History of Botany (1530-1860) (differs in German: Geschichte der Botanik vom 16. Jahrhundert bis 1860[1]) is a book about the historical evolution of botany, originally published in German by prominent German botanist[2]Julius von Sachs in 1875. The authorized translation was published by Henry E. F. Garnsey and was revised by Scottish botanist Isaac Bayley Balfour in 1890. This book quickly became a standard work on the evolution of botany as a scientific field, used by contemporary peers [3] and is still being used by modern scientists into the beginning of the21st century.[4] The book describes the history of morphology and classification of plants (for the years 1530-1860), the history of vegetable anatomy (years 1671-1860) and vegetable physiology (years 1583-1860).[5] This book is one of the firsts describing the history of botany and considered among the best books on the subject.[6]
In 1851-1856, the author attended the University of Prague. During these years he participated in scientific research positions such as microscope and plant physiology assistant as well as natural science illustrator. Von Sachs did not enjoy the biology department, however he was very interested in zoology and botany. Von Sachs was especially influenced by his philosophy course and professor, Robert von Zimmerman.[7]
In 1859, he was appointed assistant in plant physiology at the Agriculture College and Forest Academy in Tharandt where he started to write Handbuch der Experimentalphysiologie des Pflanzen. In 1861 became a professor at the Agricultural College of Poppelsdorf, later the University of Bonn.[8] During this time he published research such as Handbuch der Experimentalphysiologie des Pflanzen in 1865 which discussed plant physiology.[9] In 1867, Von Sachs became chair of botany at the University of Freiburg but moved to the University of Würzburg the following year.[7] The book Handbook of Botany, published in 1868 was very influential in the botanical community,[10] it summarizes the botanical knowledge of the time.[9]
In 1875, History of Botany was written to promote the development of science by commenting on methods and theories of the time. The book makes a historical overview of botanical research, theories and discoveries, which was not believed to have been done before. Von Sachs believed it to be the first history of botany. The book makes a picture of the beginning of the scientific study of vegetation in the 16th century with the societal culture at the time until 1860, a decade before the start of this book.[11]
Contents
The book is divided into three parts that the author calls books, which cover different time periods, ranging between the 1530's and the 1860's.[12] The author had the goal to make a picture of the beginning of the scientific study of vegetation in the 16th century until the 1860's, a decade before the publication of this book.[13]
The first book, History of Morphology and Classification, discusses the work of botanists since Brunfels to Caspar Bauhin, as well as metamorphosis and the spiral theory, and the terminology of botany used which distinguishes between Cesalpino’s time to Linnaeus from 1583 to 1760.[12]
The second book, History of Vegetable Anatomy, covers the time period of 1671 to 1860. It includes phytotomy and discusses the work of its founders Malpighi and Grew, and the studies of cells and their formation. This book included figures such as Malpighi and Grew, the founders of phytotomy and also touches upon phytotomy within the 18th century.[12]
The third book, History of Vegetable Physiology, covers a time frame from 1583 to 1860, including topics such as the theory of evolution, the theory of plant nutrition and how the theory had developed from its founding up to 1804, as well as the history of phytodynamics.[12]
Translation
After the publication of the book in German in 1875, an authorized translation to English was published by Henry E. F. Garnsey in 1890, revised by Scottish botanist Isaac Bayley Balfour, for what Von Sachs wrote the preface dedicated to the translator of his book. In this preface he talks about his changed opinions due to new research being published after 1875. He admits to have made some modifications to his book, but he declares not having made too many drastic modifications in order to respect the original meaning of the book in accordance with its historical context.[11]
Reception
Von Sachs had a high reputation in the field of botany and History of Botany was regarded as a work worthy of serious study by botany scholars.[14] A review of the book by the journal the American Naturalist congratulates the German Royal Academy of Sciences for selecting Sachs as the author of the book on the botanical history by stating: “Germans may, however, well be proud of the large and honorable share which their country men are here shown to have taken in the advancement of the science, and they may congratulate themselves upon the selection of an historian who has not ignored the claims of other nations”.[15]
In 1909, J. Reynolds Green published the book "A History of Botany 1860-1900; Being a Continuation of Sachs History of botany, 1530-1860" carrying on Sachs's work with regards to the end of the 19th century.[16] In honor of the 100th anniversary of Sachs’s birth in 1932, the President of the Linnean Society of London, F. E. Weiss commemorated Sachs as being the author of the best “History of Botany” that they had at the time.[17]
Some late historians of science harshly criticized Sachs’s History of Botany pointing out historical inaccuracies in his book. Marshall A. Howe dislikes the predominantly German focus of the book and E. L. Greene wrote: “Julius von Sachs, the last in the line, copied Sprengel’s caption The German Fathers, etc., but knew next to nothing of their works, even rating as unimportant Valerius Cordus, who was immeasurably the greatest of them all.”[18][19]
E. L. Greene also accuses Sachs of discarding the role of Dioscorides as one of the firsts to recognize natural families of plants by stating that: “it is propagating fable in place of history to affirm that natural families were first recognized and indicated by any Linnaeus, or Adanson, or Jussieu of the eighteenth century”.[19]
R.J. Harvey-Gibson spends several words in the introduction of his “Outlines of the History of Botany” (1919) criticizing Sachs for neglecting the pre-sixteenth century history of botany.[20]Charles Singer defends Sachs by pointing out that the author "frankly" called his book "History of Botany (1530-1860)" with 1530 indicating what Sachs saw as the date during which modern botany was founded thanks to the work of the German botanists Brunfels, Fuchs, and Bock.[14] Harvey-Gibson uses this claim to blame Sachs for overlooking the importance of men like Theophrastus, Tournefort and Haller in the history of botany, preferring the “dull crabbed phraseology of the German herbalists of the sixteenth century”.[20]
Related Research Articles
Antoine Laurent de Jussieu was a French botanist, notable as the first to publish a natural classification of flowering plants; much of his system remains in use today. His classification was based on an extended unpublished work by his uncle, the botanist Bernard de Jussieu.
Julius von Sachs was a German botanist from Breslau, Prussian Silesia. He is considered the founder of experimental plant physiology and co-founder of modern water culture. Julius von Sachs and Wilhelm Knop are monumental figures in the history of botany by first demonstrating the importance of water culture for the study of plant nutrition and plant physiology in the 19th century.
The year 1694 in science and technology involved some significant events.
Leonhart Fuchs, sometimes spelled Leonhard Fuchs and cited in Latin as Leonhartus Fuchsius, was a German physician and botanist. His chief notability is as the author of a large book about plants and their uses as medicines, a herbal, which was first published in 1542 in Latin. It has about 500 accurate and detailed drawings of plants, which were printed from woodcuts. The drawings are the book's most notable advance on its predecessors. Although drawings had been used in other herbal books, Fuchs' book proved and emphasized high-quality drawings as the most telling way to specify what a plant name stands for.
Hugo Marie de Vries was a Dutch botanist and one of the first geneticists. He is known chiefly for suggesting the concept of genes, rediscovering the laws of heredity in the 1890s while apparently unaware of Gregor Mendel's work, for introducing the term "mutation", and for developing a mutation theory of evolution.
Charles de l'Écluse,L'Escluse, or Carolus Clusius, seigneur de Watènes, was an Artois doctor and pioneering botanist, perhaps the most influential of all 16th-century scientific horticulturists.
Rembert Dodoens was a Flemish physician and botanist, also known under his Latinized name Rembertus Dodonaeus. He has been called the father of botany. The standard author abbreviation Dodoens is used to indicate this person as the author when citing a botanical name.
Hugo von Mohl FFRS HFRSE was a German botanist from Stuttgart. He was the first person to use the word "protoplasm".
Joseph Gaertner was a German botanist, best known for his work on seeds, De Fructibus et Seminibus Plantarum (1788-1792).
Otto Brunfels was a German theologian and botanist. Carl von Linné listed him among the "Fathers of Botany".
Karl Anton Eugen Prantl, also known as Carl Anton Eugen Prantl, was a German botanist.
Joseph Pitton de Tournefort was a French botanist, notable as the first to make a clear definition of the concept of genus for plants. Botanist Charles Plumier was his pupil and accompanied him on his voyages.
De Fructibus et Seminibus Plantarum, also known by its standard botanical abbreviation Fruct. Sem. Pl., is a three-volume botanic treatise by Joseph Gaertner. The first volume was published in December 1788. The second volume was published in four parts, in 1790, 1791, 1791 and 1792 respectively. A third volume was published after Gaertner's death by his son Karl Friedrich von Gaertner from 1805 to 1807; this final volume is also known as 'Supplementum Carpologicae', abbreviated as Suppl. Carp.. Most of the illustrations for the work were done by Johann Georg Sturm (1742-1793).
Ludolph Christian Treviranus was a German botanist born in Bremen. He was a younger brother to naturalist Gottfried Reinhold Treviranus (1776–1837).
Ernst Heinrich Friedrich Meyer was a German botanist and botanical historian. Born in Hanover, he lectured in Göttingen and in 1826 became a professor of botany at the University of Königsberg, as well as Director of the Botanical Garden. His botanical specialty was the Juncaceae, or family of rushes. His major work was the four-volume Geschichte der Botanik. His history covered ancient authorities such as Aristotle and Theophrastus, explored the beginnings of modern botany in the context of 15th- and 16th-century intellectual practice, and offered a wealth of biographical data on early modern botanists. Julius von Sachs pronounced him “no great botanist” but admitted that he “possessed a clever and cultivated intellect.”
Fritz Noll was a German botanist who made contributions in the field of plant physiology.
The history of botany examines the human effort to understand life on Earth by tracing the historical development of the discipline of botany—that part of natural science dealing with organisms traditionally treated as plants.
Gregor Konrad Michael KrausKRAUSIOR LEGENDA was a 19th-century German botanist and plant ecologist.
Joseph Reynolds Green (1848-1914) was an English botanist, physiologist and chemist whose research into plant enzymes was influential in the development of the discipline of biochemistry. He held the chair in Botany at The Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and lectured at the University of Liverpool and Downing College, Cambridge. In 1895 he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society.
Théorie Élémentaire de la Botanique is a book written by Swiss botanist Augustin Pyramus de Candolle, which was first published in 1813 and later re-issued in 1819 with a new edition. This book contributed to the field of botany by introducing the use of the term taxonomy and a new classification system for grouping plants together. This book placed emphasis on the study of evolutionary relationships in grouping plants together, rather than on shared morphological characteristics.
↑ Green, R. J. (1909). A History of Botany 1860-1900 Being a Continuation of Sachs History of Botany, 1530-1860. Oxford, Clarendon Press. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.28456
1 2 Greene, E. L. (1910). Landmarks of botanical history: a study of certain epochs in the development of the science of botany(No. 1870). Smithsonian institution.
1 2 Harvey-Gibson, R. J. (Robert John). (1919). Outlines of the history of botany. London: A.& C. Black.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
