Intellectual Ventures

Last updated
Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC
Type Privately held company
Industry Patent monetization
Founded2000  OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Founder Nathan Myhrvold
Edward Jung
Peter Detkin
Gregory Gorder
Headquarters
Bellevue, Washington
,
United States
Number of locations
10
Number of employees
800
ASN 6216 OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
Website www.intellectualventures.com

Intellectual Ventures is an American private equity company that centers on the development and licensing of intellectual property. Intellectual Ventures is one of the top-five owners of U.S. patents, as of 2011. [1] [ verification needed ] Its business model focuses on buying patents and aggregating those patents into a large patent portfolio and licensing these patents to third parties. The company has been described as the country's largest and most notorious patent trolling company, [2] the ultimate patent troll, [3] and the most hated company in tech. [4]

Contents

In 2009, the firm launched a prototyping and research laboratory, Intellectual Ventures Lab, [5] which attracted media controversy when the book SuperFreakonomics described its ideas for reducing global climate change. The firm also collaborates on humanitarian projects through its Global Good program. [6]

Overview

In 2000, Intellectual Ventures was founded as a private partnership by Nathan Myhrvold and Edward Jung of Microsoft, later joined by co-founders Peter Detkin of Intel, and Gregory Gorder of Perkins Coie. The Intellectual Ventures Management Company is owned 40% Nathan Myhrvold, 20% Peter Detkin, 20% Gregory Gorder and 20% Edward Jung. They reportedly have raised over $5.5 billion from many large companies including Microsoft, Intel, Sony, Nokia, Apple, Google, Yahoo, American Express, Adobe, SAP, Nvidia, and eBay, plus investment firms such as Stanford, Hewlett Foundation, Mayo Clinic, and Charles River Ventures. [7] In December 2013, the firm released a list of approximately 33,000 of the nearly 40,000 assets in their monetization program. [8] [9] Licenses to patents are obtained through investment and royalties. [10] In March 2009, the firm announced expansion into China, India, Japan, Korea and Singapore to build partnerships with scientists and institutions in Asia.[ citation needed ]

Investment funds

The company operates three primary investment funds: [11]

Intellectual Ventures Lab

In 2009, Intellectual Ventures launched a prototyping and research laboratory, Intellectual Ventures Lab, hiring scientists to imagine inventions which could exist but do not yet exist, and then filing descriptions of these inventions with the US Patent Office. Notable participants include Robert Langer of MIT, Leroy Hood of the Institute for Systems Biology, Ed Harlow of Harvard Medical School, Bran Ferren and Danny Hillis of Applied Minds, and Sir John Pendry of Imperial College.[ citation needed ] The Sunday Times reported that the company applies for about 450 patents per year, in areas from vaccine research to optical computing and, as of May 2010, 91 of the applications had been approved. [12] Internally developed inventions include a safer nuclear reactor design (which won the MIT Technology Review Top 10 Emerging Technologies in 2009) that can use uranium waste as fuel or thorium which is plentiful and poses no proliferation risk, [13] a mosquito-targeting laser, [14] and a series of computer models of infectious disease. [15]

Their efforts to promote a method to reverse or reduce the effects of global climate change by artificially recreating the conditions from the aftermath of a volcanic eruption gained media coverage following the release of the book SuperFreakonomics, whose chapter about global warming proposes that the global climate can be regulated by geo-engineering of a stratoshield [16] based upon patented technology from the company. [17] The chapter has been criticized by some economists and climate science experts who say it contains numerous misleading statements and discredited arguments, including this presentation of geoengineering as a replacement for CO2 emissions reduction. Among the critics are Paul Krugman, [18] Brad DeLong, [19] The Guardian , [20] and The Economist . [21] Elizabeth Kolbert, a science writer for The New Yorker who has written extensively on global warming, contends that "just about everything they [Levitt and Dubner] have to say on the topic is, factually speaking, wrong." [22] In response, Levitt and Dubner have stated on their Freakonomics blog that global warming is man-made and an important issue. They warn against claims of an inevitable doomsday; instead they look to raise awareness of less traditional or popular, methods to tackle the potential problem of global warming. [23]

Lowell Wood, an "inventor in residence" at Intellectual Ventures, became the most-patented inventor in US history in 2015, breaking the record held by Thomas Edison for over 80 years. [24]

Global Good

Global Good was a not-for-profit collaboration between the firm and the Gates family, to develop solutions for pressing problems in the developing world. Its technologies included:

In mid-2020, Global Good was dismantled, with some of its components (most notably the Institute for Disease Modeling) transitioning into the Gates Foundation, and some evolving into new entities under Gates Ventures. [29]

Companies created

Intellectual Ventures has created a number of independent companies to bring its discoveries to mass market. Examples include Kymeta, a satellite technology company, [30] TerraPower, which seeks to improve nuclear power, [31] Evolv, which applies metamaterials to imaging, [32] and Echodyne, a metamaterials-based radar communications company. [33]

Controversy

Publicly, Intellectual Ventures states that a major goal is to assist small inventors against corporations. In practice, the vast majority of IV's revenue comes from buying patents, aggregating these patents into a single portfolio spanning many disparate technologies and tying these patents together for license to other companies under the threat of litigation, or filing lawsuits for infringement of patents, a controversial practice referred to as "patent trolling." [34]

Intellectual Ventures' purchased patents have largely been kept secret, though press releases with Telcordia and Transmeta indicated some or all of their patent portfolios were sold to the company. It reports that its purchasing activity as of spring 2010 has sent $350 million to individual inventors, and $848 million to small and medium size enterprises as well as returning "approximately $1 billion" to investors before filing any lawsuits, but IV's assistance to individual inventors has been contested. [35] Investigative journalism suggests that the company makes most of its income from lawsuits and licensing of already-existing inventions, rather than from its own innovation. Intellectual Ventures has been described as a "patent troll" by Shane Robison, [36] CTO of Hewlett-Packard and others, allegedly accumulating patents not in order to develop products around them but with the goal to pressure large companies into paying licensing fees. Recent reports indicate that Verizon and Cisco made payments of $200 million to $400 million for investment and licenses to the Intellectual Ventures portfolio. [37] On December 8, 2010, in its 10th year of operations, Intellectual Ventures filed its first lawsuit, accusing Check Point, McAfee, Symantec, Trend Micro, Elpida, Hynix, Altera, Lattice and Microsemi of patent infringement. In September 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that all the relevant patent claims in the lawsuit were invalid, because "the patent merely applies a well-known idea using generic computers". [38]

The company has been accused of hiding behind shell companies for earlier lawsuits, [39] an accusation consistent with the findings of NPR's Planet Money in July 2011. [40] The episode, which also aired as the This American Life episode "When Patents Attack", [41] was dedicated to software patents, prominently featuring Intellectual Ventures. It includes sources accusing Intellectual Ventures of pursuing a strategy encouraging mutually assured destruction, including Chris Sacca calling Myhrvold's argument that Intellectual Ventures is offering protection from lawsuits in a "mafia-style shakedown". [42] However, the firm's internal research, development, and commercialization activities have softened this image. Following a series of research project announcements by Intellectual Ventures, intellectual property columnist Jack Ellis wrote, "Although licensing is bound to remain a big part of what it does, the more agreements of the kind signed this week IV is involved in, the harder it will be to label as a troll."[ citation needed ]

Intellectual Ventures staff are active in lobbying and testifying in court on United States patent policy. [43]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patent</span> Type of legal protection for an invention

A patent is a type of intellectual property that gives its owner the legal right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention for a limited period of time in exchange for publishing an enabling disclosure of the invention. In most countries, patent rights fall under private law and the patent holder must sue someone infringing the patent in order to enforce their rights.

Technology transfer (TT), also called transfer of technology (TOT), is the process of transferring (disseminating) technology from the person or organization that owns or holds it to another person or organization, in an attempt to transform inventions and scientific outcomes into new products and services that benefit society. Technology transfer is closely related to knowledge transfer.

Patent infringement is the commission of a prohibited act with respect to a patented invention without permission from the patent holder. Permission may typically be granted in the form of a license. The definition of patent infringement may vary by jurisdiction, but it typically includes using or selling the patented invention. In many countries, a use is required to be commercial to constitute patent infringement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gordon Gould</span> American physicist (1920–2005)

Richard Gordon Gould was an American physicist who is sometimes credited with the invention of the laser and the optical amplifier.. Gould is best known for his thirty-year fight with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to obtain patents for the laser and related technologies. He also fought with laser manufacturers in court battles to enforce the patents he subsequently did obtain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shuji Nakamura</span> Inventor of the blue LED, 2014 Nobel laureate in Physics

Shuji Nakamura is a Japanese-born American electronic engineer and inventor specializing in the field of semiconductor technology, professor at the Materials Department of the College of Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB), and is regarded as the inventor of the blue LED, a major breakthrough in lighting technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steven Levitt</span> American economist

Steven David Levitt is an American economist and co-author of the best-selling book Freakonomics and its sequels. Levitt was the winner of the 2003 John Bates Clark Medal for his work in the field of crime, and is currently the William B. Ogden Distinguished Service Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago as well as the Faculty Director and Co-Founder of the Center for Radical Innovation for Social Change at the University of Chicago which incubates the Data Science for Everyone coalition. He was co-editor of the Journal of Political Economy published by the University of Chicago Press until December 2007. In 2009, Levitt co-founded TGG Group, a business and philanthropy consulting company. He was chosen as one of Time magazine's "100 People Who Shape Our World" in 2006. A 2011 survey of economics professors named Levitt their fourth favorite living economist under the age of 60, after Paul Krugman, Greg Mankiw and Daron Acemoglu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nathan Myhrvold</span> Chief Technology Officer at Microsoft

Nathan Paul Myhrvold, formerly Chief Technology Officer at Microsoft, is co-founder of Intellectual Ventures and the principal author of Modernist Cuisine and its successor books. Myhrvold was listed as co-inventor on 17 U.S. patents at Microsoft and is co-inventor on over 900 other U.S. patents issued to his corporation and its affiliates.

<i>Freakonomics</i> 2005 nonfiction book by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner

Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything is the debut non-fiction book by University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt and New York Times journalist Stephen J. Dubner. Published on April 12, 2005, by William Morrow, the book has been described as melding pop culture with economics. By late 2009, the book had sold over 4 million copies worldwide. Based on the success of the original book, Levitt and Dubner have grown the Freakonomics brand into a multi-media franchise, with a sequel book, a feature film, a regular radio segment on National Public Radio, and a weekly blog.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Patent troll</span> Pejorative term related to intellectual property

In international law and business, patent trolling or patent hoarding is a categorical or pejorative term applied to a person or company that attempts to enforce patent rights against accused infringers far beyond the patent's actual value or contribution to the prior art, often through hardball legal tactics. Patent trolls often do not manufacture products or supply services based upon the patents in question. However, some entities, which do not practice their asserted patent, may not be considered "patent trolls", when they license their patented technologies on reasonable terms in advance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen J. Dubner</span> American author, journalist, and podcast host

Stephen Joseph Dubner is an American author, journalist, and podcast and radio host. He is co-author of the popular Freakonomics book series: Freakonomics, SuperFreakonomics, Think Like a Freak and When to Rob a Bank. He is the host of Freakonomics Radio.

Opposition to software patents is widespread in the free software community. In response, various mechanisms have been tried to defuse the perceived problem.

An intellectual property broker mediates between the buyer and seller of intellectual property (IP) and may manage the many steps in the process of creating a deal with regard to the purchase, sale, license, or marketing of intellectual property assets. This may include: patents, trademarks, or inventions (prototypes).

Defensive patent aggregation (DPA) is the practice of purchasing patents or patent rights to keep such patents out of the hands of entities that would assert them against operating companies. The opposite is offensive patent aggregation (OPA) which is the purchasing of patents in order to assert them against companies that would use the inventions protected by such patents and to grant licenses to these operating companies in return for licensing fees or royalties. OPA can be practiced by operating companies or non-practicing entities (NPEs)

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mosquito laser</span> Proposed device for killing mosquitoes

A mosquito laser is a proposed device that would use lasers to kill mosquitoes. The primary goal would be to reduce malaria infection rates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxford University Innovation</span>

Oxford University Innovation Limited (OUI) is a British technology transfer and consultancy company created to manage the research and development (R&D) of University spin-offs. OUI is a wholly owned subsidiary of the University of Oxford, and is located on Botley Road, Oxford, England. OUI was previously known as Isis Innovation (1988–2016) and Oxford University Research and Development Ltd (1987–1988).

<i>SuperFreakonomics</i> 2009 book by Steven Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner

SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance is the second non-fiction book by University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt and The New York Times journalist Stephen J. Dubner, released in early October 2009 in Europe and on October 20, 2009 in the United States. It is a sequel to Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything.

Article One Partners (AOP) is an online prior art search and intellectual property research crowdsourcing community. AOP was acquired by RWS Group in October 2017 and the AOP Connect crowdsourcing platform is now part of the IP Research group within RWS. RWS IP Research provides crowdsourced prior-art-search services by utilizing an online research community. The company's President stated that, as of June 30, 2018, AOP comprises "more than 40,000 in over 170 countries."

Lodsys, LLC was an American patent holding company located in Marshall, Texas that brought patent infringement lawsuits against a variety of companies in the US. Numerous app development enterprises accused them of "patent trolling".

The European Inventor Award, are presented annually by the European Patent Office, sometimes supported by the respective Presidency of the Council of the European Union and by the European Commission, to inventors who have made a significant contribution to innovation, economy and society, predominantly in Europe. Inventions from all technological fields are considered for this award. The winners in each category are presented with an award shaped like a sail. There is no cash prize associated with the award, however there is a cash prize for all 3 of the Young Inventors Prize finalists.

The LOTNetwork is a nonprofit organization that was formed to combat patent assertion entities (PAEs), also known as patent trolls, by cross-licensing patents that fall into the hands of PAEs.

References

  1. ↑ "Intellectual Ventures: Revealing Investors ", Patently-O blog, May 18, 2011. Consulted on May 21, 2011.
  2. ↑ "RPX and the complicated business of stockpiling patents for good, not evil". Pando. 9 September 2013.
  3. ↑ Robertson, Adi (4 February 2014). "The ultimate patent troll is going to trial against Google and Motorola". The Verge.
  4. ↑ Kerstetter, Jim. "Inside Intellectual Ventures, the most hated company in tech". CNET.
  5. ↑ "Bellevue lab is an inventor's real dream" by Brier Dudley, The Seattle Times - 27 May 2009
  6. ↑ "Global Good". www.intellectualventures.com. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  7. ↑ "Defendants Certificate of Interest" (PDF). US District Court, N. California. 2011-05-16. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-06. Retrieved 2013-07-18.
  8. ↑ "Intellectual Ventures Find a Patent". 2013-12-16.
  9. ↑ Richardson, Kent (2014-06-14). "What's Inside IV's Patent Portfolio". IAM Magazine . London. Issue 66. July/August 2014
  10. ↑ "Ubuntu: Microsoft is Patent Pal" by Matthew Broersma, PCWorld - 23 May 2007
  11. ↑ "Investing in Invention". Intellectual Ventures. Archived from the original on 2010-06-30. Retrieved 2010-12-26.
  12. ↑ Harris, Mark (May 16, 2010). "Green Pioneers: Godfather of nutty inventions". The Times . London. Mark Harris, The Sunday Times, May 16, 2010
  13. ↑ "TR10: Traveling-Wave Reactor" [ permanent dead link ] by Matt Wald, Technology Review - March/April 2009
  14. ↑ "Mosquito laser gun offers new hope on malaria" by Tony Allen-Mills - 15 March 2009
  15. ↑ "Mathematics, Mosquitoes, and Malaria" by Philip Eckhoff, Hertz Foundation Biennial Symposium - Spring 2009, Volume 11
  16. ↑ "Introducing the Stratoshield". Intellectual Ventures. 2009-10-21.
  17. ↑ Todd Bishop (2009-10-14). "Stratoshield: Nathan Myhrvold explains how to save the planet". TechFlash.
  18. ↑ Paul Krugman (2009-10-17). "SuperFreakonomics on climate, part 1". The New York Times. they grossly misrepresent other peoples' research, in both climate science and economics
  19. ↑ Brad DeLong (2009-10-19). "Yet More SuperFreakonomics Blogging". Grasping Reality with All Eight Tentacles. Levitt and Dubner today appear to no longer be thinking like economists
  20. ↑ "Why SuperFreakonomics' authors are wrong on geo-engineering". The Guardian. London. 2009-10-19. Many commentators have already pointed out dozens of misquotes, misrepresentations and mistakes in the 'Global Cooling' chapter
  21. ↑ "Freaking out: The controversy over SuperFreakonomics". The Economist. 2009-10-27. Retrieved 2009-11-06.
  22. ↑ "Kolbert, Elizabeth (November 16, 2009). "Hosed: Is there a quick fix for the climate?" [rev. of Levitt and Dubner's SuperFreakonomics and Al Gore's Our Choice]". New Yorker.
  23. ↑ Levitt, Steven D. (2009-10-17). "The Rumors of Our Global-Warming Denial Are Greatly Exaggerated". The New York Times . "... we believe that rising global temperatures are a man-made phenomenon and that global warming is an important issue to solve. Where we differ from the critics is in our view of the most effective solutions to this problem." and "The real purpose of the chapter is figuring out how to cool the Earth if indeed it becomes catastrophically warmer... if we weren't convinced that global warming was worth worrying about, we wouldn't have written a chapter about proposed solutions.
  24. ↑ "How an F Student Became America's Most Prolific Inventor". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2020-10-15.
  25. ↑ Cousins, Sophie (23 November 2015). "How Do You Keep Vaccines Cool? Try Spacecraft Insulation". NPR.org. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  26. ↑ Fink, Sheri (2015-07-31). "Experimental Ebola Vaccine Tested in Guinea Shows Promise, Report Says". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  27. ↑ "Intellectual Ventures' laser mosquito zapper lands key licensing deal". GeekWire. 2015-03-03. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  28. ↑ "Artificial Intelligence Offers a Better Way to Diagnose Malaria". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  29. ↑ "IV's Global Good Fund: A Legacy of Impact Invention". Intellectual Ventures. Retrieved 30 December 2020.
  30. ↑ "Kymeta Company History". Archived from the original on 2015-10-09.
  31. ↑ "About TerraPower | TerraPower". terrapower.com. Retrieved 2015-11-01.
  32. ↑ "Evolv". www.intellectualventures.com. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  33. ↑ "About Us | Echodyne". echodyne.com. Retrieved 2015-11-01.
  34. ↑ Roberts, Jeff John (October 3, 2016). "Here's Why Software Patents Are in Peril After the Intellectual Ventures Ruling". Fortune Magazine. Retrieved 5 October 2016.
  35. ↑ "When Patents Attack! | This American Life". This American Life. 22 July 2011. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
  36. ↑ Varchaver, Nicholas (July 10, 2006). "Who's afraid of Nathan Myhrvold?". Fortune.
  37. ↑ Sharma, Amol; Clark, Don (September 17, 2008). "Tech Guru Riles the Industry By Seeking Huge Patent Fees" (PDF). The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved June 1, 2009.
  38. ↑ United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (September 30, 2016). "Intellectual Ventures v. Symantec, case 2015-1769" (PDF). Retrieved 5 October 2016.
  39. ↑ "Nathan Myhrvold's Intellectual Ventures Using Over 1,000 Shell Companies To Hide Patent Shakedown"
  40. ↑ "When Patents Attack". NPR.org. 2011-07-22. Retrieved 2011-07-28. Alex Blumberg, NPR, July 22, 2011
  41. ↑ When Patents Attack!. This American Life. Retrieved on 2013-08-16.
  42. ↑ Sacca, Chris (April 5, 1994). "When Patents Attack". This American Life (Interview). Retrieved March 30, 2007. @48:44
  43. ↑ "Intellectual Ventures registers PAC — Association Trends honors leading lobbyists — FMC adds Seyfert — Steyer's uphill battle". POLITICO. 21 February 2014. Retrieved 2016-06-16.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.