Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck Program

Last updated
No states are currently using the Crosscheck program due to its legal suspension Map of Current Crosscheck States .png
No states are currently using the Crosscheck program due to its legal suspension

Interstate Voter Registration Crosscheck (commonly referred to as IVRC or Crosscheck) was a database in the United States which aggregated voter registration records from multiple states to identify voters who may have registered or voted in two or more states. Crosscheck was developed in 2005 by Kansas Secretary of State Ron Thornburgh in conjunction with Iowa, Missouri, and Nebraska. In December 2019, the program was suspended indefinitely as part of a settlement [1] of a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Kansas challenging Kansas' management of the program. [2] Prior to Crosscheck's legally mandated suspension, a dozen states had withdrawn from the program citing the inaccurate data and risk of violating voters' privacy rights. Crosscheck was also accused [3] of facilitating unlawful purges of voters in a racially discriminatory manner.

Contents

History

Crosscheck was initiated in December 2005 [4] at the Midwest Election Officials Conference (MEOC) by the office of the Kansas Secretary of State in coordination with Iowa, Missouri and Nebraska. The program combined each state's voter rolls into a database and sought to identify potential duplicate registrations by comparing first name, last name, and full date of birth. In 2006, the first crosscheck was conducted using voter registration records from Kansas, Iowa, Missouri, and Nebraska. In 2017, the last Crosscheck was conducted with records from 28 states. [5]

The program was administered by the office of the Kansas Secretary of State [6] as a free service to all member states.

Under then-Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, the program expanded rapidly from thirteen states in 2010 to a peak of 29 states in 2014. In 2017, Crosscheck analyzed 98 million voter registration records from 28 states and returned 7.2 million "potential duplicate registrant" records to member states. [7]

Accuracy

Crosscheck considered two voter registrations potential duplicates if they matched on first name, last name, and full date of birth [8] even if the last four digits of the social security number (SSN4) of the two records did not match, or when one or both SSN4 were missing.

Matching based on first name, last name, and date of birth "fails for practically all common American names" according to ID Analytics analysis [9] of a database of over 300 million unique records.

Crosscheck's use of loose matching standards led to a high rate of false positives: pairs of voter registration records lacking a match on SSN4 but who are identified as "potential duplicate registrants" by Crosscheck. Although false positives created a myriad of issues, the Kansas Secretary of State's office did not publicly release the percentage of their widely publicized "potential duplicate registrants" which were false positives. Independent researchers point to public data from Virginia's 2013 Annual Report on List Maintenance, which documented a 75% false positive rate. [10]

For voters and member states, misidentification can be costly. Each voter who is misidentified faces an incremental privacy risk when their personally identifying information is exported to at least one state beyond his or her state of residence, and the registrant risks being inappropriately inactivated or removed from voter rolls. In Ada County, Idaho, election officials relied on Crosscheck's list of "potential duplicate registrants" to mistakenly remove 766 voters. [11] None were duplicate registrants.

To avoid inappropriate deletion of eligible voters as occurred in Ada County, member states invested in extensive processing to vet each Crosscheck record. In May 2018, the New Hampshire Secretary of State's office reported that 817 work hours over nearly a year were required to process the 2017 Crosscheck results for their state. Despite that intensive effort, staff found no evidence of widespread double voting. [12] Similarly, Virginia's 2015 Annual List Maintenance Report stated "the Crosscheck program does not have a direct fee associated with it, however, the initial data received from Crosscheck requires significant agency handling to determine what data is usable and what data is not usable. Crosscheck data is prone to false positives since the initial matching is only conducted using first name, last name, and date of birth. The need to greatly refine and analyze Crosscheck data has required significant ELECT staff resources that are not accounted for when proponents claim the program is 'free'." [13]

Prior to the legally mandated suspension of the program, 12 states (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington) had withdrawn from the free program. [14]

Despite over seven million "potential double registrants" being "flagged" by the Crosscheck program in 2014, less than four people were charged with voting more than once, and not a single flagging led to a conviction, casting doubt on the system's usefulness. [15] [16] [17]

Discrimination allegations

The loose matching standards used to identify "potential duplicate registrants" by the Kansas Secretary of State also raised significant concerns about the opportunity for racial bias in list maintenance. According to "Health of State Democracies", "50 percent of Communities of Color share a common surname, while only 30 percent of white people do," so that in the program's flagged lists, "white voters are underrepresented by 8 percent, African Americans are overrepresented by 45 percent; Hispanic voters are overrepresented by 24 percent; and Asian voters are overrepresented by 31 percent". [15]

After examining "potential duplicate registrant" lists from some of the participating states, investigative reporter Greg Palast claimed the Crosscheck system "disproportionately threatens solid Democratic constituencies: young, black, Hispanic and Asian-American voters" with the intention of securing Republican victories. Palast concluded this was achieved by eliminating discrete individuals based on nothing more than similarity of name, a method with a "built-in racial bias" that especially eliminated voters from targeted minorities with a more limited pool of given names, for example, Hispanic voters named Jose Garcia. [18]

However, presence on the "potential duplicate registrant" list did not mean a voter was removed from the rolls.[ citation needed ] Independent investigators found that most states reported not using the Crosscheck "potential duplicate registrant" lists in any way.[ citation needed ]

Data security and data handling lapses

Articles in ProPublica [19] and Gizmodo, [20] relying on information provided by activists in Illinois and Kansas, revealed in fall 2017 that the Kansas-managed database holding nearly 100 million records of private voter data were protected by security protocols so flawed they could be "hacked by a novice". Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach demurred saying [21] "I don't concede there is a problem" but also pledged to quickly fix the data security issues. After a subsequent consultation with the Division of Homeland Security, Kobach quietly halted Crosscheck [22] for 2018 in advance of his gubernatorial race in Kansas. His successor as Kansas Secretary of State Scott Schwab subsequently settled a lawsuit [23] filed by ACLU of Kansas alleging that the constitutional right of their plaintiffs to privacy was violated by his office's careless [24] handling of a Crosscheck file.

Schwab's settlement acknowledged errors in handling voters' private data and requires that Kansas suspend the program until stringent data security standards are in place. [25]

Utility

Crosscheck was frequently cited[ by whom? ], without supporting evidence, as a critical tool to prevent voter fraud. Critics[ who? ] said that Crosscheck's utility was limited to a very specific type of fraud (double voting), in a very specific situation (across state lines), at very specific times (general elections only).[ citation needed ] Double voting within a state cannot be detected. Double voting in a primary election cannot be detected.[ citation needed ] Voting on the records of a deceased person cannot be detected.[ citation needed ]

In addition to problems with false positives and limited scope, Crosscheck has also had false negative results: the failure to recognize voters who are registered in two states if there is even a slight variation in their name. For example, Vic Miller registered in Kansas would not be recognized as the same as Victor Miller registered in Missouri despite the same full date of birth and last four digits of the social security number.[ citation needed ]

Voter registration maintenance programs

Debate about Crosscheck is part of a larger, ongoing controversy over whether or not such voter registration programs are a valid means of protecting against fraud.

A 2018 study by researchers at Stanford University, University of Pennsylvania, Yale University, and Harvard University quantified the tradeoff between voter accessibility and electoral integrity when purging a likely duplicate registration from another state using Crosscheck. [26] Their analysis of Crosscheck results in from Iowa in 2012 and 2014 suggests that for every double vote prevented, use of Crosscheck's proposed purge strategy impedes approximately 300 legitimate registrations. This finding is in a "best practices" scenario in which all false positives have been removed. The authors emphasize that election authorities should consider the tradeoff between election access for all eligible voters and fraud prevention.

See also

Related Research Articles

Voter caging involves challenging the registration status of voters and calling into question the legality of allowing them to vote. Usually it involves sending mail directly to registered voters and compiling a list from mail returned undelivered. Undeliverable mail is seen as proof that the person no longer resides at the address on their voter registration. The resultant list is then used by election officials to purge names from the voter registration rolls or to challenge voters' eligibility to vote on the grounds that the voters no longer reside at their registered addresses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter suppression</span> Strategy designed to restrict specific groups of people from voting

Voter suppression is a strategy used to influence the outcome of an election by discouraging or preventing specific groups of people from voting. It is distinguished from political campaigning in that campaigning attempts to change likely voting behavior by changing the opinions of potential voters through persuasion and organization, activating otherwise inactive voters, or registering new supporters. Voter suppression, instead, attempts to gain an advantage by reducing the turnout of certain voters. Suppression is an anti-democratic tactic associated with authoritarianism. Some argue the term 'voter suppression' downplays the harm done when voices aren't reflected in an election, calling for terms like 'vote destruction' that accounts for the permanence of each vote not being cast.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kris Kobach</span> Attorney General of Kansas

Kris William Kobach is an American lawyer and politician who is the Attorney General of Kansas. He previously served as the 31st Secretary of State of Kansas. A former Chairman of the Kansas Republican Party, Kobach came to national prominence over his support for immigration controls, including involvement in the implementation of high-profile anti-illegal immigration ordinances in various American cities. Kobach is also known for his calls for stronger voter ID laws in the United States, reinstating the National Security Entry-Exit Registration System, and his advocacy for anti-abortion legislation. He has made claims about the extent of voter fraud in the United States that studies and fact-checkers have concluded are false or unsubstantiated.

Ron E. Thornburgh, was the 29th Secretary of State of Kansas. He was elected into his first term in 1994 and was subsequently re-elected in 1998, 2002, and 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secretary of State of Kansas</span>

The secretary of state of Kansas is one of the constitutional officers of the U.S. state of Kansas. The current secretary of state is the former speaker pro tempore of the Kansas House of Representatives, Scott Schwab, who was sworn in on January 14, 2019.

Dolores Furtado is a former Democratic member of the Kansas House of Representatives, who represented the 19th district. She served from 2009 to 2011. Furtado ran for re-election in 2010, but was defeated by Republican Jim Denning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voter suppression in the United States</span> Efforts used to prevent eligible voters from voting

Voter suppression in the United States consists of various legal and illegal efforts to prevent eligible citizens from exercising their right to vote. Such voter suppression efforts vary by state, local government, precinct, and election. Voter suppression has historically been used for racial, economic, gender, age and disability discrimination. Before and during the American Civil War, most African-Americans had not been able to vote. After the Civil War, all African-American men were granted voting rights, causing some Southern Democrats and former Confederate states to institute actions such as poll taxes or language tests that were ostensibly not in contradiction to the U.S. Constitution at the time, but were used to limit and suppress voting access, most notably African American communities that made up large proportions of the population in those areas, but in many regions the majority of the electorate as a whole was functionally or officially unable to register to vote or unable to cast a ballot. African Americans' access to registration and voting in the South was often difficult until the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and continues to be a subject of debate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States Senate election in Kansas</span> US election

The 2020 United States Senate election in Kansas was held on November 3, 2020, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of Kansas, concurrently with the 2020 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate, elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections.

Voter impersonation, also sometimes called in-person voter fraud, is a form of electoral fraud in which a person who is eligible to vote in an election votes more than once, or a person who is not eligible to vote does so by voting under the name of an eligible voter. In the United States, voter ID laws have been enacted in a number of states by Republican legislatures and governors since 2010 with the purported aim of preventing voter impersonation. Existing research and evidence shows that voter impersonation is extremely rare. Between 2000 and 2014, there were only 31 documented instances of voter impersonation. There is no evidence that it has changed the result of any election. In April 2020, a voter fraud study covering 20 years by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found the level of mail-in ballot fraud "exceedingly rare" since it occurs only in "0.00006 percent" of individual votes nationally, and, in one state, "0.000004 percent — about five times less likely than getting hit by lightning in the United States."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roger Marshall (politician)</span> American politician and physician (born 1960)

Roger Wayne Marshall is an American politician, physician, and former military officer serving as the junior United States senator from Kansas since 2021. A member of the Republican Party, he served from 2017 to 2021 as the U.S. representative for Kansas's 1st congressional district, a mostly rural district covering much of the western and northern parts of the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mac Warner</span> American politician

Andrew McCoy "Mac" Warner is an American attorney, veteran, and the current West Virginia Secretary of State. He announced his candidacy for Governor of West Virginia in 2024 on January 10, 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity</span> Presidential commission created by President Donald Trump in 2017

The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, also called the Voter Fraud Commission, was a Presidential Commission established by Donald Trump that ran from May 11, 2017 to January 3, 2018. The Trump administration said the commission would review claims of voter fraud, improper registration, and voter suppression. The establishment of the commission followed Trump's false claim that millions of illegal immigrants had voted in the 2016 presidential election, costing him the popular vote. Vice President Mike Pence was chosen as chair of the commission and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach was its vice chair and day-to-day administrator.

<i>American Civil Liberties Union v. Trump and Pence</i> Litigation

American Civil Liberties Union v. Trump and Pence, No. 1:17-cv-01351, is a case pending before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs, the watchdog group American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), alleges that the defendants, President Donald Trump and the Vice President Michael Pence, are in violation of the Federal Advisory Committee Act by establishing the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity for the purpose of supporting the President’s "claim that he won the popular vote in the 2016 election—once millions of supposedly illegal votes are subtracted from the count."

<i>NAACP LDF v. Trump</i>

NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. v. Trump, No. 1:17-cv-05427-ALC, was a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, The Ordinary People Society, and a coalition of civil rights groups alleged that the defendants, President Donald Trump, the Vice President Michael Pence, and Kris Kobach were in violation of the Fifth and Fifteenth Amendments and the Federal Advisory Committee Act by establishing the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (PEIC) for the purpose of intentionally discriminating against Black and Latino voters in violation of the Fifth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution and the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

<i>Joyner v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity</i>

Joyner v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity is a federal case brought before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs, including Arthenia Joyner, the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, and others, sought to enjoin the State of Florida from transferring voter records to the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

<i>Fish v. Kobach</i>

Fish v. Kobach was a 2018 bench trial in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in which five Kansas residents and the League of Women Voters contested the legality of the Documentary Proof of Citizenship (DPOC) requirement of the Kansas Secure and Fair Elections (SAFE) Act, which was enacted in 2011 and took effect in 2013.

The Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) is an American conservative legal group based in Indianapolis, Indiana, which is known for suing states and local governments to purge voters from election rolls. The nonprofit was constituted in 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electronic Registration Information Center</span>

The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) is a non-profit organization in the United States that is operated and financed by state elections agencies and chief elections officials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 Kansas elections</span>

A general election was held in the state of Kansas on November 6, 2018. Primary elections were held on August 7, 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Kansas Attorney General election</span>

The 2022 Kansas Attorney General election took place on November 8, 2022, to elect the Attorney General of Kansas. Incumbent Republican Attorney General Derek Schmidt announced he would retire to run for Governor. The Republican nominee was former Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, and the Democratic nominee was former police officer, prosecutor, and state securities regulator, Chris Mann. Kobach narrowly won, taking 50.8% of the general election vote to Mann's 49.2%.

References

  1. ↑ "ACLU of Kansas settlement puts "Crosscheck" out of commission for foreseeable future; program suspended until safeguards added". ACLU of Kansas. 2019-12-10. Retrieved 2019-12-14.
  2. ↑ Kansas Abandons Technology Trumpeted by Kris Kobach, Trump's Onetime Voter Fraud Czar, ProPublica , Jessica Huseman December 12, 2019. Retrieved December 27, 2019.
  3. ↑ Palast, Greg (2016-08-24). "The GOP's Stealth War Against Voters". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 2018-11-23.
  4. ↑ Thornburgh signs four-state agreement
  5. ↑ "Copy of CrossStateCheckStatistics 2017.xlsx". Google Docs. Retrieved 2019-12-14.
  6. ↑ Interstate Crosscheck Program Grows
  7. ↑ "Copy of CrossStateCheckStatistics 2017.xlsx". Google Docs. Retrieved 2019-12-14.
  8. ↑ "Crosscheck Participation Guide" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-12-07. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
  9. ↑ "The Trouble with Names/Dates of Birth Combinations as Identifiers" (PDF).
  10. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-02-02. Retrieved 2018-02-01.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  11. ↑ Powell, Jacqulyn. "Ada County wrongly strips more than 750 voter registrations". KBOI. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
  12. ↑ DiStaso, John (2018-05-30). "Exhaustive investigation reveals little evidence of possible voter fraud in NH". WMUR. Retrieved 2018-11-23.
  13. ↑ "Virginia Annual List Maintenance Report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-12-18. Retrieved 2018-02-01.
  14. ↑ "States that left Crosscheck". Leave Crosscheck. Retrieved 2019-12-14.
  15. 1 2 Participation in the Interstate Crosscheck System, Center for American Progress Action Fund
  16. ↑ "Voter registration" . Retrieved 19 February 2019.
  17. ↑ Controversial anti-voter fraud program risks disenfranchising voters through racial bias, report finds, 2 September 2016
  18. ↑ The GOP's Stealth War Against Voters Archived 2017-09-03 at the Wayback Machine , Rolling Stone, 24 August 2016
  19. ↑ "The Voter Fraud Commission Wants Your Data — But Experts Say They Can't Keep It Safe — ProPublica". ProPublica. Jessica Huseman,Derek Willis. 2017-10-23. Retrieved 2018-02-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  20. ↑ Cameron, Dell. "Even a Novice Hacker Could Breach the Network Hosting Kris Kobach's Bogus Voter Fraud Program". Gizmodo. Retrieved 2018-02-04.
  21. ↑ House Elections , retrieved 2018-11-23
  22. ↑ Lowe, Peggy. "Security Concerns Stall Kris Kobach's Controversial Voter Tracking Program in Kansas" . Retrieved 2018-10-21.
  23. ↑ "Moore v. Kobach" (PDF). ACLU of Kansas. 2018-06-19. Retrieved 2018-11-23.
  24. ↑ Kite, Allison. "Kansas-based Crosscheck spreadsheet compromises 945 voters' data". The Topeka Capital. Retrieved 2018-11-23.
  25. ↑ "ACLU of Kansas settlement puts "Crosscheck" out of commission for foreseeable future; program suspended until safeguards added". 10 December 2019.
  26. ↑ Goel, S (2018-11-23). "One Person, One Vote: Estimating the Prevalence of Double Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections" (PDF). 5harad.com.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.