Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Last updated
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
AbbreviationITIF
FormationMarch 2006;17 years ago (2006-03) [1]
Type Public Policy Think Tank
Location
Co-Chairs
Vic Fazio, Philip English
President
Robert D. Atkinson
Revenue (2015)
$3,421,064 [2]
Expenses (2015)$3,337,382 [2]
Website itif.org

The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) is a U.S. nonprofit public policy think tank based in Washington, D.C., focused on public policy surrounding industry and technology. [3] As of 2019, the University of Pennsylvania ranks ITIF as the most authoritative science and technology policy think tank in the world. [4] In its role in developing industrial and technological policies, ITIF has attracted controversy for its affiliations with various technology companies. [5] [6]

Contents

Mission

ITIF's stated mission is to promote new ways of thinking about technology-driven productivity, competitiveness and globalization. [7] The newspaper Roll Call described ITIF as trying to "navigate the ideological waters to promote government support for innovation in many forms and with a broad range of ideals." [8] Ars Technica has described ITIF as "one of the leading, and most prolific, tech policy think tanks." [9]

ITIF has called for the United States government to implement a national manufacturing strategy to combat job losses and the trade deficit which they attribute to declining international competitiveness. [10] [11] They have argued that the U.S. government's gross domestic product (GDP) statistics suffer from statistical bias and thus overstate U.S. manufacturing output and productivity growth. [12] [13] They have also criticized the Chinese government for behaviors they label "innovation mercantilism" including standards manipulation and intellectual property theft. [14] [15]

In Internet policy, ITIF supported both the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) and the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. Congress. [16] [17] They oppose applying Title II telephone regulations to broadband, arguing that it would stifle Internet innovation, and instead support net neutrality legislation. ITIF has praised both the U.S. and the European Union "open Internet" rulings. [18] [19] [20] For similar reasons, they have supported legislation aimed at curtailing Internet piracy, stirring some controversy when they argued that data caps on Internet usage would be an effective anti-piracy tool. [21] [22]

Along with the Breakthrough Institute, ITIF has called for increased public funding for clean energy innovation, arguing that the United States is falling behind countries like China, Japan and South Korea. [23]

Publications

In economic policy, ITIF publishes the State New Economy Index, which measures how much U.S. states’ economies are driven by knowledge and innovation. [24] [25] They publish The Atlantic Century, which ranks countries on their competitiveness and innovative capacity. [26] [27] [28] ITIF took over publishing the "B-index", which measures the strength of countries' R&D tax incentive systems, from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in 2012. [29] [30]

In the life sciences field, ITIF published Leadership in Decline: Assessing U.S. International Competitiveness in Biomedical Research in 2012, which director of the National Institutes of Health and leader of the Human Genome Project Francis S. Collins deemed the "one book" he would require President Barack Obama to read in his second term in office. [31]

ITIF has published several reports advocating greater deployment of information technologies, including Digital Prosperity and Digital Quality of Life. [32] [33] In Digital Prosperity, ITIF found that IT investment delivered three to five times the productivity growth of other types of investments. Commenting on the study, former Dean of Wisconsin School of Business Michael Knetter agreed with the productivity figures, though expressed caution given that some of ITIF's contributors are in the technology industry. [34] ITIF's report Steal These Policies: Strategies for Reducing Digital Piracy provided the foundation for the controversial PROTECT IP and Stop Online Piracy Acts in the U.S. Congress, which the think tank acknowledged were at odds with the positions of many of its supporters. [35]

In 2013, the think tank published a widely cited report which found that the U.S. National Security Agency's PRISM electronic data surveillance program could cost the U.S. economy between $21.5 and $35 billion in lost cloud computing business over three years. [36] [37] [38]

ITIF previously issued an annual Luddite Award for the "Year’s Worst Innovation Killers". [39]

Leadership

Referred to as "scrupulously nonpartisan", [40] the think tank was established in 2006 with two former U.S. Representatives, Republican Jennifer Dunn and Democrat Calvin Dooley, as co-chairs. [41] Republican Philip English and Democrat Vic Fazio, former U.S. Representatives, co-chair ITIF. Senators Chris Coons and Todd Young and Representatives Suzan DelBene and Susan W. Brooks serve as honorary co-chairs. [42] Robert D. Atkinson, former vice-president at the Progressive Policy Institute, is president of ITIF. [43] While leading ITIF, he has authored two books: Innovation Economics: The Race for Global Advantage (Yale University Press, 2012), [44] and Big is Beautiful: Debunking the Myth of Small Business (MIT Press, 2018). [45]

Board Members

As of 2019, the website of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation listed 22 board members. [46]

Honorary Co-Chairs

Board Chairs

Board Members

Funders

ITIF contributors have included the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, [47] the Atlantic Philanthropies, [48] Cisco, [49] Communications Workers of America, [49] eBay, [49] the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, [50] Google, [51] IBM, [49] the Information Technology Industry Council, [52] the Nathan Cummings Foundation, [53] and Bernard L. Schwartz. [54] ITIF's research has also been funded by U.S. government agencies such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [55] and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). [56] In 2010, ITIF received funding from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to study means for improving voting accessibility for U.S. military service members who have sustained disabling injuries in combat. [57]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Think tank</span> Organization that performs policy research and advocacy

A think tank, or policy institute, is a research institute that performs research and advocacy concerning topics such as social policy, political strategy, economics, military, technology, and culture. Most think tanks are non-governmental organizations, but some are semi-autonomous agencies within government or are associated with particular political parties, businesses or the military. Think-tanks are often funded by individual donations, with many also accepting government grants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Enterprise Institute</span> American conservative think tank founded in 1938

The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, known simply as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), is a center-right think tank based in Washington, D.C., that researches government, politics, economics, and social welfare. AEI is an independent nonprofit organization supported primarily by contributions from foundations, corporations, and individuals. Founded in 1938, the organization is aligned with conservatism and neoconservatism but does not support political candidates. AEI advocates in favor of private enterprise, limited government, and democratic capitalism. Some of their positions have attracted controversy, including their defense policy recommendations for the Iraq War, their analysis of the financial crisis of 2007–2008, and their energy and environmental policies based on their more than two-decade-long opposition to the prevailing scientific opinion on climate change. AEI is governed by a 28-member Board of Trustees. Approximately 185 authors are associated with AEI. Arthur C. Brooks served as president of AEI from January 2009 through July 1, 2019. He was succeeded by Robert Doar.

The Heritage Foundation is an American conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. The foundation took a leading role in the conservative movement during the presidency of Ronald Reagan, whose policies were taken from Heritage's policy study Mandate for Leadership.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brookings Institution</span> American think tank

The Brookings Institution, often stylized as Brookings, is an American think tank that conducts research and education in the social sciences, primarily in economics, metropolitan policy, governance, foreign policy, global economy, and economic development.

New America, formerly the New America Foundation, is a think tank in the United States founded in 1999. It focuses on a range of public policy issues, including national security studies, technology, asset building, health, gender, energy, education, and the economy. The organization is based in Washington, D.C., and Oakland, California. Anne-Marie Slaughter is the chief executive officer (CEO) of the think tank.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Center for American Progress</span> Liberal think tank in the United States

The Center for American Progress (CAP) is a public policy research and advocacy organization which presents a liberal viewpoint on economic and social issues. It has its headquarters in Washington, D.C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carnegie Endowment for International Peace</span> Washington-based American think tank

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP) is a nonpartisan international affairs think tank headquartered in Washington D.C., with operations in Europe, South and East Asia, and the Middle East as well as the United States. Founded in 1910 by Andrew Carnegie, the organization describes itself as being dedicated to advancing cooperation between countries, reducing global conflict, and promoting active international engagement between the United States and countries around the world. It engages leaders from multiple sectors and across the political spectrum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Center for Strategic and International Studies</span> American think tank in Washington, D.C.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) is an American think tank based in Washington, D.C. From its founding in 1962 until 1987, it was an affiliate of Georgetown University, initially named the Center for Strategic and International Studies of Georgetown University. The center conducts policy studies and strategic analyses of political, economic and security issues throughout the world, with a focus on issues concerning international relations, trade, technology, finance, energy and geostrategy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Competitive Enterprise Institute</span> American libertarian think tank

The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) is a non-profit libertarian think tank founded by the political writer Fred L. Smith Jr. on March 9, 1984, in Washington, D.C., to advance principles of limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty. CEI focuses on a number of regulatory policy issues, including business and finance, labor, technology and telecommunications, transportation, food and drug regulation, and energy and environment in which they have promoted climate change denial. Kent Lassman is the current President and CEO.

The Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE), known until 2006 as the Institute for International Economics (IIE), is an American think tank based in Washington, D.C. It was founded by C. Fred Bergsten in 1981 and has been led by Adam S. Posen since 2013. The institute conducts research, provides policy recommendations, and publishes books and articles on a wide range of topics related to the US economy and international economics.

The Mercatus Center is an American libertarian, free-market-oriented non-profit think tank. The Mercatus Center is located at the George Mason University campus, however the organization is privately funded and its employees are independent of the university. It is directed by Daniel M. Rothschild and its board is chaired by American economist Tyler Cowen. The Center works with policy experts, lobbyists, and government officials to connect academic learning with real-world practice. Taking its name from the Latin word for market, the center advocates free-market approaches to public policy. During the George W. Bush administration's campaign to reduce government regulation, The Wall Street Journal reported, "14 of the 23 rules the White House chose for its 'hit list' to eliminate or modify were Mercatus entries".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inter-American Dialogue</span> U.S.-based think tank

The Inter-American Dialogue, also known as the Dialogue or IAD, is a U.S.-based think tank in the field of international affairs primarily related to the Western Hemisphere. Headquartered in Washington, D.C it intends to "foster democratic governance, prosperity, and social equity in Latin America and the Caribbean". The Dialogue's research areas focus on the rule of law, education, migration, remittances, energy, climate change and extractive industries.

The Columbia Institute for Tele-Information (CITI) is one of several research centers for Columbia Business School, focusing on strategy, management, and policy issues in telecommunications, computing, and electronic mass media. It aims to address the large and dynamic telecommunications and media industry that has expanded horizontally and vertically drive by technology, entrepreneurship and policy.

The America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act of 2007, also known as the America COMPETES Act, was authored by Bart Gordon and signed into law on August 9, 2007, by President George W. Bush. The act aimed to invest in innovation through research and development and improve the competitiveness of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert D. Atkinson</span> Canadian-American economist

Robert David Atkinson is a Canadian-American economist. He is president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), a public policy think tank based in Washington, D.C., that promotes policies based on innovation economics. He was previously Vice President of the Progressive Policy Institute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manufacturing in the United States</span> Overview of the manufacturing industry of the United States of America

Manufacturing is a vital economic sector in the United States. The United States is the world's third largest manufacturer with a record high real output in Q1 2018 of $2.00 trillion well above the 2007 peak before the Great Recession of $1.95 trillion. The U.S. manufacturing industry employed 12.35 million people in December 2016 and 12.56 million in December 2017, an increase of 207,000 or 1.7%. Though still a large part of the US economy, in Q1 2018 manufacturing contributed less to GDP than the 'Finance, insurance, real estate, rental, and leasing' sector, the 'Government' sector, or 'Professional and business services' sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PROTECT IP Act</span> US Senate Bill

The PROTECT IP Act was a proposed law with the stated goal of giving the US government and copyright holders additional tools to curb access to "rogue websites dedicated to the sale of infringing or counterfeit goods", especially those registered outside the U.S. The bill was introduced on May 12, 2011, by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and 11 bipartisan co-sponsors. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that implementation of the bill would cost the federal government $47 million through 2016, to cover enforcement costs and the hiring and training of 22 new special agents and 26 support staff. The Senate Judiciary Committee passed the bill, but Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) placed a hold on it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sascha Meinrath</span> British entrepreneur and technologist

Sascha Meinrath holds the Palmer Chair in Telecommunications at Penn State University. He is the founder of X-Lab, a future-focused technology policy and innovation think tank, and promotes the "Internet in a Suitcase" effort to create ad hoc mesh wireless technologies. Meinrath founded the Open Technology Institute in 2008 and directed the Institute while also serving as Vice President of the New America Foundation. He is also the co-founder and executive director of the CUWiN Foundation, a non-profit launched in 2000 that aims to develop "decentralized, community-owned networks that foster democratic cultures and local content," and in 2007 founded the Open Source Wireless Coalition, "a global partnership of open source wireless integrators, researchers, implementors and companies dedicated to the development of open source, interoperable, low-cost wireless network technologies." In 2012 he was elected as an Ashoka Global Fellow for leading support for Internet freedom in the United States and around the globe, as well as named to Newsweek's Digital Power Index Top 100 influencers among other “public servants defining digital regulatory boundaries” for his efforts to develop open-source, low-cost community wireless networks and his role in fighting Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA). In 2013 Time named Meinrath to the TIME Tech 40: The Most Influential Minds in Tech for his work to protect Internet freedom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manufacturing USA</span> Advanced industrial policy research network

Manufacturing USA, previously known as the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation, is a network of research institutes in the United States that focuses on developing manufacturing technologies through public-private partnerships among U.S. industry, universities, and federal government agencies. Modeled similar to Germany's Fraunhofer Institutes, the network currently consists of 16 institutes. The institutes work independently and together on a number of advanced technologies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Boone Bonvillian</span> American university lecturer

William Boone Bonvillian, a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), is a specialist on innovation and technology policy. He is a Lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), teaching innovation policy courses in the departments of Science, Technology and Society and Political Science, and serves as a Senior Director for special projects at MIT Open Learning researching workforce education. He was named Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science for his work in 2011, and he received the IEEE's award for distinguished public service in 2006.

References

  1. "Manufacturing News - Subscribers Only". ManufacturingNews.com. 2011-10-05. Archived from the original on 2011-10-05. Retrieved 2018-11-10.
  2. 1 2 "Information Technology and Innovation Foundation" (PDF). Foundation Center. Retrieved 23 March 2017.
  3. "White House Proposes Tax Credits for Clean Energy". Christian Science Monitor . December 4, 2009. Retrieved May 31, 2011.
  4. McGann, James G. (2018). 2018 Global Go To Think Tanks Report and Policy Advice. University of Pennsylvania. p. 151.
  5. "Group That Takes Money From Tech Industry Complains That Tech Coverage Is Too Negative". Gizmodo. G/O Media Inc. 23 February 2017. Archived from the original on 26 April 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
  6. "Moderate Democrats Back a Privacy Bill, Minus the Privacy". Revolving Door Project. Center for Economic and Policy Research. 2019-10-23. Archived from the original on 16 January 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
  7. "Mission". Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Archived from the original on August 21, 2011. Retrieved May 31, 2011.
  8. Cranford, John (April 7, 2011). "Unscientific Method". Roll Call . Retrieved January 23, 2013.
  9. Anderson, Nate (February 4, 2009). "Ars Technica's Tech Policy "People to Watch" 2009". Ars Technica. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
  10. Uchitelle, Louis (November 28, 2011). "Why Aren't the Jobless Flocking to Zuccotti Park?". The Nation .
  11. Ezell, Stephen J.; Atkinson, Robert D. (2011). The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy (PDF). Washington, DC: ITIF.
  12. Whoriskey, Peter (March 19, 2012). "Economists Offer More Pessimistic View on Manufacturing in Upcoming Report". The Washington Post . Retrieved October 30, 2012.
  13. Atkinson, Robert D.; Stewart, Luke A.; Andes, Scott M.; Ezell, Stephen J. (2012). Worse Than the Great Depression: What Experts Are Missing About American Manufacturing Decline (PDF). Washington, DC: ITIF. Retrieved October 30, 2012.
  14. Atkinson, Robert D. (2012). Enough is Enough: Confronting Chinese Innovation Mercantilism (PDF). Washington, DC: ITIF.
  15. "June 2011 VCAT Meeting Minutes". Nist. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 3 October 2011. Retrieved December 3, 2011.
  16. Castro, Daniel (2011-12-05). "PIPA/SOPA: Responding to Critics and Finding a Path Forward". The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation. Retrieved 2012-01-22.
  17. "Debate-over-Internet-piracy-legislation-heats-up". San Francisco Chronicle. 17 January 2012. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
  18. Gross, Grant (June 1, 2006). "Group Adds Alternative to Net 'Tiers'". PC World .
  19. "ITIF Comments on FCC's Net Neutrality Rulemaking" (Press release). ITIF. September 21, 2009.
  20. "Statement by Richard Bennett on European Approach to Net Neutrality" (Press release). ITIF. April 20, 2011.
  21. Castro, Daniel; Bennett, Richard; Andes, Scott (December 2009). Steal These Policies: Strategies for Reducing Digital Piracy (PDF). Washington, DC: ITIF.
  22. Doctorow, Cory (March 16, 2011). "Influential Think-Tanky Tells Congress: Bandwidth Caps Fight Piracy!". Boing Boing .
  23. Atkinson, Robert D.; Shellenberger, Michael; Nordhaus, Ted (2009). Rising Tigers, Sleeping Giant (PDF). Oakland, CA: Breakthrough Institute.
  24. Clifford, Catherine (November 18, 2010). "Massachusetts Gets the New Economy Best". CNNMoney.com . Retrieved May 31, 2011.
  25. Atkinson, Robert D.; Stewart, Luke A. (December 6, 2012). The 2012 State New Economy Index (PDF). ITIF. Retrieved April 13, 2013.
  26. Lashinsky, Adam (April 26, 2011). "Genachowski: FCC Inherited a "Real Mess" in Net Neutrality". Fortune . Retrieved May 31, 2011.
  27. Hoover, J. Nicholas (July 21, 2009). "Federal CTO Says U.S. Lagging In Innovation". InformationWeek . Retrieved May 31, 2011.
  28. Presenter: Fareed Zakaria (October 8, 2011). "Has America Gone Soft?". Fareed Zakaria GPS. CNN.
  29. Beary, Brian (July 24, 2012). "Portugal Gives Most Tax Breaks for R&D, Study Shows". Europolitics . Brussels. Archived from the original on February 18, 2013. Retrieved November 2, 2012.
  30. Stewart, Luke A.; Warda, Jacek; Atkinson, Robert D. (July 2012), We're #27!: The United States Lags Far Behind in R&D Tax Incentive Generosity (PDF), Washington, DC: ITIF
  31. "Francis S. Collins: By the Book". The New York Times . July 25, 2013. Archived from the original on August 3, 2013. Retrieved August 8, 2013.
  32. Atkinson, Robert D.; McKay, Andrew S. (2007). Digital Prosperity (PDF). Washington, DC: ITIF.
  33. Atkinson, Robert D.; Castro, Daniel D. (2008). Digital Quality of Life (PDF). Washington, DC: ITIF.
  34. Vanden Plas, Joe (March 22, 2007). "Study affirms information technology-productivity link". WTN News. Retrieved July 19, 2010.
  35. Lochhead, Carolyn (January 17, 2012). "Debate over Internet Piracy Legislation Heats Up". San Francisco Chronicle .
  36. Peterson, Andrea (August 7, 2013). "NSA snooping could cost U.S. tech companies $35 billion over three years". The Washington Post . Retrieved August 8, 2013.
  37. Rosenbush, Steve (August 6, 2013). "Cloud Industry Could Lose Billions on NSA Disclosures". The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved August 8, 2013.
  38. Yaron, Oded (August 8, 2013). "Study: NSA leaks could cost U.S. $22-35 billion". Haaretz . Retrieved August 8, 2013.
  39. "The Worst of the Year's Worst Innovation Killers". Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. 21 December 2015. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
  40. Mandelbaum, Robb (August 26, 2008). "Does It Matter That One Candidate is Comfortable Using Technology and One Isn't?". Inc . Retrieved January 23, 2013.
  41. "New DC Think Tank Will Think About Innovation". Manufacturing & Technology News. April 4, 2006. Retrieved May 31, 2011.
  42. "Board". Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Retrieved November 6, 2015.
  43. "Staff". Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Archived from the original on November 6, 2012. Retrieved November 1, 2012.
  44. www.amazon.com https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0300168993/ . Retrieved 2019-10-11.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  45. Big Is Beautiful. MIT Press. 30 March 2018. ISBN   9780262037709 . Retrieved 2019-10-11.
  46. 1 2 3 "Board". Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Retrieved 10 October 2019.
  47. "2007 Annual Report" (PDF). Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. p. 32. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-05-24. Retrieved 2011-12-28.
  48. "Public-Private Partnership Fellowship". Atlantic Philanthropies. Retrieved November 1, 2012.
  49. 1 2 3 4 Lohr, Steve (March 13, 2007). "Computers Raise Productivity, but Not Job Rolls, Study Finds". The New York Times . Retrieved November 1, 2012.
  50. Atkinson, Robert D.; Andes, Scott (2010). The 2010 State New Economy Index (PDF). Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation. p. i.
  51. "Transparency" . Retrieved November 1, 2012.
  52. "Big IT Takes Step To Influence Tech Policy In U.S." InformationWeek . March 29, 2006. Retrieved November 1, 2012.
  53. "2010 Annual Report" (PDF). Nathan Cummings Foundation. p. 20. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-04-12. Retrieved 2011-12-28.
  54. "Biography". Bernard L. Schwartz: The Official Site and Resource. August 2011. Archived from the original on November 9, 2012. Retrieved November 1, 2012.
  55. Ezell, Stephen J.; Atkinson, Robert D. (September 2011). International Benchmarking of Countries' Policies and Programs Supporting SME Manufacturers (PDF). Washington, DC: ITIF. p. 2.
  56. Innovation, Trade, and Technology Policies in AsiaPacific Economies: A Scorecard (PDF). Washington, DC: ITIF. November 2011. p. ii.
  57. "EAC Awards $500,000 to Improve Voting Accessibility for Military Heroes" (Press release). United States Election Assistance Commission. September 23, 2010. Retrieved November 1, 2012.