain imaging techniques have provided some insight into human personality, especially trait theories.

Intelligence and personality have traditionally been studied as separate entities in psychology, but more recent work has increasingly challenged this view. An increasing number of studies have recently explored the relationship between intelligence and personality, in particular the Big Five personality traits.

References

  1. ↑ Ashton, Michael C.; Lee, Kibeom; Perugini, Marco; Szarota, Piotr; de Vries, Reinout E.; Di Blas, Lisa; Boies, Kathleen; De Raad, Boele (2004). "A Six-Factor Structure of Personality-Descriptive Adjectives: Solutions From Psycholexical Studies in Seven Languages". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 86 (2): 356–366. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356. ISSN   0022-3514. PMID   14769090.
  2. ↑ Costa, P.T.,Jr. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  3. 1 2 Goldberg LR (January 1993). "The structure of phenotypic personality traits". Am Psychol. 48 (1): 26–34. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26. PMID   8427480. S2CID   20595956.
  4. ↑ Ashton MC, Lee K (2007). "Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure". Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 11 (2): 150–66. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907. PMID   18453460. S2CID   13183244.
  5. ↑ Thurstone, L. L. (1934). "The vectors of mind". Psychological Review. 41 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1037/h0075959. ISSN   0033-295X.
  6. 1 2 Lee K, Ashton MC (2008). "The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages". J Pers. 76 (5): 1001–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x. PMID   18665898.
  7. ↑ C., Ashton, Michael (2018). Individual Differences and Personality (3rd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press. pp. 59–83. ISBN   9780128098455. OCLC   987583452.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. 1 2 Ashton, M.C.; Lee, K. (2009). "The HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality". Journal of Personality Assessment. 91 (4): 340–345. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878. PMID   20017063. S2CID   17179958.
  9. ↑ Lee, K.; Ashton, M.C. (2004). "The HEXACO Personality Inventory: A New Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality". Multivariate Behavioral Research. 39 (2): 329–358. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8. PMID   26804579. S2CID   27763606.
  10. ↑ Ashton MC; Lee K (2007). "Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure". Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 11 (2): 150–66. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907. PMID   18453460. S2CID   13183244.
  11. ↑ "The HEXACO Personality Inventory - Revised". www.hexaco.org. Retrieved 2022-04-25.
  12. 1 2 Ashton, Michael Craig (2017). Individual Differences and Personality (3rd ed.). ISBN   978-0-12-809845-5. OCLC   987583452.
  13. ↑ Lee, Kibeom; Ashton, Michael C. (October 2008). "The HEXACO Personality Factors in the Indigenous Personality Lexicons of English and 11 Other Languages". Journal of Personality. 76 (5): 1001–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x. ISSN   0022-3506. PMID   18665898.
  14. ↑ Moshagen, Morten; Thielmann, Isabel; Hilbig, Benjamin E.; Zettler, Ingo (July 2019). "Meta-Analytic Investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory(-Revised)". Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 227 (3): 186–194. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000377. ISSN   2190-8370. S2CID   201398756.
  15. ↑ Saucier G (October 2009). "Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: indications for a big six structure". J Pers. 77 (5): 1577–614. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00593.x. PMID   19678873. S2CID   7106403.
  16. ↑ C., Ashton, Michael (2013). Individual differences and personality (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Press. ISBN   9780123741295. OCLC   835227535.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. 1 2 Thalmayer, A. G.; Saucier, G.; Eigenhuis, A. (2011). "Comparative Validity of Brief to Medium-Length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires". Psychological Assessment. 23 (4): 995–1009. doi:10.1037/a0024165. PMID   21859221.
  18. 1 2 Ashton, M. C.; Lee, K. (2008). "The HEXACO Model of Personality Structure and the Importance of the H Factor". Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2 (5): 1952. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00134.x.
  19. 1 2 Lee, K.; Ashton, M. C.; Morrison, D. L.; Cordery, D.; Dunlop, P. D. (2008). "Predicting integrity with the HEXACO personality model: Use of self- and observer reports". Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 81: 147–167. doi:10.1348/096317907x195175.
  20. ↑ Weller, J. A.; Tikir, A. (2011). "Predicting domain-specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure". Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 24 (2): 180. doi: 10.1002/bdm.677 .
  21. ↑ C., Ashton, Michael (2017-06-13). Individual Differences and Personality (3rd ed.). ISBN   9780128098455. OCLC   987583452.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. ↑ Ashton, M.C.; Lee, K. (2005). "Honesty-Humility, the Big Five and the Five-Factor Model". Journal of Personality. 73 (5): 1321–1353. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00351.x. PMID   16138875.
  23. ↑ Paulhus, D.L.; Williams, K.M. (2002). "The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy". Journal of Research in Personality. 36 (6): 556–563. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6. S2CID   6535576.
  24. ↑ de Vries, R.E.; van Kampen, D. (2010). "The HEXACO and 5DPT Models of Personality: A Comparison and Their Relationships with Psychopathy, Egoism, Pretentiousness, Immorality and Machiavelliansim" (PDF). Journal of Personality Disorders. 24 (2): 244–257. doi:10.1521/pedi.2010.24.2.244. PMID   20420478.
  25. ↑ https://www.act.org/content/act/en/research/reports/act-publications/beyond-academics/behavioral-skills/framework-of-behavior.html#:~:text=The%20ACT%20behavioral%20skills%20framework%20is%20hierarchical%3B%20at,%28and%20age-appropriate%29%20components%2C%20subcomponents%2C%20and%20behavioral%20skill%20dimensions.
  26. 1 2 3 McAbee, Samuel T.; Casillas, Alex; Way, Jason D.; Guo, Feng (July 2019). "The HEXACO Model in Education and Work". Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 227 (3): 174–185. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000376. ISSN   2190-8370. S2CID   201478382.
  27. ↑ Mobbs, Anthony E. D. (2020). "An atlas of personality, emotion and behaviour". PLOS ONE. 15 (1): e0227877. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1527877M. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227877 . PMC   6974095 . PMID   31961895.
  28. ↑ Edwin SK, Boon SD (January 2012). "Predicting appraisals of romantic revenge: The roles of Honesty–Humility, Agreeableness, and vengefulness". Personality and Individual Differences. 52 (2): 128–132. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.014.
  29. ↑ Shepherd & Belicki, 2008
  30. ↑ Silva, P.J.; Kaufman, J.C.; Reiter-Palmon, R.; Wigert, B. (2011). "Cantankerous Creativity: Honesty-Humility, Agreeablesness and the HEXACO structure of Creative Achievement". Personality and Individual Differences. 51 (5): 687–689. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.011.
  31. ↑ Weller JA, Tikir A (April 2011). "Predicting domain-specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure". Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 24 (2): 180–201. doi: 10.1002/bdm.677 .
  32. 1 2 Ashton, M. C.; Lee, K. (2008). "The prediction of Honesty–Humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of personality". Journal of Research in Personality. 42 (5): 1216. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006.
  33. ↑ Bourdage, J. S.; Lee, K.; Ashton, M. C.; Perry, A. (2007). "Big Five and HEXACO model personality correlates of sexuality". Personality and Individual Differences. 43 (6): 1506–1516. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.008.
  34. ↑ Saroglou, V.; Pichon, I.; Trompette, L.; Verschueren, M.; Dernelle, R. (2005). "Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 44 (3): 323–348. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.503.7559 . doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x.
  35. ↑ Sibley, C. G.; Harding, J. F.; Perry, R.; Asbrock, F.; Duckitt, J. (2010). "Personality and prejudice: Extension of the HEXACO personality model". European Journal of Personality. 24 (6): 515–534. doi:10.1002/per.750. S2CID   144042194.
  36. ↑ Noftle EE, Robins RW (July 2007). "Personality predictors of academic outcomes: big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores". J Pers Soc Psychol. 93 (1): 116–30. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116. PMID   17605593.
  37. ↑ de Vries A, de Vries RE, Born MPh (October 2010). "Broad versus narrow traits: Conscientiousness and honesty-humility as predictors of academic criteria". European Journal of Personality. 25 (5): 336–348. doi:10.1002/per.795. S2CID   18908590.
  38. ↑ Zettler, I.; Hilbig, B. E.; Haubrich, J. (2011). "Altruism at the ballots: Predicting political attitudes and behavior". Journal of Research in Personality. 45: 130–133. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.010.
  39. ↑ Chirumbolo, A.; Leone, L. (2010). "Personality and politics: The role of the HEXACO model of personality in predicting ideology and voting". Personality and Individual Differences. 49: 43–48. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.004.
  40. ↑ Zettler, I.; Hilbig, B. E. (2010). "Attitudes of the selfless: Explaining political orientation with altruism". Personality and Individual Differences. 48 (3): 338–342. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.002.
  41. ↑ Anglim, Jeromy; Dunlop, Patrick D.; Wee, Serena; Horwood, Sharon; Wood, Joshua K.; Marty, Andrew (May 2022). "Personality and intelligence: A meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin. 148 (5–6): 301–336. doi:10.1037/bul0000373. hdl: 20.500.11937/89668 . ISSN   1939-1455. S2CID   253344751.
  42. 1 2 Pletzer, Jan Luca; Oostrom, Janneke; De Vries, Reinout (August 2020). "HEXACO Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Domain- and Facet-Level Meta-Analysis". Academy of Management Proceedings. 2020 (1): 10335. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2020.10335abstract. ISSN   0065-0668.
  43. ↑ Soutter, Alistair Raymond Bryce; Bates, Timothy C.; Mõttus, René (2020-05-08). "Big Five and HEXACO Personality Traits, Proenvironmental Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 15 (4): 913–941. doi: 10.1177/1745691620903019 . ISSN   1745-6916. PMC   7333518 . PMID   32384257. S2CID   218563688.
  44. ↑ Anglim, Jeromy; Horwood, Sharon; Smillie, Luke D.; Marrero, Rosario J.; Wood, Joshua K. (April 2020). "Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin. 146 (4): 279–323. doi:10.1037/bul0000226. ISSN   1939-1455. PMID   31944795. S2CID   210698453.
  45. ↑ Goldberg, L. R. (1992). "The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure". Psychological Assessment. 4: 26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26. S2CID   144709415.
  46. ↑ De Raad, B.; Al, Et; Mlačić, Boris; Church, A. Timothy; Katigbak, Marcia S.; Ostendorf, Fritz; Hřebíčková, Martina; Di Blas, Lisa; Szirmák, Zsófia (2010). "Only three personality factors are fully replicable across languages: Reply to Ashton and Lee". Journal of Research in Personality. 44 (4): 442–445. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.005.
  47. ↑ Becker, P. (1999). "Beyond the Big Five". Personality and Individual Differences. 26 (3): 511–530. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00168-8.
  48. ↑ Larsen, R.J., & Buss, D.M. (2008). Personality Psychology: Domains of knowledge about human behaviour, third edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.